cubicle47b
Member
I'm not excited about Apple's potential entry into the market but it forces other companies to up their game which is good.
Zzz.Joe said:by "cracked it" im assuming he meant he found a way to drive up prices, monetize every aspect of it, strongarm content owners, and market it as a lifestyle change.
If Munster's estimates are accurate, and 1.4 million TVs a year could add 6 billion in revenue, then the question becomes why wouldn't they do it?Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Zzz.
I'm still having fun reading about how you guys think putting an Apple TV into a TV is a smart move. "Well shit, I didn't buy that thing when it was $99, but now that it's in a TV, I'm just going to trash this one and buy a brand new one."
It's not about how much they can sell, but why they would sell it. Apple doesn't enter a brand-new market unless they plan to flip it over, especially with Steve gone and everyone watching their next moves closely.Tobor said:If Munster's estimates are accurate, and 1.4 million TVs a year could add 6 billion in revenue, then the question becomes why wouldn't they do it?
They could easily sell 1.4 million a year, right?
The biggest issue I see is space in Apple stores. I don't know how they crack that one.
Tobor said:If Munster's estimates are accurate, and 1.4 million TVs a year could add 6 billion in revenue, then the question becomes why wouldn't they do it?
They could easily sell 1.4 million a year, right?
The biggest issue I see is space in Apple stores. I don't know how they crack that one.
Fair point, and I don't have an answer to that. Any new interface or feature I can think of is do-able with the existing Apple TV. Increased margins and price point would allow for beefier hardware, but I don't think they'd need it. There's always Apple design, but I'm not sure that's enough of a reason by itself.Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:It's not about how much they can sell, but why they would sell it. Apple doesn't enter a brand-new market unless they plan to flip it over, especially with Steve gone and everyone watching their next moves closely.
They sell 27" TV's that come with computers inside right now.Copernicus said:Smaller tvs.
You buy a new computer every year or two?Previous said:Question: Lots of people (including me) buy a new computer/phone/tablet/iPhone or iPod every year or two, but TV's? most people don't upgrade their TV's every year or so, what magical device could he have invented to make people do just that?
Tobor said:They sell 27" TV's that come with computers inside right now.
DjangoReinhardt said:I'm way more interested in the potential for Apple to disrupt the content delivery model(s) of the TV market than I am in the hardware.
Tobor said:You buy a new computer every year or two?
lunarworks said:IIRC, Steve Jobs said the #1 issue with an Apple TV is the cable companies refusing to cooperate.
Maybe he finally "cracked it" in that way. In a way that "CableCard" never managed to. In the way that he plowed right through AT&T's traditions with the iPhone.
Maybe you'll finally be able to plug your digital cable directly into your TV without that awful, primitive, unresponsive, fucking digital cable box.
He started his own Movie studioPhoncipleBone said:And by "cracked it" he probably meant "spent tons of money."
DjangoReinhardt said:I'm way more interested in the potential for Apple to disrupt the content delivery model(s) of the TV market than I am in the hardware.
Technosteve said:He started his own Movie studio
X-Frame said:This!
Steve getting excited and saying "I finally cracked it!" gives me hope of something good happening.
I might as well wait a few more months before I buy a new HDTV now.
I was going to post that, thanks. This makes me even more excited to see what they got up their sleeves.giga said:
And we know this why exactly?rezuth said:At least we know they would use awesome panels if they made an actual TV.
if you mean pixar: no. he financed it, but was not one of the creatorsTechnosteve said:He started his own Movie studio
They were not a movie studio when he purchased them.Damon Bennet said:if you mean pixar: no. he financed it, but was not one of the creators
Ninja Scooter said:I just want a cable box with a UI that isn't horribly clunky and slow, and that finally does away with numbered channels. I don't want to remember that ESPN is channel 5540, just list it as ESPN, and put the channels in alphabetical order.
Probably the same Cost as a Kuroomgkitty said:I would totally buy an Apple Television seeing the quality of their computer monitors, but damn if their TV wouldn't be hella expensive.
GG-Duo said:I'm honestly not very optimistic that this will come out in the near future.
As everyone has said, TV sets are a different market. Upgrade cycles are longer. The experience is traditionally passive. The content is a mess. Content producers are supported by ads and Apple doesn't have a great ad platform.
I'm sure Steve would have made a simple, beautiful hardware device - but unless he has the deals with content providers it doesn't mean much - and Apple always thinks about the end-to-end experience. And if Apple really has the deals, then I'm sure TV executives would be leaking stuff to the press by now. We're not hearing anything.
My best guess: It probably just means it's AppleTV with Apps that you can remote control with an iPad. It's still a game changer since TV companies, or Hulu, or Netflix can still make channels and provide videos. But I don't quite see how that's different from PS3/Xbox.
The bottom-line is that the hardware isn't the most interesting part of this discussion.
Ive is not the idea guy. He's one of the best designers in the world, if not the best, but how does that translate into understanding the future of the industry?Kosmo said:Maybe Ive is the guy to replace Jobs as the idea man. In the design of the iMac:
Famed industrial designer Jony Ive was tasked with coming up with the successor to the candy-color translucent iMac, which was the bestselling desktop computer for some time. He wanted to develop a flat-screen monitor with the components integrated into the display unit. Jobs did not like that idea, and he invited Ive over to his backyard at home to brainstorm. The sunflowers in the garden maintained by Powell Jobs inspired the design of the iMac, which had a display connected to a dome base by a metal stem. When computer parts became compact enough a few years later, Ive's initial concept was used in the models that replaced the sunflower iMac.
Sentry said:I've is definitely the future of Apple in terms of product design and that overall 'apple quality' we know. How eloquently can someone design a TV though? Will it just be the iPad but huge? :lol
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Uh, yes.
Channels aren't necessarily complicated, but they're dated. We flip through channels to find something to watch. Why don't we just find something to watch by choosing something from a listing of everything on one screen? Or some other idea that doesn't involve going through an unchanging numbered list one by one.
Tobor said:Ive is not the idea guy. He's one of the best designers in the world, if not the best, but how does that translate into understanding the future of the industry?
As I've said before, It's Forstall if it's anybody.
CrankyJay said:This is a genius idea. Maybe they could call it a guide...and put a guide button on the remote!
FUCK. :lol didn't catch that.DoctorWho said:iPhone auto correct strikes again?
Add in Cook to run the overall company and we arrive at exactly the arrangement Jobs has left behind.Kosmo said:True, but in addition to Steve's ability to see where things are goin,g he had a very good aesthetic with not putting extraneous things on his products. No one person can replace him. so it will be a combo of someone like Forstall with the tech and Ive with the design.