Cornballer
Member
Good to hear that the demo numbers were up, too. It's still a low number, but improvement helps to some extent.
Shawn Ryan's take:Thanks in part to rounding, Terriers was up 100% yesterday to a 0.4 adults 18-49 rating and rose to .725 million.
ShawnRyanTV said:Still need ratings to go higher, but encouraging.
captive said:just emailed that address, first time ever for a TV show.
Great news if true on those ratings!
Maureen Ryan said:Question: What is the most effective way to get a network to renew one's favorite show if it's struggling in the ratings? (Aside from watching live, of course)?
Answer: Well, getting all the Nielsen families you know to tune in would be swell. Otherwise, yes, try to watch the episodes live ['Terriers'], and if they are on your DVR, try to watch them soon, not several days after they air ['Terriers']. You can also watch them online, download them from iTunes; networks monitor that kind of traffic too ['Terriers']. They also keep track of online buzz on Web sites, Twitter, Facebook and the like, and they also keep track of emails sent to the network [user@fxnetworks.com]. So keep gabbing about your favorite show all over the place, in hopes that it will help build momentum and get other people interested in the struggling program ['Terriers'].
Did you notice the subliminal message in the paragraph above? It might have been too subtle, so I'll spell it out. 'Terriers' fans, please help the show, and if you're not watching the FX drama starring Donal Logue and Michael Raymond-James, check it out (I wrote more about why you might want to do so here). Right now, no other show is more deserving of this kind of assistance. Its renewal is a (very long) long shot. But it's terrific and the kind of show that fan campaign might just be able to help.
DevelopmentArrested said:fuck this show is amazing
As big a thrill as landing Terriers was, that thrill is matched by the frustration that literally no one is watching.
Its terrible. I think everyone thinks its a show about dog catchers, referring to the abysmal FX marketing campaign which featured a snarling dog instead of its winning cast or creative pedigree. Critical acclaim for the show has been consistent and glowing, but on the other hand the ratings fucking suck.
Its terrible. I think everyone thinks its a show about dog catchers, referring to the abysmal FX marketing campaign which featured a snarling dog instead of its winning cast or creative pedigree. Critical acclaim for the show has been consistent and glowing, but on the other hand the ratings fucking suck.
Quid Pro Quo
Hank, Britt, and new ally, Laura Ross, unravel the Ocean Beach conspiracy, which puts them and everyone they love in immediate danger.
Also:Cornballer said:New episode tonight!
And after watching the last two episodes, Memles tweeted:Donal Logue on Twitter said:Tomorrow's #terriers gets really dark.
You guys, #Terriers is NOT SHITTING AROUND.
Last week, my immediate reaction to the episode was "huh, this wasn't as heavy as other episodes of this show." And then I realized I was talking about an episode in which a man violently beat up an innocent man and a cop used his power to be a serial rapist.Cornballer said:I'm a little uncomfortable thinking about how much darker it can get given what we've seen already.
its certainly better than going from a .2 to .0! captain pessimist.dead souls said:I love this show, but going from a 0.2 to a 0.4 isn't great news. Either rating is cancellation worthy.
YeahSpeedingUptoStop said:I don't even know if it matters. Don't you need a Nielsen box to count as a real person?
Nielsen blows hard.
SpeedingUptoStop said:I don't even know if it matters. Don't you need a Nielsen box to count as a real person?
Nielsen blows hard.
daw840 said:Actually, we are a Nielsen family and they paid us $30 just to write down what shows we watched for 2 weeks. Pretty sweet deal, and yes we wrote in Terriers1
That's awesome!daw840 said:Actually, we are a Nielsen family and they paid us $30 just to write down what shows we watched for 2 weeks. Pretty sweet deal, and yes we wrote in Terriers1
I did this once maybe a decade ago, which raises a question. What does Nielsen use the written ones for? They report estimates and then "finals" the very next day, so what is this method contributing to? They get them way later and certainly the public never hears about adjustments being made weeks later, except for DVR usage.daw840 said:Actually, we are a Nielsen family and they paid us $30 just to write down what shows we watched for 2 weeks. Pretty sweet deal, and yes we wrote in Terriers1
Some guesswork/assumptions based on wikipedia and a couple other places - I don't think they have the set top boxes in every market, so they use the written "diary" version to fill in the holes. However, these numbers must be delayed so significantly that I wonder how they're used these days. The networks care about what the ratings are on an almost instantaneous basis, so I can't see them waiting for more accurate numbers that are showing up later.Dan said:I did this once maybe a decade ago, which raises a question. What does Nielsen use the written ones for? They report estimates and then "finals" the very next day, so what is this method contributing to? They get them way later and certainly the public never hears about adjustments being made weeks later, except for DVR usage.
- Onion A|V ClubPart of the episode's success is that I don't think even Britt entirely knows which side he's on. (Your mileage may vary; Fienberg felt he was playing Zeitlin from the start.) He feels betrayed that Hank didn't tell him about Katie (which violated both the guy code and set Britt up to go to jail for attacking the wrong guy), he's deservedly facing real jail time, he's adrift without Katie, and he doesn't have the personal stake in hating Zeitlin and Burke that Hank does. (Nor, as Hank points out, is he an Ocean Beach resident, so he doesn't care that much if the town gets paved over to put up an airport.) I still think he's 95% on Hank's side and leaving his options open if he can find a solution that helps himself (and Zeitlin) without hurting Hank, but again: deep, murky waters. Similarly, I don't think he'd have ever turned Ashley the lawyer over to Zeitlin if she really was the mole, but he sleeps with her to find out for sure, and also because Britt could really use a rebound night right about now.
The episode ends with Hank giving up the rest of his Lindus bearer-bonds to buy an arsenal from a local arms dealer. But I was more shaken by an earlier scene, when Gretchen gets the call that, and rushes into Hanks arms for comfort. Hank has ruined Gretchens life yet again and may come out ahead in the deal.Jasons dead
Thats the kind of touch to character and plot that I look for from Terriersironic in an old-school way, not a bludgeoning, symbolic one. Quid Pro Quo is full of those little moments that make we whove invested so much in these characters either smile or shudder (or both): like when Hank watches Jason call Gretchen to say hell be coming home late or when Katie reads the police report on Britts assault or when Katie goes to see Gretchen and they commiserate about their unreliable exes or when Britt refuses to laugh at one of Hanks standard jokes because Britts still a little pissed at him or when Britt blows up at Laura because he doesnt like her taking charge of their investigation. This is the kind of shit youre not going to get from No Ordinary Family. This is what happens when writers think through who their characters are and how they behave and the actors take all those little details and work them into characters that we easily come to understand and even care about.
BlackNMild2k1 said:How can I become a Nielsen family and get paid to watch the shows that I was already gonna watch?
serious question.