JdFoX187 said:most of the time, I can just clear a room out with my weapons.
Like it or not that was kind of deliberate.
JdFoX187 said:most of the time, I can just clear a room out with my weapons.
AltogetherAndrews said:So is it something I should buy, or something I should rent? I understand it's rather short and the MP is not quite all that, but is the game itself something you see yourself playing through many times?
chespace said:Onix, motion blur is on all the time in the 360 version, not just when you use tentacles.
DevelopmentArrested said:The game is good but not great by any means.
Single-player is fun. Multi-player isn't even worth looking at.
a 7.8/10 is probably the right score for this game.
jetjevons said:Well I sure hope it sells as well as Forza Che.
I know. I just wish that there was more of an emphasis on the Darkness powers. They wanted you to have a choice. But there's really hardly any incentive to use them other than puzzle solving and just to do something different.jetjevons said:Like it or not that was kind of deliberate.
chespace said:I hope so too, Dan.
Sorry if I'm coming across as overly negative but these are just my honest impressions. I suppose after Riddick, my expectation for Starbreeze was through the roof, especially since they'd be on more powerful hardware.
So far, this game has yet to surpass Riddick on almost any level, aside from obviously better graphics. Butcher Bay oozed atmosphere, incredible voice acting and cutscenes, some of the best graphics on Xbox, and innovative FPS gameplay on so many different levels, including the first FPS hand-to-hand combat system that wasn't instantly a steaming pile of crap.
Who knows, maybe I'll warm up to The Darkness. I can definitely see how others could dig the hell out of this game, though. Especially if they've never played Riddick.
chespace said:I hope so too, Dan.
Sorry if I'm coming across as overly negative but these are just my honest impressions. I suppose after Riddick, my expectation for Starbreeze was through the roof, especially since they'd be on more powerful hardware.
So far, this game has yet to surpass Riddick on almost any level, aside from obviously better graphics. Butcher Bay oozed atmosphere, incredible voice acting and cutscenes, some of the best graphics on Xbox, and innovative FPS gameplay on so many different levels, including the first FPS hand-to-hand combat system that wasn't instantly a steaming pile of crap.
Who knows, maybe I'll warm up to The Darkness. I can definitely see how others could dig the hell out of this game, though. Especially if they've never played Riddick.
3rdman said:You're going to have to explain this...how exactly would the CPU (Cell) assist with motion blurring? MB (as I understand it) is a GPU/memory function...
You have to unlock it though. Like Maid Marion's chastity belt. Your key has to be the right size.PleoMax said:Cell can do everything bro. Haven't you heard?
GameSpot said:The Good
* Amazing voice work and dialogue set the mood right out of the gate
* Stunning graphics, both technically and artistically
* Darkness powers are a lot of fun to use again and again
* Compelling, well-told story
* Can press a button to devour human hearts.
The Bad
* Most of the conventional weapons are useless
* Enemy reactions and artificial intelligence feel a little too passive at times
* Multiplayer feels a little tacked-on.
Pretty much dead on in my book.HallwayGiant said:
Gamespot said:* Can press a button to devour human hearts.
3rdman said:You're going to have to explain this...how exactly would the CPU (Cell) assist with motion blurring? MB (as I understand it) is a GPU/memory function...
chespace said:Onix, motion blur is on all the time in the 360 version, not just when you use tentacles.
beelzebozo said:side mission help
looking for the second hit for mortarello on grinder's lane. killed everyone in sight (2-3 people iirc). any ideas?
Until all games have Super Pause and Feel Remorse as standard control inputs, heart eating can wait.speculawyer said:Every game should have that feature. Even Madden.
HallwayGiant said:
AAAAHHHHHHH, DAMMITTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!Mmmkay said:Oh and it looks like IGN are the first to break out the comparison videos. Sadly for Insiders only:
http://uk.insider.ign.com/articles/799/799968p1.html
Mmmkay said:Oh and it looks like IGN are the first to break out the comparison videos. Sadly for Insiders only:
http://uk.insider.ign.com/articles/799/799968p1.html
Well, if you have both systems, might as well get the best one even if the differences are minor.urk said:God, you people are weird. The difference is negligible. We're talking motion blur or AA, not framerate or gameplay differences. Buy it.
beelzebozo said:gamespot's new medals system is rockin'.
"oh snap!"
consoul said:
I really need to see a decent comparison before deciding which to buy...of course, I don't need it enough to pay for Insider.
Mmmkay said:Oh and it looks like IGN are the first to break out the comparison videos. Sadly for Insiders only:
http://uk.insider.ign.com/articles/799/799968p1.html
Mmmkay said:Oh #2... Didn't notice that GameSpot have both 360 and PS3 screenies, just a little erm comparison. Obviously they're taken from very different environments, with different lighting but that's not what I'm interested in. Since the hand position is identical in both versions, it's easy to get a direct comparison for resolution and other slight changes in textures:
![]()
I have both systems and I have the right to purchase the version I feel is the best. The best way is vid comparisons.urk said:God, you people are weird. The difference is negligible. We're talking motion blur or AA, not framerate or gameplay differences. Buy it.
Pay particular attention to the thumb and the pager logo. If GameSpot haven't screwed up their captuing, that's not just a lack of MSAA, it's being upscaled from a lower resolution.BenjaminBirdie said:How? The lighting in both manages to obscure pretty much all the detail in two different extremes. One is muddy because it's dark, one is washed out because it's bright.
Mmmkay said:Pay particular attention to the thumb and the pager logo. If GameSpot haven't screwed up their captuing, that's not just a lack of MSAA, it's being upscaled from a lower resolution.
LJ11 said:JB1981 purchased both editions, and he told me that the PS3 version Menus and Screen text all looked to be running in an SD resolution.
Gist of it is that PS3 has more jaggies, some more framerate drops, the video is pretty low-res but you can see more jaggies in the PS3 version.Mmmkay said:Oh and it looks like IGN are the first to break out the comparison videos. Sadly for Insiders only:
http://uk.insider.ign.com/articles/799/799968p1.html
Mr_Furious said:I have both systems and I have the right to purchase the version I feel is the best. The best way is vid comparisons.
GitarooMan said:Gist of it is that PS3 has more jaggies, some more framerate drops, the video is pretty low-res but you can see more jaggies in the PS3 version.