His definition of "being fine with them" is he won't chase them down the street, apparently.
What a tool.
It seems that's a lot of peoples definition.
His definition of "being fine with them" is he won't chase them down the street, apparently.
What a tool.
Am I a bigot? Am I trash? Am I transphobic? Am I all the things that this Brandon guy has been called in this thread...?
I am a conservative and a Catholic. I hold with my church and its views on sexual behavior, sexual sin, and the God-created complementary nature of the sexes.
I see the face of Christ in all people, but I believe in objective moral standards that do not bend to cultural trends....
Am I a bigot? Am I trash? Am I transphobic? Am I all the things that this Brandon guy has been called in this thread...?
There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Can you hold traditional views on sexuality and gender norms and not be a bigot...? Is that possible...?
I am a conservative and a Catholic. I hold with my church and its views on sexual behavior, sexual sin, and the God-created complementary nature of the sexes.
I see the face of Christ in all people, but I believe in objective moral standards that do not bend to cultural trends....
Am I a bigot? Am I trash? Am I transphobic? Am I all the things that this Brandon guy has been called in this thread...?
It's pretty obvious that he means female in that regard, though. It's worded terribly but if what I said is indeed what he meant, I don't see much problem with it.
Is it transphobic to believe in the XY sex-determination system? What about religious beliefs? He might be aggressive and all, and I didn't know this guy existed before this thread, but I don't see anything in the OP' to support the accusations here.
You're the second person who cherry picked that part of a sentence to suggest I came in here asking not to discuss the issue, when I specifically said that is what I understand the man at issue's view. I'm able to admit I missed the second part of his tweets and gave the guy the benefit of the doubt when in fact he really was suggesting he should be allowed to discriminate. I hope you are able to admit you cherry picked a portion of a sentence to suggest I came in here to shit on the thread instead of participate.
The argument in this thread goes back to the same question I always want to ask in trans threads, which is:
What are trans people asking for? Is it:
a) To have the same rights and freedoms as anyone of their gender, and to be treated with politeness and respect as a member of their gender, OR
b) To have the same rights and freedoms as anyone of their gender, and to be treated with politeness and respect as a member of their gender, and to ensure that everyone genuinely believes that they are not in any respect different from a cis member of that gender.
Because I believe the first one is achievable, but that the second one will be very difficult. I simply don't believe that you can police people's internal thoughts that way. There will always be people who define things by the physical rather than the mental, by sex rather than by gender. If those people are pro-trans rights and treat trans people the same as anyone else of their gender, I personally think that person meets the standard for a good, progressive person no matter what their internal beliefs might be.
It's the difference between asking for rights and tolerance and a kind of policing of internal thoughts and ideas.
i looked at the dude's twitter and he's retweeting totalbiscuit being the worst celebrating escapist hiring some anti-feminist woman (which gamergaters love ofc), so obviously someone with power there is conservative and/or deciding to try pandering to 4chan as a business strategy
Well i just want to say i am in the same boat with you. Glad to see i am not alone in this.Can you hold traditional views on sexuality and gender norms and not be a bigot...? Is that possible...?
I am a conservative and a Catholic. I hold with my church and its views on sexual behavior, sexual sin, and the God-created complementary nature of the sexes.
I see the face of Christ in all people, but I believe in objective moral standards that do not bend to cultural trends....
Am I a bigot? Am I trash? Am I transphobic? Am I all the things that this Brandon guy has been called in this thread...?
Is it transphobic to believe in the XY sex-determination system? What about religious beliefs? He might be aggressive and all, and I didn't know this guy existed before this thread, but I don't see anything in the OP' to support the accusations here.
The argument in this thread goes back to the same question I always want to ask in trans threads, which is:
What are trans people asking for? Is it:
a) To have the same rights and freedoms as anyone of their gender, and to be treated with politeness and respect as a member of their gender, OR
b) To have the same rights and freedoms as anyone of their gender, and to be treated with politeness and respect as a member of their gender, and to ensure that everyone genuinely believes that they are not in any respect different from a cis member of that gender.
Because I believe the first one is achievable, but that the second one will be very difficult. I simply don't believe that you can police people's internal thoughts that way. There will always be people who define things by the physical rather than the mental, by sex rather than by gender. If those people are pro-trans rights and treat trans people the same as anyone else of their gender, I personally think that person meets the standard for a good, progressive person no matter what their internal beliefs might be.
It's the difference between asking for rights and tolerance and a kind of policing of internal thoughts and ideas.
..
Am I a bigot? Am I trash? Am I transphobic? Am I all the things that this Brandon guy has been called in this thread...?
Is it transphobic to believe in the XY sex-determination system? What about religious beliefs? He might be aggressive and all, and I didn't know this guy existed before this thread, but I don't see anything in the OP' to support the accusations here.
Sadly, most bigots arent alone.Well i just want to say i am in the same boat with you. Glad to see i am not alone in this.
Well i just want to say i am in the same boat with you. Glad to see i am not alone in this.
Look, honestly? Here's the statistic that matters: 40% of trans individuals will attempt suicide at some point in their lives. That number jumps as high as 75% for individuals who have family or friends who don't accept them. Whatever your beliefs are, the belief of a trans woman that she is a woman is strong enough that a lack of social acceptance drives that many to try and kill themselves. That is as genuine and heartfelt as a belief about onesself gets
Does that statistic not apply to trans men or something?
I feel this statistic is really important: The risk for a trans woman being murdered by a cis person is one in twelve. It leaps up dramatically to one in eight if they're non-white.
You say two isn't achievable, and you might be right, but at least needs to be socially unacceptable to spew the kind of hate that stirs up the culture that makes it so you're more likely to die for who you are than if you took a Malaysia Airlines flight in 2014. It needs to have the same consequences and outrage that saying "I don't care what black people think, Africa is only for animals" has for people now and not passive, and sometimes even explicit, agreement as if it's socially acceptable.
What did they hire Morse for?
If we met in person, how would you treat me? And would you call me by the name and pronouns I identify as, or the ones you believe I should be called?
being a catholic then, I'm hoping that you also take to heart James 4:12
are you respectful to others? do you judge them?
I mean really the core of this - of ALL this - is just being nice to other people. It doesn't matter if you agree with how someone lives their life if it's not hurting anyone else. Just be nice to people.
You didn't really give an explanation of how you feel on the issue of gender - you can say you're catholic but each catholic cherry-picks different parts of the bible and interprets them differently. As an example, many christians use the bible to justify homophobia and they are bigots.
What did they hire Morse for?
I feel this statistic is really important: The risk for a trans woman being murdered by a cis person is one in twelve. It leaps up dramatically to one in eight if they're non-white.
You say two isn't achievable, and you might be right, but at least needs to be socially unacceptable to spew the kind of hate that stirs up the culture that makes it so you're more likely to die for who you are than if you took a Malaysia Airlines flight in 2014. It needs to have the same consequences and outrage that saying "I don't care what black people think, Africa is only for animals" has for people now and not passive, and sometimes even explicit, agreement as if it's socially acceptable.
Sadly, most bigots arent alone.
As for names and pronouns, I would call you whatever you wanted just out of general politeness. That has nothing to do with your trans identity...I would do the same for any human being.
Yes, the Lord taught us not to judge. He also told the woman at the well to "go and sin no more." He did not tell her "keep doing whatever you want, it's all good!"
So, the question is, I suppose, how much proof must exist before we expect people to trust science over their own opinions? (A question also raised in the recent anti-vaccination arguments.)
And the "being sick of hearing about the issue" is a thing you use whenever you're not on the side of the people who are struggling for acceptance or understanding, whatever that social, political, religious, racial, or otherwise topic is.
I know this is the answer. People who hold traditional views on these issues are beyond the pale. It is not permitted in polite conversation to disagree with the popular opinion. It is the modern heresy.
His politics
I know this is the answer. People who hold traditional views on these issues are beyond the pale. It is not permitted in polite conversation to disagree with the popular opinion. It is the modern heresy.
I think the word science is being used too liberally here, but if there are studies that are premised on on the scientific method id be interested to hear. Certainly we have studies to look at, as well as general consensus amoung many / most mental health professionals in certain geographical areas. But consensus among people is not "science" necessarily, and for many people it comes across as just another example of people telling them they are wrong because they decided some new theory makes sense, despite everything the listener can see with their eyes and always new to be true.
.
I know this is the answer. People who hold traditional views on these issues are beyond the pale. It is not permitted in polite conversation to disagree with the popular opinion. It is the modern heresy.
Look, honestly? Here's the statistic that matters: 40% of trans individuals will attempt suicide at some point in their lives. That number jumps as high as 75% for individuals who have experienced abuse or neglect, and in a shocking twist they're also more likely to suffer from abuse or neglect. Whatever your beliefs are, the belief of a trans woman that she is a woman is strong enough that a lack of social acceptance drives that many to try and kill themselves. That is as genuine and heartfelt as a belief about onesself gets
Some people obviously have some reservations/preconceived notions about what it means to be Catholic. We don't hate people. We don't hate other humans. Hell, our whole belief system is based on serving the poor/helping those in need. If you seriously think that I'm somehow hurting on trans/gay/whatever people Westboro baptist style, then I'm honestly insulted.Sadly, most bigots arent alone.
You suppose that Escapist is now going to do political-themed articles?
I think this guy's views on gender are overly simplistic but that doesn't mean he should be blacklisted from every working in the videogame industry.
"Racism: The modern heresy"I know this is the answer. People who hold traditional views on these issues are beyond the pale. It is not permitted in polite conversation to disagree with the popular opinion. It is the modern heresy.
But I also don't think that your sexual orientation or gender is any more important to you than other people's religious or moral values are to them.
He rejects the notion of not offending people...
sounds like a nice guy...
So let the lord deal with that.
Some people obviously have some reservations/preconceived notions about what it means to be Catholic. We don't hate people. We don't hate other humans. Hell, our whole belief system is based on serving the poor/helping those in need. If you seriously think that I'm somehow hurting on trans/gay/whatever people Westboro baptist style, then I'm honestly insulted.
you can't please everyone.
you can't please everyone.
As a gay person I'm really tired of these kinds of witch hunts on everybody who doesn't agree with alternative lifestyles. As long as you don't literally try to stop me from living my life the way I want, then we can just civilly agree to disagree and leave it at that.
I have no idea where I fall on whether or not sexual orientation is genetic or cultural or even sometimes a choice, but I think religion and personal morality is every bit as much a part of some people's identity as sexual orientation is. Religious views and moral principles for some people are every bit as much a matter of life or death part of their identity as gender is life or death for some transpeople's sense of identity. As long as they don't literally try to stop you from living your life the way you want, you shouldn't try to get them fired or stop them from attaining happiness in their own way just because they hold different moral or religious beliefs than you.
People are more than their sexual orientation but they are also more than any one view they have on any single given topic. I think this guy's views on gender are overly simplistic but that doesn't mean he should be blacklisted from every working in the videogame industry. Nor does it mean he doesn't have worthwhile insights on videogames or any number of other topics.
you can't please everyone.
the point in this case is that the escapist has become (always was?) a haven for reactionary thinking and the hiring of this individual was done entirely because of his views on gender and other identity politics
You suppose that Escapist is now going to do political-themed articles?