SniperHunter
Banned
Is he serious? :S
probably a dig at polygon
Is he serious? :S
Is he serious? :S
Jim Sterling ‏@JimSterling 8m
Today's #TheLastofUs 10/10 review was a joke, by the way. Real one coming tomorrow.
probably a dig at polygon
It's just bullshit.
There score stands out like a shit stain on the mona lisa.
It's obvious they scored it low for hits, and there going to get them.
Once again, fuck them. Hope they get black listed on GAF, and on Metacritic.
nah. He's just laughing at himself always giving shit scores
Jim Sterling ‏@JimSterling 8m
Today's #TheLastofUs 10/10 review was a joke, by the way. Real one coming tomorrow.
So I just ran the numbers using the data in the Metacritic's weighting system revealed.
The only single reviewer that had an impact on the game's score was GameSpot's score of an 80. If GameSpot had either just not reviewed the game at all, or had given it a 100 instead of an 80, we'd have a 96 metacritic.
This of course assumes that the model is 100% accurate, which I'm almost certain it isn't. But anyway
Too late it doesn't matter. Metacritic already posted the score and they never accept an updated score.
There score stands out like a shit stain on the mona lisa
It was a joke.
Thanks for the kind words everyone. I think all at the studio deserve every bit of praise (and criticism) for working their asses off to make this game and to make it the way they/we all wanted it to turn out. I love TLOU, but then I am a key example of teh bias.
That being said, let's care less about score and start discussing what people have said, on either end of the spectrum. I'm more interested in that, now that I'm posting!
Is there any chance for 96? (metacritic average)
Buy this and Redbox Infinite, the latter can be beat in one sitting.
Congratulations guys! So glad to see that not everything from my childhood has changed, ND is still the best studio around.
I've been trying to get your game early all day today
Thanks for the kind words everyone. I think all at the studio deserve every bit of praise (and criticism) for working their asses off to make this game and to make it the way they/we all wanted it to turn out. I love TLOU, but then I am a key example of teh bias.
That being said, let's care less about score and start discussing what people have said, on either end of the spectrum. I'm more interested in that, now that I'm posting!
I say an updated tag on GAF is in order.
Too late it doesn't matter. Metacritic already posted the score and they never accept an updated score.
Thanks for the kind words everyone. I think all at the studio deserve every bit of praise (and criticism) for working their asses off to make this game and to make it the way they/we all wanted it to turn out. I love TLOU, but then I am a key example of teh bias.
That being said, let's care less about score and start discussing what people have said, on either end of the spectrum. I'm more interested in that, now that I'm posting!
The 7.5 from polygon left no impact what so ever?
And IGN....I was pretty shocked as well...Holy shit, Edge and Eurogamer gave it a 10/10? What world is this?
arne deserves a double Universal Acclaim tag.
It was kind of difficult to measure, because the weighting systems revealed thread didn't show a weight for polygon. What does that mean? It could mean Metacritic completely ignores Polygon reviews. But in reality it probably means that we just don't know what Polygon's score is. So I tried with various values of the weight for Polygon, and obviously the score lowered, but not enough to drop it a whole point. The reason was the score was closer to going up than it was to going down, based on the fractional value.
That being said, it didn't match up perfectly with Metacritic's 95, I think i was showing 96.3 or something like. So the model obviously isn't correct, but either way the point is that with such a large number of reviews, even a score as low as 75 probably won't affect the final score.
Thanks for the kind words everyone. I think all at the studio deserve every bit of praise (and criticism) for working their asses off to make this game and to make it the way they/we all wanted it to turn out. I love TLOU, but then I am a key example of teh bias.
That being said, let's care less about score and start discussing what people have said, on either end of the spectrum. I'm more interested in that, now that I'm posting!
arne deserves a double Universal Acclaim tag.
Destructoid Review said:Of course, players can try their luck at simply blasting away the opposition, though ammunition is never plentiful and enemies soak up a lot of damage. The Last of Us' one big similarity with Uncharted, and by far its biggest drawback, is the nonsensical durability of enemies, where basic humans can often survive up to three point-blank headshots with all but the most deadly of weapons. Joel's weapon sway and the bullet restrictions make it clear that a guns blazing approach isn't preferable, but for those moments where combat is necessary, it would have been more sensible to not have every mook be a miniature Tony Montana. Seeing a man take a bullet to the face and get back up breaks the otherwise laudable believability of the game's world, after all.
Going by MC, and assuming scores for TLOU keep coming in the 9.5s and 10s, that would be triple Universal Acclaim. Uncharted DF was almost Universal Acclaim as well, but fell a little short.
With The Last of Us, developer Naughty Dog has not only created a modern classic, but also one of the finest gaming experiences of all time. The fact that they set a new bar for interactive storytelling almost seems like a bonus.
arne deserves a double Universal Acclaim tag.
arne didn't work at Naughty Dog until 2008.