laesperanzapaz said:and what are the games' names, and release years?
this thread and ars articles and background research has revealed to me that even Amiga 500 was doing better-than-SNES graphics at a higher resolution, almost a decade beforehand.
Also..
how does Amiga compare with C64, in terms of:
- audio
- visuals
- resolution
- game selection
- overall reputation?
thanks.
- Audio. Superior. C64 used a 3 voice sound synth, Amiga had 4 channel 8-bit audio meaning better effects etc, but in theory a synth might have lower CPU requirements.
- Visuals. Vastly superior. Games usually had 32 colours plus various copper effects for shaded backdrops. More memory also meant more graphics. Blitter allowed games to move huge graphics around. C64 games usually used hardware sprites and was atrocious when it couldn't use them.
- Resolution. Most games were 320x200 or 320x256 (PAL) but the Amiga could do higher resolutions with less colours. Sedentary games often used a higher res with 4 colours. Amiga could also do overscan for full-screen effects. Even 320x200 resolution beats the C64 for colours and things that could happen with it.
- Game selection. Huge and generally high quality.
- Reputation. Godlike. The Amiga was an amazing machine in its day, vastly superior in most respects to contemporary Mac or the PC. How it fell from grace is a lesson in mismanagement and arrogance by Commodore.
It's well worth getting an emulator such as UAE and checking it out.