• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Wii U Speculation Thread V: The Final Frontier

Status
Not open for further replies.
It wont be that bad unless Developers decide to make it that way which could happen. The Wii U is modern enough in technology even if not in capabilities to get the support. How that support is recieved by gamers though will determine if Developers continue to bother.

Which is why the year head start and Nintendo's support of third party games are crucial.
 

StevieP

Banned
Well, looks like it's below my minimum. No chance in hell of UE4. I'm waiting for it to hit $250 and I'm not watching their E3 conference. PC this year instead. Thanks antonz.

Ah c'mon dude. lol

My stance on the danger Nintendo faces is based on the idea if others have a tablet controller it removes the uniqueness that Nintendo has used as the hook for their new console.

Nintendo is gambling this generation on the Tablet controller. If Nextbox launches with a Tablet it destroys Nintendos unique position and red oceans them right away.

Nintendo aren't the only ones playing with tablets...

Regardless, you have at least double/triple the memory of the current gen systems in the Wii U and a much more modern GPU. You don't think that's going to allow for better/clearer texture work on its games?

antonz said:
It wont be that bad unless Developers decide to make it that way which could happen. The Wii U is modern enough in technology even if not in capabilities to get the support. How that support is recieved by gamers though will determine if Developers continue to bother. So for every WiiU owner who decides to buy X major title on PC or another console they hurt Nintendos long term viability with the console

Why would I play fps ports on a dual-analog controller (downgrade) when I can play it with a pointer? (and better visuals)
 

DSN2K

Member
Nintendo sure hopes so

init...quite amusing when people mock the Wii...console has sold over 90m, HD twins frankly got battered by 2 GameCubes taped together for a good 5 years...certainly died out a fair bit in the last year what really is down to Nintendo ramping down on the platform too early.
 

BurntPork

Banned
To be honest, I was only expecting current gen ports to get better AA and AF, exclusives to look significantly better than than gen's best, and next-gen ports to look like low-medium setting at 720p or 540p compared to the other next consoles. Sounds like I'm getting what I expected.

Wuu = 3x360

PS4 = 3xWuu

XB8 = 1.1-1.25xPS4
 

Anth0ny

Member
init...quite amusing when people mock the Wii...console has sold over 90m, HD twins frankly got battered by 2 GameCubes taped together for a good 5 years...certainly died out a fair bit in the last year what really is down to Nintendo ramping down on the platform too early.

cause apple and kinect stole all the casuals away

time to go hardcore again!
 
I hope we get a small tease (IE see through covers on E3 booths) the night before E3.

We'll get the boxes and the Nintendo Fort again.

e0Akx.jpg
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Now you guys are complaining about the controller? That's the thing I look forward to most and what I predict drives sales of this console.
 

antonz

Member
To be honest, I was only expecting current gen ports to get better AA and AF, exclusives to look significantly better than than gen's best, and next-gen ports to look like low-medium setting at 720p or 540p compared to the other next consoles. Sounds like I'm getting what I expected.

Its going to be an absolutely fantastic machine on the Nintendo side of the spectrum. Zelda etc should be stunning. I just dont think it has the big chance of long term success when it comes to 3rd parties.

The "core" gamer is going to abandon the WiiU for COD12 on the Nextbox etc cause of the graphics11!!!111 etc.
 
Ok, now that I'm back on my computer it's catch up time! :D


LOL. The 640@600 was Fourth Storm I believe. Since I started talking about it I've been at 480@600. And the reason why the didn't/couldn't go with a "480 sp chip" is because none were available till the 6670 which was released at retail after the first Wii U dev kits went out. But again, that's not factoring in Nintendo's customizations as most multi-plats probably won't use them.

And yes it was said there was a bump, but we never got the full context of what that bump came from. It could have been hardware changes allowing them to go from using parts of GLSL 3.3 to using parts of GLSL 4.x.

Yup, those are my numbers and I'm sticking with them! haha. Really, my point rides on the assumption that it's a 32nm chip (IBM's eDRAM on board supports this). If AMD were achieving those numbers in their embedded line last year for casino machines, what are they possible of doing on Wii U (where much more graphics power is obviously utilized)? 640 spus at the same Mhz on the lower process seems plausible.

Then, there is the x-factor of the fixed function extension units (at least for lighting if not also other areas). I don't know to what extent they would take up die space, etc, so I can't say how much they'd affect the design of the chip. On the other hand, reducing the ROP performance from the presumed dev kits (if they were pretty much stock RV770LEs) might cause issues, unless Nintendo locked it out somehow. Not that more than 8 ROPs may even be necessary. Real performance numbers (vs theoretical) are hard to come by, but it doesn't seem to be a bottleneck in the current generation.

Your theory at 480 spus could work, but I am still holding out atm because of that rumor about overheating dev kits. If that is true, then the dev kit gpus were originally clocked higher and Nintendo's target performance would be more than 576 GFLOPS. I then assume that the "bump in performance" reported around January was when the first round of prototype Wii U GPUs went out, including the die shrink, bump in speed, and presumably this "hardwired" lighting unit.

I wouldn't go too far in clocking the chip over 600 Mhz, though. I expect clocks to be similar to 360 and Nintendo prefers to balance their systems carefully to avoid bottlenecks. There are also yields, I suppose, to take into account. My bet is on the chips being done at GF since there was just that story about their deal w/ IBM on the 32nm tech and they opened the new plant. They'll have the manpower. And the IBM eDRAM in question is specific to that technology it seems.
 
Its going to be an absolutely fantastic machine on the Nintendo side of the spectrum. Zelda etc should be stunning. I just dont think it has the big chance of long term success when it comes to 3rd parties.

The "core" gamer is going to abandon the WiiU for COD12 on the Nextbox etc cause of the graphics11!!!111 etc.

I always find this argument amusing.
If this was the case, then why isn't every gamer PC exclusive?
 

GDGF

Soothsayer
Now you guys are complaining about the controller? That's the thing I look forward to most and what I predict drives sales of this console.

Same here.

Tablets are awesome.

Buttons are awesome.

Tablets with buttons are awesomest.
 

BurntPork

Banned
Its going to be an absolutely fantastic machine on the Nintendo side of the spectrum. Zelda etc should be stunning. I just dont think it has the big chance of long term success when it comes to 3rd parties.

The "core" gamer is going to abandon the WiiU for COD12 on the Nextbox etc cause of the graphics11!!!111 etc.

I think that person cares more about having LIVE than graphics; otherwise they wouldn't be playing CoD in the first place.

I hope I can manage not to get banned before E3.

How random.
 

Delio

Member
Its going to be an absolutely fantastic machine on the Nintendo side of the spectrum. Zelda etc should be stunning. I just dont think it has the big chance of long term success when it comes to 3rd parties.

The "core" gamer is going to abandon the WiiU for COD12 on the Nextbox etc cause of the graphics11!!!111 etc.

So you get it for Nintendo games and the odd 3rd party exclusives but you keep another console for any actual third party games. Sounds like the pattern we have held since the N64.
 
Do we even know if Sony will bother with a PS4?

They've already sent out target specs, so yes.

So you get it for Nintendo games and the odd 3rd party exclusives but you keep another console for any actual third party games. Sounds like the pattern we have held since the N64.



I think we'll see far more multiplatform games on the Wii U for this coming generation than we have for a Nintendo system in a long long time.
 

magash

Member
Its going to be an absolutely fantastic machine on the Nintendo side of the spectrum. Zelda etc should be stunning. I just dont think it has the big chance of long term success when it comes to 3rd parties.

The "core" gamer is going to abandon the WiiU for COD12 on the Nextbox etc cause of the graphics11!!!111 etc.

It is a rather simple matter the issue of 3rd party support. They support all devices or they die. Pretty clear cut.
 

HylianTom

Banned
The Press will likely be much worse then I have been come E3 especially regarding this being Nintendos effort to bring back the core.
Hehe.. I'm getting a kick out of the press lately..

*titter*
*giggle*

It is a rather simple matter the issue of 3rd party support. They support all devices or they die. Pretty clear cut.
I dare 'em to underestimate Nintendo again. Let's see how that works-out for them this time. :)
 
I couldn't presume to construct a dash-based benchmark system to represent Wii U Vs. PS4 and Xbox3, but I think (based on comments from Nintendo thus far) this will not be another case of Wii Vs. PS3 and Xbox2.

This time I believe the Wii U will be much closer to the other next-gen competition. Which truth be told (and based upon the rumors of rather anemic Xbox3 hardware choices) Nintendo could compete with while remaining their usual stingy selves. I think it goes without saying that Wii U will be the weaker of the three next-gen systems, but not so weak that it can't compete at all.
 

BurntPork

Banned
Burntpork man calm down :p you are gonna die young from heart exploding
You can be disappointed something isnt better while also accepting that things are how they are

I thought that the "BURN THE WITCH" part would have made it clear that I was joking. :(

Hey, is that heart thing a fat joke? :mad:
 

boiled goose

good with gravy
You know people keep on saying the Kinect "stole" the casual's but where is the proof? Kinect software sales is just not that good and kinect hardware sales is unhealthy

there is no evidence. Wii died due to lack of suppot and 360 maintained its popularity mostly due to its core appeal, with a small boost from kinect.

Look at numbers for just dance 3 on wii vrs dance central 2 on kinect.
At its peak wii was a cultural phenomenon worldwide, with top selling titles reach 20-30million copies sold.

i think xbox did more to sell kinect than kinect did to sell xbox.
 

magash

Member
there is no evidence. Wii died due to lack of suppot and 360 maintained its popularity mostly due to its core appeal, with a small boost from kinect.

Look at numbers for just dance 3 on wii vrs dance central 2 on kinect.
At its peak wii was a cultural phenomenon worldwide, with top selling titles reach 20-30million copies sold.

i think xbox did more to sell kinect than kinect did to sell xbox.

I just found it odd that we don't have any major analysis on kinect and its software sales
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom