Technically true, but how many people owned a Wii U and did not buy a Switch? Fifteen?Zelda was on 2 platforms - Wii U and Switch. And you could argue if it really wasn't also on PC, since Cemu got it running pretty well pretty quickly.
Well, I'm one of them.Technically true, but how many people owned a Wii U and did not buy a Switch? Fifteen?
Less than 2 millions sold on WiiU, and those CEMU players are 99% pirates they won't gonna buy the game anyway.Well, I'm one of them.
(Good riddance...)
Considering Witcher was on every console plus PC, whereas Zelda was only on one platform, the outcome of this contest is easy to guess.
My vote goes to BotW. I liked the Witcher fine, but to me it was a B-level experience, nothing particularly memorable. It was objectively a good game; it just didn't do much for me, personally.
Well, I'm one of them.
well, can't do shit about, I can say that it's not my fault that Nintendo limited the game to only their consoles, which is a shitty argument, but idk what else I can say. The original The Last of Us held the record of given GOTY awards in a single year and that was an exclusive too... until The Witcher 3 has beaten that record, in a year where less GOTY awards was given too, but I know I'm biased. Happy to see my favourite game of all time win.Yeah, I'm sure there are a few. But speaking in broad strokes, it's like one small circle (Wii U) embedded inside a another, large circle (Switch). There's almost complete overlap -- nearly everyone who owned a Wii U will have bought a Switch. Compare that to the other platforms (PS4 vs. Xbox vs. PC vs. Switch), and there is much less overlap; each of these platforms are tapping a different set of people.
The overall point, which I don't think is arguable, is that BotW is a console exclusive, going up against Witcher, which appeared on every single platform there is. From that vantage point, it's an uneven comparison. It's an unequal playing field. Witcher has a head start, so to speak, because many more people have been exposed to it -- especially on a multiplatform site like GAF. Probably 25% of the members own a Switch, whereas 100% own one of the platforms Witcher appeared on.
Looks like a lot of people who wanted to vote for BotW didn't get to. These results should be invalidated since the thread wasn't pinned.
I'm also hearing rumors that a lot of people just wanted to see the poll results so they chose the top option not realizing that they wouldn't be able to switch the vote to BotW later on.
well, can't do shit about, I can say that it's not my fault that Nintendo limited the game to only their consoles, which is a shitty argument, but idk what else I can say. The original The Last of Us held the record of given GOTY awards in a single year and that was an exclusive too... until The Witcher 3 has beaten that record, in a year where less GOTY awards was given too, but I know I'm biased. Happy to see my favourite game of all time win.
Yeah, I'm sure there are a few. But speaking in broad strokes, it's like one small circle (Wii U) embedded inside a another, large circle (Switch). There's almost complete overlap -- nearly everyone who owned a Wii U will have bought a Switch. Compare that to the other platforms (PS4 vs. Xbox vs. PC vs. Switch). Although there is some overlap there, too, it's much smaller; they are tapping much different sets of people, a much broader range and scope.
The overall point is that BotW is a console exclusive, going up against Witcher, which appeared on every single platform there is. It's an unequal playing field. Witcher has an unfair advantage, because many more people have been exposed to it on a multiplatform site like GAF. Probably 25% of the members own a Switch, whereas 99% own one of the platforms Witcher appeared on.
This board has trash taste. Can't even be mad. Glad I never participated.
Looks like a lot of people who wanted to vote for BotW didn't get to. These results should be invalidated since the thread wasn't pinned.
I'm also hearing rumors that a lot of people just wanted to see the poll results so they chose the top option not realizing that they wouldn't be able to switch the vote to BotW later on.
Sure, everyone likes to be on the winning team.
I agree that exclusives can win lots of GOTY awards -- Zelda certainly did -- but note the difference between GOTY awards, which are usually decided by sites who have played all the major contenders, and this situation. Here, 75% of the people voting have never played one of the games. Fair contest? I don't think so.
I don't think that point is really arguable. I also don't think it's all that important. I'm just pointing out the inequity, not asking for reparations or demanding a recount (lol).
In the end, more people here voted for Witcher than they did for BotW. That's fine, but it doesn't really change anything. The people who loved Witcher still love Witcher, and the people who preferred BotW still prefer BotW.
Using your metrics mobile gacha games did better x3.I would just like to point out...
Fortnite made 20x more $$$ than both these games combined, is still dominating today (3 years after release) while these have been totally irrelevant for years, brought 1,000,000x more joy to gamers around the planet, and altered the trajectory of the industry significantly more than either BotW or W3.
But this is a cute award.
Using your metrics mobile gacha games did better x3.
And you forgot the amount of development, support and marketing cost of the game throughout the years.
"More joy"
"Altered the trajectory of the industry"
Those ^^ are just top tier bullshit.
Don't discount mobile gatcha games, like your word it can bring more joy to people just from the emergent gacha gameplay.Only, the DNA of Fortnite is pure traditional gameplay. It has more in common with Halo, Gears of War, Minecraft etc than mobile gatcha games.
The amount of marketing was rather small for Fortnite as well when compared with BotW and W3 which had massive marketing budgets. It flourished based on word of mouth which is the highest praise.
So this NeoGAF award is cute. Gaming historians will remember Fortnite in 50 years, not BotW or W3.
Don't discount mobile gatcha games, like your word it can bring more joy to people just from the emergent gacha gameplay.
And stop bullshitting me with Fornite having less marketing budgets and flourishing using word of mouth. Even the latest update had Marvel characters slotted in, you thought that was all free and no marketing? Fuck off with your delusions.
I didn't take the award seriously either, but your hot take is obviously more more pathetic than those who got to the fanboy heat.
Fornite which was developed and still in development by Epic games have zero marketing budget pre launch? Are kidding me? Why do you think they want to get those Tencent money then?GotG type awards go to traditional gaming experiences. IE PC, PlayStation, XBox, Switch games. Mobile gatcha games aren't considered for such an honor.
If I can take you back to 2017, when Fortnite launched, you'll see it had basically zero marketing budget. It exploded on the basis of it's design merit only. Again, W3 and BotW pre release marketing dwarfed Fortnites. Word of mouth is telling.
Fornite which was developed and still in development by Epic games have zero marketing budget pre launch? Are kidding me? Why do you think they want to get those Tencent money then?
The game had its mildly success initially but only when the Battle Royale mode launched that the game exploded, and only with continuous marketing that the game can sustain its course until now.
Even on average a typical AA game would have 4:1 scale when comparing marketing vs development costs. Only ignorant indies would launch their games with zero marketing budget.
I'm done if you continue to deflect and only cherry pick your case."Basically zero marketing budget". Key word "Basically".
It obviously had a small marketing budget, but compared to BotW or W3? Lol
People hate to hear it, but word of mouth played a massive role in Fortnites success.
Word of mouth is the purest form of growth a game can get.
I'm done if you continue to deflect and only cherry pick your case.
You obviously can't comprehend how much a "small marketing budget" means for a GAAS and how they need to continue pumping out more money for marketing, bigger than other budgets to sustain the cycle.
WoM are what that sustains the evergreen sales of W3 and BOTW years after launch, minus W3 ports and remaster efforts. Fortnite needs continuous big marketing and ads for people to continue spending money on Vbucks, of course WoM also helps but it's impossible for the game to survive just from that alone.
You're starting off with a botched narrative and still going for it. You just don't learn.
I don't think you're pointing out anything, i think you're just giving your take. That's valid. I personally think it's a joke to compare fortnite to these, or probably any of the top 10 games we decided with this poll.. but that's just me...I would just like to point out...
Fortnite made 20x more $$$ than both these games combined, is still dominating today (3 years after release) while these have been totally irrelevant for years, brought 1,000,000x more joy to gamers around the planet, and altered the trajectory of the industry significantly more than either BotW or W3.
But this is a cute award.
Don't forget that you're comparing this to SP GOTG contenders.There's absolutely no way to look at Fortnites meteoric rise in it's first 6 months, and say marketing was largely the reason why it succeeded. It's impossible.
The game was openly mocked by gamers and gaming media alike for being a PUBG knockoff. Haters called it a cheap kids game early on. There were no commercials. No big marketing events. Nothing.
I'll try looking for the article, but Fortnite Battle Royale was made by 11 Epic employees in 7 weeks. Does that sound like Epic was flushing marketing channels with $$$?
It blew up because people played a game they weren't expecting to like and fell in love.
Hell, even today it has pretty lame Marvel Avengers marketing crossover and we last heard it's getting 25 million daily active players.
Contrast that with the marketing and hype that Avengers Destiny clone got a few weeks ago and that game is already dead.
If we could measure and bottle the amount of pure fun and joy Fortnite produced over the last 3.5 years, no game would come close. That matters when it comes to GotG.
just because BotW has half-assed story, doesn't mean that TW3 has half-assed gameplay. I'm sure you will disagree on both of these arguments anyway.Gameplay vs Story
Story wins.
NeoGAF fails again!
Ah yes, the "taste is subjective" so "no way I'm wrong" aka "doesn't change anything" argument, I expected this response from someone who cannot come to grips with losing. Your right in the sense it "doesn't change" the fact the better game won. There were other games I enjoyed that didn't make it, but even so, I can't deny Witcher 3 is the better product overall. Once you get over your ego and realize Zelda is not all its cracked up to be, 452 people or the bigger picture aka the final result shows that majority of people see beyond BOTW acclaim and actually see an imperfect game not worthy of GOTG. That's perspective for you, polls are not meant to change your individual opinion, it's just most people don't agree with you that's all.
lol, what a tiny-minded, defensive, irrational projection of a response.