• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The Witcher showrunner addresses backlash to Netflix show

This could be seen as a reasonable response from a showrunner, in the sense that this is the long way of admitting failure, that Netflix Witcher is probably never going to come even close to the respect that The Witcher games and books have earned.

Imagine making a TV show so bad, that your best defense is to tell people they can read the books and play the games.
This is funnier when looking at another IP like The Expanse, which didn't seem to have this particular issue of the writer telling people during its own television run.
 
since the very first episode in my opinion, stopped watching during episode 3 if i recall

don't understand the appeal, whether you know The Witcher or not, i'm not the biggest fan of Game of Thrones but it feels insulting for GoT to be compared to that

Only comparison to GoT is how so many modern fantasy shows still want to ape that series because it hit the mainstream.

I don't think Witcher season 1 was great, but it was fine to me. Rest just got progressively worse.
 
hq720.jpg
wtf is that a real line.
 
I have to admit, I quite enjoyed Blood Origin.
The casting was terrible and the acting was a cringe fest at times, but it was good to watch a high fantasy show on TV for a change.

In the end, it's Sapowski's baby. Him or his team need to retain some creative/executive control.
 
I think it's what others have stated and it's not a problem unique to Witcher but these TV/film adaptation "creatives" almost always have to put their own personal influences into the projects. And they are almost always, God fucking awful.

I would understand if here, this person was a Witcher fan and a fantasy fan overall who wanted to tell their own stories in that universe. Okay, sure take your shot if you think you've got something good but that's often not the case at all. I notice a lot of these people have a tendency to hate their core audience and it's weird af every time I see it.
 
It's funny she says that after the author complained that the games clinged to a mistake in his books, putting him in trouble regarding new books and editions, even when they are a "separated thing".

It can be it's own thing, but if closely ties itself to the original can make it even better. It's just a polite answer to not just tell all fans to fuck off.
 
"No one is taking the books away. No one is taking the video games away. I think everyone can have their version of The Witcher and this is this version."

i m 100% sure that shareholders ll take this version away, just wait.
 
Didn't make it past the second episode, absolutely pathetic writing and character development. "I am a rat" scene was absolutely cringe, just pushing Ciri's lesbian romance was rather disgusting.

But the worst was showing Francesca FUCKING Findabair, called the most beautiful woman in existence, fucking with some reanimated bloke because she is sulking. Reducing women to a vagina must be some trope in Hollywood.
 
I feel sad for Henry Cavill. Dude was a big fan of the source material and got shoved away by people that cope about the quality of their own work with "well the source material is still there, so whatever".


Makes me wonder. What audience did they choose then? If you can't adapt the book faithfully nor the videogames, then what are you doing?
Taking advantage of existing IP to shove their own ideas down everyones throat, basically narcissism.

Like the idea that Master Chief's helmet should come off on the marketing banner. Wow you sure subverted expectations you bold showmaker! Only an artist of your sheer gallantry could have done it!
 
The show looked like corny cheap garbage from the first episode. I actually don't know why it took a season for a lot of people to figure it out. I remember my friends streaming it on discord and I couldn't sit through half an episode before I noped out.
 
Toss a coin to your witcher...

Throw bags of cash and whores to your rat catcher!



LEGEND!!!

Not at all surprised at Sharlto Copley carrying this show, and as Leo Bonhart no less. At least they got 1 thing right. Everything else looks like an affront to my eyes.
 
I watched this to the end, but skipped some parts, especially the Ciri and rats ones. A shitshow is what this is.

Liam is dull as a bag of rocks, I'm sure he's a better actor and can do better than this.

Some absolute laughable, amateurish scenes, especially in episode 6, whoever watched it knows.

Man, just write and create your own show, don't just profit from an established universe that has fans, I don't understand this.
I mean, I know some stuff needs to be changed for a movie or show, that's more than fair, but when you're just changing things for the sake of changing it or subverting expectations, that's just cheap and gratuitous, just fuck off.
 
The Witcher Season 4 Viewership Suffers Over 50% Decline



  • The Witcher Season 2: 18.5 M (three days)
  • The Witcher Season 3: 15.2M (four days)
  • The Witcher Season 4: 7.4M (four days)

It's dead, Jim.
 
The Witcher Season 4 Viewership Suffers Over 50% Decline



  • The Witcher Season 2: 18.5 M (three days)
  • The Witcher Season 3: 15.2M (four days)
  • The Witcher Season 4: 7.4M (four days)

It's dead, Jim.

I can't speak for the whole season but looking at the first 2 episodes seems enough better than the horrid previous season.
 
The show looked like corny cheap garbage from the first episode. I actually don't know why it took a season for a lot of people to figure it out. I remember my friends streaming it on discord and I couldn't sit through half an episode before I noped out.
Uh. No, not all. The first 2 episodes not seems that bad. I start to suspect too many people like to despise the whole package just for the sake of it. But I give you that the Witcher series has the bad habit to decline the whole story quality in the final episodes of the later seasons.
 
Last edited:
I stopped after season 1. As someone who loves the books and games season 1 was already pretty bad. I didn't think it could get much worse but apparently I was wrong. Thinking we could have gotten a Fantasy show with the quality of GoT if they actually hired a talented director and sticked to the source material make me sad. The good thing is I barely remember anything about the show so I can just pretend it never existed.
 
Last edited:
I stopped after season 1. As someone who loves the books and games season 1 was already pretty bad. I didn't think it could get much worse but apparently I was wrong. Thinking we could have gotten a Fantasy show with the quality of GoT if they actually hired a talented director and sticked to the source material make me sad. The good thing is I barely remember anything about the show so I can just pretend it never existed.
What exaggeration. It's not a masterpiece but it's not absolutely all that trash. Combats scenes especially are really well done. And let's be brutally honest: it's not like the narrative of books was that masterpiece neither. The games were far superior to the books and the only reason of the success of the brand imo. Now the prequel was really an abomination and I can agree with it. But I seen a lot of worst stuff on Netflix (Resident Evil or Cowboy Bee Bop) than this series. Well I hope the final episodes don't screw again everything.
 
Last edited:
Lol, this is the scene that I was talking about in episode 6, timestamped:



The mages just said "let's take a break, we'll wait for you to return"
Can't believe this, I'm just trying to remember something similar that happened in a show, embarrassing.
 
Are those requirements for real? If so, damn that's fucking dumb even for Amazon.

Amazon has like every major Hollywood studio (including the Academy of Motion Picture Arts) strict DEI requirements. Amazon has been abiding by them for more than four years now.


  • Each film or series with a creative team of three or more people in above-the-line roles (Directors, Writers, Producers) should ideally include a minimum 30% women and 30% members of an underrepresented racial/ethnic group. This aspirational goal will increase to 50% by 2024.
  • Casting actors whose identity (gender, gender identity, nationality, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability) aligns with the character they will be playing.
  • Aiming to include one character from each of the following categories in speaking roles, with minimum 50% of these to be women: LGBTQIA+, person with a disability, and three regionally underrepresented race/ethnic/cultural groups. A single character can fulfill one or more of these identities.
  • Seeking at least three bids from vendors or suppliers on productions, one of which must be from a woman-owned business and one from a minority-owned business.
  • Pay equity across casting, behind the camera staff and crew, and for vendors and suppliers.
  • "With the establishment of our Inclusion Policy and Inclusion Playbook, Amazon Studios has committed itself to being a thought and action leader in the transformation of our industry," said Jennifer Salke, Head of Amazon Studios. "We know how much work there is to be done to improve representation both on camera and behind the scenes, and it starts at home, with us. With clear directives and a commitment to accountability, these guides provide a path toward a more equitable future, both on- and off-camera."
 
And let's be brutally honest: it's not like the narrative of books was that masterpiece neither. The games were far superior to the books and the only reason of the success of the brand imo.
Youre Wrong John C Mcginley GIF


I assume a lot was lost in translation because the original Polish edition was lit AF, I don't think any series I ever read (and I read a lot) matched the humour of the Witcher books.
 
Toss a coin to your witcher...

Throw bags of cash and whores to your rat catcher!


LEGEND!!!

the writers of this episode must be on damage control right now, they wanted everyone to be shocked by the cruelty of Leo and they got everyone rooting for him.
 
Last edited:
I feel sad for Henry Cavill. Dude was a big fan of the source material and got shoved away by people that cope about the quality of their own work with "well the source material is still there, so whatever".


Makes me wonder. What audience did they choose then? If you can't adapt the book faithfully nor the videogames, then what are you doing?
Worse than that, hack showrunners parasitize beloved IPs because they cannot create anything worth watching on their own, and when fans of said IP protest they say it is aimed at a different audience.
But why not simply do a new show directly aimed at that different audience ?
Some will say mainstream entertainement has been taken over by risk adverse business school dumbass who won't greenlight new projects, which is true, but then why don't they do by the book IP adaptation, since it is a risk free strategy. Give people what they want, you already know what they like (since the IP worked on them in the first place).
 
It's amazing to me that Netflix got Henry Cavill to do one of their shows and instead of embracing that and running with it. They allow themselves to lose him in order to keep some showrunner who doesn't know WTF they are doing. I wish I could be there to see who gets fired for this massive mistake and mishandling of this show. They had a chance to really build something here and they just threw it all away.
 
Witcher 1-3 are some of my favorite series of games and I love the books, so I want to like this, but... I can't. It's like the Warcraft movie. I wanted a good and serious movie. Instead, with both Warcraft and Witcher we got some shitty campy fantasy stuff out of the 80s, but with CGI. I knew this show was doomed when Netflix picked it up and not HBO.
 
Let's be honest, Cavill's star power was the only thing keeping the show reasonably relevant for 2 seasons.

Even he couldn't polish this turd before he bailed.

The show was doomed from the get-go because the showrunner isn't even a fan of the books or the video games, didn't have a clue about the lore so doesn't understand all the little idiosyncrasies that make The Witcher what it is, so resorted to inserting her own cringe Tumblr-level fan-fiction into the series, and butchering it in the process.

This should spell the end of her career in the industry, but these ideologues always find a way to fail upwards.
 
Last edited:
Imagine given the reigns to produce a show based on one of the most beloved fantasy series, and thinking people want to see "your" version. People from LA are a different breed.

You know when I typed "LA" I thought "wait a minute, I should do my research and Google if Lauren is actually from LA."

Spoiler, she fucking is.
 
Last edited:

Based Henry Cavill. Look up interviews he did with the cast and Lauren (creator of the show) and Henry is the only one who knows what he´s talking about. He played the games. He read the novels. The others just sit there completely clueless and knows jack shit about their own show they are participating in. They are even side eyeing him, probably of jealousy because he is so knowledgeable of the world of Witcher.
 
Based Henry Cavill. Look up interviews he did with the cast and Lauren (creator of the show) and Henry is the only one who knows what he´s talking about. He played the games. He read the novels. The others just sit there completely clueless and knows jack shit about their own show they are participating in. They are even side eyeing him, probably of jealousy because he is so knowledgeable of the world of Witcher.

Jealous of that and the fact that you could combine the best features of your entire family tree and still not look as good as Henry. He'd be a prettier girl too, if he felt like it.
 
Top Bottom