• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

This is some pretty awesome Samus fanart

Status
Not open for further replies.
What do you suppose the magic suit that transforms into a ball without crushing its host is made of?

"Realism" arguments are the worst.

I was only bringing up a realism argument to counter the realism argument that "women have nipples [therefore it is not stupid that her nipple is clearly visible]."

I don't care about realism, I care about consistency. I believe, as do many others, that the nipple is inconsistent with the greater context. That's my criticism. I'm not being prudish - I enjoy looking at naked women very much. I like when women behave in a sexual fashion. I just think it's dumb to put a perky erect nipple on a suit designed to protect its wearer.

Now, if you have an argument about why it's not inconsistent, or why I shouldn't be automatically labeling a nipple as pandering, I'm listening. But the "women have nipples so therefore you cannot complain about this nipple" argument is thoroughly refuted as far as I'm concerned.
 
ibbhKuVhz00B7F.jpg
This one is traced over a photo of a nude model:
Y3YlS1Y.jpg
 
I was only bringing up a realism argument to counter the realism argument that "women have nipples [therefore it is not stupid that her nipple is clearly visible]."

I don't care about realism, I care about consistency. I believe, as do many others, that the nipple is inconsistent with the greater context. That's my criticism. I'm not being prudish - I enjoy looking at naked women very much. I like when women behave in a sexual fashion. I just think it's dumb to put a perky erect nipple on a suit designed to protect its wearer.

Now, if you have an argument about why it's not inconsistent, or why I shouldn't be automatically labeling a nipple as pandering, I'm listening. But the "women have nipples so therefore you cannot complain about this nipple" argument is thoroughly refuted as far as I'm concerned.
But that's the zero suit part, isn't it? That suit would just be there as a layer between the armour and the skin, not for protection.
 
But that's the zero suit part, isn't it? That suit would just be there as a layer between the armour and the skin, not for protection.

Well, it's for protecting her skin from the armor, right? Unless it's made of t-shirt material it probably isn't going to reveal her hard nipples, can we agree on that?

I think this is my favorite piece of Metroid art that goes for the whole synthesis of woman/machine:

metroid.jpg

Totally agree that this is a much more considered use of skin exposure and a better work in general.
 
Well, it's for protecting her skin from the armor, right? Unless it's made of t-shirt material it probably isn't going to reveal her hard nipples, can we agree on that?
I guess so. Though I could also imagine someone coming up with some sci-fi reason for why it would have to be some tight, nano-fiber mash suit. ;)
 
Nintendo should just kill Samus off and make the new metroid protag a dude to prevent any backlash at this point lol.

"too animu"

"lol she looks like a dude"

"tits too big yo"

"why do we still have nipples?"

"sexist because reasons".


I always found it cool that Samus was model like outside of the suit. That was kinda the whole point to the big reveal. If she was some hulking bodybuilder type (which would still be cool due to the lack of that I guess), it would take away from the contrast they were going for. And besides...who says pretty women can't kick ass? Other M is one game...in every other game Samus gave mofos dat work no problem.

so what is the big deal here? That she is too feminine? Like yeah the art in the OP is a big weirdly composed but fuck guys...its getting to a point where unless they are some androgynous blob that is fully clothed and personality-less that you will complain. Ever think this is a big reason why we don't have a lot of female protags (besides sales of course)?Afraid of backlash for small things.
 
Nintendo should just kill Samus off and make the new metroid protag a dude to prevent any backlash at this point lol.

"too animu"

"lol she looks like a dude"

"tits too big yo"

"why do we still have nipples?"

"sexist because reasons".


I always found it cool that Samus was model like outside of the suit. That was kinda the whole point to the big reveal. If she was some hulking bodybuilder type (which would still be cool due to the lack of that I guess), it would take away from the contrast they were going for. And besides...who says pretty women can't kick ass? Other M is one game...in every other game Samus gave mofos dat work no problem.

so what is the big deal here? That she is too feminine? Like yeah the art in the OP is a big weirdly composed but fuck guys...its getting to a point where unless they are some androgynous blob that is fully clothed and personality-less that you will complain. Ever think this is a big reason why we don't have a lot of female protags (besides sales of course)?Afraid of backlash for small things.
Literally missing the entire point of the argument in this thread.
 
The point of Samus was a woman inside a machine of mass carnage and badassery. SJWgaf needs to grow up and realize the human form isn't evil incarnate.
 
The problem with this isn't so much the nipple as it is the weird juxtaposition of the shoulders and chest to the suit of armor. If you tore the drawing down to the original pencil line draft and connected the lines for the anatomy you wouldn't be able to create proportions that make sense. Part of the work is a side view and the other part is a 3/4 view. Shiny lights are nice but without a coherent structure to work off of you get a hot mess. The nipple is basically a huge wing spoiler on an 83 Civic with a gold paint job and a dragon stencil on the side.
 
Literally missing the entire point of the argument in this thread.

am I?

I just find the idea that Samus cannot be pretty kinda dumb and ironic considering the reason oft given is that it makes her less awesome or something.

Is the nipple a bit silly? yeah but it isn't that big of a deal to me because she still looks awesome in that pic.
 
am I?

I just find the idea that Samus cannot be pretty kinda dumb and ironic considering the reason oft given is that it makes her less awesome or something.

Is the nipple a bit silly? yeah but it isn't that big of a deal to me because she still looks awesome in that pic.

Nobody has a problem with Samus being pretty, or feminine. People have a problem when an artist, in an otherwise 'serious' depiction of Samus decides to unnecessarily accentuate and idealize her breasts for no purpose other than for the viewer's sexual pleasure. It undermines the art.

I find that the picture I posted, which shows much more skin, is a better representation because it doesn't exaggerate proportions, or focus on them, and the nakedness is there to serve the theme of the piece rather than for titillation.
 
The problem with this isn't so much the nipple as it is the weird juxtaposition of the shoulders and chest to the suit of armor. If you tore the drawing down to the original pencil line draft and connected the lines for the anatomy you wouldn't be able to create proportions that make sense. Part of the work is a side view and the other part is a 3/4 view. Shiny lights are nice but without a coherent structure to work off of you get a hot mess. The nipple is basically a huge wing spoiler on an 83 Civic with a gold paint job and a dragon stencil on the side.
Exactly.

Quick and dirty:

TdNm5SW.jpg


She doesn't have a collarbone, it seems. Her breasts are located higher than her breastbone (covered by a piece of armor). It makes literally no sense. It's like the artist raised her boobs so that they aren't covered by her arm.
 
am I?

I just find the idea that Samus cannot be pretty kinda dumb and ironic considering the reason oft given is that it makes her less awesome or something.

Is the nipple a bit silly? yeah but it isn't that big of a deal to me because she still looks awesome in that pic.
Because that is not the point. Jesus.

If you read back to the beginning of the thread, it was an issue about inconsistency. Stop trying to strawman. No one is trying to white knight, but people are just weirded out by the intentional inclusion of an element that doesn't fit this hyper realistic depiction of Samus in this image.

Edit: For example look at this cool piece of art


Is GAF flipping their collective shits because she has breasts and hips? No, because it fits the retro artstyle of the time, and is a unique spin on the character.
 
Cant believe your post was ignored

The difference is that a nipple was added to Samus to sexualize it (which many find counter-intuitive to Samus's lone bounty hunter personality); and this work is about the female body non-sexualized, just appreciated.

Edit: also many do not seem to realize this is a 3D render post-processed.
 
Because that is not the point. Jesus.

If you read back to the beginning of the thread, it was an issue about inconsistency. Stop trying to strawman. No one is trying to white knight, but people are just weirded out by the intentional inclusion of an element that doesn't fit this hyper realistic depiction of Samus in this image.

Nobody has a problem with Samus being pretty, or feminine. People have a problem when an artist, in an otherwise 'serious' depiction of Samus decides to unnecessarily accentuate and idealize her breasts for no purpose other than for the viewer's sexual pleasure. It undermines the art.

I find that the picture I posted, which shows much more skin, is a better representation because it doesn't exaggerate proportions, or focus on them, and the nakedness is there to serve the theme of the piece rather than for titillation.

I am not talking about the OP pic. That is whatever. It is drawn weird. I am talking about how it seems people are upset that Samus got "animu'd" or dolled up past their made up idea of what she should be despite never being (Samus has been a slender, busty, blonde (or green lol) haired pretty lady..from jump). Those are the posts I was initially talking about and it goes back beyond just this thread (see the Smash Bros version of ZSS for example). Its the whole the prime design (which only showed her face btw) is the best design because she isn't super pretty or something that kinda annoys me a bit, not because they are wrong or anything but because it seems very contradictory to the point they are often trying to make.

But I am done shitting up the thread on this...
 
1390706058989.jpg


In Metroid Prime, before Samus was an anime goo goo doll, she was a normal human with normal human hair.

Uh...Samus always had tons of hair. Prime is the anomaly not the other way around.

SuperMetroid-BestEnding51-540x405.jpg


Not saying they haven't pushed the envelope more with the design but yeah.
 
I am not talking about the OP pic. That is whatever. It is drawn weird. I am talking about how it seems people are upset that Samus got "animu'd" or dolled up past their made up idea of what she should be despite never being (Samus has been a slender, busty, blonde (or green lol) haired pretty lady..from jump). Those are the posts I was initially talking about and it goes back beyond just this thread (see the Smash Bros version of ZSS for example). Its the whole the prime design (which only showed her face btw) is the best design because she isn't super pretty or something that kinda annoys me a bit, not because they are wrong or anything but because it seems very contradictory to the point they are often trying to make.

But I am done shitting up the thread on this...
Ok, so you're kinda arguing in general, and I was talking specifically about this thread. Sorry for the mix up. But yes, I tend to stay away from general Metroid debates, because yes, they always fall into the endless debate about Samus' model changes over the time. It reminds me of the FF fanbase, and how they pick particular renditions they liked, and have subsequently shit on every other redesign that doesn't match it exactly. So I understand where you're coming from, but I really don't want this thread to go down that path again (even though it might have already started).
 
Wait, i must have missed something, even assuming it was sexualiztion (which isn't sure) are *fan artists* not allowed to sexualize fandoms in their personal portfolios anymore?
 
Ok, so you're kinda arguing in general, and I was talking specifically about this thread. Sorry for the mix up. But yes, I tend to stay away from general Metroid debates, because yes, they always fall into the endless debate about Samus' model changes over the time. It reminds me of the FF fanbase, and how they pick particular renditions they liked, and have subsequently shit on every other redesign that doesn't match it exactly. So I understand where you're coming from, but I really don't want this thread to go down that path again (even though it might have already started).

Ok. Thanks. I am glad I got my point across. I try so hard not to come of as some asshole in these threads lol. I probably end up failing everytime.
 
Lol so many people critiquing and complaining about a nipple. Yes the nipple is neccesary, afterall it's on her breast. If it was on some random place like her face then you guys would have a leg to stand on. Alot of kids on here it seems. Great artwork in my opinion, I love how shows Samus with and without the suit at the same time. She's a badass.
 
Wait, i must have missed something, are *fan artists* not allowed to sexualize fandoms in their personal portfolios anymore?
You didn't miss anything, because no one said or implied that.

The nipple thing was just a simple observation that was blown out of proportion by the pc-police-police.
 
Exactly.

Quick and dirty:

TdNm5SW.jpg


She doesn't have a collarbone, it seems. Her breasts are located higher than her breastbone (covered by a piece of armor). It makes literally no sense. It's like the artist raised her boobs so that they aren't covered by her arm.

The fact that it's basically a "I know of some photoshop filters!" image is way worse than the anatomy.
 
Wait, i must have missed something, even assuming it was sexualiztion (which isn't sure) are *fan artists* not allowed to sexualize fandoms in their personal portfolios anymore?

Fan artists can absolutely do sexualized art (they can do whatever they want), but the image in the OP is definitely sexualized in a way that makes it out of place with the rest of the image, so it weakens the art. Also, the proportions make zeros sense. It's the incongruity between the "here's Samus being a badass warrior, but at also look at her perky tit, isn't that hot?" that bothers people.
 
Guys, do you think the Zero Suit would logically be thin enough and form-fitting enough that you can see erect nipples through it? Keep in mind this is a suit made to do complex maneuvering in and insulate from the power suit.

If not, please stop arguing from realism.
This one is pretty awesome too:

samus_portrait_by_poojipoo-d597782.jpg


Love the more tougher look.
Would like to see a Metroid game with this look.
Love that face, but I wonder how it would look with a less pissed off expression.
The anatomy of this picture is fucked.

Look at where her breast lines up :lol
It's hard not to get fucked anatomy with the Varia Suit. But yeah, the artist could have tried a bit better.
I still think this is my favorite. I really like the retro look. It'd be neat to see some Nintendo franchises in drastically different styles.
I like this one.
She would never be able to tuck all that hair into her helmet.
That's about how much hair she has in Super Metroid.
I enjoy the rare but always interesting fan art that indulges the "exoskeleton" suit theory of Samus body mechanics.

Here the concept is handled by Udon artist and hardcore game fan Robaato.

tumblr_mveg5h4nE21qdjeu0o1_1280.png


This way the anatomy of the suit, and her own comparative anatomy are not in obvious conflict. Also, it makes the morphball seem more practical, and it makes a suited up Samus seem all the more intimidating.
It looks kinda hilarious though.
This one is amazing :

metroid_by_digitaltofu-d5ksvxm.jpg
I love Kraid and Ridley, but it bugs me that Samus is pretty much traced from a particular piece of Prime 2 or 3 artwork (I forgot which one).
 
Why do people hate Deviant Art? There's some really artistic stuff on there.

Because most of the stupid brony and weird Sonic pics come from there.
I used to be so active but when i started seeing that shit as the most watched or looked at, i know the community is crumbling.
 
The drawing in the OP is pretty damn cool, but it does have some details that detract from it in my view.

I really like sexy pics of Samus and I have no problem with her nipples being rendered however the artist sees fit, I just think people should be honest about WHY the soft mound of her areolas are somehow visible beneath a layer of material.

To that end, I made a quick sketch of Solid Snake. He wears a tight suit, much like Samus.

Somehow I never before thought to draw his erect nipples through his sneaking suit.

Until now.

tumblr_n3xh6uuGXB1to4wwgo1_1280.jpg




I cheated one of his nipples over a little bit, away from where it really ought to be, but LOL realism and all that.

Hey, if you notice his oddly erect nipples I think YOU HAVE THE PROBLEM
or your eyes and critical faculties actually work.
 
I always found it cool that Samus was model like outside of the suit. That was kinda the whole point to the big reveal. If she was some hulking bodybuilder type (which would still be cool due to the lack of that I guess), it would take away from the contrast they were going for. And besides...who says pretty women can't kick ass? Other M is one game...in every other game Samus gave mofos dat work no problem.

so what is the big deal here? That she is too feminine? Like yeah the art in the OP is a big weirdly composed but fuck guys...its getting to a point where unless they are some androgynous blob that is fully clothed and personality-less that you will complain. Ever think this is a big reason why we don't have a lot of female protags (besides sales of course)?Afraid of backlash for small things.

Thank you so very much.
 
The drawing in the OP is pretty damn cool, but it does have some details that detract from it in my view.

I really like sexy pics of Samus and I have no problem with her nipples being rendered however the artist sees fit, I just think people should be honest about WHY the soft mound of her areolas are somehow visible beneath a layer of material.

To that end, I made a quick sketch of Solid Snake. He wears a tight suit, much like Samus.

Somehow I never before thought to draw his erect nipples through his sneaking suit.

Until now.

https://31.media.tumblr.com/123e8bc970d05f7c392b1df8cb5a24ce/tumblr_n3xh6uuGXB1to4wwgo1_1280.jpg/IMG]



I cheated one of his nipples over a little bit, away from where it really ought to be, but LOL realism and all that.

Hey, if you notice his oddly erect nipples I think YOU HAVE THE PROBLEM[SPOILER] or your eyes and critical faculties actually work.
[/SPOILER][/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://abload.de/img/stupid_sexy_snake_by_v5kqf.gif


(Why is there so much Solid Snake + Samus fanart?)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom