• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Today in DCEU: Affleck reportedly wants out as Batman

Status
Not open for further replies.
The reason for the massive pile-ons is because of the three middling to bad movies that have been released so far. There's little to no good will for the DCEU right now because the movies so far have made it that way.


I know why there is a pile up, my thing is if you don't like something why go into a thread to proclaim you don't like it. There's a total difference between giving reasons why you don't like something and the lol sad affleck drive by posts.


But yeah ima D.C. Stan and it's up to WB to put up or shut up, with Wonder Woman and Justice League.
 
Always go more towards the goddamn Batman route

batman-paints-a-room-yellow-for-green-lantern-3.jpg

Doesn't Robin proceed to whoops Hal's ass here?
 
I'm pretty sure most Gaffers think SS is a worse movie than BvS. Which it is.

The reason BvS gets so much negativity is because it was one of the biggest and most hyped blockbusters this decade and ended up being a big disappointment. Just because the fanboys are willing to overlook its' many, many flaws doesn't mean everyone else is.


I like Sucide Squad more because it's what I expected and I wasn't hugely as disappointed with it as I was with BvS upon seeing it. Upon going out of the theatre I was deflated with totally mixed emotions and the biggest stuff i liked, I realized was because I read comics and my friends were all left confused about a lot of stuff.
 
I like Sucide Squad more because it's what I expected and I wasn't hugely as disappointed with it as I was with BvS upon seeing it. Upon going out of the theatre I was deflated with totally mixed emotions and the biggest stuff i liked, I realized was because I read comics and my friends were all left confused about a lot of stuff.
It was the opposite for me. BvS was what I expected, while SS totally surprised me. I was expecting a really good and unique movie out of it.
 
I know why there is a pile up, my thing is if you don't like something why go into a thread to proclaim you don't like it. There's a total difference between giving reasons why you don't like something and the lol sad affleck drive by posts.

Any divisive media franchise is going to have negative comments and jokes made at their expense. Unless the criticisms are offensive (which they mostly haven't been in this case), its just something fans will have to deal with.
 
Doesn't Robin proceed to whoops Hal's ass here?

Robin nearly kills him by going for the throat. All-Star Batman and Robin almost works as satire of Frank Miller Batman. He gets it on with Black Canary as people are burning behind them. Superman jogs across the sea. Wonder Woman is just, the less said the better.
 
The hate for SS was mind boggling to me because i watched it on opening night and everyone in the theater loved it. It followed the marvel formula to the tee... lots of quips and one liners that had the audience rolling, team bonding moments, charismatic leads, bad one dimensional villains, and an overall light tone that told everyone it doesnt take itself too seriously. Even the soundtrack tried to ape the Guardians of Galaxy ost which was basically comprised of popular 80s songs.

But apparently that's not good enough. People were bitching about the editing as if everyone has a masters in editing movies nowadays. All of a sudden the character development matters in comic book movies. It's perfectly fine for the Avengers to set aside their differences because some random shield agent died, but the moment SS tries to hand wave some things, it's the worst thing in the world! I remember watching Guardians and there is a scene where they literally bond over the fact that none of them have ever had friends. And they all go 'would you like to be my friend?' 'yay we are a team now!!!' That shit is just as bad as Martha.

Someone asked what was so bad about Civil War. It suffered from the same pacing issues, and disjointed narrative that BvS suffered from. It doesnt make it a bad movie, but it literally has the same problems as BvS. The overall conflict b/w the two sides wasn't fleshed out. Boring middle act. (but hey they added lots of quips!) it didnt make sense for Tony and Steve to fight each other. the main fight is literally fought over a misunderstanding. All Steve had to say was that the real villain is zemo, sit down and explain. Same problem as the BvS title fight. And yet no one cared.

I dont think Guardians, SS, BvS, or Civil War are bad movies. Ben Affleck was amazing as Batman. Just like Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. in their roles. And yet he's nominated for a Razzie while RDJ is making a $100 million per movie.
 
The hate for SS was mind boggling to me because i watched it on opening night and everyone in the theater loved it. It followed the marvel formula to the tee... lots of quips and one liners that had the audience rolling, team bonding moments, charismatic leads, bad one dimensional villains, and an overall light tone that told everyone it doesnt take itself too seriously. Even the soundtrack tried to ape the Guardians of Galaxy ost which was basically comprised of popular 80s songs.

But apparently that's not good enough. People were bitching about the editing as if everyone has a masters in editing movies nowadays. All of a sudden the character development matters in comic book movies. It's perfectly fine for the Avengers to set aside their differences because some random shield agent died, but the moment SS tries to hand wave some things, it's the worst thing in the world! I remember watching Guardians and there is a scene where they literally bond over the fact that none of them have ever had friends. And they all go 'would you like to be my friend?' 'yay we are a team now!!!' That shit is just as bad as Martha.

Someone asked what was so bad about Civil War. It suffered from the same pacing issues, and disjointed narrative that BvS suffered from. It doesnt make it a bad movie, but it literally has the same problems as BvS. The overall conflict b/w the two sides wasn't fleshed out. Boring middle act. (but hey they added lots of quips!) it didnt make sense for Tony and Steve to fight each other. the main fight is literally fought over a misunderstanding. All Steve had to say was that the real villain is zemo, sit down and explain. Same problem as the BvS title fight. And yet no one cared.

I dont think Guardians, SS, BvS, or Civil War are bad movies. Ben Affleck was amazing as Batman. Just like Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. in their roles. And yet he's nominated for a Razzie while RDJ is making a $100 million per movie.
Well, this cinematographer/editor is probably at least decent at it and was able to call the editing garbage, so...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDclQowcE9I
 
All of a sudden the character development matters in comic book movies. It's perfectly fine for the Avengers to set aside their differences because some random shield agent died, but the moment SS tries to hand wave some things, it's the worst thing in the world! I remember watching Guardians and there is a scene where they literally bond over the fact that none of them have ever had friends. And they all go 'would you like to be my friend?' 'yay we are a team now!!!' That shit is just as bad as Martha.

Um......no? Not at all?

Coulson had some kind of connection to almost every single one of them. He helped Tony out of his funk in Iron Man 2. He personally knew Black Widow and Hawkeye because he worked with them. He made it clear to Captain America how much he admired him, and he was the one who officially accepted Thor as an ally of humanity. I think Hulk is the only one he didn't have much to do with. More than that, until now, Coulson was link that threaded the movies up until the Avengers. So it's thematically appropriate that his death was the galvanization of the team coming together. Plus Fury had to specifically manipulate them with guilt into unifying, so it's not just that he died, but Nick Fury specifically used the narrative of his death to unite them.

Similarly, the Guardians of the Galaxy were all people who were desperately looking for companionship. Gamora only had an abusive relationship with her family, Drax had nothing but desire for vengeance, Rocket is such a goddamn mess that he almost breaks down in tears explaining his backstory....the point here is that they were all broken people coming from backgrounds where they couldn't find acceptance.

I'm not saying this is grade A, complex storytelling, but it is competent storytelling that is reasonably well told. It's not in any way hand waving things away, their unity is often the goddamn point. I'm not going to attack Suicide Squad for failing to accomplish this, because I don't hate that movie as much as others. I'm indifferent to it. But Marvel movies did not get to this point because they didn't give a shit about storytelling. They gave a huge shit and tried to deliver on every front they could.
 
I know why there is a pile up, my thing is if you don't like something why go into a thread to proclaim you don't like it. There's a total difference between giving reasons why you don't like something and the lol sad affleck drive by posts.

Ya new to GAF? This no different than pre-Avenger Marvel threads with the "lol looks like a TV show" or "only Iron Man makes money" post and run.


If only they didn't gut Miller's JL days before production. We could have been in the promise land.
 
The hate for SS was mind boggling to me because i watched it on opening night and everyone in the theater loved it. It followed the marvel formula to the tee... lots of quips and one liners that had the audience rolling, team bonding moments, charismatic leads, bad one dimensional villains, and an overall light tone that told everyone it doesnt take itself too seriously. Even the soundtrack tried to ape the Guardians of Galaxy ost which was basically comprised of popular 80s songs.

But apparently that's not good enough. People were bitching about the editing as if everyone has a masters in editing movies nowadays. All of a sudden the character development matters in comic book movies. It's perfectly fine for the Avengers to set aside their differences because some random shield agent died, but the moment SS tries to hand wave some things, it's the worst thing in the world! I remember watching Guardians and there is a scene where they literally bond over the fact that none of them have ever had friends. And they all go 'would you like to be my friend?' 'yay we are a team now!!!' That shit is just as bad as Martha.

Someone asked what was so bad about Civil War. It suffered from the same pacing issues, and disjointed narrative that BvS suffered from. It doesnt make it a bad movie, but it literally has the same problems as BvS. The overall conflict b/w the two sides wasn't fleshed out. Boring middle act. (but hey they added lots of quips!) it didnt make sense for Tony and Steve to fight each other. the main fight is literally fought over a misunderstanding. All Steve had to say was that the real villain is zemo, sit down and explain. Same problem as the BvS title fight. And yet no one cared.

I dont think Guardians, SS, BvS, or Civil War are bad movies. Ben Affleck was amazing as Batman. Just like Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. in their roles. And yet he's nominated for a Razzie while RDJ is making a $100 million per movie.

They're not equivalent.

The difference is that Guardians of the Galaxy, The Avengers, and Captain America: Civil War are good.

Suicide Squad and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice aren't good.
 
Um......no? Not at all?

Coulson had some kind of connection to almost every single one of them. He helped Tony out of his funk in Iron Man 2. He personally knew Black Widow and Hawkeye because he worked with them. He made it clear to Captain America how much he admired him, and he was the one who officially accepted Thor as an ally of humanity. I think Hulk is the only one he didn't have much to do with. More than that, until now, Coulson was link that threaded the movies up until the Avengers. So it's thematically appropriate that his death was the galvanization of the team coming together. Plus Fury had to specifically manipulate them with guilt into unifying, so it's not just that he died, but Nick Fury specifically used the narrative of his death to unite them.

Similarly, the Guardians of the Galaxy were all people who were desperately looking for companionship. Gamora only had an abusive relationship with her family, Drax had nothing but desire for vengeance, Rocket is such a goddamn mess that he almost breaks down in tears explaining his backstory....the point here is that they were all broken people coming from backgrounds where they couldn't find acceptance.

I'm not saying this is grade A, complex storytelling, but it is competent storytelling that is reasonably well told. It's not in any way hand waving things away, their unity is often the goddamn point. I'm not going to attack Suicide Squad for failing to accomplish this, because I don't hate that movie as much as others. I'm indifferent to it. But Marvel movies did not get to this point because they didn't give a shit about storytelling. They gave a huge shit and tried to deliver on every front they could.

Even the point about soundtrack is wrong--youre listening to those songs because thats the tape from Starlord's mom when he was taken. That's literally all he knows until.he finds #2. It's woven into the story.

There isn't a reason for a single one of those songs to be in SS. This is what people are complaining about--understanding of the source material beyond surface level is not there, and it's resulting in bad movies.
 
They're not equivalent.

The difference is that Guardians of the Galaxy, The Avengers, and Captain America: Civil War are good.

Suicide Squad and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice aren't good.

its really as simple as this but I have an MCU avatar so...
 
Even the point about soundtrack is wrong--youre listening to those songs because thats the tape from Starlord's mom when he was taken. That's literally all he knows until.he finds #2. It's woven into the story.

There isn't a reason for a single one of those songs to be in SS. This is what people are complaining about--understanding of the source material beyond surface level is not there, and it's resulting in bad movies.

Don't forget that the songs of also served as a tonal constrast. Here you have a film that is all about futuristic space technology with aliens and ships and cosmic gems and so on. The main character has a jetpack and weird mask and space guns and so on.

The typical music choice would usually be to make the soundtrack futuristic too. But instead it goes in the opposite direction by making it 80's music, partially to give the film's tone a distinctly humanistic streak amidst all the aliens but also just to keep things interesting because it's such an unexpected choice.

I don't understand the purpose of ANY of Suicide Squads music.
 
Getting triggered.

I'm not a music guy. Forgive my ignorance of whatever decade Star Lord was kidnapped in. SlimySnake said it was 80's so I just followed his lead, but given the rest of the content of his post, I probably should have assumed that was wrong as well.
 
Is there anymore to this other than the original John Campea rumor/denial?

To be clear: He didn't deny (which is why his tantrum was so stupid). He never said he didn't believe what he told people on his talkshow. In fact, he said he still believes it. What he was mad about was that he asked a couple hundred thousand people not to turn a thing he said into its own news story, and they did it anyway.

Because of course they did. You'd have to be touched to think that wouldn't become a news story. The only reason you thought about sharing it on your talkshow is because you believed it to be newsworthy. Hence it's making news.

So Campea's never denied that the story is true. He's said he believes that it's the case. Whether you want to believe him or not is up to you (his track record as a scooper is fucking terrible), but he's never denied that he said the thing into a microphone while on camera, or that he believes what he said into the microphone while on camera. He's just mad that other people talked about it too.
 
I'm not a music guy. Forgive my ignorance of whatever decade Star Lord was kidnapped in. SlimySnake said it was 80's so I just followed his lead, but given the rest of the content of his post, I probably should have assumed that was wrong as well.

*un-cocks gun*

whew but yeah everything else you were saying is spot on.
 
hey I can empathize with DCEU defenders, I was a big defender of The Amazing Spider-Man 2, and Spider-Man 3 =x

Spider-man 3 is a guilty pleasure.


They're not equivalent.

The difference is that Guardians of the Galaxy, The Avengers, and Captain America: Civil War are good.

Suicide Squad and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice aren't good.


I mean Squad wasn't good, but it seems people on both sides likes to act like it didn't resonate with audiences.
 
Yellow. Prep-time Batman decided to get Robin to paint the entire inside of a room yellow, which is Green Lantern's weakness.

Yeah. The weakness is supposed to be because fear is represented with yellow, or something.

You forgot that they served him lemonade.

It was wonderful.
 
I mean Squad wasn't good, but it seems people on both sides likes to act like it didn't resonate with audiences.

If a lot of people on both sides don't think it resonated with audiences, it's a good bet that it largely did not resonate then, right?

That it did resonate with some doesn't nullify the larger group of people for whom it did not much.
 
The hate for SS was mind boggling to me because i watched it on opening night and everyone in the theater loved it. It followed the marvel formula to the tee... lots of quips and one liners that had the audience rolling, team bonding moments, charismatic leads, bad one dimensional villains, and an overall light tone that told everyone it doesnt take itself too seriously. Even the soundtrack tried to ape the Guardians of Galaxy ost which was basically comprised of popular 80s songs.

But apparently that's not good enough. People were bitching about the editing as if everyone has a masters in editing movies nowadays. All of a sudden the character development matters in comic book movies. It's perfectly fine for the Avengers to set aside their differences because some random shield agent died, but the moment SS tries to hand wave some things, it's the worst thing in the world! I remember watching Guardians and there is a scene where they literally bond over the fact that none of them have ever had friends. And they all go 'would you like to be my friend?' 'yay we are a team now!!!' That shit is just as bad as Martha.

Someone asked what was so bad about Civil War. It suffered from the same pacing issues, and disjointed narrative that BvS suffered from. It doesnt make it a bad movie, but it literally has the same problems as BvS. The overall conflict b/w the two sides wasn't fleshed out. Boring middle act. (but hey they added lots of quips!) it didnt make sense for Tony and Steve to fight each other. the main fight is literally fought over a misunderstanding. All Steve had to say was that the real villain is zemo, sit down and explain. Same problem as the BvS title fight. And yet no one cared.

I dont think Guardians, SS, BvS, or Civil War are bad movies. Ben Affleck was amazing as Batman. Just like Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. in their roles. And yet he's nominated for a Razzie while RDJ is making a $100 million per movie.

Jumping Through Hoops: The Post.
 
No.

You don't have to do it that way.

Origin movies are largely boring

Origin stories are largely boring.

Everyone in the world knows what the fuck a superhero is. You don't need to explain the concept to us for 80 minutes first. Much less build a whole movie around the superhero NOT being a superhero only to tell us he'll finally be the superhero we wanna watch in the second movie.

Just start at the second movie.

This shit isn't hard. Nobody's going to get lost if there's a Superman movie where Superman is just Superman at the beginning. Nobody's going to be hopelessly confused by a Batman movie where Batman's just Batman.

Agreed. Probably two of the most well known superheroes.... studios still think we need to be shown their origins.

It was a nice try by DC, but too little too late trying to catch up to Marvel. They need to stop trying to connect multiple movies and just go back to focusing on one picture at a time.
 
If a lot of people on both sides don't think it resonated with audiences, it's a good bet that it largely did not resonate then, right?

That it did resonate with some doesn't nullify the larger group of people for whom it did not much.


By both sides I mean it's typically a movie disliked by both sides of the do you like dceu debate.


Bobby please, the movie for better or worse was a success on multiple fronts despite its problems. If the movie didn't do well with the general audience it would have fizzled out as quickly as Apocalypse, F4, and Batman v Superman.
 
By both sides I mean it's typically a movie disliked by both sides of the do you like dceu debate.


Bobby please, the movie for better or worse was a success on multiple fronts despite its problems. If the movie didn't do well with the general audience it would have fizzled out as quickly as Apocalypse, F4, and Batman v Superman.

Another important thing to remember is that it also had no competition for nearly a full month.
 
Harley merch is all over the place.

It was bad, but it was an enjoyable kind of bad that gets people to watch.

Objectively, the worst or second-worst super-hero movie of 2016. But at least two better movies made me want them to move faster during the movie itself.
 
The hate for SS was mind boggling to me because i watched it on opening night and everyone in the theater loved it. It followed the marvel formula to the tee... lots of quips and one liners that had the audience rolling, team bonding moments, charismatic leads, bad one dimensional villains, and an overall light tone that told everyone it doesnt take itself too seriously. Even the soundtrack tried to ape the Guardians of Galaxy ost which was basically comprised of popular 80s songs.

But apparently that's not good enough. People were bitching about the editing as if everyone has a masters in editing movies nowadays. All of a sudden the character development matters in comic book movies. It's perfectly fine for the Avengers to set aside their differences because some random shield agent died, but the moment SS tries to hand wave some things, it's the worst thing in the world! I remember watching Guardians and there is a scene where they literally bond over the fact that none of them have ever had friends. And they all go 'would you like to be my friend?' 'yay we are a team now!!!' That shit is just as bad as Martha.

Someone asked what was so bad about Civil War. It suffered from the same pacing issues, and disjointed narrative that BvS suffered from. It doesnt make it a bad movie, but it literally has the same problems as BvS. The overall conflict b/w the two sides wasn't fleshed out. Boring middle act. (but hey they added lots of quips!) it didnt make sense for Tony and Steve to fight each other. the main fight is literally fought over a misunderstanding. All Steve had to say was that the real villain is zemo, sit down and explain. Same problem as the BvS title fight. And yet no one cared.

I dont think Guardians, SS, BvS, or Civil War are bad movies. Ben Affleck was amazing as Batman. Just like Chris Evans and Robert Downey Jr. in their roles. And yet he's nominated for a Razzie while RDJ is making a $100 million per movie.

I watched and liked SS when it first came out, but my first criticism of the film, both on GAF and in real life, was that the movie's editing was distractingly poor, that the soundtrack tried too hard to be on the nose, and that the movie's premise is circular; Waller creates the menace the team she advocates has to fight against. Suicide Squad's redemption over BvS is that several of the characters are actually likable in an offbeat Deadpool kind of way. Smith and Robbie have genuinely good chemistry on screen, and Deadshot/Harley are the best DCU characters outside of Batfleck. It's fun in an inoffensively incoherent kind of way, not unlike the first Transformers film. BvS is closer to Revenge of the Fallen.

Civil War's conflict isn't all that complicated, though Zemo's involvement in it is. Cap and Tony have several reasons to come to blows even before it's revealed that WS killed Tony's parents, not the least of which is Tony's support of superhero registration, which forces metahumans like Wanda to be put on involuntary lockdown "for their own safety", puts superheroes on the sideline at the UN's whims, and allows for trial-free military imprisonment of captured criminal metas. WS is a straight up fugitive and living weapon after the end of Cap 2 (because, lest we forget, he did murder dozens of people), and he's shown actively hurting innocent people both before and after he gets reprogrammed in the 3rd film; Cap's support of him is definitely a moral grey area. Tony is flabbergasted that Cap would go outside the law to protect an obvious criminal ("but Mind Control!" is only an excuse that works in actual comics, even the Hulk got in trouble for his rampage in Age of Ultron), and he's only ever trying to arrest Bucky which is the right thing to do until the very end of the film. Then he wants to murder him in a heat of the moment revenge rampage after watching his father get his face caved in and his mother have her throat crushed. Cap revealing the truth about Zemo doesn't even matter at that point, because he lied about Bucky.

At the end of the film, there is no reconciliation. Cap gives up the shield. Half of the Avengers are criminals and fugitives and hate Tony's guts. Rhodes is permanently crippled. The letter teases a possible future team-up, but there are now essentially two Avengers teams, with no indication of where Hulk and Thor will land in this mess (I'm guessing Banner isn't going to side with Ross).

Contrast with BvS, where Superman is being beaten to death by Batman because Batman thinks he might be dangerous. And Batman, despite being shown as a remorseless killer throughout the film, has a change of heart on a dime because of ONE word that's a complete coincidence. And then he and Clark instantly become buddies who crack jokes side by side, for the 10 minutes of the film before Superman is killed, and Batman is suddenly his biggest supporter at his funeral. They met for literally 1 minute before they became mortal foes, and were friends for literally 1 hour of real time, in universe, before Batman decided to spend his remaining days living in Superman's honor. Same with Diana. The character development is more rushed than Green Lantern or Thor 1.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom