The Wizard
Member
Adventure games in general tend to be better written than other genres and thus have better realized female characters. In fact a lot of these tropes being discussed stem from bad / lazy writing.
I guess in films the division between "niche" and "blockbuster" is not as clearcut as it is in gaming? I don't watch many "blockbuster" films, but i never feel like i'm avoiding them on purpose or that 'm searching for more obscure stuff, i just watch what inspires me.I think the same really applies to gaming. AAA games are very rarely going to have unattractive females in lead roles (if they have lead roles).
Actually there are a lot of very good female characters in more niches stuff. Especially in less action heavy genres like adventure games. However i thought the main complaint of the topic is that such characters should be part of mainstream gaming and not niche. While i think this is going to happen in the future i doubt there will be a lot of unatractive females.
Again I must ask, what is considered attractive? Maybe I should stay out of this conversation, but it's that part of me that nagging to ask. Mainly do to the fact that I have a different vision of what is attractive, compared to a majority of gamers.
Because technically, this would mean I've been playing video games with unattractive leads for as long as I've been gaming.
Refusing to play a game just because the lead isn't attractive is a stupid reason, sorry, especially if it's just in regard to female characters.
I guess in films the division between "niche" and "blockbuster" is not as clearcut as it is in gaming? I don't watch many "blockbuster" films, but i never feel like i'm avoiding them on purpose or that 'm searching for more obscure stuff, i just watch what inspires me.
In gaming, to just play 2d indie games would feel different and there isn't a big middle field between them and Resident Evil 6.
Maybe that's just a perception i have, though.
And look, it's not like i don't want attractive people in lead roles or anything, i'm just saying having some ugly characters is totally ok, if it fits the role.
Having a fat slob to play a fat slob is alright.
I actually thought that was meant to be funny. Didn't even know that it created a little scandal.And even this game supposedly needs shots like these:
So what does that tell us?
I think Heavy Rain actually did this.i've been thinking about this problem. if i was leading a game i guess what i'd do is what a handful of studios already do, in that some companies don't design their characters until they've cast their actors. that'd help a bit, because you'd introduce traits and physical imperfections. it'd help you ground things a bit more. cast gender blind if the role doesn't need to be one or the other. same with race, and so on.
that way you're just allowing acting talent to decide that stuff. even though you'd still probably have mostly attractive people, at least the women wouldn't all have comical breasts and flawless features and skin, etc. not if you want a good *actor* anyway.
i've been thinking about this problem. if i was leading a game i guess what i'd do is what a handful of studios already do, in that some companies don't design their characters until they've cast their actors. that'd help a bit, because you'd introduce traits and physical imperfections. it'd help you ground things a bit more. cast gender blind if the role doesn't need to be one or the other. same with race, and so on.
that way you're just allowing acting talent to decide that stuff. even though you'd still probably have mostly attractive people, at least the women wouldn't all have comical breasts and flawless features and skin, etc. not if you want a good *actor* anyway.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/184/961/tumblr_lnvvueuSsj1qcj56b.png?1318394475[IMG]
Sorry, maybe that picture is a little too personal. I really should've just said I don't agree.
[/QUOTE]
Sorry if it was offensive, it's not like i'm thin myself anyway.
I'll edit it out if you want.
I guess in films the division between "niche" and "blockbuster" is not as clearcut as it is in gaming? I don't watch many "blockbuster" films, but i never feel like i'm avoiding them on purpose or that 'm searching for more obscure stuff, i just watch what inspires me.
In gaming, to just play 2d indie games would feel different and there isn't a big middle field between them and Resident Evil 6.
Maybe that's just a perception i have, though.
And look, it's not like i don't want attractive people in lead roles or anything, i'm just saying having some ugly characters is totally ok, if it fits the role.
Having a fat slob to play a fat slob is alright.
I think the same applies to gaming. AAA games are very rarely going to have unattractive females in lead roles (if they have lead roles).
Actually there are a lot of very good female characters in more niche stuff. Especially in less action heavy genres like adventure games (and surprise, those also tend to be popular with women). However i thought the main complaint of the topic is that such characters should be part of mainstream gaming and not niche. While i think this is going to happen in the future i doubt there will be a lot of unatractive females.
Refusing to play the game because the character isn't female is a worst reason imo. There's no reason that Alice madness shouldn't have been a big seller along with heavenly sword....Well at least alice madness anyway.Refusing to play a game just because the lead isn't attractive is a stupid reason, sorry, especially if it's just in regard to female characters.
Well i draw, and i know that i'm always inclined to draw the most attractive characters/things possible, as a gut feeling, but unless you are putting your stuff together in a weekend, it's not hard to override that process and actually give your character's appereance a correlation to its inner character and place in the story.
If i were to draw a 50 years old hooker crackhead, i wouldn't draw her like a super hot female, even though it's fun to draw beautiful things.
And in the end, i think it'd be more fun to give every character some quirk and imperfection, even on the exterior side.
Which doesn't mean having only ugly characters, as when you walk down the street, there are plenty of good looking people around anyway, it just shouldn't become a taboo like it is for a lot of people.
Sorry if it was offensive, it's not like i'm thin myself anyway.
I'll edit it out if you want.
How so?Question, is this talk about woman attractiveness sexist?
You don't have to edit it out. I should keep in mind there is a difference between a Fat woman, and a fat slob.
How so?
Yeah i used "fat slob" as a (genderless, btw) desciption of a lousy character, Lebowski style, that is also obese.
I'm sorry sometimes it's hard to tell how offensive or appropriate a term is, in English, since it's not my mother language (and there are plenty of differences between England and the US alone).
That's stupid. I'm a girl who doesn't mind talking what her ideal woman's body would look like. Everyone has preferences.To quit a large number of feminist, men discussing woman's beauty is sexist. Anita herself is apart of that demographic of feminist. I can't remember which video it was, but she went on about how men shouldn't be inspired by the beauty of women. I still think that's dumb as that is a hinder to art. People should be inspired by what ever the fuck they want to Anita, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean you get to be a bitch about it.
It's alright, I should've made my point more clear as well. I actually wouldn't mind seeing a plus size character in a video game that wasn't a Joke. Bob from Tekken 6 is a good example of this. He looks like an average over weight guy who fights on some serious shit. I loved that his ending was him getting depressed that he lost the weight.
Wasn't there quite a bit of critical backlash within the feminist gamer community to Fat Princess? That's probably one of the few fat female leads in gaming recently and instead of being welcomed by the parts of the feminist community it was attacked and criticised.
The goal of the game was to make your own princess fat to make her heavier to kidnap. I thought it was hilarious.was the character put in a positive light (i don't know the game)? I can kind of understand the critisism if the "being fat" part was only used to make fun of the character
The goal of the game was to make your own princess fat to make her heavier to kidnap. I thought it was hilarious.
To quit a large number of feminist, men discussing woman's beauty is sexist. Anita herself is apart of that demographic of feminist. I can't remember which video it was, but she went on about how men shouldn't be inspired by the beauty of women. I still think that's dumb as that is a hinder to art. People should be inspired by what ever the fuck they want to Anita, just because you don't like it, doesn't mean you get to be a bitch about it.
She brought up female characters who only exist in stories to motivate/inspire a male character as a trope that's overused in storytelling. I don't think she actually takes issue with men being inspired by women or beauty in general, and I certainly don't think that she's dictating what artists are allowed to be inspired by in real life, lol
http://sodisarmingdarling.tumblr.co...isagrees-with-woman-makes-game-about-punching
It seems as if discussion elsewhere on the internet is proceeding smoothly. Jesus.
The goal of the game was to make your own princess fat to make her heavier to kidnap. I thought it was hilarious.
This is another moment where someone has to explain Anita's video for her. Not saying there is anything wrong for you doing that, but the fact still remains about her ability to write. It should be right there in the video, instead it sound more like that's exactly what she meant when she said men shouldn't be inspired by a woman's beauty. This, again, is why I don't want her doing this.
Tropes vs. Women is a six-part video series by Feminist Frequency that explores the reoccurring stories, themes and representations of women in Hollywood films and TV shows.
The Manic Pixie Dream Girl is a cute, bubbly, young (usually white) woman who has recently entered the life of our brooding hero to teach him how to loosen up and enjoy life. While that might sound all well and good for the man, this trope leaves women as simply there to support the star on his journey of self discovery with no real life of her own.
Refusing to play the game because the character isn't female is a worst reason imo. There's no reason that Alice madness shouldn't have been a big seller along with heavenly sword....Well at least alice madness anyway.
Just to be sure that we're discussing the same video, is it "#1 The Manic Pixie Dream Girl (Tropes vs. Women)"?
The Manic Pixie Dream Girl is really a muse who exists to be the inspiration for the troubled, tortured man. In fact we should talk about this whole idea of a muse which is the foundation for this trope. For centuries male filmmakers, writers, painters, artists of all kinds have often cited women as the inspiration for their brilliant masterpieces.
I swear if I hear one more story like this Im going to scream. Or puke. Or both.
Women are not here for mens inspiration or celebration or whatever else. We are musicians and artists and writers with our own brilliant and creative endeavors. But you wouldnt know that from the Manic Pixie Dream Girl trope.
Actually he's right about her using this trope to make a larger point about men citing women as inspiration.
Near the end of the video:
Well if were going by real life personas most people don't want to be with real chicks that considered unattractive, even if they aren't trying to bang them thats just how it is. Its just harder for a man to like an ugly female than the reverse,but that something I respect woman for since more of them can see whats on the inside first(yes there are many of exceptions but meh)
Actually he's right about her using this trope to make a larger point about men citing women as inspiration.
Near the end of the video:
Ah, I stand corrected; I forgot about that bit towards the end. It still comes across as a minor tangent that doesn't change the overall point of the video.
So ehm.. some of you guys (Grizz, tkscz, etc) don't agree with her videos (as a general stance) or with the position of females in gaming as a whole? Because the two things CAN be considered separated.
Even if you don't agree with her analysis, you can agree with the general premise?
I've stated this many times before: the representation of women in video games is far from ideal. There is not enough variety, there's room for many more interesting and lead females, and their depictions could afford to be much less sexual in general.
What I disagree with is the way Anita is approaching the issue - telling us who fits what trope isn't helpful or useful in any way, especially since we can do this easily on our own. We already established that tropes as a concept are neutral, but the tone of her overall presentation says she believes otherwise.
I've stated this many times before: the representation of women in video games is far from ideal. There is not enough variety, there's room for many more interesting and lead females, and their depictions could afford to be much less sexual in general.
What I disagree with is the way Anita is approaching the issue - telling us who fits what trope isn't helpful or useful in any way, especially since we can do this easily on our own. We already established that tropes as a concept are neutral, but the tone of her overall presentation says she believes otherwise.
I think tkscz would say pretty much the same thing.
So ehm.. some of you guys (Grizz, tkscz, etc) don't agree with her videos (as a general stance) or with the position of females in gaming as a whole? Because the two things CAN be considered separated.
Even if you don't agree with her analysis, you can agree with the general premise?
tropes as a concept are neutral from a good writing vs bad writing perspective. that isn't to say that certain tropes aren't reinforcing harmful gender roles if they're allowed to appear the 'norm' though. just a distinction i think it's fair to make. a trope can contain a potentially harmful gender stereotype. it's not bad because it's a trope, it's bad because it's a harmful stereotype.
Actually he's right about her using this trope to make a larger point about men citing women as inspiration.
Wait, so if we're actually inspired by a woman to create something, are we supposed to just... lie about it, or something?
Well i have only seen a couple of videos of her (one being the pixie one) and i think she had some good to decent points, as well as some questionable to awful ones.
In the end i haven't found them very compelling so i stopped caring (which is what most of the "haters" should simply do, imo) but i think the discussion itself is very interesting and worth having, so in that sense, it's been a positive influence, if anything for bringing attention to the issue.
If i had to give a damn about every blogger/youtuber i didn't find compelling enough, i'd have hanged myself by now.
Wasn't there quite a bit of critical backlash within the feminist gamer community to Fat Princess? That's probably one of the few fat female leads in gaming recently and instead of being welcomed by the parts of the feminist community it was attacked and criticised.
Others have said it, but the problem with Fat Princess is she's not a lead, she's the 'flag' in a game of 'capture the flag'. It's a fun game, but there really isn't much more that could be done to have the character be objectified, which was the main complaint.
But see you are a woman, lesbian at that, so it's cool. Men just do it to objectify women.That's stupid. I'm a girl who doesn't mind talking what her ideal woman's body would look like. Everyone has preferences.
I wish it were that cut and dry cause. Hell you can be the biggest misandrist in the world and still be called a feminist.Let's get one thing straight before we go on.
World English Dictionary
feminist (ˈfɛmɪnɪst)
— n
1. a person who advocates equal rights for women
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminist
So anyone here not a feminist?
One of my lesbian friends objectifies attractive women.But see you are a woman, lesbian at that, so it's cool. Men just do it to objectify women.
I'm pretty sure that women also talk about what the ideal man would look like.But see you are a woman, lesbian at that, so it's cool. Men just do it to objectify women.
I wish it were that cut and dry cause you can be the biggest misandrist in the world and still be called a feminist.
note: my web browser don't even recognize the word lol.
I'm pretty sure that women also talk about what the ideal man would look like.
Again, "feminist" is not a singular brained entity, it's stupid to generalise like that, just like it's stupid to do it with any other group.But that's not sexist according to feminist. It's why I can't support the majority of feminist. While they try and stand against sexism, they themselves are sexist.
But that's not sexist according to feminist. It's why I can't support the majority of feminist. While they try and stand against sexism, they themselves are sexist.
Anita Sarkeesian said:The Manic Pixie Dream Girl is really a muse who exists to be the inspiration for the troubled, tortured man. In fact we should talk about this whole idea of a muse which is the foundation for this trope. For centuries male filmmakers, writers, painters, artists of all kinds have often cited women as the inspiration for their brilliant masterpieces.
I swear if I hear one more story like this Im going to scream. Or puke. Or both.
Women are not here for mens inspiration or celebration or whatever else. We are musicians and artists and writers with our own brilliant and creative endeavours. But you wouldnt know that from the Manic Pixie Dream Girl trope.