• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Trump Finally Surpasses Clinton In National Poll

Status
Not open for further replies.
"I have the biggest, longest, girthiest poll. Other polls don't come close. Mexico and China aren't sending their best polls. Neither are the Muslims. Sad!"
 
And yes I know this poll is bullshit, Seeing Trump possibly winning is like standing on a 500 foot ledge. There's always that little voice in your head saying, "Jump!"
 
Trump's numbers seem to be surging and dropping as he gets the Republicans to give in and then pisses them off, and then gets them to give in again.
 
Political polls can call cell phones.

But young people screen their calls more and are probably more likely to hang up on a pollster.

Correct. I get called by pollsters all the time. I always make sure I have the time to go through it but I totally understand why most people my age wouldn't.

That Ras poll has them tied with voters under 40.

Chances of that happening = 0

Ras doesn't let you view the crosstabs without a subscription. Do you know how the preferences split by race? Last poll I saw where Trump was doing well, he was polling in the 30s among Hispanics (lol).
 
Ras doesn't let you view the crosstabs without a subscription. Do you know how the preferences split by race? Last poll I saw where Trump was doing well, he was polling in the 30s among Hispanics (lol).

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch

They talk about some of the poll there. All they mention on minorities is this:

Clinton continues to hold a wide lead among blacks. Trump leads among whites and other minority voters.
 
I've always wondered why Rasmussen bothers to publish reports that are way out of line with every other reporter considering Rasmussen never gets it right. When you look up "statistical noise" in the dictionary, you see a picture of Rasmussen Polling.
 
I've always wondered why Rasmussen bothers to publish reports that are way out of line with every other reporter considering Rasmussen never gets it right. When you look up "statistical noise" in the dictionary, you see a picture of Rasmussen Polling.

Rasmussen usually has right-leaning results. It isn't noise because they are consistently wrong.
 
Lol Rasmussen again.

How many people are going to fall for them this year? Polls in 2012 also showed Obama uniformly up EXCEPT for Ras (and Gallup) saying "no no, it'll be a Romney landslide!" At least Gallup had the sense to refrain from horse race polling after that.
 
Lol Rasmussen again.

How many people are going to fall for them this year? Polls in 2012 also showed Obama uniformly up EXCEPT for Ras (and Gallup) saying "no no, it'll be a Romney landslide!" At least Gallup had the sense to refrain from horse race polling after that.

Only a nine point swing in one week, no big deal.
 
I like how people won't look to the absolute torrent of polls showing Clinton in the lead, but will look to the one pollster showing a huge Trump lead, forgetting the wonderful com Rasmussen pulled on the right in 2012.
 
I've always wondered why Rasmussen bothers to publish reports that are way out of line with every other reporter considering Rasmussen never gets it right. When you look up "statistical noise" in the dictionary, you see a picture of Rasmussen Polling.

Don't know about the rest of Fox News, but I know Hannity regularly has the guy on his shows.
 
Fact. When they revealed for the millionth time that there was no wrongdoing and that there was nothing new found she was sunk.

Fact: She put a US Ambassador in a hostile and unstable country.

Fact: She failed to provide adequate security for that ambassador and he ended up dead.

No wrong doing there, just horrible leadership.
 
Fact: She put a US Ambassador in a hostile and unstable country.

Fact: She failed to provide adequate security for that ambassador and he ended up dead.

No wrong doing there, just horrible leadership.

jv1DYLU.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom