Meanwhile, PPP has Clinton up by 4, Fox News has her up by 6, and Reuters has her up by 10.
Meanwhile, PPP has Clinton up by 4, Fox News has her up by 6, and Reuters has her up by 10.
Yesterday's news friend. Benghazi report destroyed her.
Yesterday's news friend. Benghazi report destroyed her.
Yesterday's news friend. Benghazi report destroyed her.
Telephone survey. Land lines. They're polling a bunch of 60+ year-olds.
Cnn: 54-41 Clinton
http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/04/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-poll-general-election/index.html
Regardless, it's too early for general election polls.
Seriously? That polls a month old.
Political polls can call cell phones.Telephone survey. Land lines. They're polling a bunch of 60+ year-olds.
Political polls can call cell phones.
But young people screen their calls more and are probably more likely to hang up on a pollster.
That Ras poll has them tied with voters under 40.
Chances of that happening = 0
Ras doesn't let you view the crosstabs without a subscription. Do you know how the preferences split by race? Last poll I saw where Trump was doing well, he was polling in the 30s among Hispanics (lol).
Clinton continues to hold a wide lead among blacks. Trump leads among whites and other minority voters.
I'd like to know what they're considering as other minorities.http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch
They talk about some of the poll there. All they mention on minorities is this:
Why are you quoting me?Seriously? That polls a month old.
I've always wondered why Rasmussen bothers to publish reports that are way out of line with every other reporter considering Rasmussen never gets it right. When you look up "statistical noise" in the dictionary, you see a picture of Rasmussen Polling.
Well, I don't get why this thead got bumped if the poll is a month old then. Someone just reminising over old times?
Well, I don't get why this thead got bumped if the poll is a month old then. Someone just reminising over old times?
Well, I don't get why this thead got bumped if the poll is a month old then. Someone just reminising over old times?
Probably Hillbillies....or rather, Trumpbillies.I'd like to know what they're considering as other minorities.
Lol Rasmussen again.
How many people are going to fall for them this year? Polls in 2012 also showed Obama uniformly up EXCEPT for Ras (and Gallup) saying "no no, it'll be a Romney landslide!" At least Gallup had the sense to refrain from horse race polling after that.
Yes, I can totally see Trump leading with Latinos. /shttp://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/white_house_watch
They talk about some of the poll there. All they mention on minorities is this:
The same ones they polled earlier when Clinton polled higher
Rass's polls are anywhere between 6-10% points in republicans favor. No I don't trust them anymore
I've always wondered why Rasmussen bothers to publish reports that are way out of line with every other reporter considering Rasmussen never gets it right. When you look up "statistical noise" in the dictionary, you see a picture of Rasmussen Polling.
Last time i heard Trump was finished
Fact. When they revealed for the millionth time that there was no wrongdoing and that there was nothing new found she was sunk.
Fact: She put a US Ambassador in a hostile and unstable country.
Fact: She failed to provide adequate security for that ambassador and he ended up dead.
No wrong doing there, just horrible leadership.
Ras always brings the jokes.Clinton continues to hold a wide lead among blacks. Trump leads among whites and other minority voters.