The article is primarily focused on Alison Rapp. As I understand it, this is the most mainstream coverage this harassment has received. Hopefully it can help put an end to it.
Excerpts:
Please note, the full article discusses recent allegations regarding Rapp's second job. I'd appreciate if, in discussing this, we can refrain from any shaming of her or of women.
Full article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-online-harassment-tactic-is-ruining-careers/
See also:
WaPo's article on GamerGate, "The only guide to GamerGate you'll ever need to read":
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...mergate-you-will-ever-need-to-read/?tid=a_inl
Please lock if old or if inappropriate. I felt WaPo's handling of the subject was very thoughtful.
MOD NOTE This (this thread and this forum) isn't the place to talk about the details of anything dug up about Alison Rapp, or indeed anyone who's been targeted by this type of harassment. Nobody's gonna weigh your intent too closely on this sort of thing, so please refrain.
Excerpts:
There are literal textbooks for online harassment, the original dating back to 1999. These “ruin-life” guides include tactics from doxing and SWATing to placing endangering or annoying ads in online classifieds.
As popular as those techniques remain, however, online harassers have learned that they can cause far more damage with a slightly less flashy and more methodical approach — you might even say the “hottest new trend” in harassment is opposition research.
The Intersect
This horrifying and newly trendy online-harassment tactic is ruining careers
Resize Text Print Article Comments 31 Book mark article Read later list
Saved to Reading List
By Caitlin Dewey April 11 at 3:00 PM
(Twitter)
There are literal textbooks for online harassment, the original dating back to 1999. These “ruin-life” guides include tactics from doxing and SWATing to placing endangering or annoying ads in online classifieds.
As popular as those techniques remain, however, online harassers have learned that they can cause far more damage with a slightly less flashy and more methodical approach — you might even say the “hottest new trend” in harassment is opposition research.
[In the battle of Internet mobs vs. the law, the Internet mobs have won]
The latest high-profile victim is Alison Rapp, formerly a spokesperson for Nintendo of America. Rapp has been in the crosshairs of an online mob since fall, when Nintendo changed several female characters in American versions of its games to make them less sexual. Critics wrongly assumed that Rapp, an outspoken feminist, was involved, and launched a very public investigation into her personal life. In between deconstructing her Amazon wishlist, surfacing anonymous social accounts and circulating copies of her undergraduate thesis, the self-styled investigators also found evidence that Rapp was working a mysterious second job — for which she was fired from Ninetendo on March 30.
They fail to recognize that just because someone makes a product that is publicly accessible — or worse, because someone is tangentially and distantly involved in the making of a product that is publicly accessible — does not mean that they themselves should be, in their entirety, accessible to the public. And the mere fact that something can be publicized is not ethical justification for doing it.
Please note, the full article discusses recent allegations regarding Rapp's second job. I'd appreciate if, in discussing this, we can refrain from any shaming of her or of women.
Full article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-online-harassment-tactic-is-ruining-careers/
See also:
WaPo's article on GamerGate, "The only guide to GamerGate you'll ever need to read":
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...mergate-you-will-ever-need-to-read/?tid=a_inl
Please lock if old or if inappropriate. I felt WaPo's handling of the subject was very thoughtful.
MOD NOTE This (this thread and this forum) isn't the place to talk about the details of anything dug up about Alison Rapp, or indeed anyone who's been targeted by this type of harassment. Nobody's gonna weigh your intent too closely on this sort of thing, so please refrain.