• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

What is the best looking PS3 game so far?

Guantletfans love for MGS4.

"I'm calling you out for declaring a title a technical showcase when it really isn't."

--

"Dynamic shadows are hardly anything new, and they have been done better. Similarly, lighting a normal mapped face with a dynamic light source is hardly pushing new grounds in terms of technology."

---

"We could talk about standard features which MGS doesn't have - ambient occlusion baked into the environments for one, or any complex environment shaders on surfaces in-game. Normal maps are clearly generated using a 2D image cool, and the poly-count on props and objects is very low."

---

"How is it a technical marvel when it moves substantially less polygons than many other titles, consistently suffers from slowdown (sub 30fps) and has jagged, pixelated shadows? You can call it a marvel of art direction, but a technical marvel it certainly is not. (Also, a true technical marvel would not require an install every time you want to replay a level, but I digress..)"

---

"It impresses in cutscenes, but in-game it's not up there with the best this gen has offered."

---

"No. I finished MGS 4 this weekend and there are many action titles with better gameplay already on the market, and there will be many to come this year."

---

"MGS 4 doesn't come close to Uncharted in terms of tech, they are like a generation apart."

---

"MGS 4 is open to exactly the same criticism as this Bond title - MGS as a game is stunning, yet if we take a critical approach it suffers from poor lighting, simplistic environment geometry, lack of (or very basic) shader usage and low texture resolution, yet stating these things is taboo on this site."



All the above were from the first page of his post history.


---

But in regards to Ghost Buster.

"This looks really, really good. Very impressed."

---

In regards to Call of Duty: World at War.

"Trailer looks great, certainly better from a technical perspective than several big titles everyone has been gushing over on this forum."

---

To COD4.

"I'd put COD 4 up there with Uncharted and Ratchet. There are several moments where it can look indistinguishable from real life."

---

Dead Space.

"Looks gorgeous in motion, can't wait for this game. Neogaf keep on hatin..."

---

Bourne Conspiracy.

"This game looks really gorgeous in places.. the first level, walking around the french bars and cafes, amazing stuff - great sound design too. The game itself is proving a lot of fun"

---

Lost Via Domus.

"Graphically it had some stunning moments (best looking Jungle environments on a console, IMO)"

---

Uncharted.

"Oh hell no. :lol

Uncharted was a fun game but had typically abysmal videogame-level storytelling and cardboard characters."


---

God Hand.

"Game is trash"

---

F1 Championship PS3.

"The last F1 game on the PS3 was abysmal."

---

Crackdown and Rataouille.

"Crackdown is the best platformer of the past few years.

Ratatouille was actually pretty good.. ridiculously hard though (just try the demo)"


---

Jab at GT5P

"Yep. This is the first true 'next gen' looking racer, those replays look like CG in many instances."

---

Heavenly Sword.

"I've yet to play this game all the way through, but I do remember this being hyped to the high heavens by GAF when it came out. So no-one likes it now?"



Other MGS4 comments.


---

"Summary of this thread: EDGE give game I don't like a 10, EDGE's reviews standards must have changed.

EDGE's standards haven't changed, games have. There's a lot more high quality software around..."


---

"So Eurogamer and Edge are lambasted for being 'worthless' and 'not to be trusted' but everyone puts credence in Famitsu, the giant advertising pamphlet, now?

:lol Oh, Gaf"


---

"How so? it obviously isn't pushing the machine from a technical perspective.. aliasing problems, simple shaders and poly counts. "

---

"GRID has always been a day one purchase for me, but it's great to see it getting these spectacular reviews, congrats Codemasters. MGS 4 always seemed like an '8' to me"




And all the above comments (second batch) are from the first 3 pages of his post history.




Anyone notice a pattern? :lol I really think he needs to give the MGS4 (or PS3 exclusive) bashing a rest. I wish he'd offer the same level of leniency or optimism to PS3 exclusives as he does other games.
 
Luigison said:
I loved Excite bike so I'm considering Motorstorm. What's the news on Motorstorm 2?
Excite Truck and Motorstorm may look pretty similar in their settings. And they're both arcade racer. But their gameplay are completely different. Excite Bike is a combo game, you have to make the biggest score possible by doing crazy jumps and going trough trees.

Motorstorm is more of a survival racing game. You're constantly battling the environement and the opponents to stay on tracks, you have a lot of alternante path and differents vehicules which makes the game extremely varied despites its lack of tracks.

Both are awesome, but just don't go buying Motorstorm expecting Excite Truck, it's not the same game at all. It's like playing Ninja Gaiden expecting DMC. Yes, both are kick ass action games, but they're very different take on the genre.

Luigison said:
Can Imsomniac still make Spyro games? Their PS versions were fun, but other developers lost something. I'm sure Insomniac would make a very good looking Spyro now. I'd definetly buy a new Spyro game if Insomniac made it. Are they working on Resistance 2 now?
No the licence belongs to Universal now, unless Universal orders Insomniac to make a new Spyro it's not going to happen. But Insomniac doesn't belong to Sony, so who knows? I still think they'd rather make a Resistance or Ratchet and keep their freedom though.
 
Good god man, that is creepy.

Jesus. Instead of discussing the technical side of things you spend a half hour digging through irrelevant posts in order to achieve.. what? nothing you have quoted is relevant to this discussion. Next time I need a heads up I am talking to a loony, GAF.
 
Luigison said:
1. Uncharted definitely gets the number one spot. I just downloaded the demo yesterday. Got my PS3 Tuesday.
2. GT5p is probably the most photo realistic. I'm not into racing games, but I'll probably try this when my brothers and I get together.
3. To me Ratchet & Clank: Tools of Destruction looks better than MGS4. I love the colors and textures of R&C and it's fun to play.
4. MGS4 has too much brown and gray from what I've seen, but I haven't opened it yet so I'm only basing this on images I've seen on the web now. I reserve the right to rerank it later.

I think you should play through MGS4 and Uncharted before making comments like this. Making an assessment based on screenshots is not the best way to go with MGS4. It looks far better in motion when you can see the graphical effects that aren't as obvious in static screenshots. Uncharted also has much more to show you than in the demo. That wasn' even the entire level.
 
Metalmurphy said:
It's actually pretty easy to see they're dynamic as most of the the shadows "tremble" a bit on the edges, probably due to the upscale going on.
I don't think that's an artifact of upscaling. The quality of the shadows seems rather dynamic and adjusts itself depending on distance and angle. This is EXTREMELY common, however. Assassin's Creed, GRAW, and lots of other games using fully dynamic shadows have the same issue. Uncharted was a nice exception to that, however, as its method of casting shadows was on par with the likes of Crysis, believe it or not. Crysis was also quite variable, however, as it WAS a PC title. It can look insane if you tweak it properly, but it can also look really bad (and can be disabled).
 
GauntletFan said:
Good god man, that is creepy.

Jesus. Instead of discussing the technical side of things you spend a half hour digging through irrelevant posts in order to achieve.. what? nothing you have quoted is relevant to this discussion. Next time I need a heads up I am talking to a loony, GAF.

I don't know about technical aspects, but I know what I see. MGS4 looks great, and your arguments look like shit.
 
1- Uncharted
UnchartedPic.jpg


2- Metal Gear Solid 4
nospacemgs4kojima.jpg


3- Super Stardust HD
stardust_03.jpg


4- Rachet n Clank Future
697668150_3c93376cfc.jpg


5- GT5 Prologue
2329079929_f06603e8e7.jpg
 
fortified_concept said:
Don't start with post histories when the list is as weak as this. Plus yours isn't better either, don't make me start quoting your "MGS4 can be done on X360" posts.

Yet you forget to mention i did say Uncharted isn't possible on the x360.
 
dark10x said:
I don't think that's an artifact of upscaling. The quality of the shadows seems rather dynamic and adjusts itself depending on distance and angle. This is EXTREMELY common, however. Assassin's Creed, GRAW, and lots of other games using fully dynamic shadows have the same issue. Uncharted was a nice exception to that, however, as its method of casting shadows was on par with the likes of Crysis, believe it or not. Crysis was also quite variable, however, as it WAS a PC title. It can look insane if you tweak it properly, but it can also look really bad (and can be disabled).

Iit's been a while but I seem to remember Call Of Juarez having impressive realtime shadows also. I can't recall if they used the cascade method, but I don't remember much glitching. I might be wrong though, it's been a while since I looked at it.
 
I'm not a big fan of Uncharted but the upriver motorboat sequence looked way beyond than anything else on the system.
 
Of the games I've played and the time I've spent playing them, Skate. is the best looking game on the PS3.

Granted I haven't played past a few levels of Uncharted, don't own MGS4 yet, and I've only played the demo version of Prologue.
 
Skate looks considerably better on 360.

For me it has to be Uncharted, that game looks unbelievable, I love MGS4, but I don't think it's all that great visually.
 
stuburns said:
Skate looks considerably better on 360.
I don't think so. They look the same to me, the PS3 might even look a touch better, but the 360 version does run better by far. Here is hoping Skate2 can have a nice constant frame rate and add several new features.
 
DCharlie said:
ii've been incredibly impressed with Resistance, MGS4 and Uncharted. What sound system you running, J ?

Just a simple Onkyo receiver and polk speakers with self powered sub. 7.1 config. Nothing special as I was waiting on the new Denon gear, but never got around to replacing it as this does the trick just fine. Once I see how much space I'd have in a new home it'll dictate where to go from there. Hopefully Denon has some fancier stuff out then. Haven't decided on speakers.
 
Does anyone understand how Uncharted can get those visual textures consistently everywhere in the game and also have ZERO install time and space? I don't get it. What is this magic tech that they're using?

No idea, though Naughty Dog really are in a league of their own when it comes to console developers. Hell, I think even Gabe one time managed to give them props. They claim they have lots of headroom yet with the PS3, guess we'll see how Uncharted 2 ends up. Hopefully they keep the same formula to it as well, with perhaps more platforming, more story, and more action. Nate's the man as well! Uncharted wasn't just a graphical and audio powerhouse though, it really was a damn fun game. Very summer blockbuster-ish.
 
I think a lot of people need to go back and play Uncharted again. Cut scenes aside, MGS4 comes 2nd or third place in my opinion. It looks great at times but If you played the game you would notice a lot a flat textures that look straight out of a ps2 game.
 
yea i've argued with him many times about fable 2's graphics. They are good but not great if you ask me. He thinks otherwise, which is fine.
 
King_Slender said:
Agreed - Uncharted blows it away, IMO. The character models are insane, but much of the environment is meh.
parts of Act 2 had flat textures, but Shadow Mosas Was Incredible. Especially with the blizzard going on
 
AmMortal said:
gt5versusreality.jpg

GT5 wins from every other console game.
I really don't understand how people can look at comparisons like this and think GT5 looks even remotely close. If anything, it just emphasises how much further we have to go before games get close to looking photorealistic.
 
The point is that it's greatly closer than any other game on the market, and perhaps any other that will be for this generation.
 
andrewfee said:
I really don't understand how people can look at comparisons like this and think GT5 looks even remotely close. If anything, it just emphasises how much further we have to go before games get close to looking photorealistic.
Show that picture to someone who is not versed in CG, you'll understand then.
 
fortified_concept said:
It's God of War 3 actually. Btw in case anyone missed it check out the 4th paragraph from this CowboyAstronaut post.


And? I said it and I'll stand by it.

Did I hit a nerve? If you want to jump on me for thinking MGS4 doesn't have the best graphics ever then by all means go ahead.

Metal Gear Solid 4 does not look better than Resident Evil 5 graphically, but you can have your opinion. Resident Evil 5 is on the PS3 and it looks better graphically than MGS4. Is Resident Evil 5 suddenly not a PS3 game or it shouldn't be counted for some bizarre reason? RE5 as a multi-platform game just looks better.

Also, can I laugh at you for mentioning God of War when none of us here even know what the damn thing looks like? Although, in your defense, God of War 3 probably will look better than most titles this generation, but until we see it, bringing it up is a total joke.

Oh and in regards to Fable 2 I suppose you think Fable 2 doesn't look better because it doesn't use a realistic art style like MGS4 does? Fable 2, from a purely graphical standpoint, looks better than MGS4. I think you're more impressed with the production values and art direction and how that heightens the effectiveness of the overall visual package. As a result of that you are convinced that MGS4 represents the best visuals we've seen on the PS3 or 360 this generation. I'm not saying MGS4 isn't easily one of the best, I just don't believe it IS the best. I'm not even saying you're wrong, but I'll respect your opinion and you respect mine.

Scoobs, I'm a little confused because I'm not sure if you're talking about me or somebody else, but it would be pretty difficult to argue with you about fable 2's graphics when I have no idea who you are and I'm positive I've never spoken to you before unless of course you know who I am in person and just happen to know my GAF alias, but other than that possibility, I really have no idea who you are. I've definitely had conversations regarding how good I thought Fable 2 looked, but nothing that I would ever classify as being in the realm of an argument.

I'm assuming now that this is the reason you private messaged me the other day?
 
CowboyAstronaut said:
Resident Evil 5 is on the PS3 and it looks better graphically than MGS4. Is Resident Evil 5 suddenly not a PS3 game or it shouldn't be counted for some bizarre reason?
Does it not even having a solid release year count? Although that isn't that bizzare of a reason. RE5 does look great, but it completely irrelevant to this discussion since it isn't out.
 
Thread title: What is the best looking PS3 game so far? lol @ these joke posts (I sincerely hope) that are listing unreleased games.

Also, this thread? It sucks. There is a general consensus (Uncharted, MGS4, GT, R&C) but the fights here that are getting started over nothing are sigh-worthy.
 
CowboyAstronaut said:
And? I said it and I'll stand by it.

Did I hit a nerve? If you want to jump on me for thinking MGS4 doesn't have the best graphics ever then by all means go ahead.

Metal Gear Solid 4 does not look better than Resident Evil 5 graphically, but you can have your opinion. Resident Evil 5 is on the PS3 and it looks better graphically than MGS4. Is Resident Evil 5 suddenly not a PS3 game or it shouldn't be counted for some bizarre reason? RE5 as a multi-platform game just looks better.

Also, can I laugh at you for mentioning God of War when none of us here even know what the damn thing looks like? Although, in your defense, God of War 3 probably will look better than most titles this generation, but until we see it, bringing it up is a total joke.

Oh and in regards to Fable 2 I suppose you think Fable 2 doesn't look better because it doesn't use a realistic art style like MGS4 does? Fable 2, from a purely graphical standpoint, looks better than MGS4. I think you're more impressed with the production values and art direction and how that heightens the effectiveness of the overall visual package. As a result of that you are convinced that MGS4 represents the best visuals we've seen on the PS3 or 360 this generation. I'm not saying MGS4 isn't easily one of the best, I just don't believe it IS the best. I'm not even saying you're wrong, but I'll respect your opinion and you respect mine.

It bothers me because your opinion seems so very very forced. Purposely avoiding the thread title ("...so far") you're mentioning the only non-exclusive you could find which btw doesn't even have a release date yet and Capcom has shown only one reatime video of. And by your standards of mentioning future games the list should include Killzone too right? So you're implying that Killzone too looks worse than RE5, right? Hilarious. It's quite obvious that you came in the thread for a specific purpose.

ps. I won't mention Fable 2 anymore in this thread. It's both embarassing for you and it derails the thread.
 
pakkit said:
Thread title: What is the best looking PS3 game so far? lol @ these joke posts (I sincerely hope) that are listing unreleased games.

Also, this thread? It sucks. There is a general consensus (Uncharted, MGS4, GT, R&C) but the fights here that are getting started over nothing are sigh-worthy.
You didn't mention Warhawk, Heavenly Sword and Motorstorm? IT'S ON!
:p
 
Madman said:
Does it not even having a solid release year count? Although that isn't that bizzare of a reason. RE5 does look great, but it completely irrelevant to this discussion since it isn't out.


What does it not being released have to do with this, unless of course Resident Evil 5 became a 360 exclusive without my knowledge.

It's a ps3 and 360 title and, performance wise, it already runs like a champ. What is there to be confused about? Resident Evil 5 looks better.

I'll mention, yet another, unreleased ps3 game, but who cares. Killzone 2 has better graphics than MGS4, but what makes MGS4 the more impressive looking game in my opinion? Superior art direction and far better overall production values.

Even without Killzone 2 being released, I already know it wont touch MGS4 in that aspect. So is there something wrong with me saying that Killzone has better graphics than MGS4? I assume people wont take quite as much offense to me saying that another PS3 exclusive has better graphics? Deep down I feel the only reason people refuse to accept Resident Evil 5 as a visual superior to MGS4 is because the game is also on the Xbox 360.

I already know why nobody would dare accept Fable 2 as such. It's a 360 exclusive. I think Fable 2 looks better than Gears of War 2 as well. So yea, I'm totally getting it out there. I think Fable 2 is the best looking Xbox 360 exclusive title we've seen to date. Even better than Gears and definitely, in my opinion, better than the unreleased Gears of War 2. Only thing that will change this realization in my eyes is if the game receives a significant visual downgrade prior to release.

I think Uncharted has better graphics too. Let me ask one question. There isn't the slightest of possibilities that those who think MGS4 is the best looking game we've seen this generation, that the amazing production values and impressive art direction is playing heavily into people believing this? Nobody is willing to admit that the game's production values come into play bigtime and not necessarily soley the games raw graphical prowess?

This might confuse people, but I think MGS4 is the most impressive PS3 title I've seen to date, but I don't say this because of it's raw graphical output. I say this due to the incredible amount of work put into the game. From the incredible animation, to the amazing art, to the mindblowing sound, to amazing VA, to the incredible story... I could really go on and on as to how impressive I think MGS4 looks, but I do not think the game soley on a graphical level is pushing boundaries that haven't either been matched or ecliped by other titles. It just so happens that there likely wont be another game this generation to eclipse MGS4's overall production values with, perhaps, the possible exceptions being games like God of War 3, Resident Evil 5, or maybe one of the Final Fantasy XIII games.

When I say MGS4 isn't the best game graphically on the PS3 or this gen, to understand me, you have to see where i'm coming from.

Edit :: Fortified, your stealth accusations of me being a fanboy of some sort, fail miserably.

Resident Evil 5 gets mentioned not because it's the only non exclusive PS3 title, it's because it's the best looking game we've seen this entire fucking generation. "So far"

You seem to have a reading comprehension issue as well. Since when did "so far" only apply to games that have already released on the PS3? Go ahead and tell me. If the thread said RELEASED so far, then and only then would you have a point. So till then please don't waste your breath. It's funny how you get so defensive over any suggestion that MGS4 doesn't have the best graphics this generation and instantly resort to badly veiled swipes at my being a "Xbox fanboy"

I probably should've known once I looked at the thread title that this would be a haven for fanboys like yourself. Please allow me to exit it this one for good. Good day to you.
 
kaching said:
As for my vote, game visuals tend to impress me more with scope and the ability to juggle lots of moving parts, so I'd personally be more inclined to vote for something like Super Stardust HD because sometimes the shit they throw at you in Endless mode is more visually stunning to me than the ability that games like MGS4 or Uncharted have in simulating different kinds of surfaces (which is still impressive, BTW).

Oh, and Warhawk. Still looks great to me because it achieves a balance between large levels, stable framerate, lots of moving parts.

SSDHD and Warhawk are stunning.
 
CowboyAstronaut said:
Scoobs, I'm a little confused because I'm not sure if you're talking about me or somebody else, but it would be pretty difficult to argue with you about fable 2's graphics when I have no idea who you are and I'm positive I've never spoken to you before unless of course you know who I am in person and just happen to know my GAF alias, but other than that possibility, I really have no idea who you are. I've definitely had conversations regarding how good I thought Fable 2 looked, but nothing that I would ever classify as being in the realm of an argument.

I'm assuming now that this is the reason you private messaged me the other day?

Alright cowboy, you keep playing your game i know who you are! You are trying too hard sir :)
 
CowboyAstronaut said:
What does it not being released have to do with this, unless of course Resident Evil 5 became a 360 exclusive without my knowledge.

It's a ps3 and 360 title and, performance wise, it already runs like a champ. What is there to be confused about? Resident Evil 5 looks better.

I'll mention, yet another, unreleased ps3 game, but who cares. Killzone 2 has better graphics than MGS4, but what makes MGS4 the more impressive looking game in my opinion? Superior art direction and far better overall production values.

Even without Killzone 2 being released, I already know it wont touch MGS4 in that aspect. So is there something wrong with me saying that Killzone has better graphics than MGS4? I assume people wont take quite as much offense to me saying that another PS3 exclusive has better graphics? Deep down I feel the only reason people refuse to accept Resident Evil 5 as a visual superior to MGS4 is because the game is also on the Xbox 360.

I already know why nobody would dare accept Fable 2 as such. It's a 360 exclusive. I think Fable 2 looks better than Gears of War 2 as well. So yea, I'm totally getting it out there. I think Fable 2 is the best looking Xbox 360 exclusive title we've seen to date. Even better than Gears and definitely, in my opinion, better than the unreleased Gears of War 2. Only thing that will change this realization in my eyes is if the game receives a significant visual downgrade prior to release.

I think Uncharted has better graphics too. Let me ask one question. There isn't the slightest of possibilities that those who think MGS4 is the best looking game we've seen this generation, that the amazing production values and impressive art direction is playing heavily into people believing this? Nobody is willing to admit that the game's production values come into play bigtime and not necessarily soley the games raw graphical prowess?

This might confuse people, but I think MGS4 is the most impressive PS3 title I've seen to date, but I don't say this because of it's raw graphical output. I say this due to the incredible amount of work put into the game. From the incredible animation, to the amazing art, to the mindblowing sound, to amazing VA, to the incredible story... I could really go on and on as to how impressive I think MGS4 looks, but I do not think the game soley on a graphical level is pushing boundaries that haven't either been matched or ecliped by other titles. It just so happens that there likely wont be another game this generation to eclipse MGS4's overall production values with, perhaps, the possible exceptions being games like God of War 3, Resident Evil 5, or maybe one of the Final Fantasy XIII games.

When I say MGS4 isn't the best game graphically on the PS3 or this gen, to understand me, you have to see where i'm coming from.

Edit :: Fortified, your stealth accusations of me being a fanboy of some sort, fail miserably.

Resident Evil 5 gets mentioned not because it's the only non exclusive PS3 title, it's because it's the best looking game we've seen this entire fucking generation. "So far"

You seem to have a reading comprehension issue as well. Since when did "so far" only apply to games that have already released on the PS3? Go ahead and tell me. If the thread said RELEASED so far, then and only then would you have a point. So till then please don't waste your breath. It's funny how you get so defensive over any suggestion that MGS4 doesn't have the best graphics this generation and instantly resort to badly veiled swipes at my being a "Xbox fanboy"

I probably should've known once I looked at the thread title that this would be a haven for fanboys like yourself. Please allow me to exit it this one for good. Good day to you.

who cares crysis looks better than all those blah blah...lets get back to ps3 games
 
CowboyAstronaut said:
And? I said it and I'll stand by it.

Did I hit a nerve? If you want to jump on me for thinking MGS4 doesn't have the best graphics ever then by all means go ahead.

Metal Gear Solid 4 does not look better than Resident Evil 5 graphically, but you can have your opinion. Resident Evil 5 is on the PS3 and it looks better graphically than MGS4. Is Resident Evil 5 suddenly not a PS3 game or it shouldn't be counted for some bizarre reason? RE5 as a multi-platform game just looks better.

Also, can I laugh at you for mentioning God of War when none of us here even know what the damn thing looks like? Although, in your defense, God of War 3 probably will look better than most titles this generation, but until we see it, bringing it up is a total joke.

Oh and in regards to Fable 2 I suppose you think Fable 2 doesn't look better because it doesn't use a realistic art style like MGS4 does? Fable 2, from a purely graphical standpoint, looks better than MGS4. I think you're more impressed with the production values and art direction and how that heightens the effectiveness of the overall visual package. As a result of that you are convinced that MGS4 represents the best visuals we've seen on the PS3 or 360 this generation. I'm not saying MGS4 isn't easily one of the best, I just don't believe it IS the best. I'm not even saying you're wrong, but I'll respect your opinion and you respect mine.

Scoobs, I'm a little confused because I'm not sure if you're talking about me or somebody else, but it would be pretty difficult to argue with you about fable 2's graphics when I have no idea who you are and I'm positive I've never spoken to you before unless of course you know who I am in person and just happen to know my GAF alias, but other than that possibility, I really have no idea who you are. I've definitely had conversations regarding how good I thought Fable 2 looked, but nothing that I would ever classify as being in the realm of an argument.

I'm assuming now that this is the reason you private messaged me the other day?

:lol WTF

I would say Uncharted > MGS4 > GT5 > Ratchet > Motorstorm > Heavenly Sword > Warhawk
 
icecream said:
The point is that it's greatly closer than any other game on the market, and perhaps any other that will be for this generation.

The cars sure are.

btw the details and textures in Bad Company on characters is pretty damn impressive. Uncharted characters look better in cut-scenes but Bad Company wins in gameplay sections.
 
Top Bottom