makingmusic476
Member
Suckers.
We're actually right in the middle of another right now haha! Dolby Vision vs HDR 10.
HORRIBLE!i wonder how different the format wars would have been if this was the 360's normal disc drive instead of DVD..
In the end, they were right about one thing, though: the death of HD DVD was also the end of amazing BOGO deals. I built up my library at that time for like a fraction of what it would cost now.Man I remember all of the stanning that went on for HD-DVD, and why Blu-ray was gonna fail.
AVS Forum was a fucking war zone, so entertaining to watch from the sidelines.
Man I remember all of the stanning that went on for HD-DVD, and why Blu-ray was gonna fail.
AVS Forum was a fucking war zone, so entertaining to watch from the sidelines.
In the end, Sony and the BDA money-bagged the shit out of Fox and Warner to end the war. At the time, Fox and Warner were in talks together to join up and side with HD-DVD. Fox was having manufacturing troubles, and Warner hadn't decided which platform to side with. They thought if they chose HD-DVD together, there would be enough momentum swinging in that direction to end it. Fox then went to Sony with their manufacturing issue first and Sony gave them $120 million to stay Blu-Ray only. When that fell through, Warner then felt pretty obligated to join Blu-Ray, and Sony and the rest of the BDA paid Warner $500 million to go to Blu-Ray. Crazy amounts of money, but it did pretty decisively end the war after that and everything fell in line like domino's.
Me too. I had just gotten a raise and promotion at work and had loads of income. So I bought a 32" HDTV, ($1100 in 2006) a 360 and Dead Rising (The game that made me pull the trigger on the HD generation) and a few months later I got the attachment because I thought for sure it would win based on the name alone. I didn't get too much use out of it though. Got a few HD-DVDs here and there but eventually the format lost. Eventually bought a $200 Blu-Ray player.I bought it because I had just gotten an HDTV and it was pretty much the first time I had any kind of disposable income an adult.
Didn't regret it at all. We spent so much time watching Planet Earth on there when my kids were little.
Got any proof for that? Because the only confirmed money-hatting I can remember was Toshiba paying $29 million for Paramount.
Man I remember all of the stanning that went on for HD-DVD, and why Blu-ray was gonna fail.
AVS Forum was a fucking war zone, so entertaining to watch from the sidelines.
I believe the tipping point was Transformers. It was exclusive to HD DVD, and even on its release week, HD DVD couldn't top Blu-ray sales. It never topped BD sales, no matter what it did, so it wasn't super surprising that Warner went exclusive with BD.Plus, FOX was Blu-ray exclusive from the getgo. Why would they suddenly switch sides completely, at a time when Blu-ray discs were outselling their HD DVD counterparts due to ps3?
Plus, FOX was Blu-ray exclusive from the getgo. Why would they suddenly switch sides completely, at a time when Blu-ray discs were outselling their HD DVD counterparts due to ps3?
And it continues to this day:Man I remember all of the stanning that went on for HD-DVD, and why Blu-ray was gonna fail.
AVS Forum was a fucking war zone, so entertaining to watch from the sidelines.
The main advantage of HDDVD was that it used better codecs and, on average, looked marginally better than Blu-Ray did. It also came from a consortium rather than a single corporation.
It would have been really interesting to see where 4K video would have went if HDDVD had won - from what I understand, 4K movies barely fit on a Blu-Ray.
One of the many Microsoft-supported technologies that have untrustworthy, manipulative people spreading misinformation to influence those that don't know any better.I do still think HD-DVD had its benefits. Particularly, the fact that it used open standards of HTML5 / JavaScript as the main engine. Blu-Ray's use Java and when you watch a movie, it's pretty much booting up a Java VM for the disc to execute inside of. Yuck. At the time, HD-DVD did have more features that Blu-Ray did not, so it was further ahead in its technology. The area it was lacking was in terms of capacity which Blu-Ray had a lead on, even though HD-DVD was making strides to release higher density discs. HD DVD was at the time even more affordable. It had a lot going for it, outside of corporate cash...
In the end, Sony and the BDA money-bagged the shit out of Fox and Warner to end the war. At the time, Fox and Warner were in talks together to join up and side with HD-DVD. Fox was having manufacturing troubles, and Warner hadn't decided which platform to side with. They thought if they chose HD-DVD together, there would be enough momentum swinging in that direction to end it. Fox then went to Sony with their manufacturing issue first and Sony gave them $120 million to stay Blu-Ray only. When that fell through, Warner then felt pretty obligated to join Blu-Ray, and Sony and the rest of the BDA paid Warner $500 million to go to Blu-Ray. Crazy amounts of money, but it did pretty decisively end the war after that and everything fell in line like domino's.
We're actually right in the middle of another right now haha! Dolby Vision vs HDR 10.
I'm pretty sure Jeff Rigby bought one to go with his 4K tv
At the time I thought HD DVD would win the war for sure due to the name. Haha... seems silly now.
And it continues to this day:
One of the many Microsoft-supported technologies that have untrustworthy, manipulative people spreading misinformation to influence those that don't know any better.
That would have been crazy. HD DVD would win in North America, but Blu-ray would win in Europe because of PS3.