soundscream
Member
Wii U has games coming as well.
The games I want Metroid, proper 3D Mario, Zelda are not coming out for YEARS! Which is why I got rid of my Wii U, I'll pick it up again when those games are out.
Wii U has games coming as well.
Okay, I tried.That's a pretty bad analogy because:
1) Ferrari gives you "power for price" while "looking sexy"/supercars!
2) Because of the above people want it.
Compare to the WiiU which:
1) Has no competent online system
2) Has no third party support which leads to
3) No games. Outside of Nintendo game releases which makes the calender tumbleweeds.gif
Oh... yes, let's not forget:
4) No "power for price."
If the "Wii U is a Ferrari" what does that make the PS4/720? Bugatti Veyron and Veyron Supersports?
Again with this?
It's not necessarily a bad thing, it wasn't a fad for many but I mean when you look at it overall.
fad
/fad/
Noun
An intense and widely shared enthusiasm for something, esp. one that is short-lived; a craze.
It depicts Wii perfectly doesn't it?
Nintendo clearly havn't retained (nearly) any of the userbase that bought the Wii.
We've just had the "fad" conversation a million times on here. I think the length of time it was successful definitely couldn't be described as "short-lived." It was dominating for 4-5 straight years.hwy_61 said:Is there a problem with calling the Wii a fad? I sure don't think so.
I remember the N64 doing okay - not bad - but there's a lot of hyperbole these days where Nintendo is concerned and I was pretty young at the time. Gamecube didn't sell gangbusters either from what I remember, but I don't think it was ever in the predicament that Wii U is in.If I remember correctly, N64 actually did really well in its first couple of years, sales-wise.
The games I want Metroid, proper 3D Mario, Zelda are not coming out for YEARS! Which is why I got rid of my Wii U, I'll pick it up again when those games are out.
Yes.I am sorry but the IGN article mentions this figure of 160.000 consoles as being sold to customers/consumers...
Can they be really so incompetent?
Clinging to a thread.
The "all is well" plea isn't going to cut it anymore.
Proper 3D Mario is coming out this December, actually. Zelda is coming out in October, but obviously you meant a new one.The games I want Metroid, proper 3D Mario, Zelda are not coming out for YEARS! Which is why I got rid of my Wii U, I'll pick it up again when those games are out.
Shitty name (Wii 2/Super Wii)
high price considering the hardware
The Wii and its software sold very well for much of its lifespan, right up until the major 1st party efforts dried up. So it wasn't really a fad in any meaningful sense.It depicts Wii perfectly doesn't it?
Nintendo clearly havn't retained (nearly) any of the userbase that bought the Wii.
What do you think they were doing with all those Wii and DS games that people on internet forums don't consider new IPs because they don't like them? Wii Fit, Nintendogs, Brain Training, Sonic and Mario Olympics, etc.They need new leadership. The company is stagnant. They should still make new games like Mario, Zelda, etc., but they also need to take way more risks with new IP that targets different demographics.
They need new leadership. The company is stagnant. They should still make new games like Mario, Zelda, etc., but they also need to take way more risks with new IP that targets different demographics.
Don't worry, Iwata is going to do another Nintendo Direct soon. That will fix everything! *laughs*
We've just had the "fad" conversation a million times on here. I think the length of time it was successful definitely couldn't be described as "short-lived." It was dominating for 4-5 straight years.
That said, Nintendo didn't do a good enough job retaining those fans. Look at how many people bought cheap 360s/PS3s recently. I think they moved on to those.
The thing that hurts is that I really like Iwata, he's clearly a gamer CEO, and I don't wish him to go anywhere from Nintendo. Yet they do need change.
Proper 3D Mario is coming out this December, actually. Zelda is coming out in October, but obviously you meant a new one.
The thing that hurts is that I really like Iwata, he's clearly a gamer CEO, and I don't wish him to go anywhere from Nintendo. Yet they do need change.
I'd take that gamble and would too.Would buy a bundle with an elite Wii U and game for $199.
We need a new word for the U, bomba doesn't cut it anymore.
Again, just like I questioned him (and he still hasn't responded to): Did the audience "Get tired" of playing games at that exact time, or was it a result of Nintendo basically abandoning the system at that exact same time?
Seems a little coincidental, don't you think? Nintendo's release list was barren right at that time. No new games = no new console sales. I highly, highly doubt it was just a matter of "welp, the casuals just got tired all at the same time!" Nintendo wasn't releasing any games.
As for Iwata: I was hesitant with him sticking around but thought it was ok until next year. However, the fact that they aren't revising sales estimates is absolutely INSANE. Talk about head in the sand.
Couldn't you have just... keep it for when that time comes instead of paying for the console a 2nd time?
Most Wii owners I know moved slowly towards zero interest, with only the real hangers-on left by 2010, which is exactly when Ninty apparently had nothing left in the tank and completely fubar'd the Wii and all future chances of success.
Without question.
We need a new word for the U, bomba doesn't cut it anymore.
4 years, and compared to other fads it had ongoing support so you would expect it to last longer.
I don't like how fad is seen as a bad word or thing, it is what it is, it was hugely successful and an IT product then it tanked, I don't see how that isn't a fad, look at the audience it attracted.
I definitely agree that they should strive to create new IPs, but I feel like the WiiU hasn't been around long enough for them to really try. They have to get their big hitters out first. Personally, I think their first order of business should be to give Smash Bros a working online infrastructure, so it's the sort of game that people can really get behind.It seems only the hardcore fans buy a Nintendo console to get more of the same. Nintendo needs to create something new if they want to win back the casual gamer; they should just forget about the PS3/360 COD audience.
Raises hand
Jeebus fuck.
Um. Not sure what to say. I like my WiiU. I think the Xbox One will cone close to bombing this hard.
Just a disagreement on the time needed to call something a "fad." I'd argue 1-2 years tops. No big deal. They brought a ton of people into the industry. They just failed at retaining them. Horribly.
"more gimmicks" is not what nintendo needs. They already have the stench of "gimmick platform" after the wii and wiiU.
a VR helmet won't help things.
Wii U was a retarded name.
There are no killer apps.
The price is too high.
The hardware is unimpressive.
Online architecture is 10 years out of date.
My family and I have had every Nintendo console (except Virtual Boy) in the launch window since 1985...I saved up for months prior to N64 coming out and waited a month after my 11th birthday to spend my birthday money when it launched. I stood in line at midnight for my Wii. I make more money now than I ever have and still couldn't justify buying a Wii U for $350.
uhh that's 160k for 3 months? (Apri, May, June)
...
what
Kind of like how Sunshine is the GC version of Mario 64? The first three 3D Mario games are much more similar than people acknowledge. 3D Land was actually the first 3D Mario to break away from the mold that Mario 64 laid down on more than a cosmetic level.