jump_button
Banned
Could just be a big year for 3DS I'am sure Wii U will be they but nothing new showed to us anyway
Believe.
Alright, LETS DO THIS
Believe.
Assuming Nintendo will do things based on logic
You may find this is not the best strategy
Believe.
I have read Angry Birds will be the bundled game with Wii U, thoughts ?.
Also im giving serious thought to buying the 3DS bundle with Mario for £150 which is amazing considering a 3DS alone was £240 at launch but what is the % chance that a newer 3DS will be shown at E3 with dual analogue sticks ?.
Is it worth getting a 3DS just for Mario, Mario Kart, RE: Revelations and Starfox ?.
Cheers.
Bundling angry birds would be a huge mistake. They do not want to compared to an ipad. That would send the wrong message.
I'd agree if this were a year ago, but Angry Birds is on anything with a chip and touch screen these days. I don't think it's considered just an IOS game anymore.
Rösti;35066441 said:Thanks for the appreciation, guys. I'm glad my posts can contribute with somewhat meaningful information. I also hope to next week, starting tomorrow, bring more information about what is going on with the Wii U trademark (in North American) in conjunction with that suspension letter. I'll try to get Mr. Nagae (trademark counsel for Nintendo) to spill the beans on this matter, or at least provide me with some hints. While I'm quite certain my own suggestions to the reasons of the current status and practice are correct, hearing it from an official source could be interesting.
http://kotaku.com/5884388/start-your-engines-for-sonic--sega-all+stars-racing-sequel
Remember rumors of this a few weeks ago, but seems like the game is in the making.
About the Crytek thing: I hear they're eager to show something very soon, and I'm almost certain they'll show it at GDC
wsippel said:- but don't be disappointed if it's only shown behind closed doors. This is GDC after all.
Crytek were next to Nintendo last year, with similar sized booths.
http://web.archive.org/web/20101211...df/floorplan/GDC 2011_12_01_10 South Hall.pdfCrytek were next to Nintendo last year, with similar sized booths.
GDC takes place March 5-9.When is GDC? If they show off at least ONE game, or at least announce it, I'd be ecstatic.
Crytek were next to Nintendo last year, with similar sized booths.
Well Nintendo Patented Triforce recently.Notice how their position is shaped like the Triforce? Crytek making the next Zelda for Wii U using AMD's latest GPUs?
This is clearly footage from Zelda U, Nintendo just hadn't let them put in the deku babas the ship's infested with yet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_IKqjb9TRY
Angry Birds will probably be available day one on the e shop at least.
The 3DS bundle is a bargain, and yes, all of those games are worth the purchase - though if you've never played Ocarina of Time, I suggest picking that up too.
HYPE
HYPE GONE
Lol crytek Zelda jokes are not very wise joke posts. And some of you wonder why GAFfers single you out as Nintendo fanatics.
Lol crytek Zelda jokes are not very wise joke posts. And some of you wonder why GAFfers single you out as Nintendo fanatics.
Lol crytek Zelda jokes are not very wise joke posts. And some of you wonder why GAFfers single you out as Nintendo fanatics.
Rösti;35066014 said:
The likelihood of Nintendo releasing new information about Wii U at Game Developers Conference is high, due to several factors:
In addition to what Nintendo provides, there are several events connected to GDC, that could surely function as a ground for discussion, amongst industry members, about Wii U: Choice Awards, Independent Games Festival, Magnetic Game-O-Matic, Career Pavilion, Game Career Seminar, Parties & Networking, GDC Play and more.
- They have booked a larger booth than in 2011, and they also have a booth in the business area
- While not directly connected to Wii U, Nintendo has two speakers featured: Steve Rabin (NoA) and Koichi Hayashida (EAD)
- Several of Nintendo's closest business partners (AMD most prominently) with the Wii U are exhibiting
- Reggie Fils-Aime has in interviews with both CNN and GameTrailers said that they will share more information between now (this was in early January) and E3
- GDC is the single most important industry event before E3, and provides excellent opportunities to create hype as well as informing partners about deals, licenses and more
While Nintendo has not confirmed nor denied Wii U at GDC this year, I think we can safely assume the system will be there in more ways than one. I take the liberty of once again posting the floorplans:
Notice that Nintendo, Crytek and AMD have their booths very close. AMD's developing the GPU for Wii U, and former Director of Technology at Crytek, Mark Atkinson, was hired by Nintendo last year as Consultant Software Engineer. And Crytek's Cevat Yerli expressed excitement about the Wii U SDK last year, as reported by Beyond3D and GamesIndustry.biz:
Sources: http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.php?p=1582363&postcount=7706, http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2011-09-14-state-of-play-crytek-editorial
Nintendo's deep contacts with both AMD and Crytek, as well as other exhibitors at GDC, can mean they will be given golden opportunities to demonstrate the Wii U's capabilities. Probably not through games, but through tech demos (other than Chase Mii and Shield Pose). Opportunities I at least wouldn't waste.
My sources say you are headed in the right direction.
People keep saying that Zelda needs a shake up, etc, when talking about future installments/Retro. What in the world do they mean because I'm confused?
Skyward Sword had:
-Unique art style
-Unique villains
-Unique controls
-(Mostly) unique items
-Unique NPCs and races
-Different progression from the norm
-Heavier focus on story & characterization
-Vastly different explorationuzzles:combat ratio than usual
That's not considered a shake up? At this point the only thing left to do would be to change the genre. I imagine that when people say Zelda needs a reboot, they're saying "make Skyrim" most of the time?
I want next Zelda to be developed by Valve!taking place in Meta East
People keep saying that Zelda needs a shake up, etc, when talking about future installments/Retro. What in the world do they mean because I'm confused?
Skyward Sword had:
-Unique art style
-Unique villains
-Unique controls
-(Mostly) unique items
-Unique NPCs and races
-Different progression from the norm
-Heavier focus on story & characterization
-Vastly different explorationuzzles:combat ratio than usual
That's not considered a shake up? At this point the only thing left to do would be to change the genre. I imagine that when people say Zelda needs a reboot, they're saying "make Skyrim" most of the time?
Nah, it's the same thing with that Rebirth Gamecube demo. It's just a tech demo.
I'm personally more interested in performance improvements over visual enhancements. Super fast loading and seamless screen'menu/OS transitions. Something super snappy, fast, and consistent across the entire OS and interface would be great. As well as incorporating that into most games. For as far as we've come since the SNES/N64 eras visually, we've taken so many steps back in terms of active user experiences.
Rösti;35066766 said:http://web.archive.org/web/20101211...df/floorplan/GDC 2011_12_01_10 South Hall.pdf
While true, Wii U (then known as Project Café) had not been unveiled by GDC 2011, and we did not know about Crytek's plans for the system. Also, last year Nintendo's booth was not by the entrance, which it is this year (well, at least it's very close).
The Triforce is a lie.
Like a Zelda from Crytek.Nintendo wasn't far from the entrance, but seriously this is not 'a thing'. Nintendo has a reasonable sized presence, will have numerous 3DS systems on display and probably a couple of Wii U demo units like CES, and the majority of the Nintendo stand will be taken up with meeting rooms specifically designed for making *not-public* announcements in.
G-Man is actually Ganondorf in disguise!
You're just taking aspects of the game and adding "unique" in front of them.
-Unique villains, but not incredibly difficult, and still follow the "exploit obvious weakness x times for win" mode of combat that many consider stale.
-Unique controls, but not as precise as many had hoped.
-Unique items but not a whole lot of customization options.
-Unique NPCs, not really sure what you mean by that by anyway there weren't nearly enough of them.
-Heavier focus on story and characterization, which I enjoyed, but it also made the lack of voice acting and walls of scrolling text all the more awkward.
For me, I think that Skyward Sword was definitely a good game and a step in the right direction, but at this point Zelda needs more than a step. It needs a jump. Not to mention that in order to make a lot of this happen they traded in what was arguably one of Zelda's biggest strengths: its open world.
SS was a great game, but at this point Zelda needs more than a shake up. The series has already peaked in its current style of gameplay, so that's why alot of people are asking for something different. I don't blame them for being very careful in doing so. They need to strike a good balance of smart changes, while still remaining distinctly Zelda.
You know what Zelda needs?
Nanomachines.
Believe.