Unknown Soldier
Banned
And miss out on some of the best games out there? No thanks.
The games will still be there when it's $99.
And miss out on some of the best games out there? No thanks.
Browsing through the PS Store on my new Vita has been a revelation. If Nintendo just launched a modern eShop where you could buy every first party game they've made from NES through Wii, the system would sell on that alone. Not to even mention the unfathomable amounts of cold cash they would make on the sales of the games themselves. Hell, just NES through N64 would be a good start.
Now I understand what everybody has been bitching about with regards to Nintendo's online experience.
Someone give me a good reason why Iwata is still CEO.
This line of thought is curious because it doesn't actually support your argument... SNIP
Someone give me a good reason why Iwata is still CEO. The DS and Wii was a success but that was then this is now.
It's a lot of ifs, but I tend to agree that a $199 Wii U in a drastically better economy with Smash and Kart already out would be much more competitive, and probably actually outselling GCN.
Someone give me a good reason why Iwata is still CEO. The DS and Wii was a success but that was then this is now.
prag16 said:But what I took away from his post is the he thinks if the SUPPORT from Nintendo (worse than GCN), economy of the era (worse than GCN), and price (worse than GCN even after considering inflation), we'd have a different situation.
It's a lot of ifs, but I tend to agree that a $199 Wii U in a drastically better economy with Smash and Kart already out would be much more competitive, and probably actually outselling GCN.
If Wii U had sold only 150k in November we'd already have heard of mass sudoku inside Nintendo.
What will happen if they start to become unable to make a successful handheld as well? Because that time IS coming, the trends are incredibly clear.
If Wii U had sold only 150k in November we'd already have heard of mass sudoku inside Nintendo.
But what do I know, I said the same thing about it selling less than 100k in January...
I think this is key. It's like Nintendo said what's the cheapest technology we can use that will just provide enough performance for HD gaming at 720p.
If WiiU was twice as powerful, I feel the launch software would have been a lot stronger and more third parties would have been interested in developing for it.
Was there some sort of incident that damaged Harker's credibility that I wasn't aware of? He's been around for as long as I can remember, has a solid track record, and is vetted by other credible sources/leakers.
peace vibes from the success of DS and Wii and the relative turn around of 3DS from complete failure to moderate success.
But although I am smart enough to know saying "Nintendo is doomed" is shortsighted considering history, I am also aware that we are about to enter a stage in this industry that is also without precedent - an era in which gaming dedicated handhelds are fast becoming irrelevant (ask Y2Kev for an explanation on why 3DS is not doing near as impressive as some think), and Nintendo cannot release a relevant bit of console hardware either.
What will happen if they start to become unable to make a successful handheld as well? Because that time IS coming, the trends are incredibly clear.
Is this a meme? Either way, I got a kick out of it fits their games' E rating pretty well.If Wii U had sold only 150k in November we'd already have heard of mass sudoku inside Nintendo.
A bunch of "insiders" on GAF all call each other credible. Then one by one slowly get banned for repeatedly posting "insider" information that is false. "Insider information" that comes from random PMs from other "insiders", all of whom have meaninglessly called each other credible.
I ask again, if he has secret infoz why can't he just share them now, instead of waiting until NPD numbers come out then saying "I guess what I hinted at was right?"
Anyone can drop hints like "I hear Funky Barn is struggling" then when NPD comes out say "yep, I was right!"
Give me a reason to believe that any of these insiders aren't mailroom employees at best.
peace vibes from the success of DS and Wii and the relative turn around of 3DS from complete failure to moderate success.
But although I am smart enough to know saying "Nintendo is doomed" is shortsighted considering history, I am also aware that we are about to enter a stage in this industry that is also without precedent - an era in which gaming dedicated handhelds are fast becoming irrelevant (ask Y2Kev for an explanation on why 3DS is not doing near as impressive as some think), and Nintendo cannot release a relevant bit of console hardware either.
What will happen if they start to become unable to make a successful handheld as well? Because that time IS coming, the trends are incredibly clear.
[/B]
IOS Android
Est - a few years from now
I really don't know. The way Japanese companies operate is baffling. He would have been forced to resign a long time ago if it was a western company.
If Wii U had sold only 150k in November we'd already have heard of mass sudoku inside Nintendo.
Yes. I've been saying this for a while. I don't see a future for Ninendo unless they go third party. The dedicated handheld gaming market will evaporate and Nintendo are incapable of delivering a competing home console platform.
Worse of all. I genuinely believe folks are starting to be less interested in the key Nintendo IP's like Mario.
Actually crazy thing is they didn't - if they haven't used low power parts they could have gotten system that would at least run x360/ps3 at better quality.
I understand how you feel, but every console will have a game we don't like, I'm not saying the Wii should have failed because Metroid: Other M was fucking awful.
Yes, that is what some suggest they should be doing now. I actually do think it might devalue the brand, but I don't know what the alternative is.
It's a very tough situation in the future. I think a lot of people will have a tough time, but due to Nintendo's reliance on handhelds, I am especially worried about the strategy they will have. They have not shown themselves particularly adept since the Wii.
Pokemon iOS, with microtransactions out the ass.
Are you really going to engage in this sort of semantic pedantry?
Fine. The numbers would need to be precisely ten times what he predicted to even come close to what the people hoping Mario would "save" the Wii U were hoping for. Even at four, five, or six times as much they would be poor sales numbers for Nintendo in November, and an extreme shortfall in light of the nine million sales prediction Iwata refused to relinquish at the recent Nintendo investor call.
Isn't pretending to be insider bannable offence on GAF ? So if John was faking it he would have been banned already ?
November is when people do xmas shopping...
Their flagship holiday game doesn't really use the pad. Why is it a thing.I want them to drop the game pad at this point just so I can say I was right. This thing could sell double 150k and it would still be a catastrophobomb. You could see it from space.
It needed to move at least 1mm combined nov + December to even register on the EKG IMO and it's not going to do that.
Was there some sort of incident that damaged Harker's credibility that I wasn't aware of? He's been around for as long as I can remember, has a solid track record, and is vetted by other credible sources/leakers.
peace vibes from the success of DS and Wii and the relative turn around of 3DS from complete failure to moderate success.
But although I am smart enough to know saying "Nintendo is doomed" is shortsighted considering history, I am also aware that we are about to enter a stage in this industry that is also without precedent - an era in which gaming dedicated handhelds are fast becoming irrelevant (ask Y2Kev for an explanation on why 3DS is not doing near as impressive as some think), and Nintendo cannot release a relevant bit of console hardware either.
What will happen if they start to become unable to make a successful handheld as well? Because that time IS coming, the trends are incredibly clear.
But I hope you understand it's a completely meaningless argument to have. That's like arguing "well if there was a nuclear war during the Gamecube era, the Wii U would be doing better right now!" Such hypotheticals merely fade into wishful thinking, because there is no way to prove whether the scenario would ever actually be true or not, and it simply avoids stating what is here at face value.
The face value of the night is "Wii U is performing demonstrably worse than GCN by every metric available." The why is the only thing really up for discussion, I feel
Sony is a Japanese company, yet Kutaragi was demoted shortly after the PS3 launch.
the lack of attention to the wii u is bizarre in comparison and seems grounds for any sort of random conspiracy theory.
Their flagship holiday game doesn't really use the pad. Why is it a thing.
I agree that every console will have a game we don't like, but when that game so happens to be your big launch title and it's mario, the lack of effort was astounding.
Did nobody at nintendo even look at the advertising showing mario u on a tv, to most people it looked almost identical to the wii version, not to mention it was shown with people using wii remotes to play it.
The wii u deserves to fail because in my eyes Nintendo thought that a half assed mario effort would see the money roll in, they had nearly two years to prepare for the wii u launch and that was the best they could do? really?
You can half ass it like with all the 'new' mario games after your console is successful, not before. And i'm so glad that people didn't fall for it.
The worst thing about this whole system has been that one mario u video released showing 2 developers laughing together as they show a video of mario and luigi from 'new' super mario bros wii and then showing them from mario u, running on the same grass, the same models, the same hills only an increase in resolution.
It's as if they were laughing at how easy it was, and that they were convinced it would be another runaway success with such little development effort. And this is why despite being a huge nintendo fan i'm happy to see the console fail. It might only be one game, but to me mario u, signifies everything wrong with nintendo.
I don't know, 8 years, 0 bans; but the people are hungry, they say! feed them, they say! will you feed them with your fine wine? or just your fancy words?
well I say, let them go hungry! no NPD for you!
awwww, i'm just messing. I get goaded all the time, nothing new here. move along folks.
I for one, am actually really excited about Tropical Freeze. Returns was awesome!
Sadly, its like a terrible car accident on the side of the road, everyone slows down to take a peek. This is how I see the predicament Nintendo is in. Its ugly, but I can't help but look.
I see Nintendo making a deal with Apple or something before just entering the wilderness on their own as a third party or what have you. In a lot of ways, an Apple/Nintendo partnership is a match made in heaven for both companies.
His constant hammering on about that is strictly based on comparison between 3DS and DS, which is silly considering the fact that the DS sold freaking 154 million copies. This year 3DS is performing very well, and has been the only platform that has YoY increase in sales. And that is in a very competitive segment with tablets and smartphones.
The mobile market has TREMENDOUSLY expanded, and Nintendo's dedicated handheld is experiencing year on year growth to keep pace despite other options available. That's a big success no matter how anyone tries to flip it otherwise.