-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
WikiLeaks release excluded evidence of 2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia
- Thread starter chadskin
- Start date
- Status
A lot of people have not kept up on the past few months of developments.
They were always a propaganda outlet, we just didn't know it.
Dongs Macabre
aka Daedalos42
This.
Is it related to "cultural marxism"?
Just_myles
Member
Felix Lighter said:
Huh? You mean the campaign is threatening reporters or is wikileaks threatening reporters who pursue this perceived cover up? Either way this just sounds all kinds of bad.
I think it's their term for Russophobia mixed with a pinch of propaganda and conspiracy theories. Anyway, it's the third time I've seen them use it in the last few weeks. They're really desperate for it to catch on.
jack_package_200
Banned
Strange how all those people here who supported Wikileaks leaking those DNC emails seem nowhere to be found in this thread.
Brawly Likes to Brawl
Member
Redacting sensitive information of civilians? ain't nobody got time for that!
Preventing Russia from looking bad? We're on it!
These are our heroes of transparency, folks.
Preventing Russia from looking bad? We're on it!
These are our heroes of transparency, folks.
ClosingADoor
Member
So the organisation that says it is for transparency is threatening other journalists now who write about them in order to bring more transparency about the organisation. They don't see the irony in this I guess.
D
Deleted member 80556
Unconfirmed Member
Wtf. If the candidate you hate so much can take the bad press, surely, you the protectors and investigators of freedom around the world can fucking take it, right Assange?
They're not even trying to hide it. Jesus.
What is bothering people is that you're overgeneralizing. This is not limited toward English speaking people. People in my country say "we should stop Maduro [Venezuela's president] with a military attack" or "they should kill him" considering they're on the process of legally taking him down. The same with your country, Brazil. I'm sure there were very loud people advocating for a coup d'etat against Dilma and others against the current president. That doesn't represent what your country as a whole thinks, does it?
Obviously not, but I would probably be putting serious diplomatic pressure on Ecuador to stop harboring a rapist who also happens to be a spy trying to subvert America's government.
It's more that they don't give a shit, any supporters they have left will just claim
What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
And going to a South American country with 'hey you know what we always do with you guys? Fucking up your politics and stuff? Yeah Russia is trying that with us now and we very upset, plz help'
-Will definitely end well, good luck.
Edit: that wikileaks PR guy is a nutcase that keeps on giving
I am not an officer of the court and can say what I like, but sure, I'm advocating trial, not getting shot out of hand. Obstruction of justice is itself a crime, however, and I think it's pretty clear he did that.
I mean, okay. This is an argument for everybody else being right, isn't it? If Ecuador won't cooperate with America in securing enemy spies, then we really should just send in a SEAL team and go get him. I'm just trying to be nice and respect people's sovereignty here!
nephilimdj
Member
Are you really trying to imply wikileaks supporters are conspiracy theorists?
He literally quoted a guy saying that all the evidence that Wikileaks is a Russian intelligence tool is a conspiracy, so.
I'm pretty sure nephilimdj was joking.
StopMakingSense
Member
Im starting to read all of Wikileaks/Assange's retorts to criticism in Starscream's voice.
Felix Lighter
Member
It's in the OP. Wikileak's threated the reporters, if they pursue the story, they will return the favor one day.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked