• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Windows 8 Gaming Performance (benchmarks inside)

Haha, thanks to this thread, I finally decided to try out the RC for Windows 8.

I'll post my opinion after actually checking out the OS. :D
 
Seeing the reaction on this forum to Windows 8 has led me to believe that it is incredibly divisive. Constant back and forth arguing in these threads.

I'm not planning on upgrade not because I think Windows 8 is bad, but because 7 is perfectly adequate and I can't be bothered.

I think that's a good stance. It's a $40 upgrade though. I think that's more than a fair price for an OS update (especially if boot up, general computing, etc. performance increases).
 
I'm most worried what happens if Windows 8 is a success sales wise and the built in app store really takes off.

In a few years when MS has a very successful app store that the overwhelming majority of users use, will they really have that much incentive to include legacy start menu in Windows 9? And then you will have your true tablet OS on a desktop and a true closed platform.

Is this not a valid concern?
 
I'm most worried what happens if Windows 8 is a success sales wise and the built in app store really takes off.

In a few years when MS has a very successful app store that the overwhelming majority of users use, will they really have that much incentive to include legacy start menu in Windows 9? And then you will have your true tablet OS on a desktop and a true closed platform.

Is this not a valid concern?

It's a valid concern but hey, we can stick to Windows 7 for the next 10 years+
 
I'm most worried what happens if Windows 8 is a success sales wise and the built in app store really takes off.

In a few years when MS has a very successful app store that the overwhelming majority of users use, will they really have that much incentive to include legacy start menu in Windows 9? And then you will have your true tablet OS on a desktop and a true closed platform.

Is this not a valid concern?

You can use DOS in Windows 8.
 
I'm sure devs would love doubling up on interface development. Would have been a sure fire application market hit.

But isn't the current situation worse? Not only do you have to design an application for two different interfaces, you practically have to develop two different versions (Metro version and desktop version if you want to maximize your potential audience). I could be wrong of course, if there are any developers here I'd love to hear their thoughts on this.
 
I think my only big issue will be that, unless 8 has controller support, I won't be able to start up in desktop, so whenever I go make a "steambox" with BPM I'll still have use kbm to get to the desktop. Sounds like it's not much of a problem, but I would like complete controller support without the need of using kbm when I start and shut it off.
 
I'm most worried what happens if Windows 8 is a success sales wise and the built in app store really takes off.

In a few years when MS has a very successful app store that the overwhelming majority of users use, will they really have that much incentive to include legacy start menu in Windows 9? And then you will have your true tablet OS on a desktop and a true closed platform.

Is this not a valid concern?
if windows 8 doesn't take off, and Apple's way of doing things continues to take off, won't this happen anyway?

if customers want that model, it will come to pass... whether windows 8 succeeds or not.
 
I'm most worried what happens if Windows 8 is a success sales wise and the built in app store really takes off.

In a few years when MS has a very successful app store that the overwhelming majority of users use, will they really have that much incentive to include legacy start menu in Windows 9? And then you will have your true tablet OS on a desktop and a true closed platform.

Is this not a valid concern?

It is. Paul Thurrott even says so in a recent arcticle:

http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/start-windows-8-era-begins-144002

Should the new stuff—Metro—take off, you can expect Microsoft to drop the desktop like it's suffering from leprosy. In fact, I’m pretty sure the only reason Windows RT—the ARM-based Windows 8 version that will only be preinstalled on a handful of machines from a tiny number of hardware makers—exists is to make this future vision a reality.

Damn Valve fanboys, they're everywhere!
 
It is. Paul Thurrott even says so in a recent arcticle:

http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/start-windows-8-era-begins-144002



Damn Valve fanboys, they're everywhere!

but RT has the desktop and comes preinstalled with desktop versions of Office. also, i'd be surprised if they only sell a handful of the RT versions of Surface. we'll see what pricing is like.

the problem with RT isn't that it doesn't have a desktop (because it does) it's that desktop software can only be bought through the official store over in Metro land. i'm sure microsoft would love this, yes, but again the failing of Windows 8 isn't going to stop this happening if consumers continue to not give a shit about it, and Apple continue to eat more and more of the market as a result.
 
if windows 8 doesn't take off, and Apple's way of doing things continues to take off, won't this happen anyway?

if customers want that model, it will come to pass... whether windows 8 succeeds or not.

Now it coming to pass is more inevitable than ever. MS and Apple's business models will get closer and closer until we can't vote with our wallets anymore.

What oh what will happen to my steam games.
 
I think my only big issue will be that, unless 8 has controller support, I won't be able to start up in desktop, so whenever I go make a "steambox" with BPM I'll still have use kbm to get to the desktop. Sounds like it's not much of a problem, but I would like complete controller support without the need of using kbm when I start and shut it off.

It would be awesome to control Metro with the 360 controller that always sits beside my couch.
 
I wouldn't trust Paul Thurott. Microsoft makes a lot of money off of legacy support. A LOT.

he's actually a fan of Windows 8 overall. not that you'd know that from that selective quote though. here's one from his summary:

With Windows 8, you get all the good stuff from the past, served with a heaping helping of both new and better. And I think you’re going to love it.
 
Driver support blows for Windows 8 right now.. its not even out yet, give it 2-3 months and then run benchmarks.

Windows 8 isn't some new magical platform, it's still very much based on Windows 7 core standards except it has WDDM 1.2 support. Drivers will improve at the same rate as Windows 7 drivers still are, doubt you'll see any major performance increases. Drivers just suck because they are still working with new-feature kinks.
 
The amount of willful ignorance in every single Windows 8 thread is depressing. I think I'll stop clicking on them.

Yeah. GAF is apparently the least knowledgeable community there is regarding Win8. Weird.

My games have been running better on Win8 as well by the way. Especially BF3.

It would be so much nicer if most people didn't just regurgitate everything Valve and Blizzard say. I wish MS had released a free version of the OS for people to preview so they could form their own opinions.




OH WAIT
 
Defensive much? Get over it, alot of people aren't going to bother with this. You can't sell me on 'Oh its snappy', I'm on a 256GB SSD, there isn't a single thing thats slow on my machine to begin with. You guys are becoming a bit annoying gang jumping anyone who refuses to worship W8. Especially since nearly all of us are deciding to stay with Win7... Like what are you even accusing people of here? Being fanboys? But of what? Windows? Its not like we are screaming "OH BOY, WIN8 LOOKS TERRIBLE TIME TO BUY A MAC".

If anything, stuff like this just shows me that I wont be missing anything game performance wise. Just pile that on the list of reasons that its not worth bothering with.

I've noticed this happening a lot on gaming side windows 8 threads, people get a little to defensive over it. It just isn't appealing to a lot of people.
 
As long as my Windows 7 keeps working as it is working now, there is no reason for me to move on. Skipping 8.
 
Not bad. I am still enjoying Windows 8 much faster boot times and all round snappier OS. Makes it hard going back to Windows 7 whilst at work.
Of course disabled metro by default so I never ever have to see it. I do not even know how to activate it again even if I wanted too ha
How do you disable metro? Haven't tried the RTM but I tried one of the earlier previews and I don't think it was possible then, metro was one of my main dislikes. May be tempted to give Windows 8 a try again if it can be turned off.
 
Not bad. I am still enjoying Windows 8 much faster boot times and all round snappier OS. Makes it hard going back to Windows 7 whilst at work.
Of course disabled metro by default so I never ever have to see it. I do not even know how to activate it again even if I wanted too ha.








I have to assume all of you guys are trolling... Or just know absolutely nothing.

How do you turn off Metro?
 
"Hey, guys. It's really cheap right now, so you know it's going to be reallllllly good! :D"

Said no one.

It's like W7 is your first OS you worked with, kid. Chill out.

I am probably older than you are and have been using Windows since 3.1. Don't call me a kid.

My point is, if you know it's going to be updated and turn out just fine, you should save money by buying it when it's cheap. When has Windows ever been $40 to upgrade?
 
but RT has the desktop and comes preinstalled with desktop versions of Office. also, i'd be surprised if they only sell a handful of the RT versions of Surface. we'll see what pricing is like.

the problem with RT isn't that it doesn't have a desktop (because it does) it's that desktop software can only be bought through the official store over in Metro land. i'm sure microsoft would love this, yes, but again the failing of Windows 8 isn't going to stop this happening if consumers continue to not give a shit about it, and Apple continue to eat more and more of the market as a result.

He's the thing. The desktop in RT is 100% pointless. Microsoft will not accept direct downloads of desktop apps for RT in the store. The desktop only exists because they haven't got Office running on Metro yet. Once they have, I would expect an update for RT which replaces Office with the Metro version and removes the desktop wholesale. I am concerned that if this transition succeeds, the desktop will be phased out in Windows 9, rendering every major digital distributor bankrupt.
 
I'm buying W8, but I really don't understand the horizontal scrolling (even on a tablet). With vertical scrolling I can scroll with my thumb and still grip the tablet, and my mouse wheel works intuitively.

I hope we will ultimately be able to control the start screen with a 360 pad though. From power on straight into Borderlands 2 with just a controller would be nice.
 
He's the thing. The desktop in RT is 100% pointless. Microsoft will not accept direct downloads of desktop apps for RT in the store. The desktop only exists because they haven't got Office running on Metro yet. Once they have, I would expect an update for RT which replaces Office with the Metro version and removes the desktop wholesale. I am concerned that if this transition succeeds, the desktop will be phased out in Windows 9, rendering every major digital distributor bankrupt.
About that...

I work for a major financial company. All of our independent advisors all across the country have to either run XP natively, or XP Mode on Windows 7, because the vendor that provides the software they use to run their business still after many years haven't brought their application up to speed. And the amusing thing is, by all accounts we're actually ahead of the game.

Your desktop isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
 
I don't think Windows 8 deserves the flack it's getting. I've been running it exclusively on my desktop since the Consumer Preview (now on RTM) and it's been nothing but a smooth experience.

I use Metro as a start menu replacement, but beyond that I never use Metro apps. You don't have to, and I don't know why people seem to think it's necessary.

Other than the start menu now being fullscreen, the rest of the experience is only improved upon/completely standard with Windows 7.
 
See no real reason to spend money and time upgrading my OS when 7 is working perfectly fine right now. I've always been a 1 OS per build kind of guy, and my current rig is only 8 months old, will be skipping 8 as I did Vista for 9 in a few years when I need to upgrade
 
For that matter XP and work perfectly fine too. If you don't upgrade until an OS is broken, why are you using 7 now?

Because Windows 7 actually offers a lot of benefits over Windows XP for gamers, like native DirectX 10+, WDDM 1.1 which alleviates driver related BSODs, much better memory mangement which has helped in a fair few games and stability issues. Does XP even support SLI properly? Plus a real native 64Bit OS that isn't some retrofitted Server abomination.

EDIT: Dammit :P
 
Haha, thanks to this thread, I finally decided to try out the RC for Windows 8.

I'll post my opinion after actually checking out the OS. :D

I actually did that recently as well and I have to say I really like it. It can look really damn close to Win 7 if you want it to. The Metro stuff was pretty good, though. I liked it a lot more than I thought I would.

Doesn't mean I'm buying 8 the day it comes out or anything because 7 is doing well for me, but sometime in the next year, yeah, sure.

I understand why Gabe and Notch have their balls in a twist, though. No, not their stated reasons, but what's obviously underneath them. The built-in app/games store on 8 is pretty goddamn slick and easy to use. It will take a little spotlight off third party game clients for sure.
 
Windows 8 isn't some new magical platform, it's still very much based on Windows 7 core standards except it has WDDM 1.2 support. Drivers will improve at the same rate as Windows 7 drivers still are, doubt you'll see any major performance increases. Drivers just suck because they are still working with new-feature kinks.

Sure, but lets be honest.. we're discussing benchmarks for an operating system that isn't even available in retail yet. Its just asking for the crazies to show up and scream at the clouds.

I guess my main point was that we should simply wait a bit before freaking out is all.
 
Top Bottom