PHOENIXZERO
Member
Do I need to track down more actual viewership numbers for Raw? Rating number is irrelevant due to how frequently Nielsen would change their calculation of what a ratings point equaled. Like a posted a few pages back for example a 6.3 in November 1999 equaled just under 4.8 million viewers while February 1999 4.435M viewers was a 4.45.
http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1999/Cable-TV-Nielsen-Ratings/id-c8ec08046af6824fedf58548c58e6fdf
The influence of Vince Russo and Ed Ferrara is what has pretty much lead to where we are now. Making WWE more low brow Jerry Springer inspired trashy crash TV in their ripping off ECW's edginess without the understanding of wrestling from Paul Heyman is a major reason why WWE eventually went to shit creatively and booking wise as they started going with TV writers instead of bookers who don't understand wrestling and on average don't stick around for more than a few months. I'm pretty sure they influenced Vince McMahon with the silly "we're making movies" nonsense considering that's how Russo and Ferrara viewed at it as well and were incapable of understanding why something they saw on some TV show didn't work or draw for wrestling. As already said, their"strength" was having a mid-card that always had something going on and the ideas that would get filtered though sometimes Vince failed that like with the stupid miscarriage angles WWE did starting with the first one involving Terri Runnels which is something Russo and Ferrara came up with as well as P.M.S and Meat, pretty sure the "Terri Invitational Tournament" was also an idea of theirs but they weren't the booker since Pat Patterson was still around but I guess give them credit for that which ended up getting the Hardys and Edge and Christian over... Though they got a lot more popular post Russo with Brian Gewitz writing for them.
If you really want to get into the whole writers thing.
Brian Gewitz > Russo and Ferrara
I think you mean Val Venis.
http://www.apnewsarchive.com/1999/Cable-TV-Nielsen-Ratings/id-c8ec08046af6824fedf58548c58e6fdf
The influence of Vince Russo and Ed Ferrara is what has pretty much lead to where we are now. Making WWE more low brow Jerry Springer inspired trashy crash TV in their ripping off ECW's edginess without the understanding of wrestling from Paul Heyman is a major reason why WWE eventually went to shit creatively and booking wise as they started going with TV writers instead of bookers who don't understand wrestling and on average don't stick around for more than a few months. I'm pretty sure they influenced Vince McMahon with the silly "we're making movies" nonsense considering that's how Russo and Ferrara viewed at it as well and were incapable of understanding why something they saw on some TV show didn't work or draw for wrestling. As already said, their"strength" was having a mid-card that always had something going on and the ideas that would get filtered though sometimes Vince failed that like with the stupid miscarriage angles WWE did starting with the first one involving Terri Runnels which is something Russo and Ferrara came up with as well as P.M.S and Meat, pretty sure the "Terri Invitational Tournament" was also an idea of theirs but they weren't the booker since Pat Patterson was still around but I guess give them credit for that which ended up getting the Hardys and Edge and Christian over... Though they got a lot more popular post Russo with Brian Gewitz writing for them.
If you really want to get into the whole writers thing.
Brian Gewitz > Russo and Ferrara
Remember he's from the company that had Test and Albert managed by Trish (T&A) and a wrestler subtly named Paul Penis.
I think you mean Val Venis.