Pagusas
Elden Member
is it still navi? this will mean that the ps5 and xbox6 will be very similiar.
We are well past the age where consoles were distinctively different. They all, including the switch, are just PC's now.
is it still navi? this will mean that the ps5 and xbox6 will be very similiar.
Jaguar (used in X1/PS4) is a low-end netbook (remember netbooks?) CPU design that was laughably inferior to desktop CPUs available at the time.I know nothing about tech, is an eight-core Zen 2 7-nm CPU good enough for next-gen jump if paired with a good gpu like 1070?
Jaguar (used in X1/PS4) is a low-end netbook (remember netbooks?) CPU design that was laughably inferior to desktop CPUs available at the time.
Zen 2 is AMD’s high end CPU design for next year that should be at or near the top of the performance charts.
It’s a massive upgrade. Easily several times the performance.
The most interesting part is AMD "next-generation" GPU. If it is AMD "next-gen" architecture then that is the one that comes after Navi and should bring a number of new features.
I wonder if Scarlet will have hardware ray-tracing capabilities...
lolCirca 2013
From the Vandal (spain) article :
Brad Sams of Thurott - a medium that has revealed multiple details of Microsoft and Xbox - has commented on the first reliable details given the history of web leaks.
According to Sams, its launch would be targeting 2020 - AMD had dropped it - and would include an eight-core Zen 2 7-nm CPU, as well as the next-generation AMD GPU. In principle, it seems that the launch dates of Xbox Scarlett and PlayStation 5 and its features would be very similar
Source
Don't know if this relevant or who this guy is.
Close if old or rubbish.
Really don't see any big third-parties wanting their retail sales tanked by being offered via streaming rather than purchase on a single platform!
So don't expect such low-end streaming box to be in any way equivalent to a proper console.
I'd also add that its value proposition basically depends on it being better than, or having more utility than a pure software client running on a PC, tablet, phone whatever. Because basically that's what its competing with, and those clients will be free downloads...
Zen is AMD's newest CPU architecture so it's natural that the next generation of consoles will utilize that. In terms of price, performance, power and scalability Zen blows away all of AMD's previous architectures by a country mile. Polaris architecture is the outgoing AMD GPUs and AMD's newest GPU architecture is Navi.Too lazy to google it, but can anyone here tell how good a Zen cpu would be?
All these AMD acronyms over the years..... Jag, Polaris, Ryzen etc....... There's more and probably mixing them up. Where does Zen fit in?
Ryzen is top dog right? Is Zen number 2?
Sams summary of MS gameplan 2019-2020:
- Discless X1S next Spring with discless attach feature called project Roma - allows you to buy services like Game Pass and XBL at checkout and the unit comes to you prepped and ready with the services you ordered available.
- Scarlett launch in 2020
- Zen 2 architecture, AMD next-gen GPU tech, 4k60fps the rule not the exception
- Option 1) Streaming "stick" service, more for casuals, XCloud, next-gen gaming at a low price point, plays all games, he suggests it may be cost as little as $115.00
- Option 2) High-end traditional box with all bells and whistles available
- Back Compat emphasis will continue
- MS considered buying EA
- MS still considering buying Discord
The rule for first party releases, third parties can do what they wishHow will they mandate this? Or is this the loose term of "the rule" like with 1080p on the base PS4?
How would this affect sales negatively? You buy the game from the MS Store and then MS allows you to stream it from their servers. The only person cut out is the retail middle-man. Not every game will be Game Pass. That will be developer choice.
For me to dish out money next gen on new consoles, they need to do 4k @ 60fps easily and without compromise.
Also, off topic, Nintendo's revision better offer 1080p standard next year if they want to keep up.
[...] so it's natural that the next generation of consoles will utilize that.
Sams summary of MS gameplan 2019-2020:
- Option 1) Streaming "stick" service, more for casuals, XCloud, next-gen gaming at a low price point, plays all games, he suggests it may be cost as little as $115.00
For me to dish out money next gen on new consoles, they need to do 4k @ 60fps easily and without compromise.
Also, off topic, Nintendo's revision better offer 1080p standard next year if they want to keep up.
You mean sceen on unit itself? 1080p to tv is a given but I'm not sure about handheld mode, maybe 900p with 1600x900 screen? That would be great.
Depends on what hardware will be put inside, a Turing-based GPU could easily do the job, and/or they can add G-Sync support and don't have to aim for rock-solid 60FPS. Or they could turn to AMD for a complete 7nm solution, with heavily underclocked Ryzen+Navi combo, like let's say 1,2-1,6GHz 4C/4T Ryzen, and 400-800MHz 12-16CU Navi. Not to mention the possibilities of super easy ports from other consoles it would give. I fricking love the whole concept of the Switch, but the performance is simply not there, and what comes with it - the games library.
It's going to be 2020. They will launch with Forza as always and that's why forza is not coming out in 2019.
Indeed and I do keep that in mind. If AMD's "leaked" lineup for next year is true we'll be seeing a Zen 2 + Navi APU (3600G) in Q3 2019. Of course this is technically a rumor, but some people "in the know" have basically confirmed that the lineup is real minus some details which weren't specified.It's not so obvious - bare in mind AMD custom chips are always at least a year behind their desktop/laptop products. Few examples - 14nm process was already available before PS4/XB1 were launching, but we had to wait for their refreshes three years later to utilize it. Ryzen CPU was available on the market for some time, but X1X still launched with (modified) Jaguar CPU.
So for next-gen consoles Zen-based CPU was a given, MAYBE Zen+, but Zen2? And 7nm? When they will ba available somwhere next year for the desktop market? Not to mention that next-gen GPU when Navi won't be available untill next year as well? Amazing news if all of this comes out to be true. It would mean that they either have an extremely tight production schedlue, or the 2020 will actually be a "paper" release with super short supplies, with the actual mass production starting in 2021.
He was using the phrase "it will be the rule and not the exception" to mean Scarlett will be powerful enough so that games with 4k60fps will be the standard, not the exception. He wasn't referencing any actual "rule" from MS.How will they mandate this? Or is this the loose term of "the rule" like with 1080p on the base PS4?
To be clear he didn't say he got that price point from a source. I think that's his own speculation based on earlier reports of a much lower cost device. I agree that if MS goes to ~$100 with Scarlett XCloud, they win.If true, this will single-handedly win the upcoming generation for them. As PS4 shown, saturating the market with as much user base as possible, it's THE key to everything - software sales, service sales, DLC sales, accessories sales, everything follows directly on how the platform sells itself.
He was using the phrase "it will be the rule and not the exception" to mean Scarlett will be powerful enough so that games with 4k60fps will be the standard, not the exception. He wasn't referencing any actual "rule" from MS.
To be clear he didn't say he got that price point from a source. I think that's his own speculation based on earlier reports of a much lower cost device. I agree that if MS goes to ~$100 with Scarlett XCloud, they win.
To be clear he didn't say he got that price point from a source. I think that's his own speculation based on earlier reports of a much lower cost device. I agree that if MS goes to ~$100 with Scarlett XCloud, they win.
- MS considered buying EA
- MS still considering buying Discord
You mean sceen on unit itself? 1080p to tv is a given but I'm not sure about handheld mode, maybe 900p with 1600x900 screen? That would be great.
Are you serious? lol.. How far away from the TV do you game? I have a 70 inch 4K and I'm like 3 meters from it and I can tell you there is a huge difference!It's been proven at living room viewing distances that there is no marked improvement from 1080p to 4K. This is just plain physics.
LOL.It's been proven at living room viewing distances that there is no marked improvement from 1080p to 4K. This is just plain physics.
Well with a 70 inch 4k TV you need to be at least 1.35 meters closer to the TV to noticed the addiction resolution. At 3 meter you won’t see difference between 1080p and 4k.Are you serious? lol.. How far away from the TV do you game? I have a 70 inch 4K and I'm like 3 meters from it and I can tell you there is a huge difference!
Depending how close you are from TV of course you will see noticeable difference.LOL.
I have a 4k tv and even watching dedicated 4k tv channels vs the standard HD channel (which I think they pump out 1080i), there's a noticeable difference in clarity watching sports.
As for gaming, the first game I booted up with my new X and 4k TV was Gears 4. The title page alone was amazingly clear. A combo of better tv and X textures even makes the dude's pores show on screen.
Yet that still gave us great looking games. Then these next cpus should be something else. Yeesh.jaguar was worse than CPUs from 2010 from intel. amd was struggling at that point in history. its a garbage CPU. which is why many ps4 and xbox games can't go upto 60 even tho the GPU is capable of it.
That's utter crap, I don't care what those article measurements are or what you say.. You are wrong! 3 Meters on a 70 is not that far.. I can definitely tell!Well with a 70 inch 4k TV you need to be at least 1.35 meters closer to the TV to noticed the addiction resolution. At 3 meter you won’t see difference between 1080p and 4k.
https://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/
BTW these are manufacturers recomendaríamos too.
Depending how close you are from TV of course you will see noticeable difference.
X does boost graphics in Gears 4 that is why even far away from your TV you see difference but to see these 4k pixels you need to be closer to TV depending of the size.
Wonder if Xbox and PS will end up almost identical under the hood, sorta like most flagship Android phones have the same Snapdragon inside.
It's been proven at living room viewing distances that there is no marked improvement from 1080p to 4K. This is just plain physics.
lol8K/120fps will be a must in 8 years.
Really don't see any big third-parties wanting their retail sales tanked by being offered via streaming rather than purchase on a single platform!
So don't expect such low-end streaming box to be in any way equivalent to a proper console.
I'd also add that its value proposition basically depends on it being better than, or having more utility than a pure software client running on a PC, tablet, phone whatever. Because basically that's what its competing with, and those clients will be free downloads...
That's utter crap, I don't care what those article measurements are or what you say.. You are wrong! 3 Meters on a 70 is not that far.. I can definitely tell!
4k is important.
60fps is a must.
4k is just pure waste of resources. Funny how so many at here laugh at people whom state the fact that 1080p vs 4k = no difference after certain distance
It is just fysical fact that they look the same after certain distance.
And casuals usually sit damm far from their tv, 3-5m so 4k == fullhd.
With unlimited power, why not to target it. But if/when next gen is just 2-4x ps4 pro = graphical jump will be smaller if all games target 4k
Same with 60fps, it is smoother but also waste of resources because stable 30fps is enough for many kind of games, those that have bad reflexes/ability to adapt can play with pc and 144hz.
lol this forum. 900p vs 1080p 'huge diffrenece, lolz Xbox', 4k vs 1080p, no difference lol.
Agree. Those graphs might apply to ordinary movies, television etc. but most certainly not to computer generated image, a.k.a. games - if there is no difference at certain distance, then how the hell there are still jaggies when no AA is applied?
Well with a 70 inch 4k TV you need to be at least 1.35 meters closer to the TV to noticed the addiction resolution. At 3 meter you won’t see difference between 1080p and 4k.
https://carltonbale.com/does-4k-resolution-matter/
BTW these are manufacturers recomendaríamos too.
Depending how close you are from TV of course you will see noticeable difference.
X does boost graphics in Gears 4 that is why even far away from your TV you see difference but to see these 4k pixels you need to be closer to TV depending of the size.
Any TV manufacture ever said that you can’t see over 24fps? Sorry but no.This sounds like a new kind of "can't see moar than 24fpssssss!" type post.
lol Yeap utter crap lolThat's utter crap, I don't care what those article measurements are or what you say.. You are wrong! 3 Meters on a 70 is not that far.. I can definitely tell!
I will check later but you can see difference between 1080p and 900p up to 3m depending of the size of the display... that is a far away distance... most play closer.lol this forum. 900p vs 1080p 'huge diffrenece, lolz Xbox', 4k vs 1080p, no difference lol.
I have a 50inch 4ktv, sit about 2.5-3m away, and the difference between 1080p and 4k is VAST.
I do not think even 8-16K will be where we give up on AA. It is a signal sampling problem (well sampling frequency one). In order to be aliasing free without a filter (AA), you need to sample at at least 2x the frequency than the signal you are trying to represent. Else you get “jaggies” or in general a disturbed / aliased representation.
You can imagine trying to sample a signal with an almost comically large dynamic range / infinite frequencies so without trying to intelligently (and in a stable way) to discard those components that actually generate aliasing instead of simply trying a brute force approach.
What makes a lot of the movies you like super awesome (even on DVD at 480p) is the anti aliasing of dynamic surfaces, edges, and textures as well as motion blur (temporal anti aliasing).