battle system is identical to the Wii version. and I was surprised by how it still work on the smaller portable screens.
What do you dislike about it? I think it was a very good BS, honestly. I'd also say that is one of the few cases where I was looking to battle against monsters because of the pleasure of the BS.
Best JRPG of the past 15 years not named Persona.
There's 0 punch to the battle, you know. The swords don't collide with anything and the numbers goes up. Kinda like a MMO, but worse than some I've played (like Ragnarok Online, for example).
A turn based battle system would be better, IMO.
The rest looks pretty good. The world, the music...
Reyn time? lol
The battle system is the biggest flaw in Xenoblade. It's fun to control and you have lots of options. The 'player side' is pretty much fine. The problem is that the enemies don't develop any kind of AI or special abilities to test your skills. For 98% of the game, you can be shulk, run to the back on an enemy, backslash, use other skills, and get by that way. The game only ever asks you to actually think about what you're doing a handful of times across the entire game, making the majority of battles sheer busywork once you know what you're doing. It's more fun busywork than the average JRPG because you're actually controlling your character, but it feels like busywork rather than anything challenging or tactical all the same.
Reyn time? lol
It's only one of the most critically acclaimed rpgs in the last decade after all, so I can see why you are not sureI'm not even sure it was a top 10 one let alone the best. Maybe being portable will mask some of its deficiencies.
Chû Totoro;157414564 said:I don't have 70 hours to spend on a game...
...but this seems to be such an awesome adventure :'(
I may buy it even if I play a few dozen hours. How long does the game takes to be interesting?
Don't say after "Screen Title" lol (even if this screen has sort of hypnotized me making want to play it more)
Chû Totoro;157414564 said:I don't have 70 hours to spend on a game...
...but this seems to be such an awesome adventure :'(
I may buy it even if I play a few dozen hours. How long does the game takes to be interesting?
Don't say after "Screen Title" lol (even if this screen has sort of hypnotized me making want to play it more)
Chû Totoro;157414564 said:I don't have 70 hours to spend on a game...
...but this seems to be such an awesome adventure :'(
I may buy it even if I play a few dozen hours. How long does the game takes to be interesting?
Don't say after "Screen Title" lol (even if this screen has sort of hypnotized me making want to play it more)
It's only one of the most critically acclaimed rpgs in the last decade after all, so I can see why you are not sure
Xenoblade Chronicles remains a must-play RPG. While this version doesn't do anything special to entice old fans to return, it still holds the same fun it did the first time around. Don't let it pass you by again if it did previously; this world captivates and takes hold of you like a great game should.
I was hooked an hour in. But I also like MMO-type RPG games which this is.
The setting is the real selling point of the game and it's pretty awesome from the starting village. Once you get to the Gaur Plains (What, 10 hours in?) you start to see the real scale and beauty of this game.
Chû Totoro;157414564 said:I don't have 70 hours to spend on a game...
...but this seems to be such an awesome adventure :'(
I may buy it even if I play a few dozen hours. How long does the game takes to be interesting?
Don't say after "Screen Title" lol (even if this screen has sort of hypnotized me making want to play it more)
The fact that a mediocre port of Xenoblade is getting a mostley 8s and 9s bodes well for Xenoblade X.
how do you know that it is mediocre? do you have the game?
Oh, so I wasn't crazy when I dropped the game because I was not liking the battle system? Cool. Willing to give it another shot on 3DS.The battle system is the biggest flaw in Xenoblade. It's fun to control and you have lots of options.
It being portable is a big appeal to me because I got nothing to do when I go to my parent's home. That is when I tend to play my RPGs.Chû Totoro;157414564 said:I don't have 70 hours to spend on a game...
...but this seems to be such an awesome adventure :'(
Best JRPG of the past 15 years not named Persona.
All the reviews are saying that the port isn't great. I own the original and I'm not compelled to get this version based on what's being said.
This is sad that it is true. Blue Dragon was the last JRPG I enjoyed.Best JRPG of the past 15 years not named Persona.
Chû Totoro;157415827 said:I used to play J-RPG but my favourites are on Snes, Playstation or Dreamcast... I'm not into MMOs and I don't like Monster Hunter.
I'm not sure what I'm saying helps but do you think I could enjoy it?
note : I'm trying hard to find a justification but I know I'm going to buy this since I have to try one of the best games of last gen... (I'm so weak)
Yeah I was just watching GameXplain's review video and they said the feature should just be turned off. I like to use the feature finally since it works better on the N3DS and to have this part work so poor (or virtually non-existent) is disappointing.So, the 3D is faked in this one? No thanks. The nerve of them to include it in the name if it isn't true 3D.
It was the only redeeming feature of this version. I can't stand when devs do that in 3DS games like EOIV and now even moreso that the N3DS has better 3D with the tracking.
the port IS actually good. Monster games did a good job. fact is that the game was/is really massive and of course its scale transaltes as an inferior version from home console to portable system.
PS: I've played and reviewed the game. Not that this "justify" my point of view, but I'd just want to share my opinion.
Amen to this. I'm actually playing Persona 4 Golden right now and I'm pretty sure Xenoblade and that game are my favourite JRPGs ever
Because the acclaim of the games enthusiast press carries so much weight. You'll forgive me if I dont blindly follow paid fanboys and develop my own opinions.
I only said I was a little disappointed. No doubt this is still a great game but I was hoping for something to make this new version more essential. For example, most people would recommend playing Persona 4: The Golden over the original.
I have the Wii version, have never played it; I've always meant to, just never have.
This seems like the prefect experience for me, as I play on handhelds more than console.
I'd like to know (love 3D, love it even more on N3DS): how is the 3D effect in this game?
what? Xenoblade was critically acclaimed and well recieved, among the hardcore niche that bought it at least, it also has a positive thread every now and then.I'm not even sure it was a top 10 one let alone the best. Maybe being portable will mask some of its deficiencies.
So, the 3D is faked in this one? No thanks. The nerve of them to include it in the name if it isn't true 3D.
It was the only redeeming feature of this version. I can't stand when devs do that in 3DS games like EOIV and now even moreso that the N3DS has better 3D with the tracking.