• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Xenoblade X Localization Changes for Character Models

With all these changes to the Japanese versions, now I'm really worried about Genei Ibun Roku. I hope they don't change anything.

How the hell did Bayo 2 release completely untouched?
 
I was in doubt about buying this game and i have too much to play already, but more censorship will definitely make me not buy it.
 
With all these changes to the Japanese versions, now I'm really worried about Genei Ibun Roku. I hope they don't change anything.

How the hell did Bayo 2 release completely untouched?
No underage characters to worry about being exploited? It seems pretty cut and dry.
 
You say this as if they don't do this when developing the game to begin with.

You can't tell for sure what is removed for what reason when the game is still being made. When a complete, final version is released in one region though, we can at least draw the line there.
 
You say this as if they don't do this when developing the game to begin with.

Yeah, dialogue gets censored from Japanese games all the time sadly, however smaller publishing firms like Aksys and XSEED tend not to shy away from the heavy stuff.

With all these changes to the Japanese versions, now I'm really worried about Genei Ibun Roku. I hope they don't change anything.

How the hell did Bayo 2 release completely untouched?

Bayo 2 has an M rating so it has that freedom.
 
Yeah, when I read about the glowing previews that the game is getting I wondered what will the complains will be about next. Didn't have to wait too much.
 
With all these changes to the Japanese versions, now I'm really worried about Genei Ibun Roku. I hope they don't change anything.

How the hell did Bayo 2 release completely untouched?

Swimsuit DLC is not happening I would guess.
And that cutscene with Tsubasa in her swimsuit would get changed somehow.
 
I have zero problems advocating for a private company to have the ability to make decisions on what content it adds or removes from its own properties.

You have zero problems with censorship, but you have a strange aversion to actually admitting it using the word.
 
Basically the whole "We shouldn't complain guys. They cut their own content obviously out of fear of controversy, but lol it's not censorship " stance.

It's definitely self-censorship. People complain about it like it was the government stepping in and mandating that the content be removed, though. A creator of any work that has a publisher is ultimately going to have to release the product the publisher wants released because they paid for it. It could be a book, a movie, whatever. If the publisher has a problem with the content they'll remove it. It might be a bust slider, or it might be a character that has the same name as the publishing CEOs son and he doesn't like the character so he makes them rename him.
 
You have zero problems with censorship, but you have a strange aversion to actually admitting it using the word.

What I have a problem with is the connotation of CENSORSHIP that gets tossed around in these threads as if there is a Department of Decency in the government that is mandating that this content be removed. The publisher removed it, sure it's censorship, but it's self-censorship. They can do that if they want to. Why is it only ever a problem when it has something to do with sexualized women in games?
 
Removing a slider isn't censorship, nor is changing swimsuit styles.

Censorship.

Censorship.

What I have a problem with is the connotation of CENSORSHIP that gets tossed around in these threads as if there is a Department of Decency in the government that is mandating that this content be removed. The publisher removed it, sure it's censorship, but it's self-censorship. They can do that if they want to. Why is it only ever a problem when it has something to do with sexualized women in games?

Well for starters, having a breast slider is not only for the purposes of sexualization.

It's only brought up like this because changes to bodies and such is the type of content which is most visible and easy to see for your typical gamer, so it's the easiest one to bring up arguments about. Stuff like miniscule text changes to make someone sound less "offensive" is a bit harder to bring up a full argument for because of the nuances of text, but doing something so overt as removing a character creator item is very much obvious.
 
Yeah, dialogue gets censored from Japanese games all the time sadly, however smaller publishing firms like Aksys and XSEED tend not to shy away from the heavy stuff.



Bayo 2 has an M rating so it has that freedom.

Fatal Frame too, and #FE (lets see)
Now, i havent heard anything about Devils Third.:p

Besides, Bayo 2 is overall less sexualized than the first game, not that it matters much
 
You say this as if they don't do this when developing the game to begin with.

Lots of things happen during development, but it was put there in the actual release in Japan. The problem here is removing content that was in the Japanese release from the U.S. release. That's the problem. That is not okay.

I don't care about Fatal Frame and wouldn't use the swimsuit outfits if I did play it, but I object to it's removal in principle. I don't particularly /care/ that much, since I have no interest in the game and it was an alternate outfit, but it bothers me in principle. Similarly, I'm not deeply upset about the Lin bikini thing here, and I actually think the new one looks better anyway, but I still disagree with the decision. Because these things are changes to the original for the purpose of not offending.

I apply this to things I actually get offended over too, by the way. There is a game that came out in Japan this year that had something I found really gross and will not buy the game because of it, but I don't advocate or approve of changing it in the upcoming U.S. release.
 
-The character creator has been modified so that the bust slider has been removed and so therefore when creating a female character, all female characters created by the player have by default medium-sized breasts.

Are you fucking kidding me? Breast size is a physical human feature just like any other. This is ridiculous. Holy shit. What kind of babysitting is this?

Not only that, but it's in plenty, if not most, of all other character creators without ANY controversy. This is insane.
 
What I have a problem with is the connotation of CENSORSHIP that gets tossed around in these threads as if there is a Department of Decency in the government that is mandating that this content be removed. The publisher removed it, sure it's censorship, but it's self-censorship. They can do that if they want to. Why is it only ever a problem when it has something to do with sexualized women in games?

This sticks out to me in every one of these threads. Cries of "CENSORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" are never about political themes, philosophies, religious themes, racial themes, etc. It's not even about feminism. It's always sexualized nonsense that comes across as pandering and gross, especially to Western audiences.
 
Lots of things happen during development, but it was put there in the actual release in Japan. The problem here is removing content that was in the Japanese release from the U.S. release. That's the problem. That is not okay.

I don't care about Fatal Frame and wouldn't use the swimsuit outfits if I did play it, but I object to it's removal in principle. I don't particularly /care/ that much, since I have no interest in the game and it was an alternate outfit, but it bothers me in principle. Similarly, I'm not deeply upset about the Lin bikini thing here, and I actually think the new one looks better anyway, but I still disagree with the decision. Because these things are changes to the original for the purpose of not offending.

I apply this to things I actually get offended over too, by the way. There is a game that came out in Japan this year that had something I found really gross and will not buy the game because of it, but I don't advocate or approve of changing it in the upcoming U.S. release.
What the hell? Of course it's okay. If a developer and publisher want to change their message for a different audience, that's their prerogative- it isn't suppression.

McDonald's is censored in Mexico because we don't get the exact same menu as Americans.

no kidding
 
McDonald's is censored in Mexico because we don't get the exact same menu as Americans.
McDonalds doesn't change its menu based on a flimsy perception that having genre-standard options associates them with perversion and pedophelia.
 
Are you fucking kidding me? Breast size is a physical human feature just like any other. This is ridiculous. Holy shit. What kind of babysitting is this?

Interesting that they cherry-picked this as one of a handful of physical features though, isn't it?
 
This sticks out to me in every one of these threads. Cries of "CENSORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" are never about political themes, philosophies, religious themes, racial themes, etc. It's not even about feminism. It's always sexualized nonsense that comes across as pandering and gross, especially to Western audiences.

In modern times, how often in games does political talk or racial themes or feminism get removed from region to region? Now compare that to the number of times censorship relating to the human body has happened.

People aren't ignoring one for the other; one happens way more often with historical precedent to back it.
 
This sticks out to me in every one of these threads. Cries of "CENSORSHIP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" are never about political themes, philosophies, religious themes, racial themes, etc. It's not even about feminism. It's always sexualized nonsense that comes across as pandering and gross, especially to Western audiences.

Name something else that ever gets censored and that everyone is a okay with

(also breasts are not sexualization)
 
McDonalds doesn't change its menu based on a flimsy perception that having genre-standard options associates them with perversion and pedophelia.
They wouldn't sell us stuff that we wouldn't buy, yeah. They adapt their products to our market. This is called localization.
 
It's very much censorship. "They made changes" = removed options out of fear. Censorship.

If people know or don't know that the censorship is taking place; If Nintendo is merely executing their options in their capability; it's still censorship

They aren't being censored. I suppose you could call it "self-censorship," but that's no different than making changes to your work that you think will make it more palatable to specific audience.

The whole "out of fear" stuff is just your interpretation.
 
You can't tell for sure what is removed for what reason when the game is still being made. When a complete, final version is released in one region though, we can at least draw the line there.
Why does the line have to be drawn there? Shouldn't a creator be free to decide that they want to make a change to something after the fact?

What about VNs that had sex scenes in the original Japanese release to help sell them to a specific market over there? Should those games be saddled with those scenes when localized for other markets where they don't need that content to find an audience in the new market?
 
Top Bottom