no troll serious question, is 101 a retail $60 game?
It's a 99 cent iPad game, though I hear they're exploring free-go-play business models, as well as browser play.no troll serious question, is 101 a retail $60 game?
Yeah, some people need to pay more attention. On the internet...
Also, oh my god, I just now discovered the meaning behind your user name and avatar, after noticing your posts from well into my lurker days. I feel so stupid now
It's a 99 cent iPad game, though I hear they're exploring free-go-play business models, as well as browser play.
Yup. Might be $50 though.
no troll serious question, is 101 a retail $60 game?
Yup. Might be $50 though.
Sure.Shin'en's game is a glossy shader heavy shooter with a few levels. Pikim is a retail game with a large world. Like all Shin'en games, it's basically a "look what we can do" tech demo. Note that I'm not implying this as a negative point about Shin'en.
i agreeThis thread needs more screenshots.
Shin'en's game is a glossy shader heavy shooter with a few levels. Pikim is a retail game with a large world. Like all Shin'en games, it's basically a "look what we can do" tech demo. Note that I'm not implying this as a negative point about Shin'en.
Besides that point, the "it started on Wii" shit goes the other way. Pikmen 3doesn't look like an upscaled Wii game. That's raw trolling. There's no need to qualify or defend how the game looks. It uses a lot of effects and runs at 60fps. It has very attractive design and art direction. It looks rich. Pixel counters turn around and march off to buy a new video card for their PC, this nonsense is not needed here.
The "Nintendo is lazy when it comes to internal productions" is old, trite, and tired. Whether anyone likes it or not, this is what Nintendo does: apply an appropriate amount of production value to make a game look nice. Whether that's a little or a lot. They do not play the game of "let us sell games based on graphics and impressing a thin slice of geeks by advertising our game has the most expensive audio-visual production to date in gaming."
When a game can use heavy investment in visuals, they readily go there. But the truth is, if you're a pixel counter and all that matters to you is feeling reassured that every game you lay eyes on pushes technology to be bleeding edge without regard for the return on it, Nintendo is going to confound and frustrate you with their sensible and reasonable approach to game development that allows them to enjoy remaining profitable on the software they release.
I wish people would stop with the "Pikmin 3 is running at 60 fps" misquote from E3; I've played the game, and it is absolutely not running at 60 fps. It does look substantially nicer in motion, but it's not at that level by a long shot.
Man Transformers looks bad but I guess its just a Wii port.
I can't stand the "it started as a Wii game" argument either, especially when a 5 person team with no recourses (Shin'en), managed to make an eShop game that looks a lot better than Pikmin.
So what kind of game is Transformers Prime?
I think Nintendo is just inexperienced with HD graphics, they have been working with gamecube-level graphics for 10 years so now that they've upgraded significantly, they're probably like "what the fuck am I doing?", I'm sure once they get the hang of the hardware they will produce some fantastic-looking games
Must resist urge to joke about British dental hygiene...
Dyad?nano assault is such a shitty ripoff of that sony psn game. lol
nano assault is such a shitty ripoff of that sony psn game. lol
Must resist urge to joke about British dental hygiene...
I think Nintendo is just inexperienced with HD graphics, they have been working with gamecube-level graphics for 10 years so now that they've upgraded significantly, they're probably like "what the fuck am I doing?", I'm sure once they get the hang of the hardware they will produce some fantastic-looking games
Dyad?
Dyad (Release): Jul 17, 2012
Nano Assault (3DS Release): Dec 5, 2011
Dyad?
Dyad (Release): Jul 17, 2012
Nano Assault (3DS Release): Dec 5, 2011
I would assume he means Super Stardust HD from 07.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jhhocl7jf3o
I do like Nano Assault though.
the british have bad teeth thing is the most bizare and inacurate stereotype, i'm british and really cant see where it comes from, look even that zombie's got fairly good teeth
That's nothing Nano Assault Neo at all, it looks more like Geometry Wars in a 3D plane.
Alright, now someone edit this onto the box
I think Nintendo is just inexperienced with HD graphics, they have been working with gamecube-level graphics for 10 years so now that they've upgraded significantly, they're probably like "what the fuck am I doing?", I'm sure once they get the hang of the hardware they will produce some fantastic-looking games
Dear Nintendo can we please have a photo of Wii U on its stand?
Just one photo... please...
Forget the haters, I'm down with that Zombi U boxart.
here u goWould anyone mind uploading all of the NSMBU, Rayman, and Scribblenauts shots if there are any? Thanks