Xenomorph said:Sigh. Looks like that concept art won't be realized...
What game design courseZoe said:I'm disappointed but not surprised in the least. Warren Spector was very much about innovation during his game design course, and it was pretty obvious how much he liked the Wii.
AltogetherAndrews said:Well, it was interesting while it lasted.
Princess Skittles said:Someone tinypic the cover. ;___;
Blizzard said:This looks like a Country Bear or something after acid. File calls it a "Beetle Thing"
avatar299 said:What game design course
Yeah, I expected it to be a codename, it's a bit weird.Father_Brain said:Wasn't expecting Epic Mickey to be the actual title, though.
"Should be on XXXX" platform whining is bannable, though the enforcement is uneven.ItsInMyVeins said:I know people got banned, but what were they saying?
Stumpokapow said:i feel like i have front row seats and popcorn for the battle of the somme.
Duly noted. Good to finally know what it is!Haunted said:Huelen, stop posting that pos fanart please.
omg rite said:It's okay, not everyone does.bafflewaffle said:I have no soul and never had a childhood either
Dragona Akehi said:So remember this thread the first time around? Keep that in mind.
It was strongly rumored as such, and there was plenty of evidence, but there was no official confirmation and the constant whining led to "special measures" till the platform got officialized (now).stuminus3 said:For some reason, I thought this was always a Wii game.
Guess I should pay more attention.
Thanks. It's beautiful.Hero of Legend said:Here ya go!
http://i33.tinypic.com/zwaik4.jpg
That cover is fucking BE-AWESOME!!!
So is it officially called Epic Mickey?
Dragona Akehi said:So remember this thread the first time around? Keep that in mind.
AltogetherAndrewsAltogetherAndrews said:Seems pretty reasonable. Interesting game becomes uninteresting due to platform, nothing strange about that.
:lolschuelma said:Kind of like your full member status!
This has no meaning.EmCeeGramr said:"AAA"
As far as Western devs go, definitely. If we're talking first, period, then you get into debates over what actually constitutes AAA from Japanese developers (and yeah, MH3, at minimum, definitely counts).EmCeeGramr said:Thinking about it... isn't this like, the first "AAA" third-party Wii game? Like, it's not a spinoff, it's being developed by serious talent instead of a B-team, its publisher and IP will no doubt ensure it will be well advertised, and from what little we know it'll contain "core" elements but still take advantage of the Wii.
Ah, that's probably why.Jocchan said:It was strongly rumored as such, and there was plenty of evidence...
You'll be allBisnic said:What's the cover? Website is blocked at work. Host on tinypic/photobucket please?
Bisnic said:What's the cover? Website is blocked at work. Host on tinypic/photobucket please?
I want screnshoooooots! I want to know if that team did a good job with that.
EmCeeGramr said:Thinking about it... isn't this like, the first "AAA" third-party Wii game? Like, it's not a spinoff, it's being developed by serious talent instead of a B-team, its publisher and IP will no doubt ensure it will be well advertised, and from what little we know it'll contain "core" elements but still take advantage of the Wii. The only other example I can think of is Monster Hunter 3.