Yes, first GPU under Raja Koduri's leadership (not sure if he's designing it or whether he just calls the shots).
And that's bad.
It's not accurate. There is also small glitches that happen because of it. The vsync also adds lag. But again the bigger sticking point is compatibility and having to dl the games.
Tidux any good at prediction or being insider or is he even one?
OléGunner;244079370 said:
Tidux any good at prediction or being insider or is he even one?
No shit. That doesn't make it good. I'll quote what you originally replied to:
Wake me up when I can play Mushihimesama Futari on the Xbox One.
Tidux any good at prediction or being insider or is he even one?
That's nothing compared to the PS3 price back at launch. Haha
or at least I'd certainly hope so.
You were talking only about the GPU of which I answered and how much power they could reduce from just a die shrink.
I think we're all aware of what's inside a console
Nothing to defend or be defensive about so not sure where you got that idea from
Just hard to keep up with conversation since things escalate from one thing to the other really fast.
lol
TheThreadsThatBindUs said:Not to come across as confrontational, but you claim to be more conservative than most and yet your speculated specs. are simply a mirror of what many people in this thread have already said.
I know one or two have come in and speculated at 16-20 TFLOPs GPUs, but they certainly haven't been the majority as I've seen.
Your specs. above aren't what I would consider (more) conservative for a late 2019 launch. In fact, the fact that you're considering the possibility of an 8c Zen or HBM2 (Samsung's low power HBM would be much more likely than HBM2, imho -- even if the likelihood of HBM at all is low) indicates that you're just as hopeful as the rest of us *wink*.
And I know we've gone back and forth on the feasibility of a late 2019 launch over a 2020. So it's nice to see that you're now a believer on that point
The 'Max Draw' figures that manufacturers specify.
That implies your cooling is near 100% efficient, which it is unlikely to be. It's how Microsoft managed to make the XBO X smaller than the XBO S despite the former consuming more power. The vapour chamber solution they use adds more expense though. These are all trade-offs and depend on what you wish to achieve. You may well just plop a heatsinc on an APU but that doesn't do much work spreading and dissipating heat. The goal is to distribute heat in as large a surface area as you can so that you can dissipate it into the air.
OG PS4 does not exceed 151W (KZ:SF).
HBM3/LCHBM is where it's at.
Performance boosts require software to run with inaccurate timing that causes rare visual glitches, though MS has been able to address those in a relatively timely fashion like you mentioned. But that point is quite controversial anyway. Higher performance is in itself inaccurate which is why people like it to begin with! This has been very controversial with ports in the Shmup community for instance where ports are expected to match the original slowdown as seen in the original hardware.
24GB is a weird quantity. It would require a 384-bit bus, which would drive up costs (PCB traces, APU pin count etc.) 192-bit bus would feel really underwhelming.
I could see a 384 bit bus just to get the extra bandwidth out of it if they use GDDR6. I think we're going to see over 500gb/s.