Scaled experience was a mistake.All I want is a better way to get mons to 100. I'd literally rebuy this is that was the only new thing.
Scaled experience was a mistake.All I want is a better way to get mons to 100. I'd literally rebuy this is that was the only new thing.
Scaled experience was a mistake.
I boxed that bitch.
Grrr....I boxed that bitch.
Who here didn't nickname Nebby "Nebby"? Why?
You heartless monster.
Also up the trainer count pls because the number of actual battles in SM was hella low.
Just break down and add the fuckin "Easy/Normal/Challenge" Modes back from BW2. That was such a godsend and should have been standard for the series going forward, especially considering how little effort it requires to implement.
Who here didn't nickname Nebby "Nebby"? Why?
Let's start from the villain, Lusamine is a lot better because she doesn't just want world domination. She had her husband disappear because of his research on Ultra Beasts, then entered in contact with one that started intoxicating her slowly driving her mad and her children stole the Pokémon she was using to presumably try to get him back. Awesome interactions between her and Lillie.
Ghetsis just wanted world domination and didn't really have much going on besides that.
Next up, Bianca and Cheren vs Lillie and Hau. Lillie obviously goes through much more character development than basically any other character in the series, Hau also felt more alive as a rival than Cheren for example in the way he expressed emotions, but was probably simpler overall.
Kukui and Guzma were both awesome characters, same as Nanu and others such as Acerola and Hapu.
Gladion was a bit underdeveloped and N was probably the best in BW.
At the end of the day SM had way more memorable characters and most of them were also written better, I feel.
They also need to up the Pokémon count as they only held two but seeing footage of Hau having four Pokémon in Paniola Town, in Sun and Moon he only had two, plus with the statement of the game being more expanded gives hope that they will do that.
.
Any chances of new Alolan regionals? I'd really want gen 2-3 remixes!
not likely
They also need to up the Pokémon count as they only held two but seeing footage of Hau having four Pokémon in Paniola Town, in Sun and Moon he only had two, plus with the statement of the game being more expanded gives hope that they will do that.
Honestly I don't mind Game Freak taking steps in making the series more accessible for new comers however I wouldn't mind the return of Challenge mode for veteran players who have no interest in the meta game and would like a bit more challenge in their game.
Who here didn't nickname Nebby "Nebby"? Why?
Who here didn't nickname Nebby "Nebby"? Why?
Script twice as long doesn't mean game is twice as long.So its confirmed US/UM is twice the length of S/M? If so I might buy it as I only did one playthrough of S/M back when it released and haven't touched the game since.
Lusamines living collection is meant to be wrong and villainous but we have done the exact same shit in every previous game, to a much larger degree with PC Boxes.
Lillies preachy shit about pokemon not being tools or things to collect is even more laughable when right after that you can collect creatures and gods that the game tells you want to go back to their world, or are required to govern the region. (or even worse, how we are encouraged to breed Pokemon over and over until you get a good one, and the rest are 100% disposable)
Give us a simple and funny story and not these messy melodrama and cataclysm plots. Whoever thinks a "serious" or "realistic" Pokemon is a viable angle is off their rocker.
Yeah, XY is what we get when the story is kept "simple". 5 seconds of you and your stupid friends visiting a spooky haunted house, then suddenly Ganondorf wants to blow up the region with a superweapon with no buildup.
But Lusamine herself points out how it's supposedly hypocritical of us since we collect and remove Pokémon we can't use from our party as we please (her exact words). In regards to catching the ultra beasts, Looker says they are scared and are attacking civilians and need to be stopped and the only way to do that is catch them (preferably) or eliminate them. We are also not encouraged to breed for perfect Pokémon in any way outside of the competitive scene and that really goes beyond the normal gameplay.
If you want to play the same non-story over and over again that's fine, but let's not pretend everyone wants that. Many people myself included really enjoy these stories and they have shown they are capable to improve on them. To me especially, the fact the games started off with simpler stories only really makes these crazier ones shine more. To find out about different worlds and dimensions and legends in a game that continuously builds its world feels a lot more exciting than say a game that is clearly sci-fi from the get go. It actually feels special, there are mysteries that actually feel like mysteries and sometimes they don't even give you answers which I think is awesome when not overdone (looking at you XY).
You don't need multidimensional end of days to have a good story, that comes down to the quality of writing so im not sure why you're conflating XY as being the end result of that.
Black and White didn't have any multi dimensional plot going on, no other worlds or anything, but the story was still quite good. Did you like that one?
Its the best of Pokemon, but thats not really saying much. It was kind of hard to take a Pokemon ethics debate seriously.
I'm still not sure why people think the story in Black and White was good. I played it for the first time last year and while I agree that they're great Pokemon games, the story definitely did not stand out to me
I can probably play this and not feel like I missed anything if I skipped S/M, yeah?
Sorry if dumb question. Haven't been near this franchise since 2013. The double script thing just kinda caught my attention.
Yeah you can
It's like how Platinum was to Diamond & Pearl but with far more changes. It can stand on its own as opposed to Black 2/White 2 which were sequels
I have to imagine that many of the people praising the stories of Gen V and VII are fairly young and just haven't had much exposure to other games, let alone books and film, etc. Either that or they exclusively play Nintendo games (which rarely place much emphasis on story) and so the Pokemon series stands out as a result.I'm still not sure why people think the story in Black and White was good. I played it for the first time last year and while I agree that they're great Pokemon games, the story definitely did not stand out to me
Thanks, Joe! Always answering my questions, be it on NeoGAF, GateWorld, or anywhere else.
I have to imagine that many of the people praising the stories of Gen V and VII are fairly young, and just haven't had much exposure to other games, let alone books and film, etc. Either that or they exclusively play Nintendo games (which rarely place much emphasis on story) and so the Pokemon series stands out as a result.
It's honestly the only explanation for how people could defend the vapid dialogue of Sun & Moon.
They are good for Pokémon standards. What were saying is we want to see them keep on improving on this front and not go back to simple/non existent storiesI have to imagine that many of the people praising the stories of Gen V and VII are fairly young and just haven't had much exposure to other games, let alone books and film, etc. Either that or they exclusively play Nintendo games (which rarely place much emphasis on story) and so the Pokemon series stands out as a result.
It's honestly the only explanation for how people could defend the vapid dialogue of Sun & Moon.
Yeah. I mean obviously Pokemon is always going to require a greater degree of story that that so that you know where you're going and why things are happening, but Gen V and especially VII took it way too far. Couldn't play for more than fifteen minutes without another cutscene/dialogue section.I liked Rosalinas optional story in Galaxy because it was optional. If it were forced on me at regular intervals id have been too annoyed to care about any of it.
I have to imagine that many of the people praising the stories of Gen V and VII are fairly young and just haven't had much exposure to other games, let alone books and film, etc. Either that or they exclusively play Nintendo games (which rarely place much emphasis on story) and so the Pokemon series stands out as a result.
It's honestly the only explanation for how people could defend the vapid dialogue of Sun & Moon.
I have to imagine that many of the people praising the stories of Gen V and VII are fairly young and just haven't had much exposure to other games, let alone books and film, etc. Either that or they exclusively play Nintendo games (which rarely place much emphasis on story) and so the Pokemon series stands out as a result.
It's honestly the only explanation for how people could defend the vapid dialogue of Sun & Moon.
I have to imagine that many of the people praising the stories of Gen V and VII are fairly young and just haven't had much exposure to other games, let alone books and film, etc. Either that or they exclusively play Nintendo games (which rarely place much emphasis on story) and so the Pokemon series stands out as a result.
It's honestly the only explanation for how people could defend the vapid dialogue of Sun & Moon.
They are good for Pokémon standards. What were saying is we want to see them keep on improving on this front and not go back to simple/non existent stories
Are we really going to act like people can't like "good" stories, and stuff that aren't as "good"? A lot of people found S&M to be charming, it's as simple as that. I look at this gen and Gen V and think "Neat, please continue to improve in this regard."
Regardless of the media, people like things of varying quality all the time, so please get off that high horse.
They are good for Pokémon standards. What were saying is we want to see them keep on improving on this front and not go back to simple/non existent stories
I'm not expecting (or wanting) a complex story from these games. I'm with you - I'd prefer for the games to return to having simple, near non-existent stories. GameFreak seems intent on making them a focus now though, so that's never going to happen. And if that's the direction they're taking the series...well I'll just have to deal. Ideally they will find a better balance than they did in SM though. I hope they realize that a good chunk of the fanbase didn't love how forced and all-encompassing the story was.The stories in Pokemon games are written to be understood by 8-10 year old children. Of course they're not going to super complex.
But I'm someone who more or less has no care at all about story, and heavy story bits in any game, good or bad, generally bore me.
They are good for Pokémon standards. What we're saying is we want to see them keep on improving on this front and not go back to simple/non existent stories
I feel like there's a difference between finding the story of Sun & Moon 'charming' and the genuine praise for it that I often see in these threads. Regardless - I probably was too harsh there. Different strokes for different folks and all of that.Are we really going to act like people can't like "good" stories, and stuff that aren't as "good"? A lot of people found S&M to be charming, it's as simple as that. I look at this gen and Gen V and think "Neat, please continue to improve in this regard."
Regardless of the media, people like things of varying quality all the time, so please get off that high horse.
With everything he knows about Pokemon, he should start a website.
BTW has it been confirmed if trading/battling with Sun and Moon will be possible?
Feels like it has to be in the game but i haven't seen confirmation.