• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

HBO Talk ‘Confederate’ Controversy, Defends Slave Drama, Not The Way It Was Announced

A week after HBO announced Confederate as a follow-up series for Game Of Thrones creators David Benioff and D.B. Weiss, the controversy over the project’s concept, which involves slavery, has yet to subside. Expectedly, it took central stage during HBO’s TCA executive session with the network’s president of programming Casey Bloys.

Written by Benioff and Weiss, who also will showrun, as well as Nichelle Tramble Spellman and Malcolm Spellman, Confederate chronicles events leading to the Third American Civil War. It takes place in an alternate timeline, where the Southern states successfully have seceded from the Union, giving rise to a nation in which slavery remains legal and has evolved into a modern institution.

Bloys started off by expressing regrets over the way Confederate was announced, calling the decision to issue a press release “misguided.” Instead, he suggested that the project’s topic would’ve been better suited for one-on-one interviews, in which the creators could fully flesh out their vision the way they had done in pitch meetings with HBO executives, something that cannot be conveyed in a one-line logline.

“If I could do it over again, our mistake — HBO’s mistake, not the producers’ — was thinking that we would be able to announce an idea that was so sensitive and require so much care in a press release,” Bloys said.

While he admitted that “all the boxes have to be ticked,” Bloys stressed that “we have a long history betting on our talent” and cautioned against quick judgments. “I hope that people will judge the actual material, not how it could be or might be. We will rise and fall based on the material,” he said.

Admitting the “high degree of difficulty” associated with the subject matter, Bloys was adamant that the most controversial part in the concept for Confederate, the portrayal of slavery, will be nuanced.

“The producers have said they’re not looking to do Gone With the Wind 2017,” he said. “It’s not whips and plantations. It’s what they imagine a modern-day institution of slavery would look like.”

Bloys also stood firmly behind Benioff, Weiss and the Spellmans.

“These four writers are at the top of their game — they can do anything they want, and this is what they feel passionately about. I’ll bet on that,” Bloys said, adding that the series “is a risk worth taking.”

http://deadline.com/2017/07/hbo-casey-bloys-confederate-slave-drama-1202136753/
 

Montresor

Member
I'm glad they're moving through with this. I'm really interested in this show, and I really like fiction that looks at alternate realities - I'm hoping somehow the alternate reality in this show mirrors what Tarantino did with Inglourious Basterds and what Bethesda / MachineWorks are doing with Wolfenstein. And while Django Unchained was not an alternate reality film necessarily, it did feature a superhero (Django) brutally murdering slave owners - and I hope that this occurs as well.

What I don't want to see is the show being more than 3 seasons. If the show is too long, it just won't work in my opinion. They need the main characters to quickly dismantle modern day slavery and work towards a swift brutal/violent end to slave owners, like Django did.
 

iPaul93

Member
I don't get why people are whining.If you're not interested,then don't watch it.It's not that hard.
 

Apathy

Member
It's a work of fiction and alternate history no less (one of my favorite). Why the fuck be upset about this. It's not like they are going to glamorize slavery, they're going to show the south being shitty to slaves because that's what would have happened if this alternate history were true. You're still going to be rooting against the south. Take man in the high castle, no one is rooting for the nazis, you still want to see them fail.
 
I don't get why people are whining.If you're not interested,then don't watch it.It's not that hard.

Because it's a sensitive subject; especially in today's society. I'm a black male and I'm highly skeptical about this show. Whether I choose to watch it or not.
 

Busty

Banned
I get how provocative an idea this is but some were talking as if this was being produced exclusively for the Alt Right nutters, have any of those worried about this show ever watched HBO's output before?

This is the home of Last Week Tonight, Looking and Girls among others and recently put into development a comedy about a gay Muslim woman.

This is not a series that any of the red states will be tuning in for.
 
"God stop being angry that the only prestige roles actors of color can get are as slaves or criminals"

To quote the good sir Snoop Doggy Dogg

Enough of this slave shit.
 

DKehoe

Member
I get how provocative an idea this is but some were talking as if this was being produced exclusively for the Alt Right nutters, have any of those worried about this show ever watched HBO's output before?

I think how the producers have handled race before is what has some people concerned

iwhenh.jpg
 

Seesaw15

Member
I don't get why people are whining.If you're not interested,then don't watch it.It's not that hard.

Come on. If the shows good I'll watch it but I 100% get why people are complaining. Artist can do whatever they want but the consumers of the art have just as much right to voice their opinion.
 
I imagine they could have avoided a lot of the controversy by not attaching it to the GoT bros, who are some of the last people I'd want near any sensitive subject matter.
 

jmood88

Member
I don't get why people are whining.If you're not interested,then don't watch it.It's not that hard.
Do you do this in all threads here where people are whining about framerates or how much they hate certain costumes in movies or is it just when there are complaints about yet another media portrayal of black people in subservient positions?
 

BigDug13

Member
You mean prison?

Yeah I guess the issue is that the producers are coming from this idea that slavery was a thing from the past and is not currently still happening when in fact it already is happening in a "totally modern and not plantation-based" way.
 
No,I don't.If something bothers me about a show,I simply won't support it,so I don't watch it.

Not feeling the subject matter or the ability for those guys to pull it off. That being said, I can have that opinion without wanting or needing to see the show no matter how much you dislike people "whining."
 

Siegcram

Member
It's a work of fiction and alternate history no less (one of my favorite). Why the fuck be upset about this. It's not like they are going to glamorize slavery, they're going to show the south being shitty to slaves because that's what would have happened if this alternate history were true. You're still going to be rooting against the south. Take man in the high castle, no one is rooting for the nazis, you still want to see them fail.
I wouldn't trust those writers with anything sensitive like slavery on their best day. Throw in the current political climate and everyone can see that this will be a shitshow more likely than not.

Plus the premise is fucking laaaaaame.
Alternative history is so much more than "what if we still had nazis". Ain't all that alternative.
 

watershed

Banned
Isn't it great that a couple of super creative, super successful white writers sat around wondering "what would modern day slavery in America look like? We should really tackle that question." That alone disturbs me a bit.
 

Enduin

No bald cap? Lies!
Everything time they talk more about this show to ease fears it just sounds even dumber and they seem even less capable at handling something like this.
 

Busty

Banned
I think how the producers have handled race before is what has some people concerned

iwhenh.jpg

I'm not a black person so I'm not going to pretend that this is an issue that I can relate to (excuse the wording if it's clumsy) but do you think that what you posted was a deliberate choice by the producers, the image of the white saviour?

If you don't think the show is a good idea then fair enough but while this is a provocative issue I think there's a wealth of material to mined here that could relate to modern world we live in. I think that's why stuff like the Handmaid's Tale resonates so much at the moment.

Whether it works or not is another question but I don't think that there's any intentional malice here.
 

Seesaw15

Member
Spoilers I guess

Westworld
is kinda about that in a round about way. Yes it's more about
autonomy and free will, but the hosts can be seen as slaves

Ehhh
Technically a couple of white male humans help the robots get autonomy in order to give them freedom.
 

jph139

Member
Why couldn't we get a show where the slaves free them selves.

A show where a repressed minority underclass in modern America rises up to violently overthrow their white oppressors?

Nah. Too risky. Misery porn, now that's a moneymaker!
 

jmood88

Member
I'm not a black person so I'm not going to pretend that this is an issue that I can relate to (excuse the wording if it's clumsy) but do you think that what you posted was a deliberate choice by the producers, the image of the white saviour?

If you don't think the show is a good idea then fair enough but while this is a provocative issue I think there's a wealth of material to mined here that could relate to modern world we live in. I think that's why stuff like the Handmaid's Tale resonates so much at the moment.

Whether it works or not is another question but I don't think that there's any intentional malice here.
I don't know why people like you seem to think that it's only an issue if it's deliberate. Even if it was completely unintentional, how blind do you have to be to not see how an image like that would appear and why should anyone trust that you'd be able to handle a topic that explicitly deals with race and racism?
 

rjinaz

Member
Yeah I'm not going to watch this. Slavery was bad enough, watching a show in which it never ended to me sounds gross and definitely not entertaining.
 

iPaul93

Member
Do you do this in all threads here where people are whining about framerates or how much they hate certain costumes in movies or is it just when there are complaints about yet another media portrayal of black people in subservient positions?
No,I don't.Also,comparing framerates to a screenplay isn't the best analogy.I said what I had to say.I'm out.
 

royalan

Member
Criticizing the premise of a show and not watching it are things that can be done simultaneously.

American slavery is still fresh, and the effects of it are still felt by black people to this day. Nothing that I know about the people that are involved tells me that this is a subject that will be handled with the care that it deserves. Nothing.

If you're going to tell the story, tell it. But make it more than the fucking fantasy of two white men with a penchant for depicting rape and the grotesque.
 
I'm not a black person so I'm not going to pretend that this is an issue that I can relate to (excuse the wording if it's clumsy) but do you think that what you posted was a deliberate choice by the producers, the image of the white saviour?

If you don't think the show is a good idea then fair enough but while this is a provocative issue I think there's a wealth of material to mined here that could relate to modern world we live in. I think that's why stuff like the Handmaid's Tale resonates so much at the moment.

Whether it works or not is another question but I don't think that there's any intentional malice here.

Provocative is not a reason to do a show. It has to have something meaningful to add the conversation which why a lot of folks in the black community don't trust the two white showrunners of GoT to have anything useful to add. I am also sick of the best roles a black person can get being a fucking slave. While I applaud hbo for a show like insecure, I will remain skeptical here until I see the end product
 
"“These four writers are at the top of their game — they can do anything they want, and this is what they feel passionately about"

That's the problem. Why is modern slavery something you feel passionate about and want to do?
 

Busty

Banned
I don't know why people like you seem to think that it's only an issue if it's deliberate. Even if it was completely unintentional, how blind do you have to be to not see how an image like that would appear and why should anyone trust that you'd be able to handle a topic that explicitly deals with race and racism?

I see.
 
Isn't it great that a couple of super creative, super successful white writers sat around wondering "what would modern day slavery in America look like? We should really tackle that question." That alone disturbs me a bit.


It disturbs me that you base what people should and shouldn't be able to write about on their race.
 
I'm not a black person so I'm not going to pretend that this is an issue that I can relate to (excuse the wording if it's clumsy) but do you think that what you posted was a deliberate choice by the producers, the image of the white saviour?

If you don't think the show is a good idea then fair enough but while this is a provocative issue I think there's a wealth of material to mined here that could relate to modern world we live in. I think that's why stuff like the Handmaid's Tale resonates so much at the moment.

Whether it works or not is another question but I don't think that there's any intentional malice here.

Here's the thing. Whether it was intentional or not, is besides the point. The Effects are still there. Most "White savior" tropes in fiction are not intentional. Doesn't mean they still don't propagate white supremacy.
 

SpaceWolf

Banned
What I think is interesting about this is that for the recent Handmaiden's Tale adaptation , the showrunner talked publically about their very conscious decision to excise all the racist elements from the show (where Gilead dictatorship has essentially shipped off anyone who isn't white somewhere else), arguing that often "there's very little difference "between making a show about racists and making a racist show".

Then this show comes along and pretty much throws that perspective out the window, by literally making a show where white people still reign supreme and black people are still forced into slavery.
 
“If I could do it over again, our mistake — HBO’s mistake, not the producers’ — was thinking that we would be able to announce an idea that was so sensitive and require so much care in a press release,” Bloys said.

While he admitted that “all the boxes have to be ticked,” Bloys stressed that “we have a long history betting on our talent” and cautioned against quick judgments. “I hope that people will judge the actual material, not how it could be or might be. We will rise and fall based on the material,” he said.

Admitting the “high degree of difficulty” associated with the subject matter, Bloys was adamant that the most controversial part in the concept for Confederate, the portrayal of slavery, will be nuanced.
The problem was not that it was a press release. The problem is the actual show. And no, showing slavery in a nuanced way is not a fix for that.

If they want to make the show, that is their call, but expect a lot of criticism before and probably after it has aired.
 

Seesaw15

Member
Forgive me for not having blind faith in a writer who's only credits are Empire and Soprano's the video game

Nichelle Tramble wrote some good episodes of Justified and The Good Wife. Though I don't think it'll really matter. I doubt D&D are gonna give these black writers final word on story and script ideas.
 

Busty

Banned
Provocative is not a reason to do a show. It has to have something meaningful to add the conversation which why a lot of folks in the black community don't trust the two white showrunners of GoT to have anything useful to add. I am also sick of the best roles a black person can get being a fucking slave. While I applaud hbo for a show like insecure, I will remain skeptical here until I see the end product

That's fair. I have to imagine that HBO will be sensitive to how this will look (if they weren't before they will be now!) moving forward, assuming it does move forward, but until we see or hear anymore it's just going to be an awkward elephant in the room for the network.

Here's the thing. Whether it was intentional or not, is besides the point. The Effects are still there. Most "White savior" tropes in fiction are not intentional. Doesn't mean they still don't propagate white supremacy.

I'm not going to argue for or against this series given that we know next to nothing about it except for a brief description but I can see your point of view.
 
Top Bottom