T
thepotatoman
Unconfirmed Member
I dunno. I was just creating a possible scenario of what may have "really" happened, if what Hannah/Eve says is nothing but a very complex lie to get away with murder. It was an exercise in creativity, if you want. The truth is everything said by the person or people being interviewed can be put into question. If we accept that the testimony represents what actually happened, then both of the two main theories may have some ground beneath them. But if we assume that some parts (or everything) that the suspect(s) said may be a lie... then we end up with the "criminal mastermind/insane genius" interpretation.
If it really was that she was lying about everything, then I'd say this game's story is absolutely terrible and a waste of time. Thankfully, it's pretty clear that your explanation isn't possible because it would make the underlining theme of reflections and mirrors completely pointless. Maybe your theory is mechanically consistent, but literarily it simply isn't.