• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kotaku: Sony is working on a ‘PS4.5; briefing devs on plans for a more powerful PS4

Papacheeks

Banned
I'll wait and see what people like Naughty Dog developers, and such have to say about this. SAME with Indie developers.

If they sing nothing but praises then I'll eat crow.
 
I'm sorry and excuse the language, but 4k gaming is not something me, or you or even Sony would consider as .5 upgrade to their system. We are talking around Titan Gpu performance wise.

So, I call bullshit on this. Sorry.

You really don't think journey or games of similar pedigree wouldn't be possible?
 

mcrommert

Banned
2016 is not happening.

1. AMD Zen chips haven't launched yet.
2. The first 14 NM card's havent shipped
3. HBM is still in its infancy, with Fury X suffering a 4 GB cap.
4. Launching Q4 2016 would put PSVR in direct competition with PS4.5.
5. It's MARCH, and we've yet to hear a single announcement.
6. Developers are JUST now hearing about it. Sounds like devkits haven't even SHIPPED.



Conclusion? 2017/8 sounds realistic. More 4K televisions will be in consumer hands, 14nm GPUs will have ironed out any superlative yield issues, and enough PSVR headsets will have sold to consumers to start speaking about new hardware.

Lets hope you are wrong.

For the sake of competition with the Xbox
 

Protann

Member
So this could be last leak from Kotaku. Hulk Hogan just won lawsuit against Gawker and they owe him 115M. Welp.

4112%20-%20hulk_hogan%20pointing%20wwf.png


"LOOKS LIKE KOTAKU'S GONNA BE BANKRUPTU, BROTHER"
 
Sounds kind of anti-consumer. Hypothetically, it would push the consumer to buy new iterations in order to play the newest games, that, potentially, are built and optimized for the stronger hardware in mind.

Seems like they want to do something similiar to Apple's Iphone revisions.
 
I'm sorry and excuse the language, but 4k gaming is not something me, or you or even Sony would consider as .5 upgrade to their system. We are talking around Titan Gpu performance wise.

So, I call bullshit on this. Sorry.

Not only that but releasing this year also? Yeah, I doubt that but we'll see.
 

thuway

Member

OK so let me get this straight:
1. This is a major upgrade in performance
2. This is launching Q4' 2016
3. This will have backwards and forward compatibility.
4. This will render PS4 quality games 4K.

Can you explain what sort of tech is under the hood because it makes absolutely no sense that thing can do 4K 30 with modern AAA Games when GPU's at twice and three times the thermal power of the ENTIRE PS4 can't seem to do that.
 

Protann

Member
OK so let me get this straight:
1. This is a major upgrade in performance
2. This is launching Q4' 2016
3. This will have backwards and forward compatibility.
4. This will render PS4 quality games 4K.

Can you explain what sort of tech is under the hood because it makes absolutely no sense that thing can do 4K 30 with modern AAA Games when GPU's at twice and three times the thermal power of the ENTIRE PS4 can't seem to do that.

Insider battles!
 
Releasing a new phone on a regular basis is in a completely different ballpark to a new console. If we are expected to trade in our consoles on a semi-regular basis there are other considerations such as savegames, hdd data, peripherals, etc

Moving to a new phone these days is a fairly seamless process.

The big question here is will I be able to transfer my P.T. to the PS4.5's HDD ? :)


It all revolves around pt lol.

All your saves should be in the cloud and accessories should work or there's no point.

I hope they do it
 
Wtf this is stupid. Devs will surely be pissed off.
Why would they be? Same system but with better specs, if they want to they can pretty up their games for the upgraded hardware or just not and it will still benefit frame rate wise. Upgrades every 4 to 5 years instead of generational resets every 5-7 is actually what devs want.
 

orochi91

Member
OK so let me get this straight:
1. This is a major upgrade in performance
2. This is launching Q4' 2016
3. This will have backwards and forward compatibility.
4. This will render PS4 quality games 4K.

Can you explain what sort of tech is under the hood because it makes absolutely no sense that thing can do 4K 30 with modern AAA Games when GPU's at twice and three times the thermal power of the ENTIRE PS4 can't seem to do that.

Yea, I want answers to all these as well.

Because none of this adding up right now, lol
 

RiccochetJ

Gold Member
Sounds kind of anti-consumer. Hypothetically, it would push the consumer to buy new iterations in order to play the newest games, that, potentially, are built and optimized for the stronger hardware in mind.

Seems like they want to do something similiar to Apple's Iphone revisions.

Anti-consumer? You want to hold back advances in technology for others because you want to feel good about your purchase?
 
OK so let me get this straight:
1. This is a major upgrade in performance
2. This is launching Q4' 2016
3. This will have backwards and forward compatibility.
4. This will render PS4 quality games 4K.

Can you explain what sort of tech is under the hood because it makes absolutely no sense that thing can do 4K 30 with modern AAA Games when GPU's at twice and three times the thermal power of the ENTIRE PS4 can't seem to do that.

Where did he say ps4 quality games? Could be 4k for a handful of indies and remasters. Ps3 boasted 1080p and only a handful of games actually did it.
 
The main issue I have, is that me being in broadcast and knowing what's only available for 4k, is that there is still hardly anything out content wise. Only a couple of movies and shows on netflix. ANd it takes a long time for broadcast. We still have 3 years or so until we start upgrading our station and transmitter.
So it makes no sense just to say he we have 4k for Sony/MS. When there is shit for content out. There are only a handful of blurays from 2014 and on that support 4k.

Which is why tv's are so cheap. Same thing happend for 3D tv's prices dropped like a rock after first second year, because of tech and because of no content to support it. That and it was a fade. 4k though is an actual format change, and that shit takes lots of time for companies to get content out.

Makes more sense to finish this generation, and have your next console be that much more mature when handling 4k, and advanced audio, along with boasting way better specs that blow the socks off PS4.

If consoles were an open platform, in-terms of development minus what MS is doing, it would make more sense, and it would make more sense if those different configurations were based on different tier's of gaming like low to high end cp/steam boxes.
What doesn't make sense in the long run is thinking that having mid generational upgraded consoles will make your sales for your new console be higher. If anything it will make them that much lower, and people wont buy them until a new iteration.

I think we will see a lot more 4K content by 2017. The movies in production right now or released as of Star Wars are ready for the 4K market to take off. There maybe 25 or so 4K blu-ray movies in the market right now, but that number will change and will be in hundreds, just like Avatar changed the number for 3D movies. However, unlike 3D, 4K has real benefits and is not a gimmick. Movies are already shot close to 4K, so there is nothing extra that has to be done there to bring it to mass market. Right now the MSRP of 4K and 3D blu-ray movies is in the same $29.99 range (with regular blu-rays in the $24.99 range), so it's easier for the studio to justify the price.

Just as an idea, in the wedding industry, I can already produce native 4K wedding films if necessary. The content is already there. The demand will be generated when your home hardware next year is all 4K and beyond. The good thing it'll do is make 1080p TVs dirt cheap. Though since you're talking about Cable/Satellite market, know that they've always been the last one to adopt any technological advancement, always. They were the last to provide 720p, and the last to provide 1080p. They will be the last to provide 4K. And yet, they're already announcing 4KTV content for the mass market for select channels (e.g. Rogers 4K service: http://www.rogers.com/consumer/tv/4k).

Also, you're right. It makes sense to finish this generation. However, VR changed this generation and is forcing it to jump ahead. Microsoft making XBO a Windows platform and treating it as an upgrading hardware is forcing Sony to jump ahead. PC already forcing folks to upgrade their hardware for VR is making Sony to jump ahead. The push of 4K movies and the finalization of HDMI specs for 4K not meeting that of current consoles is doing the same. Sony is an electronics company, and they will never have a gimped hardware running their superior products without them complimenting each other. PS4K will compliment 4KTVs that your future TV buyers will get. This generation was always destined to be shorter, but there's no way to cut it short without losing backwards compatibility or other shenanigans. Refreshing the hardware is a much smarter gamble.

You're also right that when PS5 releases (if it does), some folks maybe hesitant and say "I just bought a PS4K!" and won't make the jump until PS5K (lol) is released. Remember though, this will be a 4 year wait from PS4 to PS4K. I'm sure the games won't stop developing for PS4 until two or so years down the line to PS5's release.
 
I will laugh if they use upscaling to upscale 1080p to 4K because that will be so ugly. There is a reason why upscaling generally isn't used because it looks bad(else everyone would be doing it).
 

sono

Member
If they do this consoles will die. Its way too soon.I didnt buy this chunk of hardware for my lounge to last three years before I retire it.

Next you will be telling me Andrew House will say launch PS4 is a legacy platform..Sorry had a bad day but this is bs of the highest order.
 
True, but I don't think the risk is really that great. Early adopters are generally early adopters simply because they can't resist the new shit. We always know we're getting a crappy deal overall, but buy anyway, because 2017 isn't 2013 and we ain't that patient... hell, there's no guarantee we'll even live to see it, lol. If anything, those that buy consoles at or near launch are far more likely to be in the "upgrade every iteration" group.
I think you are overestimating the number of people who would buy new console just because they are new. I don't think 30 million people bought PS4 because they couldn't resist buying it.

The majority bought it cause to them it was the superior 8th generation console (I'm talking about 8th gen vs 7th gen, not X1 vs PS4), shinier graphics, better performances, more games, etc. And IMO, a very big part of that was the fact that it would last them for the next 6-7 years to come. The device that they just bought will be the superior gaming device for the next 6-7 years. That's a very strong mindset that compels people to buy consoles shortly after their release.

But after PS4.5 that factor will be gone for PS5 and I think that will be a big deal.

People like to know that they are getting the superior version of the stuff that they are buying and when PS5 comes around, many will know that in a few (short) years that thing will be inferior, and that can and will affect their decision to buy it or just wait for the superior version.
 

Lingitiz

Member
I seriously could not imagine the current generation hardware lasting for another 3 or 4 years. PC is progressing extremely fast at this rate and the current consoles are serviceable, but dated.

On top of the performance upgrades, PS4 needs a 5ghz AC wifi adapter. Maybe they could use this opportunity to produce controllers with better build quality and batteries. Add more usb ports to the core system. These upgrades are needed if they want this generation to persist for the length of the last one before a full iteration is needed.
 

Nanashrew

Banned
Wtf this is stupid. Devs will surely be pissed off.

Nah, because it's mostly devs who are asking for this because the current generational cycle has been bad for them and some publishers. Hence why we've seen so many cross-gen games more than any other, because there's still a very large userbase on previous generation systems.


I mean, even Konami, Konami, had slides wanting to see this with consoles because traditional console cycles are detrimental now to the health of the industry with rapid tech evolution, and everything being thrown out including the userbase generation to generation.
 
Legit 4K gaming on a current-gen APU is kinda a ridiculous assertion, no?

It absolutely is.

What are this posters credentials besides saying TLG was at E3 2016?

The entire thing feels like a dude who got an easy guess on the nose trolling the fuck out of people.

Hopefully that fact that Thuway has shown up will get this bullshit out of here.
 
OK so let me get this straight:
1. This is a major upgrade in performance
2. This is launching Q4' 2016
3. This will have backwards and forward compatibility.
4. This will render PS4 quality games 4K.

Can you explain what sort of tech is under the hood because it makes absolutely no sense that thing can do 4K 30 with modern AAA Games when GPU's at twice and three times the thermal power of the ENTIRE PS4 can't seem to do that.
Maybe he’s saying it will be a significant upgrade, but not in the performance areas we are assuming?

Maybe this is purely for better VR titles? Or is the way console development will be going forward. Every 3 years a refresh comes, and this will be the new norm? I dunno what the fook son.
 

Chabbles

Member
If this is true, i hope its something that can be added to or used with an existing PS4.

As long as it's only for 4k, I don't give a shit. I bought my 1080p TV only a year ago. Not ready to upgrade in a long time.

Do enough of the general public even own 4K tvs for Sony justifying doing something like this now ?. If Sony actually go through with this, its got to be for VR mainly, with maybe the 4K thing being more of a smoke screen instead of saying something like, "the PS4 is a pos for better VR experiences going forward, we badly need to upgrade" Lots of PSVR preorders might get canceled if Sony showed doubt in the PS4s power for VR. Ofcourse this is just speculation.
 

Sky Saw

Banned
I seriously could not imagine the current generation hardware lasting for another 3 or 4 years. PC is progressing extremely fast at this rate and the current consoles are serviceable, but dated. .

And yet most here would say Uncharted 4 looks better than any PC game..So i'm not so sure.
 
Top Bottom