The footage was on normal and the guy shooting was a weak enemy using the basic level pistol.
If you play on hard a single enemy will drop you in 3 bullets.
That's not true.
The footage was on normal and the guy shooting was a weak enemy using the basic level pistol.
If you play on hard a single enemy will drop you in 3 bullets.
but if that's the case,enemies should punish you for not using them,not stay still and allow you to take a break of 10 minutes while they are shooting you
that's one on my problems with many games..don't tell me i have several different mechanics to use if i don't need to use them at all because your game is poorly programmed or too easy to bother.
this is valid also for all those games with all kinds of different attacks ,but all do the same thing, giving only a deceptive appearance of variety..i'm looking at you mass effect
Hard mode does this. The AI actively hunts you down if you try to cover and pop. You get cornered with grenades and heavy infantry. The game actively encourages you to use time for mobility and to combo powers into one another. If you look at the game and insist it's a cover shooter, you're probably only going to play on normal and have a bad time.
Honestly I think the game deserves a poor score for calling their powers 'Time Vision', 'Time Shield' etc. What does 'Time Vision' even mean really?
The footage was on normal and the guy shooting was a weak enemy using the basic level pistol.
If you play on hard a single enemy will drop you in 3 bullets.
His Destiny review was the one that made me a fan, that review is near perfection and brought up so many great and funny points regarding that game at it's release.
It isn't bad game design, it's a player literally refusing to use the toolbox handed to him.
It isn't bad game design, it's a player literally refusing to use the toolbox handed to him.
That's not true.
It isn't bad game design, it's a player literally refusing to use the toolbox handed to him.
It isn't bad game design, it's a player literally refusing to use the toolbox handed to him.
When it comes to some posters here, we're already at UC3 outrage tier salt.
But its a 3rd person cover shooter... with time powers. Its literally designed with cover mechanics in mind. Why else is there cover?
It isn't bad game design, it's a player literally refusing to use the toolbox handed to him.
It's almost like he waits 2 weeks to do his review AFTER he's read through all of the other reviews
Have you played the game? It is literally impossible to stay in one place more than 5-10 seconds. Especially on Hard, but I'm playing atm on Normal and even then you're forced out of cover very frequently. Your time powers are only really effective when you move with them (you get slow-time bonuses for moving), so you're incentivised to move.
I tell you what I dislike about his reviews is that they just go along with what everyone else is saying. I've yet to see a point brought up by him that hasn't been brought up 400x by others online.
It's almost like he waits 2 weeks to do his review AFTER he's read through all of the other reviews
I tell you what I dislike about his reviews is that they just go along with what everyone else is saying. I've yet to see a point brought up by him that hasn't been brought up 400x by others online.
It's almost like he waits 2 weeks to do his review AFTER he's read through all of the other reviews
I definitely get that impression.
It sounds like this game is great fun if you follow a very long list of rules and regulations on how it should be played.He did use the powers though, just not 'correctly' according to you.
Lol he buys his games and plays through them like all the other people, then has to record and edit a 30 minute video.
Being salty af is one thing but ignorant is a different matter.
If anything Joe has gone easy on QB with a 5 out of 10.
The game is a boring slog broken up by even more boring, awfully produced zero level "TV episodes" that add literally nothing to the game.
For me I would give it 2 out of 10, the only redeeming thing is that the game isn't long if you skip the cut scenes so you don't have to wade through the boring shit show for any great length of time.
Can I ask without getting scolded? We have review threads. Why is AJ so special that he gets a thread for every review? Why doesn't this go in the review thread? Or maybe an Angry Joe OT like Kinda Funny has.
This has zero to do with my opinion of AJ, it's simply curiosity. I don't understand why his content is singled out. It's not like he's an industry veteran with outrageously valuable experience and insight.
Can I ask without getting scolded? We have review threads. Why is AJ so special that he gets a thread for every review? Why doesn't this go in the review thread? Or maybe an Angry Joe OT like Kinda Funny has.
This has zero to do with my opinion of AJ, it's simply curiosity. I don't understand why his content is singled out. It's not like he's an industry veteran with outrageously valuable experience and insight.
These threads bring out the worst in people a lot. Usually more so than a regular review thread.
That has nothing to do with it. It's that his reviews are an almost the perfect microcosm of the opinions about a game in general. I've always gotten the sense that he checks out what people are saying about a game to work those into his review.
For the same reason each Jimquisition gets their own threads: because they've both been getting their own threads for a while. It's become tradition or sommit.
Because there's merit in being able to have a focused discussion on a single thing, be it a video, podcast or in this case an in-depth video review.
It's the same reason why we have weekly Bombcast and Beastcast threads where people can discuss the contents of that particular episode and not just Giant Bomb in general.
One thing I find weird is that one of his biggest complaints was the lack of emotional connection with the characters. He calls the episodes boring, low budget pieces and it shows him "snoozing" on a scene that had Liam and his wife. The episodes are mostly there to characterize some of the secondary characters and this scene in particular was there to provide context as to why Liam's so hellbent on finding the lifeboat. There are slow moments in the show (not everything can be guns and explosions) but there were definitely efforts there to make the player sympathize with some of the characters. I don't know if he just completely ignored the show (seeing the review and also him leaving during the show on his live stream) but he definitely should at least give it a chance.
I want to put Joe to the test, he needs to review KI. If he fucks that up then i know where we stand
I guess that makes sense, it just seems weird when everything else is usually put in one thread. I've always been curious why this was OK but other threads considered derivative or that caused clutter got closed. Was always too nervous to ask since I've seen people get banned for it.
Can I ask without getting scolded? We have review threads. Why is AJ so special that he gets a thread for every review? Why doesn't this go in the review thread? Or maybe an Angry Joe OT like Kinda Funny has.
This has zero to do with my opinion of AJ, it's simply curiosity. I don't understand why his content is singled out. It's not like he's an industry veteran with outrageously valuable experience and insight.
These threads bring out the worst in people a lot. Usually more so than a regular review thread.
Pretty poor review, weighed down by an enormous amount of hyperbole. Nothing out of the ordinary or unexpected from someone whose main selling point is being angry in video.
Not sure why this one deserved its own thread, and wasn't posted on the review thread, mind you.
That has nothing to do with it. It's that his reviews are an almost the perfect microcosm of the opinions about a game in general. I've always gotten the sense that he checks out what people are saying about a game to work those into his review.
One thing I find weird is that one of his biggest complaints was the lack of emotional connection with the characters. He calls the episodes boring, low budget pieces and it shows him "snoozing" on a scene that had Liam and his wife. The episodes are mostly there to characterize some of the secondary characters and this scene in particular was there to provide context as to why Liam's so hellbent on finding the lifeboat. There are slow moments in the show (not everything can be guns and explosions) but there were definitely efforts to make the player sympathize with some of the characters. I don't know if he just completely ignored the show (seeing the review and also him leaving during the show on his live stream) but he definitely should at least give it a chance.
I tell you what I dislike about his reviews is that they just go along with what everyone else is saying. I've yet to see a point brought up by him that hasn't been brought up 400x by others online.
It's almost like he waits 2 weeks to do his review AFTER he's read through all of the other reviews
I find the lack of hip fire in the game bizarre as well considering the emphasis on movement and making the combat look cinematic.Very weird omission considering RT does nothing out of aiming. The game also kinda reminds of infamous where the combat is a lot more fun when you are constantly moving, although shooting from cover is far more viable in QB due to regenerating health which could be seen as bad design.
Doesn't Joe get his own thread because by the time his review comes out the mega review thread is dead? He puts a lot of work into these, it'd be kinda sad if we shot up a several week old thread, it got two or three new responses and then it died again rather than the fresh discussion a new thread is generating.
It is literally impossible to stay in one place more than 5-10 seconds.
The Fallout 4 review was a lot more positive than the microcosm of the opinions about the game. How do you explain that?