FeenixRising
Banned
Where you hear that at?I keep hearing that the level has been remastered. Is this true?
Where you hear that at?I keep hearing that the level has been remastered. Is this true?
would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
The problem is Activision would probably ask a huge price for the IP
would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
The Crash series is almost always the top most purchased classic games on PSN. As long as they kept the budget realistic I think it could be very successful for them. The problem is Activision would probably ask a huge price for the IP
So does this mean there's play throughs on YouTube already?
would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
So does this mean there's play throughs on YouTube already?
I don't care, I just want a new Crash game! I think it deserves a chance to be brought back, at the very least.would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
The only way Sony can top last year E3 is by announcing a new Crash game with remaster of the first 3 plus CTR
Why are people thinking this means a Crash game is coming?
Naughty Dog featuring one of their IPs as an easter egg in their newest game...
It's a portent of nothing, they did it in TLOU, were people screaming about a new Jak game incoming then?
I didn't give a single shit about any of their big 3 last year. Not a single one. Anything Crash related automatically makes this their best E3 in years for me.The only way Sony can top last year E3 is by announcing a new Crash game with remaster of the first 3 plus CTR
I'd agree with you, but the number of Crash references over he past year or two seems like a little too many to be just for nostalgic purposes.I agree. It does seem like people are grasping at straws. ND know people love Crash, so they put the first game as an asset in their latest. That's it, a nod to a past beloved game.
I'm not saying it doesn't mean they'll make a new crash game, but confirmation this is not.
Now if the game was a ps4 case and showed a new game like:
Uncharted x Bandicoot
Then we'd be onto something.
Why are people thinking this means a Crash game is coming?
Naughty Dog featuring one of their IPs as an easter egg in their newest game...
It's a portent of nothing, they did it in TLOU, were people screaming about a new Jak game incoming then?
would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
I agree. It does seem like people are grasping at straws. ND know people love Crash, so they put the first game as an asset in their latest. That's it, a nod to a past beloved game.
I'm not saying it doesn't mean they'll make a new crash game, but confirmation this is not.
Now if the game was a ps4 case and showed a new game like:
Uncharted x Bandicoot
Then we'd be onto something.
would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
would crash games even be commercially successful currently?
i feel like it might be something the internet wants but it might not reflect into sales (then again i was quite young when crash was at its peak, and though i played and enjoyed the games, my understanding of the overall picture was quite low so i might be underestimating how big crash was/is)
Suddenly, Naughty Dog adds a playable Crash level
As a post a few above me says, Sony do not own Crash. Even if they have distribution rights for Crash 1-3, CTR and Bash, they do not possess any right to incorporate that IP into any NEW product -- which Uncharted 4 clearly qualifies as. Activision has reportedly been the reason for distribution problems for Crash games in the past as well (including being rumored as part of the reason they're not on Vita in NA) and has been NOTORIOUSLY stubborn about the use of Crash by Sony and Naughty Dog -- famously denying them the casual use of it in an art contest celebrating their history, despite Naughty Dog not using it for any sort of profitable means.
But suddenly, Robomodo can't add Crash to Tony Hawk 5 because of "bad timing" and "rights issues". How are there rights issues on an IP their parent company owns the rights to in full? Suddenly, Naughty Dog adds a playable Crash level and a boxed copy of the game in a character's living room, despite going on RECORD 10 months earlier, saying that they planned such a segment and removed it. Bruce Straley gave the reason they removed it -- because Sony does not own Crash, and they "don't control it."
Yet today, the segment is in the game. How can it be in the game now, when Bruce Straley clearly said they cut it because they did not own the rights and couldn't license it? He even went so far as to say "if it were possible, which it's not, let me emphasize". Suddenly now, it's possible? What are we to assume that means then?
Yet today, the segment is in the game. How can it be in the game now, when Bruce Straley clearly said they cut it because they did not own the rights and couldn't license it? He even went so far as to say "if it were possible, which it's not, let me emphasize". Suddenly now, it's possible? What are we to assume that means then?
Has this been shown in any videos yet, or just hearsay?
In before Day One Patch removes this content and this was just a leftover from that test.
In before Day One Patch removes this content and this was just a leftover from that test.
Has this been shown in any videos yet, or just hearsay?
I've read a couple of different accounts of the game from people who have already played it. And both of them mentioned there's a playable level of Crash
As a post a few above me says, Sony do not own Crash. Even if they have distribution rights for Crash 1-3, CTR and Bash, they do not possess any right to incorporate that IP into any NEW product -- which Uncharted 4 clearly qualifies as. Activision has reportedly been the reason for distribution problems for Crash games in the past as well (including being rumored as part of the reason they're not on Vita in NA) and has been NOTORIOUSLY stubborn about the use of Crash by Sony and Naughty Dog -- famously denying them the casual use of it in an art contest celebrating their history, despite Naughty Dog not using it for any sort of profitable means.
But suddenly, Robomodo can't add Crash to Tony Hawk 5 because of "bad timing" and "rights issues". How are there rights issues on an IP their parent company owns the rights to in full?Suddenly now, it's possible? What are we to assume that means then?Suddenly, Naughty Dog adds a playable Crash level and a boxed copy of the game in a character's living room, despite going on RECORD 10 months earlier, saying that they planned such a segment and removed it. Bruce Straley gave the reason they removed it -- because Sony does not own Crash, and they "don't control it."
Yet today, the segment is in the game. How can it be in the game now, when Bruce Straley clearly said they cut it because they did not own the rights and couldn't license it? He even went so far as to say "if it were possible, which it's not, let me emphasize".
I'll spoiler tag in case others haven't paid it much attention.
Shit, already knew about this, but didn't pay much attention to the hand. It doesn't look like Drake's at all
Oh but it is. This is actually a huge spoiler but many people won't spot it. Best to leave it that way.
Oh but it is. This is actually a huge spoiler but many people won't spot it. Best to leave it that way.
Could you PM me the spoiler? Now I'm really curious and it will be a while before I get around to playing Uncharted 4. I still have to finish 2 and 3 haha.
it's in the picture. look for it and it's pretty obvious, too.
i dont even know the exact spoiler but one can deduce from the image what it is
Given how tight are Sony and Lazyeye this gen (Destiny & CoD) i think there is a chance this e3 will top 2015s!
On a pessimistic note, I can't see a new Crash doing all that well in this climate, both critically or financially.
And here we go with everyone jimping on the "it's happening" bandwagon. Careful guys, I wouldn't look at this as confirmation.
On a pessimistic note, I can't see a new Crash doing all that well in this climate, both critically or financially.