• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Barge-Size Noah’s Ark Is a Creationist’s Wet Dream

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sulik2

Member
The dimensions on the ark are for a giant box, its wasn't a boat. They spent $100 million and couldn't even read the dimensions correctly. Then again, they think the bible supports a six thousand year old earth so they lack reading comprehension clearly. Gah at the dinosaurs.
 
I want to go.

The dimensions on the ark are for a giant box, its wasn't a boat. They spent $100 million and couldn't even read the dimensions correctly. Then again, they think the bible supports a six thousand year old earth so they lack reading comprehension clearly. Gah at the dinosaurs.

Giant boxes aren't as enticing. They took some "creative liberties".
 

thelatestmodel

Junior, please.
The whole thing is obscene. Complete waste of money, time, skills and materials. And it gets tax breaks? Holy fuck. Rage inducing.
 

Sojgat

Member
yxrzuktbekm4xdenpffa.jpg

b0WCaPc.gif
 

Viewt

Member
Aside from the ideas I don't believe in and think are factually wrong, I think it's pretty cool that somebody built something like this.

Hah, yeah, is it cool for me to check this out just because I think it's cool that someone built a ridiculously large wooden boat?

Really, though, this is just a missed opportunity to make an awesome, Noah's Ark-themed zoo.
 

Krejlooc

Banned
So Noah just did a shitty job on the whole "two of every animal" stuff and thats why the dinosaurs are extinct? He alone failed them?
 
Hah, yeah, is it cool for me to check this out just because I think it's cool that someone built a ridiculously large wooden boat?

Really, though, this is just a missed opportunity to make an awesome, Noah's Ark-themed zoo.

Huh? You can do whatever you want. If you want to visit the giant arc in the middle of god-knows-where Kentucky, I'll wish you well.
 

Izuna

Banned
I can read thank you but in the words of Homer Simpson's brain "Money can be exchanged for goods and services."

I'm asking you to clarify your argument because on the surface it makes no sense. Even if we dive deeper into thinking that there is a limited amount of food (not really) it still makes little sense.

This particular construction isn't a good example, but yes, you are paying people for services etc.

You could pay people jobs to help with the transporting and distributing food, but it's not the only job that should exist. If we stopped production of art or attractions etc. you would lose the skilled labour required to do after you somehow "solve" world hunger (which won't happen in a single generation).

Anyway I see this "but the money could be used on xyz!" example being used on pretty much anything that philanthropic.

EDIT:

The Ark was meant to be a box? I didn't know that.
 

PSqueak

Banned
It's a great idea if it was built just like a curiosity tourist attraction, but that doesn't seem to be the case.
 

zbarron

Member
This particular construction isn't a good example, but yes, you are paying people for services etc.

You could pay people jobs to help with the transporting and distributing food, but it's the only job that should exist. If we stopped production of art or attractions etc. you would lose the skilled labour required to do after you somehow "solve" world hunger (which won't happen in a single generation).

Anyway I see this "but the money could be used on xyz!" example being used on pretty much anything that philanthropic.

EDIT:

The Ark was meant to be a box? I didn't know that.
I assume you meant to say "You could pay people jobs to help with the transporting and distributing food, but it's [not] the only job that should exist" in which case I agree, but these construction workers could make something more useful like farming equipment, irrigation systems, the chronically underfunded desalination of sea water, or homes for the homeless. We're not going to solve the problem but that doesn't mean we can't improve it. At least the 100 million would make a difference for something good as opposed to this which brings nothing positive.
 

jem0208

Member
The structure is meant to commemorate the work of Noah, and to stand as a proof that the stories in the Bible are true.
Attaching a horn to a horse doesn't prove unicorns are real, why would someone think this is proof that the ark was real...?
 

Fuchsdh

Member
I want to go.



Giant boxes aren't as enticing. They took some "creative liberties".

Now I'm really interested in the level of shipbuilding technologies available at the time. Wikipedia doesn't have anything on stuff from that far back. Doesn't seem like they would have knowledge of keels at the time, although the only ancient boats I know of are from Egypt and they're shallow-bottomed riverboats.

It is just an allegory, the number 7 is a number of fullness.

Yeah the exact numbers don't matter, there's whole bits in the Bible where the numbers are about symbolism and not chronology. Which is one more reason why the people who take it as literal truth and date their world from a haphazard counting of "begats" are crazy.
 

Aureon

Please do not let me serve on a jury. I am actually a crazy person.
I'm pretty sure that 1000 years ago, writing that there were dinosaurs on the Ark could've got you burned at stake.
Oh, well.
 
if people want to waste their money on a momument to ignorance that's their prerogative but they shouldn't be getting any kind of tax break or subsidy or anything.
 
http://www.forbes.com/sites/dalebus...-builder-ken-ham-tempts-a-storm/#56a305c7152b

And like any ambitious entrepreneur, Ham continues to think ahead. Elsewhere on the site he plans a replica of the kind of walled city where Noah and his family might have lived. Among other plans: a depiction of the Tower of Babel, whence God, after the flood, dispersed earth’s inhabitants, according to Genesis.

But without a specified measurement in the Bible, Ham hasn’t yet said how tall the tower might be.
 

Mahonay

Banned
if people want to waste their money on a momument to ignorance that's their prerogative but they shouldn't be getting any kind of tax break or subsidy or anything.
Pretty much this.

If you can get a tax break for building a giant ark with dinosaurs on it, I should get a tax break if I want to build a 80ft monument to The Macho Man Randy Savage.
 

MCN

Banned
"Stories in the bible are true"

"Took 6 years to build"

Wait, I'm sure that's not how the story went in the bible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom