• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Besty Devos splits Senate with 50/50 vote, VP Pence confirms nomation

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's true, though. Bernie? Here's a photo of him in the Soviet Union. Jill? Clearly this chiropractor who loves crystals is a Kremlin saboteur! Wikileaks? Agent of Putin! All who dared speak ill of the Yaass Kween is a pinko commie! We didn't lose on November 8th because of the incompetence of a bunch of rich white men burning through a billion dollars trying to meme Hillary into the White House! We lost because those dastardly communists hacked the election!

Look, here's an anonymous source within the CIA saying so! Clearly this is undeniable facts that my worldview is 100% true, even after it leads to failure after failure!

This was only used as a suggestion of what the GOP would use against Bernie when busters like yourself wouldn't shut up about how much better of a candidate he was.
 

Ambient80

Member
Lol, McCain talked some big talk until the vote came in. If it were ever a question, he should never be trusted after this.
 

mr jones

Ethnicity is not a race!
Unfortunately, an educated electorate would result in Dem control of government. So gotta keep people dumb, Jesus loving and voting Republican.

Disagree.

Republicans aren't uneducated idiots. They wouldn't have such political dominance if they were.

Why would a wealthy republican banker vote against his self interests? Republicans look to lower taxes, especially for the wealthy. They look to give financial perks to businesses. They believe in student vouchers, that can provide tax-based funding for students to go to private schools. Less regulation on bank loans. Less regulation on government contractors. Less regulation on pharma/medical companies.

Then you add the lower tier stuff, like tougher immigration (from certain countries), protecting the sanctity of marriage (because eww gays), and lowering of federal government aid (because bootstraps), and you have the plucked at the hearts and minds of millions of educated, conservative-minded Americans.

The Tea Party isn't a bunch of old baby boomers, y'all. Not all republicans wear hatred on their sleeves like Spencer. Know your opponents.
 

flkraven

Member
The math just doesn't work for the Dems in 2018. Most of the republicans up for re-election are in pretty solid red states with very little opportunity to change that. You fucked yourselves in 2016, and 2018 isn't going to save you.
 

mr jones

Ethnicity is not a race!
Lol, McCain talked some big talk until the vote came in. If it were ever a question, he should never be trusted after this.

That fool towed the line after Trump clowned him for being a prisoner of war, fam. He belittled a decorated veteran and senator. McCain still provided his endorsement.

We're all complex people, but you don't let some bullish orange fuckboi shame you publically like that. Fuck a political party - that's your character, the very sacrifice that you made for your country that he's putting on blast.

He fell in step with his party.

This doesn't surprise me in the least.
 

Not

Banned
Maybe McCain's mouth and language center isn't interconnected with the rest of his body

And it's screaming for help
 

Damaniel

Banned
School districts with competent administrators don't have to put up with stupid one-size-fits-all standards. If you want your school district to be modeled after Finland and not be forced to teach reading to kindergartners, then you can.

At least I could trust the more progressive blue states to do the right thing. It's the red states that concern me - a decade of DeVos-like leaders in charge (or the abolishment of the Department of Education altogether) could result in students in Mississippi and West Virginia going to places like the 'McDonald's (Whites-only) School of Jesus and Guns', being taught by undereducated 'teachers' making $10/hr with no benefits. That would just result in woefully undereducated students, the reduction of teachers to second-class citizens, and the never ending shoveling of federal education funds into the pockets of wealthy Republicans - including many who voted today to confirm DeVos.

(And yeah, the 'McDonald's school of Jesus and Guns' thing is hyperbole, but your tax dollars *will* be used to fund second rate religious 'education' taught by people not qualified to teach, I guarantee it.)
 

GhaleonQ

Member
I skimmed a few pages of the ripped sackcloth and ashes, and I just want to ask:

You all know that the Education Secretary has very little power in 2017, right? Like, if you wanted a head on a pike, make DeVos it, sure, but when I read emotional posts like, "Now, our public school district system will be terrible!" (as if it wasn't already), I wonder.

Arne Duncan was the latest in a string of Education Secretaries who had big plans but terrible implementation and no interest in relationship building.

He ignored rural communities entirely.

He wasted billions of dollars on urban Race To The Top and School Improvement Grants, which had unrealistic expectations for implementation and no way to motivate or discipline. districts and states that had already gotten their money. Obama's office concluded that there was no effect. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174013/pdf/20174013.pdf This also makes it impossible for any secretary to do the same in the future, even if he or she had a really good idea.

And while I find the Samantha Bees and suburban Republicans of the world to be distasteful in their school in their "equity/choice, except if it affects me" stances, it was his duty to convince them of Common Core's quality, or of the necessity of his reforms in breaking poverty cycles. DeVos herself noted this, criticizing both parties. http://www.federationforchildren.or...Betsy-SXSWedu-speech-final-remarks.pdf?e40fe9

So, because he pissed off literally every portion of America, the Education Secretary got stripped of its power in the latest Every Student Succeeds Act, and to the extent that the office has power, it will be checked by the Congressional education committees.

So, settle down. She cannot do much, positive or negative
 
I skimmed a few pages of the ripped sackcloth and ashes, and I just want to ask:

You all know that the Education Secretary has very little power in 2017, right? Like, if you wanted a head on a pike, make DeVos it, sure, but when I read emotional posts like, "Now, our public school district system will be terrible!" (as if it wasn't already), I wonder.

Arne Duncan was the latest in a string of Education Secretaries who had big plans but terrible implementation and no interest in relationship building.

He ignored rural communities entirely.

He wasted billions of dollars on urban Race To The Top and School Improvement Grants, which had unrealistic expectations for implementation and no way to motivate or discipline. districts and states that had already gotten their money. Obama's office concluded that there was no effect. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174013/pdf/20174013.pdf This also makes it impossible for any secretary to do the same in the future, even if he or she had a really good idea.

And while I find the Samantha Bees and suburban Republicans of the world to be distasteful in their school in their "equity/choice, except if it affects me" stances, it was his duty to convince them of Common Core's quality, or of the necessity of his reforms in breaking poverty cycles. DeVos herself noted this, criticizing both parties. http://www.federationforchildren.or...Betsy-SXSWedu-speech-final-remarks.pdf?e40fe9

So, because he pissed off literally every portion of America, the Education Secretary got stripped of its power in the latest Every Student Succeeds Act, and to the extent that the office has power, it will be checked by the Congressional education committees.

So, settle down. She cannot do much, positive or negative

You say things as if these limitations will affect this adminstration. It won't precedence has been broken long time ago . Keep saying don't worry then it happens
 

GhaleonQ

Member
You say things as if these limitations will affect this adminstration. It won't precedence has been broken long time ago . Keep saying don't worry then it happens

If Trump has a puppet congress, voucher schools are the least of your worries.

Charter/private schools have made huge inroads with the Democrats. Cory Booker, Zuckerberg, etc. - the Democrats have largely abandoned rebuilding an adequate public education institution across the board. It took an unpredictably successful insurgent campaign from Sanders to get Hillary to even consider what would end up being a horribly incompetent means-tested claptrap policy because "I don't want Trump's kids going to college!"

Yeah, but you say this like it hasn't been tried. The people in here complaining about obstructionism would FLIP if they ever went to a school board meeting or was a fly on the wall in a metropolis' superintendent office for a week.

The response that is always given is, "More money, please! For equity! For K2 and K3! For ever-increasing benefits!" That's not a solution, so they've gone outside the district system.

Whether or not you agree with it, it is wholly rational.
 
So, because he pissed off literally every portion of America, the Education Secretary got stripped of its power in the latest Every Student Succeeds Act, and to the extent that the office has power, it will be checked by the Congressional education committees.

So, settle down. She cannot do much, positive or negative

Chairman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce: Virginia Foxx

*Googles*

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/virginia-foxx-obama-education-legacy-232084

”I'm going to push to diminish the role of the federal government in everything it's in that isn't in the Constitution," Foxx said in an interview in her district. ”That's education, health care. All the things that the federal government does that it should not be doing. I'm happy to diminish its role."

Foxx's small-government views are rooted in the Blue Ridge Mountains in a slice of Appalachia where she grew up without power and running water and began working as a weaver at age 12 to help support her family — experiences that convinced her it's an individual's hard work, and not federal programs, that lead to success.

She said she would love to dismantle the federal Education Department altogether, but acknowledges that that is unlikely in the near term.

”I definitely don't think the Department of Education has any business doing all the things that it's doing,"
she said. ”But I don't think you do it overnight. I think you have to devolve it over time."

Foxx reels off a list of possible targets: The billions doled out annually under Title 1 — a Great Society program that boosts funding to schools serving poor students. The money is now considered a possible funding source for Trump's school choice plan to allow low-income students to select private or charter schools. Despite the trillions spent on the existing program, ”we haven't changed reading levels one bit. Not one bit," she said. ”They are the same they were when we started putting out that money in 1965. Something's wrong with the system."

(Scores on the Nation's Report Card show that reading scores for students ages 9 and 13 have been going up since the 1970s, although scores for 17-year-olds have remained largely stagnant.)

She wants to re-examine the role of the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights, which conservatives revile for its focus on issues such as campus sexual assault and bathroom access for transgender students. ”The office deserves some scrutiny, let me just put it that way," Foxx said.

She'd like to reverse a Democratic Congress' decision to have the Education Department, not banks, issue student loans — because ”that's not a function of the federal government." And she wants to reverse its regulations targeting for-profit colleges — cutting off financial aid to programs where students leave with high debt and poor job prospects.

You're not reassuring anyone.
 

GhaleonQ

Member
You just posted something that confirms that she hates the idea of a powerful Education Secretary. This would be supporting my point.

If you are suggesting that the Trump team has the skill to wind down the national Education Department, HA.

I'm suggesting that she'd be perfectly happy and willing to continue to dismantle student-focused funding, programs, and protections at the federal level. She wouldn't be a "check" on DeVos at all.

That's what people are most worried about regarding DeVos, no?
 

FStubbs

Member
I skimmed a few pages of the ripped sackcloth and ashes, and I just want to ask:

You all know that the Education Secretary has very little power in 2017, right? Like, if you wanted a head on a pike, make DeVos it, sure, but when I read emotional posts like, "Now, our public school district system will be terrible!" (as if it wasn't already), I wonder.

Arne Duncan was the latest in a string of Education Secretaries who had big plans but terrible implementation and no interest in relationship building.

He ignored rural communities entirely.

He wasted billions of dollars on urban Race To The Top and School Improvement Grants, which had unrealistic expectations for implementation and no way to motivate or discipline. districts and states that had already gotten their money. Obama's office concluded that there was no effect. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174013/pdf/20174013.pdf This also makes it impossible for any secretary to do the same in the future, even if he or she had a really good idea.

And while I find the Samantha Bees and suburban Republicans of the world to be distasteful in their school in their "equity/choice, except if it affects me" stances, it was his duty to convince them of Common Core's quality, or of the necessity of his reforms in breaking poverty cycles. DeVos herself noted this, criticizing both parties. http://www.federationforchildren.or...Betsy-SXSWedu-speech-final-remarks.pdf?e40fe9

So, because he pissed off literally every portion of America, the Education Secretary got stripped of its power in the latest Every Student Succeeds Act, and to the extent that the office has power, it will be checked by the Congressional education committees.

So, settle down. She cannot do much, positive or negative

You were on a roll until the bolded - then your argument crashed and burned. There is no Congressional oversight of the Trump administration.
 

FStubbs

Member
At least I could trust the more progressive blue states to do the right thing. It's the red states that concern me - a decade of DeVos-like leaders in charge (or the abolishment of the Department of Education altogether) could result in students in Mississippi and West Virginia going to places like the 'McDonald's (Whites-only) School of Jesus and Guns', being taught by undereducated 'teachers' making $10/hr with no benefits. That would just result in woefully undereducated students, the reduction of teachers to second-class citizens, and the never ending shoveling of federal education funds into the pockets of wealthy Republicans - including many who voted today to confirm DeVos.

(And yeah, the 'McDonald's school of Jesus and Guns' thing is hyperbole, but your tax dollars *will* be used to fund second rate religious 'education' taught by people not qualified to teach, I guarantee it.)

So the colleges will all be like Bob Jones and Pensacola Concentration Camp - I mean Pensacola Christian College?
 

Zen Aku

Member
Aren't children suppose to be the untouchable holy grail in society? Aren't they the ones who are suppose to be the most well protected and looked out for?

How the fuck did this happen?

When 20 children died in the Sandy Hook shooting and nothing was done about gun control, you know that's when American government really don't care about children lives at all. Much less their education.

Edit: To clarify, Obama administration did put a few things in place after that tragedy but Trump is about to dismantled them.
 
Fucking GOP minus those two senators are a national disgrace. This is an absolute travesty. Its embarrassing. She, like Trump, is wildly unqualified for this position.

This was only used as a suggestion of what the GOP would use against Bernie when busters like yourself wouldn't shut up about how much better of a candidate he was.

At this point, anyone who is still bitching about the primary has refused to accept reality. They aren't worth engaging with. They make other people who believed in Bernie's message look bad.

I hate that it keeps being brought up in every fucking political thread.
 

Ferrio

Banned
Fucking GOP minus those two senators are a national disgrace. This is an absolute travesty. Its embarrassing. She, like Trump, is wildly unqualified for this position.

Don't excuse those two senators. They voted that way because they knew they could, if this had any way in chance of being shot down they would have voted yes.
 

Nephtes

Member
Has anyone else done Teach for America?
I'm all about public schools as the next person, but not all public schools are created equal.

If I had a choice between sending my kid to the "3rd world country" I taught at for two years, where the children's biggest problem are parents that don't give a fuck, and paying money to send my kid to a private school... I pick the private school every time.

Devos is probably not the right answer...Vouchers aren't the right answer. Keeping public education as it is it not the right answer.

The right answer is holding parents accountable for their children's education, to hold parents accountable for ensuring their children aren't little shits towards their teachers and elders before they become teenagers, to realize as a nation that everyone isn't going to college and that's okay, and to provide many other avenues of success besides the college route.
 

Xe4

Banned
You are probably right.
Not probably. At least one of the two, maybe boh were on her comitte to pass DeVos to congress. Either of them voting no could have stopped DeVos in her tracks. They didn't. Their actions are almost worse than the republicans that did vote yes, because they were scumbags hiding it from their constituents.
 

dohdough

Member
Stop giving this traitorous lunatic any attention.

Doctors can be pretty stupid sometimes. Or all the time in her case.

Especially after she swindled millions from naive but well meaning Democrats. I wonder how much of that went back to Putin btw?

Ugh...Stein actually used to be a decent candidate. I have no idea what happened since her run for Warren's current seat, but she clearly jumped the shark. I blame the haircut and it breaks my heart.

Lol, McCain talked some big talk until the vote came in. If it were ever a question, he should never be trusted after this.

Yep. He was teetering. But 0 spine.

Maybe McCain's mouth and language center isn't interconnected with the rest of his body

And it's screaming for help

McCain's vote was never in question and his status as a "maverick" is a myth.
 

PK Gaming

Member
The fact that we lost in a tiebreaker is what really makes this whole thing sting

Of all the Ls we took this past year, I can't believe got lucked this badly
 
Yep. He was teetering. But 0 spine.

He was never teetering, he was pumping himself up like he always does. He's a fucking snake oils salesman and a piece of shit. He's an opportunist and a scumbag and it's pathetic people still try to build him up as some beacon of righteousness. He's a self serving jackass.
 

GhaleonQ

Member
The responses to me were, "There will be no congressional oversight." *sigh*

In any case, you should really have more confidence in your voter mobilization techniques in 2018!

Devos is probably not the right answer...Vouchers aren't the right answer. Keeping public education as it is it not the right answer.

The right answer is holding parents accountable for their children's education, to hold parents accountable for ensuring their children aren't little shits towards their teachers and elders before they become teenagers, to realize as a nation that everyone isn't going to college and that's okay, and to provide many other avenues of success besides the college route.

This is what charter schools and voucher schools are often allowed to do. In some ways, district schools are awful because of incompetence, poor training, occasionally a lack of resources, and other things. In others, their hands are tied.
 

Magwik

Banned
The responses to me were, "There will be no congressional oversight." *sigh*

In any case, you should really have more confidence in your voter mobilization techniques in 2018!



This is what charter schools and voucher schools are often allowed to do. In some ways, district schools are awful because of incompetence, poor training, occasionally a lack of resources, and other things. In others, their hands are tied.

So the solution to fixing public education is taking kids out of it and letting the rest burn and fail?
 
Has anyone else done Teach for America?
I'm all about public schools as the next person, but not all public schools are created equal.

If I had a choice between sending my kid to the "3rd world country" I taught at for two years, where the children's biggest problem are parents that don't give a fuck, and paying money to send my kid to a private school... I pick the private school every time.

Devos is probably not the right answer...Vouchers aren't the right answer. Keeping public education as it is it not the right answer.

The right answer is holding parents accountable for their children's education, to hold parents accountable for ensuring their children aren't little shits towards their teachers and elders before they become teenagers, to realize as a nation that everyone isn't going to college and that's okay, and to provide many other avenues of success besides the college route.

What does any of this have to do with DeVos and how shitty of a candidate she is? I'm glad you have the money for private school, most don't and the broken voucher system and an incompetent head of education that doesn't even know basic things about our education system aren't the answer. So nice attempt to deflect all actual conversation to talk about something that has nothing that has to do with this topic.
 
Did anybody get an email from Mike Pence about the nomination?

I'd absolutely love to reply with some select swears, but I highly doubt mails to the White House would be read anyway...
 
That fool towed the line after Trump clowned him for being a prisoner of war, fam. He belittled a decorated veteran and senator. McCain still provided his endorsement.

We're all complex people, but you don't let some bullish orange fuckboi shame you publically like that. Fuck a political party - that's your character, the very sacrifice that you made for your country that he's putting on blast.

He fell in step with his party.

This doesn't surprise me in the least.

I still can't believe he let that happen.
 

RK128

Member
Hey GUYS!

It gets even better!

http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-acti...r-proposes-abolishing-department-of-education



Hey - maybe the silver lining we need? Betsy won't be around long anyway?

/nervous chuckle

This shocked me when I read it on Twitter before......outright removing the 'Department of Education'?! That could fully removed education jobs within public schools. I'm in college to become a teacher.....this is scary news.

Guess Trump's America doesn't want children educated. Just.....just horrible.
 
So I work at a low income school that was given all this technology to teach poor kids how to code. I get to make the curriculum but with this woman in charge I do not know what the future direction will be. I have been in a daze worried if this is going to get defunded exactly how bad is this woman?
 

watershed

Banned
A history making vote on a clearly unqualified secretary of education who will do more to harm public education than help it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom