Schwowsers
Member
I'd have no problem dating someone who is HIV+. People who know their status and are being treated aren't the ones spreading it around.
No, because I know drug adherence is a huge problem. Like over half of people with chronic illnesses don't take their medication properly. So no.
Studies have consistently shown that 20 percent to 30 percent of medication prescriptions are never filled, and that approximately 50 percent of medications for chronic disease are not taken as prescribed, according to a review in Annals of Internal Medicine. People who do take prescription medications whether its for a simple infection or a life-threatening condition typically take only about half the prescribed doses.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/17/well/the-cost-of-not-taking-your-medicine.html
With this stuff maybe, but she'd have to be pretty much a living Real Doll.
Casual sexism
Eh, not so sure about that.
The idea is that if I am going to shoulder extra risk, and having to always use a condom, then other positive attributed will have to magnified to justify the increased burden.
The positive attributes you value based on your post are attractiveness, thinness, and breast size. And maybe having dead eyes. Pretty text book stuff.
The positive attributes you value based on your post are attractiveness, thinness, and breast size. And maybe having dead eyes. Pretty text book stuff.
OP don't do it.
No way to live with that fear deep down inside.
You will find another person who is not HIV +
There really have been some amazing, perhaps even unthinkable for 2008, medical advances in almost a decade when it comes to controlling and preventing HIV.
From Whitman-Walker, the clinic which was instrumental in getting PreP to the public:
That 8% is still to high for me personally. I wouldn't drive my car if I had a 8% chance of getting in a accident.
Reduces an already low risk by 92%. That's not saying an 8% chance.
That'll be a no for me. There are a lot of people out there, eventually you'll find someone who you sync with and is healthy.
lol at this Necro bump.
Happily in a relationship with someone else now but my perspective on this question would be way different today now that PreP is a thing.
Considering how dangerous it is to drive, specially on ice, specially with some other drivers, and considering you would drive more time than having sex with an HIV positive person, I'm pretty sure that it's more dangerous driving a car.That 8% is still to high for me personally. I wouldn't drive my car if I had a 8% chance of getting in a accident.
Reduces an already low risk by 92%. That's not saying an 8% chance.
I think it's closed minded and cruel to say no, but it'd still be a no for me. I'm quite paranoid about STIs and I just wouldn't be able to sleep at night.
I think it's closed minded and cruel to say no, but it'd still be a no for me. I'm quite paranoid about STIs and I just wouldn't be able to sleep at night.
If the number isnt 100% I wouldn'tbe comfortable. And thats just my opinion. Condoms aren't a 100% effective, and if I knew ahead of time the person I was about to have sex with had any STD I wouldn't do it.
Amibguous Cad said:A refusal to date someone who is positive and knows isn't quite homophobic, and isn't quite ableist, but it's certainly rooted in animus against people with this particular disease. It also makes it much harder to get people to learn and disclose their HIV status.
Finally, the idea that anyone who refuses to penetrate or be penetrated by another human being who is HIV positive harbours animosity towards people with HIV is utterly absurd. I prefer not to kiss people with colds, and I wouldn't date someone with trichomoniasis; but somehow I manage not to harbour any ill will towards people suffering from these infections.
The positive attributes you value based on your post are attractiveness, thinness, and breast size. And maybe having dead eyes. Pretty text book stuff.
8% risk is still too high for me personally.
Every jurisdiction should have a law which requires disclosure because of that risk, and I'm pretty sure many do.
It's very good for people living with the affliction that we've progressed medically and been able to treat it much better than before, but it's still a serious concern and not a risk to be entered into lightly.
That 8% is still to high for me personally. I wouldn't drive my car if I had a 8% chance of getting in a accident.
You may not have any ill will towards those people, but you most certainly have an irrational fear towards those people. Thats a fact.
And heeey guess what? That's exactly where HIV stigma comes from: Fear
You have hard fucking science saying that people who are on medication CANNOT give away HIV. You have hard fucking science saying that people with HIV can go on to have children who are free from the virus. We prech science up and down on these boards and yet we seem to have a hard time understanding this. Why?
8% risk is still too high for me personally.
Every jurisdiction should have a law which requires disclosure because of that risk, and I'm pretty sure many do.
It's very good for people living with the affliction that we've progressed medically and been able to treat it much better than before, but it's still a serious concern and not a risk to be entered into lightly.
There's a big difference between a controlled study and actual, real-world people that have to consciously take their medication every day as well as take all the other precautions.