• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

'Stop Giving Evil Characters Brown Skin'

MoogleMan

Member
This is literally the reason why it's bad. I have no idea how you can't see the harm in that association.

Because dark is not the same as ethnic, which is how a lot of individuals are spinning it.

The only harm is the misconceived perception that "dark" = "ethnic".
 

Shaanyboi

Banned
To blame our cultures assumption that dark skin = bad and light skin = good on movies, games and media in general is kind of odd to me. Even without reinforced visual representation of darker villains, I would argue the assumption that darker embodiments are antagonists is engrained long before we realize. In every religion I know of evil is portrayed by darkness, pure virtue is portrayed by light. Light vs Dark is just a theme and the fact that it is carried out in games and various media so literally isn't reinforcing any stereotype or agenda and is just a continuation of thousands of years of storytelling. If this was the reason people were racist shitbags everyone that grew up watching Disney movies, playing video games and watching tv would be a degenerate asshole to every person with a darker shade of skin. Come the fuck on people.

This is a gaming thread. The link posted relates to videogame characters. This is the circle of discussion we choose to discuss and are responsible for. If you'd like to start up a thread in OT, please feel free to do so.
 

vocab

Member
Most of the times when a Japanese game does darking skin its more based on Japanese folklore, and less about realism (I mean, were talking about a fighting game where people shoot fireballs out of there hand, leave your brain at the door). Akuma is basically a demon. Oni is basically him being consumed completely. Evil Ryu was an always what if situation, and Violent Ken was always kind of a meme made by SNK. This kind of stuff is all over the place in 80's anime/manga. There are true dark skin tone villains that have nothing to do with those ideas of course.

I'll agree that it is an issue in Western media, but I don't think using Evil Ryu/Violent Ken is a good example.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Gonna make sure there's a link to this on every page.

won't make a difference

people who are willfully goddamn stupid are going to continue being willfully goddamn stupid, because it's not actually about the argument that giving evil characters darker skin is harmful.

it's about people feeling like you are attacking them for liking media that does this, so the defense shields go up and the fingers go into the ears and everybody acts like they can't reason any better than a five year old
 
This is a gaming thread. The link posted relates to videogame characters. This is the circle of discussion we choose to discuss and are responsible for. If you'd like to start up a thread in OT, please feel free to do so.

The link posted was referencing characters from multimedia. They used characters from both games and animated movies. I was continuing the discussion in line with the OP.

Gonna make sure there's a link to this on every page.

This video would seem to show that the original doll experiment, which was done in the late 30's/early 40's may have a more improved outcome if done today.
 

Synth

Member
To blame our cultures assumption that dark skin = bad and light skin = good on movies, games and media in general is kind of odd to me. Even without reinforced visual representation of darker villains, I would argue the assumption that darker embodiments are antagonists is engrained long before we realize. In every religion I know of evil is portrayed by darkness, pure virtue is portrayed by light. Light vs Dark is just a theme and the fact that it is carried out in games and various media so literally isn't reinforcing any stereotype or agenda and is just a continuation of thousands of years of storytelling. If this was the reason people were racist shitbags everyone that grew up watching Disney movies, playing video games and watching tv would be a degenerate asshole to every person with a darker shade of skin. Come the fuck on people.

Just because the roots of certain ideologies lay elsewhere, doesn't mean they're not worth considering within more specific environments... If this thread was instead about female representation in games, would you similarly dismiss it with "yea well, religion has been saying this for ages", as though that's reason enough to ignore the effects of this everywhere else?

Hell, I certainly wouldn't use religion to argue against pretty much anything to be honest.

Because dark is not the same as ethnic, which is how a lot of individuals are spinning it.

The only harm is the misconceived perception that "dark" = "ethnic".

I doesn't need to be about ethnicity though. Skin colour is a characteristic inherent to a person, and to have that continually represented to be something bad or evil, with very few examples of the opposite can have legitimately negative effects on a person. If you go up to someone and comment negatively on purely their skin colour, do you think that would be fine so long as you leave any other ethnic attributes our of your insults?

Again.. look at this...
This is how children's view of the world can be shaped by the reinforcement of a skin colour being a negative trait, this then will impact their view of themselves when pretty much the only time they see a character that "looks like me" is when it's yet again the bad guy.
 
Just because the roots of certain ideologies lay elsewhere, doesn't mean they're not worth considering within more specific environments... If this thread was instead about female representation in games, would you similarly dismiss it with "yea well, religion has been saying this for ages", as though that's reason enough to ignore the effects of this everywhere else?

Hell, I certainly wouldn't use religion to argue against pretty much anything to be honest.

I wasn't using religion to argue against anything, just that even without visual representations we would still have the concept of light vs dark and the notion that light is good and dark is evil.

Dark is usually associated with evil while light is usually associated with good. Has nothing to do with skin color.

Exactly my point as well.
 
Do I have to read this thread or is it the usual? Mostly white ppl with a sprinkle of poc's saying no ( insert topic about race/representation) doesn't matter. They don't notice a problem therefore there obviously isn't one. It's just the way things are. Stop looking for racism. I bet someone linked a study or some sorta video/ scholarly article that those ppl will ignore. Etc etc. I'll be shocked if it's different lol.
Bonus points if others can't believe neogaf has members that are that dense who also lack empathy.
 

Synth

Member
I wasn't using religion to argue against anything, just that even without visual representations we would still have the concept of light vs dark and the notion that light is good and dark is evil.



Exactly my point as well.

Yes, but "it has nothing to do with skin colour" stops being true the moment you apply it to skin colour...
 
Do I have to read this thread or is it the usual? Mostly white ppl with a sprinkle of poc's saying no ( insert topic about race/representation) doesn't matter. They don't notice a problem therefore there obviously isn't one. It's just the way things are. Stop looking for racism. I bet someone linked a study or some sorta video/ scholarly article that those ppl will ignore. Etc etc. I'll be shocked if it's different lol.
Bonus points if others can't believe neogaf has members that are that dense who also lack empathy.

Nailed it. Its honestly quite shocking how you hit the nail on the head
 

xxracerxx

Don't worry, I'll vouch for them.
Do I have to read this thread or is it the usual? Mostly white ppl with a sprinkle of poc's saying no ( insert topic about race/representation) doesn't matter. They don't notice a problem therefore there obviously isn't one. It's just the way things are. Stop looking for racism. I bet someone linked a study or some sorta video/ scholarly article that those ppl will ignore. Etc etc. I'll be shocked if it's different lol.
Bonus points if others can't believe neogaf has members that are that dense who also lack empathy.
God damn.
 
Look at the fucking post above yours.

My issue with your video is that it is largely American/Western-centric. What about those of us on the other side of the world who are largely homogeneous but still think that darkness = evil, light = good? You know, the concept that has been in trope even as far back as the dawn of Christianity (which, by the way, has its birthplace in the Middle East)?

If you want a more socially apt example, even in SEA, where I live, this concept has long been recognized even before Western colonizers came and discovered our lands. Light skin is more associated with nobility because nobles do not have to work under the fields, hence no tan. Whereas peasants, associated with rough labor under the sun, tend to get darker skin. So now you know why people look on lighter skin in a more favorable light, and something to aspire to. Which is why I find it amusing when Western people go out of their way to get a tan; you have no idea how many SEA people would love to have fair skin.

Yeah, you people over there have serious problems with minority and representation that needs to really be addressed but sometimes, I hope that before putting everything into a racial lens, y'all take a moment to see if there's any other reasoning behind it. In this case, it's a simple dark = evil, light = concept theme. In the case of Evil Ryu and Violent Ken, their change in skin tone is just to "cast" a darker more ominous counterpart to their lighter-skinned versions. It's like how, as an artist, if I want to create a more somber and depressed mood on a scene, I select a darker and more muted palette. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "black/brown/minority skin color = evil". If Ryu or Ken's default color is brown, I guarantee you their evil counterpart would just be a darker shade of it because, you know, dark = evil. And there's nothing really racial in that.
 

PSqueak

Banned
it's about people feeling like you are attacking them for liking media that does this, so the defense shields go up and the fingers go into the ears and everybody acts like they can't reason any better than a five year old

Basically the problem.

I fucking love Street Fighter and Zelda and Persona 5, but im not gonna pretend the games didn't had objectionable choices.

People need to understand it's completely possible to be critical of the things they like.
 

Mik2121

Member
Black as an evil character is a thing I can't say I ever notice. Pale skin as an evil character though? All over the place.

Hell, if anything I'd say "stop using albino characters only as bad or creepy guys", since that's how they are almost always portrayed.
 

LotusHD

Banned
Do I have to read this thread or is it the usual? Mostly white ppl with a sprinkle of poc's saying no ( insert topic about race/representation) doesn't matter. They don't notice a problem therefore there obviously isn't one. It's just the way things are. Stop looking for racism. I bet someone linked a study or some sorta video/ scholarly article that those ppl will ignore. Etc etc. I'll be shocked if it's different lol.
Bonus points if others can't believe neogaf has members that are that dense who also lack empathy.

27e0190e1d0b5934efdc36d3b6ee2f25.jpg
 
There is also this more recent study that shows that instead of black children have preference for white dolls, they now show near neutrality between the two colored dolls. White children are more biased toward the black dolls, but less so than the original study done seven decades ago. Maybe the white children are just raised by shitty parents instead of being brainwashed by the color of antagonists in the media they consume. Maybe I'm just a naive asshole.
 

Pantz

Member
It makes me feel self conscious about my grey hair strands due to all the evil characters with grey hair.
 

Toxi

Banned
I mean, there is a reason for it, and it's not inherently racist. We're instinctually afraid of the dark. This is ingrained in our ancestral history, lighting fires to keep away the baying wolves. The dark = black, the light of day = white. It's why many major 'gods' from major religions are, or are based on, sun gods.
The human species evolved in Africa. While we instinctually avoid actual darkness because we're diurnal animals, the idea that dark skin plays on instinctual fears of the dark is laughable.
 
My issue with your video is that it is largely American/Western-centric. What about those of us on the other side of the world who are largely homogeneous but still think that darkness = evil, light = good? You know, the concept that has been in trope even as far back as the dawn of Christianity (which, by the way, has its birthplace in the Middle East)?

If you want a more socially apt example, even in SEA, where I live, this concept has long been recognized even before Western colonizers came and discovered our lands. Light skin is more associated with nobility because nobles do not have to work under the fields, hence no tan. Whereas peasants, associated with rough labor under the sun, tend to get darker skin. So now you know why people look on lighter skin in a more favorable light, and something to aspire to. Which is why I find it amusing when Western people go out of their way to get a tan; you have no idea how many SEA people would love to have fair skin.

Yeah, you people over there have serious problems with minority and representation that needs to really be addressed but sometimes, I hope that before putting everything into a racial lens, y'all take a moment to see if there's any other reasoning behind it. In this case, it's a simple dark = evil, light = concept theme. In the case of Evil Ryu and Violent Ken, their change in skin tone is just to "cast" a darker more ominous counterpart to their lighter-skinned versions. It's like how, as an artist, if I want to create a more somber and depressed mood on a scene, I select a darker and more muted palette. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "black/brown/minority skin color = evil". If Ryu or Ken's default color is brown, I guarantee you their evil counterpart would just be a darker shade of it because, you know, dark = evil. And there's nothing really racial in that.

We are on the same page and I agree with your point of view.
 
The majority of the shit in this thread I'll cosign as being an issue. I don't buy that characters like Evil Ryu being a little darker than Ryu as an issue because, just like there's a ton of instances of characters becoming darker as they turn evil, there's tons of examples of characters becoming lighter when they turn evil. They're both tropes.

Evil Albino
Dark is Evil

It's not some zero sum game lmao

They don't cancel out because it happens to both dark skin and light skin characters.

and it's not even equivalent. White/lighter skin characters have way more protagonist/good examples than darker skin characters. Which is why the trope is a lot more noticeable.
 
Do I have to read this thread or is it the usual? Mostly white ppl with a sprinkle of poc's saying no ( insert topic about race/representation) doesn't matter. They don't notice a problem therefore there obviously isn't one. It's just the way things are. Stop looking for racism. I bet someone linked a study or some sorta video/ scholarly article that those ppl will ignore. Etc etc. I'll be shocked if it's different lol.
Bonus points if others can't believe neogaf has members that are that dense who also lack empathy.

This ain't my first rodeo smh.

Lmao

I've only browsed 3 pages and I've seen all of this here
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
And the concept of light = good, dark = evil is nigh universal across many cultures. The video in the OP is basically just a reaction to this trope.

And there are so many ways to show this other than to darken their skin.

Unless every character in the game is completely naked. And even then nah.
 
The tan for evil characters, such as Evil Ryu is a design to contrast the light skin of the protagonist, since they are suppose to be an opposite and opposing force of the original.

That's about it. It's a ying and yang thing. It's to contrast and also shown that the character gave in to power (darker skin is stronger than a delicate white skin).
 

LordKasual

Banned
Light being good and Dark being bad isn't really rooted in subconscious colorism as much as it's just basic human instinct? We gravitate towards the light and shy away from the dark. But people (and yes children) can generally tell the difference between a dark(er) skinned character with red eyes, an evil expression and crazy hair, vs. just a regular human who happens to have brown/dark skin.

I mean when I personally think of just clearly "EVIL" characters....they're usually sunken, unusually pale with an unhealthy tint. Sometimes you get the dark(er) skinned variant with crazy unkept jet black hair, but i don't think that really makes people associate ethnic people with the same attributes because they are not at all the same thing.

This really only becomes an issue to me when it's ethnic characters that are only ever put into roles that are deemed bad. Which is definitely a problem, but not so much in any of the examples in that video.


In that video there's alot of conflating....but the main thing is that all fictional characters could completely reverse this "trope" and the issue would still persist because it really has nothing to do with it.
 
And there are so many ways to show this other than to darken their skin.

Unless every character in the game is completely naked. And even then nah.

But doing so is the most effective way to get the point across that the character has gone dark or evil. Color is a very strong representation and is universally and instinctively more recognized by every one across every culture, to the point that almost every color has something immediately associated with them: red = anger/fury, purple = disgust, yellow = happiness/warmth, and yes black = death/evil/darkness and white = light/goodness. Video games, being a visual medium, will naturally take advantage of this.
 
My issue with your video is that it is largely American/Western-centric. What about those of us on the other side of the world who are largely homogeneous but still think that darkness = evil, light = good? You know, the concept that has been in trope even as far back as the dawn of Christianity (which, by the way, has its birthplace in the Middle East)?

If you want a more socially apt example, even in SEA, where I live, this concept has long been recognized even before Western colonizers came and discovered our lands. Light skin is more associated with nobility because nobles do not have to work under the fields, hence no tan. Whereas peasants, associated with rough labor under the sun, tend to get darker skin. So now you know why people look on lighter skin in a more favorable light, and something to aspire to. Which is why I find it amusing when Western people go out of their way to get a tan; you have no idea how many SEA people would love to have fair skin.

Yeah, you people over there have serious problems with minority and representation that needs to really be addressed but sometimes, I hope that before putting everything into a racial lens, y'all take a moment to see if there's any other reasoning behind it. In this case, it's a simple dark = evil, light = concept theme. In the case of Evil Ryu and Violent Ken, their change in skin tone is just to "cast" a darker more ominous counterpart to their lighter-skinned versions. It's like how, as an artist, if I want to create a more somber and depressed mood on a scene, I select a darker and more muted palette. It has nothing whatsoever to do with "black/brown/minority skin color = evil". If Ryu or Ken's default color is brown, I guarantee you their evil counterpart would just be a darker shade of it because, you know, dark = evil. And there's nothing really racial in that.

<This brown artist agrees with this post.
 

LotusHD

Banned
And there are so many ways to show this other than to darken their skin.

This. Keep seeing posts acting as if we're completely unfamiliar with the theme of light vs. dark, good vs. evil, as if that justifies it. You can do it without darkening a character's skin.
 
Half of the people who played the game didn't finish it to begin, with so I doubt that many people didn't make the obvious connection.
Especially when in the sequel, gerudos are all pirates who will kill you on sight.
The gypsy undertone is probably a bigger deal than the brown one for OoT's era Gerudo though.
They're absolutely not portrayed as good people.

But this is in OOT, in breath of the wild the Gerudo are totally depicted as good, normal people, so they did correct this. Also in OOT the Goron have dark skin and are different good guys, and have been in every game I can think of.
 

KarmaCow

Member
And the concept of light = good, dark = evil is nigh universal across many cultures. The video in the OP is basically just a reaction to this trope.

No shit. The article isn't saying this is a uniquely American phenomenon or even that this is explicitly about race.

The effects extend to adults as well. In the U.S. criminal justice system, dark-skinned criminals are often given longer sentences. A recent study found that in Georgia between 1995 and 2002, sentences for black people were 378 days longer than white people's, on average. Dark-skinned black people also got 2.7% longer sentences than light-skinned ones.

Colorism can also worm its way into politics. In the 2008 presidential election, Republicans used darker-skinned images of Barack Obama in ad campaigns, according to a study published in 2015. Commercials promoting John McCain also lightened the Republican candidate's skin tone.
 

Antiwhippy

the holder of the trombone
But doing so is the most effective way to get the point across that the character has gone dark or evil. Color is a very strong representation and is universally and instinctively more recognized by every one across every culture, to the point that almost every color has something immediately associated with them: red = anger/fury, purple = disgust, yellow = happiness/warmth, and yes black = death/evil/darkness and white = light/goodness. Video games, being a visual medium, will naturally take advantage of this.

If only we humans do things something like wearing clothes or personal effects as a way to represent ourselves. I guess we really don't do stuff like that.
 
And the concept of light = good, dark = evil is nigh universal across many cultures. The video in the OP is basically just a reaction to this trope.

Ahhh yes, another "this isnt racist, this is just the way it is"

I get it, examples could be better but your reaction being "nope, no racism here, just tropes" does nothing in a conversation about race in media. In fact you sounding a lot like the juniors in this thread.
 

Pompadour

Member
It's not some zero sum game lmao

They don't cancel out because it happens to both dark skin and light skin characters.

and it's not even equivalent. White/lighter skin characters have way more protagonist/good examples than darker skin characters. Which is why the trope is a lot more noticeable.

Like I said in my post the majority of the examples in this thread are legitimate problems. I don't buy the trope of darkening a character's skin to show corruption is a problem when the trope is also executed by lightening skin. It's just an obvious visual cue to show that the character is now evil like glowing red eyes or purple auras. If you're doing a skin tone change it has to become either lighter or darker and I don't believe there's way more examples of one than the other. I feel like this is claiming that the evil twin signifier of a mustache is prejudiced against the facial hair prone.

Shit like Resident Evil 5 or treating people with dark skin as savage/evil/exotic/etc. is a problem. The dark skin corruption thing is more of a coincidence.
 

NewGame

Banned

This is really weird.

Is there a modern version of this experiment? I seriously feel this is artefact'd at this point. And before you jump down my throat about "YOU SAYIN THERES NO MORE RACISM??" what I'm saying is that with how much more aware this coming generation is I'm pretty sure this problem is rarer than ever before.

EDIT:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i20d11fGz-0


Newer version 2009. Trying to find a 2016+ version.
 
Top Bottom