• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

An important statement from Naughty Dog

I know, it's just frustrating that my favourite hobby is so gross behind the scenes.

Little me didn't understand this when I got into gaming as a child.
Music and film industry are pretty terrible as well. It just sucks that the entertainment industry in general is so shitty (despite loving working in the film industry myself).
 
The idea that HR didn't document the complaint is hardly some grassy knoll shit here, especially if it was by phone.

Here's the thing I'm having trouble with. Ballard claims Sony HR got involved after he had a "mental breakdown" (unclear what this entailed) so there must be a report on that? Are Naughty Dog saying this didn't happen too or are they just saying it was never mentioned in the report that Ballard said it was as a result of harassment.

It seems plausible to me that Sony decided to fire Ballard after this mental breakdown (maybe why he also can't find new employment) and the HR department omitted that it was a result of sexual harassment, leaving everybody else none the wiser. However, if this is the case, you would think this would warrant further investigation which is hopefully happening right now.
 

badb0y

Member
By immediately publishing a refutation, on a Sunday, less than 24 hours after the allegation was made, perhaps? That's not enough time to contact everyone involved and perform any kind of reasonably thorough investigation of allegations involving two companies.

Probably because records are archived digitally. It's not that difficult to search up the archives and see if there is any complaint made by a person. And yes, anytime you contact HR they open a case, that's how they keep track of everything because they have other cases to investigate too.
 
Ok I know I've previously said I'm out but this is just too ridiculous. How many HR departments have you worked in?

Do you have any idea how difficult it would be to purge evidence of something like this ever happening if it was documented somewhere? Nevermind the fact that they would also be purging evidence in the hope that the victim hasn't kept copies of emails etc for himself?

Why would anybody in HR put their whole life at risk over something like this?

This is lunacy.

Oh I agree, it's completely crazy that something as simple as not recording an HR issue to protect a valued executive is presented as something outlandish and far-fetched. Companies and individuals within them will do far worse for far less.
 

chubigans

y'all should be ashamed
A good response, if they wanted to respond quickly, would be to issue a statement saying that they take the allegations seriously and will be thoroughly investigating. Their response was to effectively throw Dave Ballard under a bus.

It was an allegation two years ago involving two employees no longer with the company with apparently zero evidence of any formal complaints made to HR or anywhere else.

While I agree that more tact could have been used and the statement could have been handled much, well, better, there's not much further to go based on the little evidence we have.
 

Bsigg12

Member
Yeah none of this is surprising.

And that's a problem. It should be surprising. People should not have to wait until a national news story of a head of a company sexually abusing clients for decades comes out to challenge the ones that abused them.

I understand why Naughty Dog put out the statement they did but it doesn't look good and until there's an investigation or someone like Jason over at Kotaku is able to dig something up, everyone should be taking everything in and not dismissing any one person's accusation.
 
If you boycott every industry that has had sexual harassment cases, then you will be left with nothing.

Exactly. It's why I find this whole boycotting argument so weak and tired. Why is the solution to this to boycott when this literally happens in every industry and remains unchecked? Today it's the company you love or hate or the company who did you wrong so yeah, let's rally behind putting an end to them but it's not about the fact that it happens in every single industry and wanting more people to speak out in general.

No one is going to boycott everything so it's time to get real about actually doing more to support those who speak out by actively seeking ways to address a society that continues to allow this to happen. Whether that be in politics, personal life with family and friends, work, etc etc. But that's where this stop gap happens...
 

GHG

Member
Oh I agree, it's completely crazy that something as simple as not recording an HR issue to protect a valued executive is presented as something outlandish and far-fetched. Companies and individuals within them will do far worse for far less.

So which is it? The evidence was destroyed or no evidence was ever created in the first place?

Because based on your previous replies you seemed to be suggesting the former, but now you're angling towards the latter?

What's changed?
 

mrk8885

Banned
Many of you in this thread are being absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable.


Here are the only pieces of information we have:
1) David Ballard makes allegation of sexual harassment on his public twitter account

2) ND releases statement that there is no evidence they could find regarding any harassment complaint being made.


Seems a perfect situation for a wait and see approach, to see if more evidence is uncovered.

Instead, this thread is filled with:
-Assumption of guilt for Sony and ND
-Claims of a huge conspiracy and coverup, including documents being destroyed by HR
- Talk about boycotting ND and Sony
- Outrage over ND using David’s name in their statement despite him making the allegation on his public twitter account. Nearly all of us knew who was making the allegation before ND ever released a statement, but suddenly here’s an outrage they used his name?

And of course the completely unfair and unreasonable assumption that since the Weinstein issue is prevalent right now, suddenly every accusation made right now is assumed true.



I’m not saying it didn’t happen. I’m not saying it did. I’m saying no one here has ANY clue what did or didn’t happen, and should probably not be commenting with such strong opinions
 
It was an allegation two years ago involving two employees no longer with the company with apparently zero evidence of any formal complaints made to HR or anywhere else.

While I agree that more tact could have been used and the statement could have been handled much, well, better, there's not much further to go based on the little evidence we have.

How do you know the person being accused is no longer employed at Naughty Dog?
 

Pastry

Banned
He was fired after he complaint, so that complaint would still have been filed unless someone destroyed evidence or didn't record it to begin with.

That’s not how HR departments work, he would have to file a seperate case specifically around th sexual harassment.
 
Oh I agree, it's completely crazy that something as simple as not recording an HR issue to protect a valued executive is presented as something outlandish and far-fetched. Companies and individuals within them will do far worse for far less.

'Not recording a HR issue' and 'shredding the paper trail and destroying any evidence of the crime'.

Exactly the same things.
 
So which is it? The evidence was destroyed or no evidence was ever created in the first place?

Because based on your previous replies you seemed to be suggesting the former, but now you're angling towards the latter?

What's changed?

Someone must've explained how software like PeopleSoft works...
 
Not specifically tied to this case, but I'm going to reiterate something I said.

People need to stop using terms like "industry" or "Hollywood" or whatever. This isn't specific to an industry and tying to a specific industry ignores the bigger picture - it's an issue with society and anywhere there is power dynamics.

From the POTUS to the head of a film studio to a lead at a game studio to the manager of a cafe.

If there's power dynamics, there's people to be abused.
 

Feorax

Member
Many of you in this thread are being absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable.


Here are the only pieces of information we have:
1) David Ballard makes allegation of sexual harassment on his public twitter account

2) ND releases statement that there is no evidence they could find regarding any harassment complaint being made.


Seems a perfect situation for a wait and see approach, to see if more evidence is uncovered.

Instead, this thread is filled with:
-Assumption of guilt for Sony and ND
-Claims of a huge conspiracy and coverup, including documents being destroyed by HR
- Talk about boycotting ND and Sony
- Outrage over ND using David’s name in their statement despite him making the allegation on his public twitter account. Nearly all of us knew who was making the allegation before ND ever released a statement, but suddenly here’s an outrage they used his name?

And of course the completely unfair and unreasonable assumption that since the Weinstein issue is prevalent right now, suddenly every accusation made right now is assumed true.



I’m not saying it didn’t happen. I’m not saying it did. I’m saying no one here has ANY clue what did or didn’t happen, and should probably not be commenting with such strong opinions

Spot on.

Half the people saying how they would have handled things better in this thread go on to immediately say that they would act in a way that compromises any investigation.

Genuinely, there are so many people in here making comments that have no idea what they're talking about, but are just baying for blood regardless. That doesn't help anyone, including the victim.
 
I don't understand the logic here. Like how does this whole thing make him more employable really?

Firstly, it's a good PR move to hire a victim of sexual harassment. A cynical way of thinking but I think we all know that to be true. It would also mean he has a better response for why he left Naughty Dog and had a "mental breakdown" than just being burnt out due to crunch, something that probably puts a lot of devs off.

I'm not saying he made it up but if he did then as a way to find employment and boost his profile does seem like the most logical reason.
 
Not specifically tied to this case, but I'm going to reiterate something I said.

People need to stop using terms like "industry" or "Hollywood" or whatever. This isn't specific to an industry and tying to a specific industry ignores the bigger picture - it's an issue with society and anywhere there is power dynamics.

From the POTUS to the head of a film studio to a lead at a game studio to the manager of a cafe.

If there's power dynamics, there's people to be abused.

The horror stories I've heard about my local GameStop and some of the fast food places
 
So which is it? The evidence was destroyed or no evidence was ever created in the first place?

Because based on your previous replies you seemed to be suggesting the former, but now you're angling towards the latter?

What's changed?

I'm not angling towards anything. I'm giving the alleged victim the benefit of the doubt and believe that it is quite possible that if what he says is true the company would not hesitate to cover it up.
 
So which is it? The evidence was destroyed or no evidence was ever created in the first place?

Because based on your previous replies you seemed to be suggesting the former, but now you're angling towards the latter?

What's changed?

Are you saying that evidence has never been destroyed or altered in the wake of serious accusations against an organisation or business? Its only in recent years that a small proportion of big cover ups have been uncovered.

By the way, I'm not saying this is what's happened here, merely that it has happened in the past and is still going on.
 

Loudninja

Member
Not specifically tied to this case, but I'm going to reiterate something I said.

People need to stop using terms like "industry" or "Hollywood" or whatever. This isn't specific to an industry and tying to a specific industry ignores the bigger picture - it's an issue with society and anywhere there is power dynamics.

From the POTUS to the head of a film studio to a lead at a game studio to the manager of a cafe.

If there's power dynamics, there's people to be abused.
Agreed.
 

Fiendcode

Member
Firstly, it's a good PR move to hire a victim of sexual harassment. A cynical way of thinking but I think we all know that to be true. It would also mean he has a better response for why he left Naughty Dog and had a "mental breakdown" than just being burnt out due to crunch, something that probably puts a lot of devs off.

I'm not saying he made it up but if he did then as a way to find employment boost his profile does seem like the most logical reason.
This feels like a reach. Like this could also go very badly for Ballard depending on how it plays out, why take that risk?
 

Ctlead

Banned
Many of you in this thread are being absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable.


Here are the only pieces of information we have:
1) David Ballard makes allegation of sexual harassment on his public twitter account

2) ND releases statement that there is no evidence they could find regarding any harassment complaint being made.


Seems a perfect situation for a wait and see approach, to see if more evidence is uncovered.

Instead, this thread is filled with:
-Assumption of guilt for Sony and ND
-Claims of a huge conspiracy and coverup, including documents being destroyed by HR
- Talk about boycotting ND and Sony
- Outrage over ND using David’s name in their statement despite him making the allegation on his public twitter account. Nearly all of us knew who was making the allegation before ND ever released a statement, but suddenly here’s an outrage they used his name?

And of course the completely unfair and unreasonable assumption that since the Weinstein issue is prevalent right now, suddenly every accusation made right now is assumed true.



I’m not saying it didn’t happen. I’m not saying it did. I’m saying no one here has ANY clue what did or didn’t happen, and should probably not be commenting with such strong opinions


You speak the truth. I think it would benefit everyone if we just slow down, and wait for any more information. We just don't know enough yet.
 
This feels like a reach. Like this could also go very badly for Ballard depending on how it plays out, why take that risk?

17 months without a job, struggling to pay bills, what is there to lose?

Like I said, I'm not saying he made it up but he wouldn't be the first to do such a thing. I think the likelihood is that he's telling the truth but Naughty Dog deny any knowledge of it happening, something that could also go very badly, so at this moment we don't know the situation. All we can do is speculate, which is pretty sad but there you go.
 

Alienfan

Member
Pretty shitty response actually. Not even the generic "we're looking into it" or "we've reached out to the victim". Just a straight up "didn't happen".
 

legacyzero

Banned
Isn’t ND run by some pretty liberal people though? Like Druckman? Obviously there are rules and guidelines there where it’s not tolerated. I find it really interesting that people are automatically ready to dogpile while forgetting innocent until proven guilty, and completely ruling out even a slight chance of malicious intent.

Do we really believe that ND would just try to bury this?
 

Justified

Member
This feels like a reach. Like this could also go very badly for Ballard depending on how it plays out, why take that risk?

17 months of job seeking, and not being hired. then just putting your previously employer on blast (who fired you) when you have a history of mental breakdowns is not reaching.

Not saying thats what happened here, but its not far fetched with what little facts we have.
 

ByWatterson

Member
Pretty shitty response actually. Not even the generic "we're looking into it" or "we've reached out to the victim". Just a straight up "didn't happen".

Nope. Literally not what they said. They said we have no evidence of receipt of a complaint. That's the beginning and end of what they said. And his story merely says "HR got involved."

Both of these things can be true - it seems highly likely he never made a formal complaint.
 

TheModestGun

Neo Member
The thing that's strange to me right now is the amount of people speaking of Naughty Dog as if they are some monolithic single being and not a corporation with many independently thinking minds that may have different goals, behaviors, and attitudes involving these issues.

It's very likely in the case that this is true that there were a few independent actors that either neglected to file a report or did not act accordingly to their jobs ethical standards or is straight up incompetent as an HR worker. HR departments document this stuff to a T when they are informed of it if they are worth a damn. They must do so to shield themselves from any potential legal action of employees past and present. It is very unlikely that this is some grand conspiracy.

Hanlon's razor often rings true "never attribute to malice what can easily be explained by stupidity, neglect and misunderstanding" paraphrasing here.

I think it's important that these distinctions are made.

This DOES NOT make what potentially happened to this man ok, but I think it's important that this doesn't spiral into conspiracy shark jumping territory.
 

Fiendcode

Member
17 months without a job, struggling to pay bills, what is there to lose?

Like I said, I'm not saying he made it up but he wouldn't be the first to do such a thing. I think the likelihood is that he's telling the truth but Naughty Dog deny any knowledge of it happening, something that could also go very badly, so at this moment we don't know the situation. All we can do is speculate, which is pretty sad but there you go.
Never working again, blacklisting, loss of reputation, humiliation, public retaliation, possible legal ramifications? There’s plenty to lose and these things could happen even if the accusation is true too, this isn’t exactly a win/win situation for him.
 
Many of you in this thread are being absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable.


Here are the only pieces of information we have:
1) David Ballard makes allegation of sexual harassment on his public twitter account

2) ND releases statement that there is no evidence they could find regarding any harassment complaint being made.


Seems a perfect situation for a wait and see approach, to see if more evidence is uncovered.

Instead, this thread is filled with:
-Assumption of guilt for Sony and ND
-Claims of a huge conspiracy and coverup, including documents being destroyed by HR
- Talk about boycotting ND and Sony
- Outrage over ND using David’s name in their statement despite him making the allegation on his public twitter account. Nearly all of us knew who was making the allegation before ND ever released a statement, but suddenly here’s an outrage they used his name?

And of course the completely unfair and unreasonable assumption that since the Weinstein issue is prevalent right now, suddenly every accusation made right now is assumed true.



I’m not saying it didn’t happen. I’m not saying it did. I’m saying no one here has ANY clue what did or didn’t happen, and should probably not be commenting with such strong opinions

Thank you for this. It's crazy that people nowadays feel empowered to be prosecutor, judge and executioner all in one, and they only need a few tweets.

If this is true, then it's very serious and both ND and Sony should face the consequences. But we cannot become a society in which people start looking for someone to blame and going into action the minute we have the tiniest piece of information.
 

llien

Member
Wow, another thread. I'll just post what I said in the other one.

I think we're going to have a lot of these that could be fake allegations. It could be real. We don't know.
Certainly no person in the World can be exempt from this kind of crime. Anyone can do it.

The difference is that the journalist who wrote the piece on exposing Weinstein spent years making it. There's a huge difference between a single post of Twitter vs what it took to finally expose Weinstein.

Good point.
 

Justified

Member
Never working again, blacklisting, loss of reputation, humiliation, public retaliation, possible legal ramifications? There’s plenty to lose and these things could happen even if the accusation is true too, this isn’t exactly a win/win situation for him.

That is all true, but if you suffer from mental breakdowns, in his mind he probably already feel like the worst has happen
 
Isn’t ND run by some pretty liberal people though? Like Druckman? Obviously there are rules and guidelines there where it’s not tolerated. I find it really interesting that people are automatically ready to dogpile while forgetting innocent until proven guilty, and completely ruling out even a slight chance of malicious intent.

Do we really believe that ND would just try to bury this?

Maybe ND wouldn't but Sony would, and if it's Sony HR he reach out to then it's in their hands.
 
Why would Ballard lie? And why would another claim they were also harassed at ND?


I choose to always trust the victim in cases like this, in which is one's word against another's.. Let's wait and see if either side comes with actual hard proof.

Some people want vengence on company which fired them. They usually report all dirt they have on their workplace to proper authorities but that's in Europe not sure how well that would work in american written for corporations law.
 

Putty

Member
Many of you in this thread are being absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable.


Here are the only pieces of information we have:
1) David Ballard makes allegation of sexual harassment on his public twitter account

2) ND releases statement that there is no evidence they could find regarding any harassment complaint being made.


Seems a perfect situation for a wait and see approach, to see if more evidence is uncovered.

Instead, this thread is filled with:
-Assumption of guilt for Sony and ND
-Claims of a huge conspiracy and coverup, including documents being destroyed by HR
- Talk about boycotting ND and Sony
- Outrage over ND using David’s name in their statement despite him making the allegation on his public twitter account. Nearly all of us knew who was making the allegation before ND ever released a statement, but suddenly here’s an outrage they used his name?

And of course the completely unfair and unreasonable assumption that since the Weinstein issue is prevalent right now, suddenly every accusation made right now is assumed true.



I’m not saying it didn’t happen. I’m not saying it did. I’m saying no one here has ANY clue what did or didn’t happen, and should probably not be commenting with such strong opinions

Bingo...
 
Given the nature of the allegations, it's hardly surprising there is no evidence recorded. He was apparently fired 24 hours after making his complaint and offered money to stay silent.

Impossible for an outside to say what did or didn't happen, but I wouldn't be reassured by Naugty Dog's statement in any way.
 

DESTROYA

Member
Many of you in this thread are being absolutely ridiculous and unreasonable.


Here are the only pieces of information we have:
1) David Ballard makes allegation of sexual harassment on his public twitter account

2) ND releases statement that there is no evidence they could find regarding any harassment complaint being made.


Seems a perfect situation for a wait and see approach, to see if more evidence is uncovered.

Instead, this thread is filled with:
-Assumption of guilt for Sony and ND
-Claims of a huge conspiracy and coverup, including documents being destroyed by HR
- Talk about boycotting ND and Sony
- Outrage over ND using David’s name in their statement despite him making the allegation on his public twitter account. Nearly all of us knew who was making the allegation before ND ever released a statement, but suddenly here’s an outrage they used his name?

And of course the completely unfair and unreasonable assumption that since the Weinstein issue is prevalent right now, suddenly every accusation made right now is assumed true.



I’m not saying it didn’t happen. I’m not saying it did. I’m saying no one here has ANY clue what did or didn’t happen, and should probably not be commenting with such strong opinions

Thank you for being a voice of reason.
 
Top Bottom