MisterHero
Super Member
People aren't perfect, and it would be scary to leave art to people we deemed "perfect".
Harming other people is not art.
Harming other people is not art.
It all depends upon context of who the person is, what they did, and what their content is. As an example I'll still watch Mel Gibson films like Braveheart and Lethal Weapon because his racist schtick really doesn't change how I view those films. On the flip side I have a hard time watching Bill Cosby's stuff because his sexual assuault/abuse/harrassment stuff contradicts so much with Cosby's stand up and the Cosby's shows morals that it actively ruins them for me.
Yes, art transcends its creator. DaVinci was stealing corpses and cutting them up. Am I supposed to disavow his contributions?
I'm a big Ye stan so I have to
Yes, art transcends its creator. DaVinci was stealing corpses and cutting them up. Am I supposed to disavow his contributions?
Who the person is directly influences the art they create, either consciously or subconsciously. So no.
Exactly. Youtube stars' content directly reflects who they are as a person. PDP's character is a complete reflection of him acting outrageous and saying outrageous things on camera for the enjoyment of other people.Separating actors is easier than YouTube guys for me because YouTube guys aren't playing characters. For example I can still enjoy lethal weapon but I don't think I'd be able to watch a YouTube video of Mel Gibson talking for 10 min.