• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PS5 Pro devkits arrive at third-party studios, Sony expects Pro specs to leak

hlm666

Member
I'm not sure why you couldn't go have a look yourself.

 

Loxus

Member
On the RT debate, this is the best explanation I've seen on why AMD RT performance is behind.

https://www.reddit.com/kdfk91b?utm_...&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=2
Edit: link not working, so added image.
TgsWbFQ.jpg


I believe RDNA4 have solved this problem with the introduction of the Traversal Engine.

gvr9IW4.png


Not to mention AMD is like what, 2 generations behind?


GPU Architecture Deep Dive: Nvidia Ada Lovelace, AMD RDNA 3 and Intel Arc Alchemist
D0azc8I.jpg
LVywFGQ.png

Cmo3ezp.jpg
 
Last edited:

S0ULZB0URNE

Member
I'm not sure why you couldn't go have a look yourself.


🤔
 

Killjoy-NL

Member
There might not be much to leak. The only thing might be the GPU clock speed, and since it's variable that doesn't tell you much. The other thing would be the price and developers aren't going to know that.
That wouldn't be much reason to not leak official specs though.
 
I guess because MS studios aren't getting them, the leaks won't happen.

PlayStation is too strong at this moment for devs to risk their wrath is my guess.
Did you want to quote someone else? Anyways you could be right here. Sony is definitely not giving the Pro devkits to MS devs this time around, not yet.
 

Mr.Phoenix

Member
From https://i0.wp.com/chipsandcheese.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/rdna2.drawio-1.png?ssl=1

This is from clam chowder

4YugkzA.png

Notice both clam chowder's Ampere and RDNA 2 have "TMU / RT" box.
How can someone with access to so much information.... still just get it wrong?

That the TMU and RT share the same cache doesn't mean they are the same unit.

It is simple. Nvidia has RT cores that accelerate everything, including the BVH generation. AMD does not, and that is primarily why their RT implementation is so bad. Them using TMUs to do that part is the equivalent of using pixel shaders which are non-dedicated, to handle RT period. It can be done, but it will not perform well.

Did you hear anything about Volume Rendering for Next-Gen?

It's time for true 3D or 4D if they can work melting ice & plant growth into gameplay somehow

( They're not going to stop arguing about Ray tracing are they? Lol)
Can you blame them/us?

When you see both AMD and Nvidia cards running a game at ~80fps without RT, then the second you turn on RT, the Nvidia card takes a 20% performance hit dropping to 64fps but the AMD card takes a whopping 50% hit and drops to 40fps... you did better start taking it seriously.

Can someone explain this
The relative performance equivalents in raster and in RT of the 8700XT (RDNA4) to existing GPUs.
 
Last edited:

DJ12

Member
Did you want to quote someone else? Anyways you could be right here. Sony is definitely not giving the Pro devkits to MS devs this time around, not yet.
Yeah, my bad.

I believe the last Sony console leak was from an ms studio? Or at least that's what I read here.
 

ChiefDada

Gold Member
That is hint for 8700XT (64CU) So we can see info about RDNA4 RT. Based on some info seems 2 or 4 position
5f8b6d1dceed938e83bed316c8bd8f46.png

I don't think this is anything.

Looking through the tweet chain, it appears to be some sort of google sheet he created for people to write down their performance speculations.
 
Last edited:
The problem with them making the Pro a huge upgrade is that it will lessen the jump when they release the PS6, personally I'd rather them focus on getting it out sooner with a good perf increase but not so much it makes next gen look disappointing.
Most people won’t get a pro no matter how much of an upgrade it is so the ps6 can still be fresh your also underselling what kind of tech will be here in 2028 and 9
 
Well yeah, that's true. All the more reason why it doesn't make too much sense to release one.
You read my comment wrong I’m saying that point is absolutely ridiculous cause even if a pro was insanely powerful most won’t get it so the ps6 will still be fresh for them this means they shouldn’t hold back on the pro
 

Killjoy-NL

Member
You read my comment wrong I’m saying that point is absolutely ridiculous cause even if a pro was insanely powerful most won’t get it so the ps6 will still be fresh for them this means they shouldn’t hold back on the pro
I know what you're saying.

Bolded is what I was replying to. 10% bought PS4 Pro, but at the time Sony released PSVR as well, which needed a slight powerboost. Hence the 2 GPUs and a lil bit of extra RAM to increase performance.
Having an edge over Xbox for a year was an added bonus.

This gen is entirely different. So unless Sony wants to aim for those 10% sales, most of which likely double-dip, there really is barely any need for a Pro.
PSVR2 is solid enough and there isn't any competition this gen.
 

DrDamn

Member
I actually just started learning blender do you know how to use/add ray tracing to your projects on it? I wanted to add rt shadows and lighting to a shadow model
It's not something you add to projects as such but based on the render engine you use for the output. Switch the Render Engine from Eevee to Cycles and your renders will now use a ray tracing. Make sure you have the Cycles render devices set correctly in Preferences -> System. E.g. if you have an Nvidia card then pick OptiX and tick your GPU. For the Scene then make sure the Device for the render is set to GPU Compute. Lots of other options in there too.

More info here: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/introduction.html
And here: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/gpu_rendering.html
 
It's not something you add to projects as such but based on the render engine you use for the output. Switch the Render Engine from Eevee to Cycles and your renders will now use a ray tracing. Make sure you have the Cycles render devices set correctly in Preferences -> System. E.g. if you have an Nvidia card then pick OptiX and tick your GPU. For the Scene then make sure the Device for the render is set to GPU Compute. Lots of other options in there too.

More info here: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/introduction.html
And here: https://docs.blender.org/manual/en/latest/render/cycles/gpu_rendering.html
I see so I don’t have to do anything else that’s really convenient thank you I don’t have an nvidia gpu at the moment but I think it’s on my radar now
 
Last edited:
I know what you're saying.

Bolded is what I was replying to. 10% bought PS4 Pro, but at the time Sony released PSVR as well, which needed a slight powerboost. Hence the 2 GPUs and a lil bit of extra RAM to increase performance.
Having an edge over Xbox for a year was an added bonus.

This gen is entirely different. So unless Sony wants to aim for those 10% sales, most of which likely double-dip, there really is barely any need for a Pro.
PSVR2 is solid enough and there isn't any competition this gen.
I know what you're saying.

Bolded is what I was replying to. 10% bought PS4 Pro, but at the time Sony released PSVR as well, which needed a slight powerboost. Hence the 2 GPUs and a lil bit of extra RAM to increase performance.
Having an edge over Xbox for a year was an added bonus.

This gen is entirely different. So unless Sony wants to aim for those 10% sales, most of which likely double-dip, there really is barely any need for a Pro.
PSVR2 is solid enough and there isn't any competition this gen.
I guess we got to disagree then
 

magnumpy

Member
hell yeah IMO you can never have too much graphical power. and it's not a constant level of value, your GPU/CPU becomes less valuable every day. it's not a question of should I/shouldn't I, it's simply a question of when should I.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
Should we expect a PS5 price drop when this launches or will this just be maybe $100+ more?
I think this will just be $100 more, but they are able to drop the price of the base PS5. I think they will save it if they need some price flexibility when XSX2 comes out or if sales dip a bit.
 

Jesb

Member
Anyone in here that never bought a ps5 and will wait on this one? I recently bought my first 4K tv and don’t even have a current gen system, would love a ps5 right now but why drop 600 Canadian on a console now when that can be used on the pro console. How much of a difference are we expecting to be better. 10% better or we thinking something significant like 30% better or more? How much better will older PS5 games be on this? What about PS4 games?
 
Last edited:
Anyone in here that never bought a ps5 and will wait on this one? I recently bought my first 4K tv and don’t even have a current gen system, would love a ps5 right now but why drop 600 Canadian on a console now when that can be used on the pro console. How much of a difference are we expecting to be better. 10% better or we thinking something significant like 30% better or more? How much better will older PS5 games be on this? What about PS4 games?

How much do you hate 30 fps? (Unfortunately it doesn't seem like it will be fast enough to be able to deliver 60 fps where the base console is doing 30... so we will have to see)
 

Imtjnotu

Member
Anyone in here that never bought a ps5 and will wait on this one? I recently bought my first 4K tv and don’t even have a current gen system, would love a ps5 right now but why drop 600 Canadian on a console now when that can be used on the pro console. How much of a difference are we expecting to be better. 10% better or we thinking something significant like 30% better or more? How much better will older PS5 games be on this? What about PS4 games?
I'd wait bro
 
  • Like
Reactions: Isa

ChiefDada

Gold Member
How much do you hate 30 fps? (Unfortunately it doesn't seem like it will be fast enough to be able to deliver 60 fps where the base console is doing 30... so we will have to see)

Based on TH and HeisenbergFX4 info and assuming identical graphical settings:

If raster only games on base PS5 are locked 4k30, more often than not PS5 Pro will run at 60fps.

If RT games on base PS5 are locked 4k30, PS5 Pro will run > 2x all the time.
 

Geruda065

Member
Anyone in here that never bought a ps5 and will wait on this one? I recently bought my first 4K tv and don’t even have a current gen system, would love a ps5 right now but why drop 600 Canadian on a console now when that can be used on the pro console. How much of a difference are we expecting to be better. 10% better or we thinking something significant like 30% better or more? How much better will older PS5 games be on this? What about PS4 games?
Bro PS5 Pro maybe never comes. We might be looking at Switch Pro situation here. Go get PS5!
 
Based on TH and HeisenbergFX4 info and assuming identical graphical settings:

If raster only games on base PS5 are locked 4k30, more often than not PS5 Pro will run at 60fps.

If RT games on base PS5 are locked 4k30, PS5 Pro will run > 2x all the time.
I am betting on ~2x with added RT effects.
Doesn't matter. People are working themselves into a hype tizzy expecting the latest AMD tech and a generational leap in specs and performance while believing it's still going to be a PS5, just $100 more. We're already past the edge of the map.
Indeed. People actually waiting for this thing are realistically expecting about 4070 performance (raster and RT). But oddly those against it are expecting 4090 performance, I wonder why. I am pretty sure it's the perfect way to be disappointed.
 
Top Bottom