• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

2012 First U.S. Presidential Debate |OT| OK Libya... We need a leader, not a reader.

Status
Not open for further replies.

ISOM

Member
ibjlpaWcJbc6WN.gif

Romney is freaking creepy I swear. He looks like a robot with no emotions..
 

RDreamer

Member
i wonder how many people switched after that debate... im certanly disappointed

I certainly hope not so many fell for it. The reason Romney won was because he lied his goddamned ass off like I've really never seen before. The reason people should be disappointed in Obama is because he didn't call those out hard enough.
 

MBison

Member
If he lied his ass off you would think there would be more mainstream investigative reporting on it. Not just the liberal blogosphere name-calling-apolooza.
 

ISOM

Member
Obama got thoroughly pummeled in that debate. I felt sorry for him at the time because, damn, that was a thrashing. But now I can't wait to see it again.

If pummeled you mean romney lied, lied some more and lied again ok. Winning a debate in today's world is all about style not substance of which romney is only able to go up.

I foresee obama adjusting very well to the second debate. He now knows romney has no character, no scruples and is willing to lie about his lies.

Infact I can't wait for the next debates.
 

MrCheez

President/Creative Director of Grumpyface Studios
If he lied his ass off you would think there would be more mainstream investigative reporting on it.

Focusing on the facts is not the main priority of the mainstream media. I realize how cliche that sounds, but the last 48 hours couldn't be a more perfect example of this... and it sucks.

...not just the liberal blogosphere name-calling-apolooza.

It's really easy to do some quick research on the dozens of misleading claims, lies, and flip-flops Romney managed to cram into the debate. The facts have been out there all over the internet, from plenty of neutral and non-partisan sources.
 

RDreamer

Member
If he lied his ass off you would think there would be more mainstream investigative reporting on it. Not just the liberal blogosphere name-calling-apolooza.

His own campaign had to fact check him afterwards! His plan doesn't cover people with pre-existing conditions. Romney's charge of 50% of Obama's green investments failing? Yeah, Lie lie lie lie. More like 1.4%. Romney's charge that the IPAB board can tell people what treatments they can get? False. Romney is now denying his $5 trillion tax cut? Yeah, you should guess... lie... or flip flop. I'm not even sure what the fuck to call this or to call his "tax plan" now
 
At this point it's all swoon factor. The fact-checking is for the ones who track this on a day-by-day basis - you know, the ones who already made up their minds.
 
If pummeled you mean romney lied, lied some more and lied again ok. Winning a debate in today's world is all about style not substance of which romney is only able to go up.

I foresee obama adjusting very well to the second debate. He now knows romney has no character, no scruples and is willing to lie about his lies.

Infact I can't wait for the next debates.
By "pummeled" I meant eviscerated and humiliated.
Wow. Look at that New Yorker cover.
I think Obama will do better in a town hall style debate though. It's easier for him to hide his inadequacies and ignorance on issues.
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
If he lied his ass off you would think there would be more mainstream investigative reporting on it. Not just the liberal blogosphere name-calling-apolooza.
His tax plan made no sense whatsoever. It's almost as if he was just telling people what he thought they wanted to hear.
 

ISOM

Member
By "pummeled" I meant eviscerated and humiliated.
Wow. Look at that New Yorker cover.
I think Obama will do better in a town hall style debate though. It's easier for him to hide his inadequacies and ignorance on issues.

No conservative should be talking to me about obama's inadequacies when you are pumping up lol romney.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Im still waiting for the polls post-debate to see how much of a gain Romney did get... have there been any published so far?

http://news.yahoo.com/romney-gains-ground-obama-strong-debate-072907939--business.html

It's only a tracking poll, though, so grain of salt and all...

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's lead over challenger Mitt Romney has narrowed to just two percentage points since the Republican's strong performance in their first debate, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Friday.

In more bad news for Obama, one in five voters said the Democrat's performance in the contest in Denver on Wednesday made them feel more negative about him and almost a third said they felt more positive about his Republican challenger.

"Romney did well, he was perceived as doing well, and we're seeing the effect of that today," said Ipsos managing director Cliff Young. "Definitely in the short-term now, he's picking up people because of his performance in the debate."
 

nib95

Banned
Turns out Romney's cheat sheet was his handkerchief which he used several times during debate to wipe his face.

Time to roll out the next excuse. Maybe Obama hadn't gotten laid in awhile.

There's so excuse. He performed poorly, with a lack of confidence and attack. But I think he may have been bemused by Romney's barrage of flip flopping, exaggerations and lies. Even then, he should of called him out on them and played more dirty. 47%, tax rates et all.
 
I certainly hope not so many fell for it. The reason Romney won was because he lied his goddamned ass off like I've really never seen before. The reason people should be disappointed in Obama is because he didn't call those out hard enough.

lied?

Not sure if serious

obama-blank-stare.jpg


Obama was the one lying and Romney called him out on it every single time. If Romney was lying then why didn't Obama do the same thing and call him out on it?

I think those stares of his were related to him finally having a clear vision that Mitt's got the game plan and his own playbook sucks.

Can't wait to see Ryan rip apart old Slow Joe.
 

slit

Member
Poor Romney, all the talk about how well he did in the debate. Wiped out in less than 48 hours later by the jobs report.
 

nib95

Banned
lied?

Not sure if serious

obama-blank-stare.jpg


Obama was the one lying and Romney called him out on it every single time. If Romney was lying then why didn't Obama do the same thing and call him out on it?

I think those stares of his were related to him finally having a clear vision that Mitt's got the game plan and his own playbook sucks.

Can't wait to see Ryan rip apart old Slow Joe.

I'm guessing you haven't been following the fact checking going on all around the Internet? Obama was guilty of certain exaggerations, but very few. Mitt on the other hand, a barrage of lies and exaggerations that dwarfed Obama's several fold. You must be living under a rock if you think the opposite.
 

ISOM

Member
Poor Romney, all the talk about how well he did in the debate. Wiped out in less than 48 hours later by the jobs report.

It's more funny than anything, watching fox news and conservatives freak out is always entertaining.
 

MBison

Member
Man you guys are riled up about Romney's alleged lies. You know who has confirmed lied? Obama. Remember when he said unemployment would be 5.6 if they jammed through the "stimulus"? Remember when the American people would get to read bills online before they are passed? I don't recall being able to read the health care bill before hand. Heck even lawmakers didn't get to read it. Remember when the deficit would be cut in half? Yeah good stuff. Remember when Gitmo would be closed?

I know. Bush's fault!

Obama got crushed in the debate because his record is poor. He didn't do a lot of hope and change he ran on. He did the same stuff everyone else has done and in some instances worse. Its been 4 years and all he can say is how bad it was when he inherited it. What's the statute of limitations on that? If Obama wins does the next democratic nominee get to run on that too?
 

ISOM

Member
Man you guys are riled up about Romney's alleged lies. You know who has confirmed lied? Obama. Remember when he said unemployment would be 5.6 if they jammed through the "stimulus"? Remember when the American people would get to read bills online before they are passed? I don't recall being able to read the health care bill before hand. Heck even lawmakers didn't get to read it. Remember when the deficit would be cut in half? Yeah good stuff. Remember when Gitmo would be closed?

I know. Bush's fault!

Obama got crushed in the debate because his record is poor. He didn't do a lot of hope and change he ran on. He did the same stuff everyone else has done and in some instances worse. Its been 4 years and all he can say is how bad it was when he inherited it. What's the statute of limitations on that? If Obama wins does the next democratic nominee get to run on that too?

No the next democratic nominee can run on not being a republican in a much more bluer united states.
 

nib95

Banned
Man you guys are riled up about Romney's alleged lies. You know who has confirmed lied? Obama. Remember when he said unemployment would be 5.6 if they jammed through the "stimulus"? Remember when the American people would get to read bills online before they are passed? I don't recall being able to read the health care bill before hand. Heck even lawmakers didn't get to read it. Remember when the deficit would be cut in half? Yeah good stuff. Remember when Gitmo would be closed?

I know. Bush's fault!

Obama got crushed in the debate because his record is poor. He didn't do a lot of hope and change he ran on. He did the same stuff everyone else has done and in some instances worse. Its been 4 years and all he can say is how bad it was when he inherited it. What's the statute of limitations on that? If Obama wins does the next democratic nominee get to run on that too?

Whilst I agree progress has been slow and below his earlier promises (as is the case for every president, bar Clinton in recent years), fact of the matter is congress and the Republicans have been one of the major causes for that. They are literally hindering or standing in the way of so much that could bring progress and growth. I think with Obamacare, whilst perhaps unorthodox in its creation, Obama did what he had to do, because the Republicans sure as hell wouldn't allow it, especially if it is more socially geared. Anything socially geared and less corporate or private they seem to pounce on.

Obama also never claimed he could sort everything in one term and did say he'd need the full two terms, even then it would take time. Add to that, this is the worst recession since the great depression and there's not much anyone could have done about it. It was a double dip one, especially with the latter European crisis which sent things spiralling back in to abyss.
 

dramatis

Member
Man you guys are riled up about Romney's alleged lies. You know who has confirmed lied? Obama. Remember when he said unemployment would be 5.6 if they jammed through the "stimulus"? Remember when the American people would get to read bills online before they are passed? I don't recall being able to read the health care bill before hand. Heck even lawmakers didn't get to read it. Remember when the deficit would be cut in half? Yeah good stuff. Remember when Gitmo would be closed?

I know. Bush's fault!

Obama got crushed in the debate because his record is poor. He didn't do a lot of hope and change he ran on. He did the same stuff everyone else has done and in some instances worse. Its been 4 years and all he can say is how bad it was when he inherited it. What's the statute of limitations on that? If Obama wins does the next democratic nominee get to run on that too?
I'm curious on the examples you can provide where he has done what 'everyone else' has done, and the instances in which he did worse. I would also like to know what you would consider the ideal solution in 2008 to the problems we can see now that was the fallout of the housing bubble and economy tanking, since you seem to be quite an expert on how the Bush administration's backed up sewage really can't last that long.

I would also like to know if you consider Romney's proposed solutions better than the solutions Obama proposes, and why.

Also, the health care bill was everywhere online during the time it was discussed. If you honestly cared about its content you would have looked it up yourself. Rather than character assassination, it would be better if you could provide something a little more solid than "the same stuff everyone else has done".
 

Amir0x

Banned
Absolutely. And you know what's really funny. A few days before the election, this little anomaly will bite Democrats in the ass when that unemployment rate goes up again. Mark my words.

come on, "Independent" Bulbo, you can be better than this.

The last revision was jobs rose significantly MORE than the reports have been saying; chances are revisions will continue to be on the UPTREND, not the downtrend.

I know this post won't matter to your vision of reality, but you should not close your ears to the truth in the darkness when you're in your own head. You can't deceive yourself.
 
come on, "Independent" Bulbo, you can be better than this.

The last revision was jobs rose significantly MORE than the reports have been saying; chances are revisions will continue to be on the UPTREND, not the downtrend.

I know this post won't matter to your vision of reality, but you should not close your ears to the truth in the darkness when you're in your own head. You can't deceive yourself.
I disagree. I'm pretty good at deceiving myself.
 
This thread is about a bunch of biased loons arguing against each other.

To the liberals: It was Barack Obama's job to call Mitt Romney out on his lies during the debate. He did not do that. End of story.

To the conservatives: Mitt Romney did lie. He claimed that he will not reduce the taxes being paid by the rich. (http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-first-debate-mitt-romneys-five-biggest-lies-20121004)

http://www.mittromney.com/issues/tax

Yet, on his campaign site, he's advocating for across the board tax cuts.
 

Amir0x

Banned
Yes he did. He was a lot more optimistic at the beginning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCN5-ovvFL0

That's not the same as claiming he would sort everything out in four years. He merely said if the economy didn't turn around in 3 years he wouldn't be re-elected. Turning around doesn't mean completely recovered; it merely means on a trajectory that seems like recovery. Since he basically now is confirmed to have halted the Great Recession it its track and unemployment just hit 7.8%, I'd say he passed the bar... albeit, barely.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
That's not the same as claiming he would sort everything out in four years. He merely said if the economy didn't turn around in 3 years he wouldn't be re-elected. Turning around doesn't mean completely recovered; it merely means on a trajectory that seems like recovery. Since he basically now is confirmed to have halted the Great Recession it its track and unemployment just hit 7.8%, I'd say he passed the bar... albeit, barely.
To most people, "turning around" probably means more than 7.8%, but I'm just assuming. There's still a lot of people out of work. I think your definition is a bit generous, and I'm not sure if a lot of other people would be as generous too.
 

Amir0x

Banned
To most people, "turning around" probably means more than 7.8%, but I'm just assuming. There's still a lot of people out of work. I think your definition is a bit generous, and I'm not sure if a lot of other people would be as generous too.

I think it's nearer to an objective standard if we asked: did he at least get unemployment down to levels lower than they were when he got in there, effectively officially changing course on the great recession?

Of course people can disagree with every standard we try to find, but I certainly don't know who would have expected the worst economic downturn since the Depression to be totally fixed in four years... I didn't expect that, certainly.
 

Doc Holliday

SPOILER: Columbus finds America
It truly saddens me to see so many misinformed people :/. I mean we can have different opinions on how to deal with issues or coms from different backgrounds but it doesn't mean we can just make up shit. It's like facts don't matter wtf. How the hell we supposed have discussions and solve if we can't agree on what is real and what is not. It's so fucking bizarre.
Also shame on people hoping for the economy to tank so they can get Obama out of office. What kinda of American are you? so fucking weird :/

Ps Obama can have an unemployment rate under 5 and he will still get shit.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
I think it's nearer to an objective standard if we asked: did he at least get unemployment down to levels lower than they were when he got in there, effectively officially changing course on the great recession?

In that case, 7.8% would be the goal, since that was (iirc) the rate in January 2009. However, that doesn't really paint the whole picture. While at least getting back to 7.8% is promising...

1. A lot of those new jobs are McJobs

2. More people have dropped out of the workforce completely, so they push the unemployment percent down since they aren't counted anymore.

Ps Obama can have an unemployment rate under 5 and he will still get shit.
He won't get shit on for the economy, but will get shit on for his policies (by Republicans). 2006 and 2007 had under 5% unemployment and Bush still got a reaming for his policies (by Democrats).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom