Sorry, must have just read past that, been used to posting in the High Res thread.
No consecutive posts mate.
Come on guys, the rules aren't that hard to follow.
Yes, the rules need ironing out. On the hud issue, there may be some games where you can't even mod it out so that shouldn't discount them from being admitted.
Great shot and Avatar.
I'd advise, though that you try the different types of Bicubic. I find the sharpen one makes Aliasing more evident, so I stay away from it, but plenty of others here seem to use it so I guess it may just be me...
Ditto on the shots and avatar, PlanetSide 2 in particular. It's a shame, I find that game being either hit or miss, the large landscape shots can be absolutely amazing, shame textures are fairly weak.
As for sharpen methods, I agree that Bicubic Sharpen does expose aliasing more easily, absolutely. I tested quite a few before posting, the smoother, normal and even the IrfranView resample sharpen.
The IrfranView sharpen was by far, in my opinion, the worst. It sharpened way too much, and made it seem like things were aliased even though they aren't in the original screenshot. Bicubic Smoother, in relation to the screenshot I posted, was a slight sharpen however when I was comparing it to the sharpen, there was a noticeable image quality difference. Not major, but when striving to get the highest quality... if there was noticeable aliasing however in the original shot (I didn't notice any in my screenshot, there's a couple of areas where it sort of looks like it, but it's caused by the wind blowing the foliage everywhere), I'd definitely use smoother.
Not to be too critical, but this shot seems busy. Might retake it without the body/boxes/grate open.
That hand is really great though. If it was taken to create a tunnel-like effect with the hand as its center, I'd imagine it would be both freaky and fantastic.
Not being familiar with screenshot thread etiquette I didn't realise it was such a big deal. Always fun learning things about the more niche sides of GAF!
That said, my reaction still stands, no need to be so over the top in response to those failing to follow the rules.
Definitely. BF3 still holds its own, and even at playable settings (that was about 15-20fps) it still really shines.That looks like a fucking painting. You can't tell it's textures and polygons.
Because this is supposed to be the anal retentive version of the High-Res thread with some very specific rules. They are fairly simple and straight forward, yet people don't even bother reading them and just post - It's disrespectful and annoying.
Why am I seeing huds? Is reading fucking hard?
"No HUD: As we're here to behold the beauty of games, we require HUD-less screenshots or screenshots with minimal on-screen effects outside the game itself. Some games feature non-intrusive minimal HUDs which we also allow, however you should still strive to remove even that if possible."
Those huds I'm seeing aren't minimal. It's like people are just so excited to take a dump and they can't hold it in.
Hey guys, maybe we should try not taking pictures of video games so seriously?
Some games it's real tough to get rid of the HUD without resorting to photoshop.
It's better to get an example of a game with a HUD than never have the chance to see one.
Mel Gibson?
As for action.. well.. heh. About that.
please more of 7680x4320
It's Stallion Free. He's always like that. Best to just ignore it.
This is probably a dumb question, but what is a good screencap solution other than Fraps or MSi Afterburner? Fraps rapes performance and MSi is unreliable.