• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bioshock Infinite | Official Spoiler Thread |

teh_pwn

"Saturated fat causes heart disease as much as Brawndo is what plants crave."
We have to drown thomasmahler in case he decides to be reborn as BruceLeeRoy.
 

Metroidvania

People called Romanes they go the house?
I would hold off accepting any final conclusions presented in the OP as "true" for the time being. There are large swaths of unexplained things still. Keep digging.

Theoretically, since the date of the sale of Anna in 1893 is such a key figure in terms of the multiverse for Booker, it's possible that some memory leak/remnant exists as sort of a deja vu moment to concern Booker with Anna's being in her crib.

If Booker and Comstock's timelines run parallel, and they are the same age, does that mean it took 20 years for the Luteces to contact Booker to get Liz back?

Yes, though this depends on how you view time (and the extent of the Luteces abilities regarding travel through it) being either linear or cyclical. The date on the Luteces death in the photographer's voxophone states they died in October 1909. Perhaps the reason they choose 1912 Founder's Day is for a lowered guard state due to the festivities or because that's when Liz is most approachable, or because in some universes, that's when the Vox Populi are about to uprise, or heck, because it's simply the way things work. Alternatively, it could just be that the Luteces picked this Booker at this time because they can't hop around in time/space the same way Liz can, but have to keep moving forward. We don't know for sure.
 

pixelat3d

Member
Theoretically, since the date of the sale of Anna in 1893 is such a key figure in terms of the multiverse for Booker, it's possible that some memory leak/remnant exists as sort of a deja vu moment to concern Booker with Anna's being in her crib.

Not talking just about the bumper. People seemed to have settled on something that's too simplistic for what's presented. There are some major oddities towards the end of the game.
 

Lakitu

st5fu
That IGN video is great. But no way they would have planned it so much in advanced. It was creepy though, I would have noticed it while playing.

Great thread, answers many questions. Gosh, I love Irrational and Ken. Gonna start on my 3rd playthrough soon, probably on 1999 mode.
 

ezekial45

Banned
I would've liked more info about how the Luteces dealt with the lighthouse keeper in the game. It was only a vague hint, really.
 

megalowho

Member
A few more easter egg images from the game as food for thought:

The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, by Rosalind Lutece
ipg4aao3LQ7Zw.jpg

The scalps of the Founders from the Vox revolution timeline

Robert and Rosalind enjoying some secret downtime
 

Trigger

Member
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.

Booker was mocked for having Native American blood in the past. He probably internalized that racism while throwing away his previous identity. The baptism didn't make him racist.

"In front of all the men, the sergeant looked at me and said, 'Your family tree shelters a teepee or two, doesn't it, son?' This lie, this calumny, had followed me all my life. From that day, no man truly called me comrade. It was only when I burnt the teepees with the squaws inside, did they take me as one of their own. Only blood can redeem blood."
 

Metroidvania

People called Romanes they go the house?
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.

The baptism leads to racism in the sense that it allows Comstock to 'come to grips with his actions' in Wounded Knee, and Later, in Peking and the events of Columbia, because he believes that he is following a higher power, in this case, his interpretation of God, rather than man's law/guilt.

Without ever having to come to terms for his actions, he never has to face/accept the wrongness of them, and continues on his destructive path, only now, he has a rationale to excuse his behavior. He's already racist, just never has to come to terms with it on his own like Booker does (who is shown specifically to not be racist in several scenes)

I said it in the other thread, but can anyone point out where the priest is said to be blind? It obviously makes sense, I was wondering how he didn't recognize Booker, especially if Comstock took him with from the baptism, but I must have missed where it was mentioned.

Not talking just about the bumper. People seemed to have settled on something that's too simplistic for what's presented. There are some major oddities towards the end of the game.

Agreed, it is very odd. But unfortunately, with such a lack of information, we can only make solid assumptions based off of what we know. Anything more moves to pure guess-work or adding intent where none is shown outright.
 
Maybe Ken only put the Songbird cries in the code of some copies of Bioshock, to signify the number of timelines in which Booker never made it that far?
 

Yoshichan

And they made him a Lord of Cinder. Not for virtue, but for might. Such is a lord, I suppose. But here I ask. Do we have a sodding chance?
BruceLeeRoy, you are amazing. Thank you!!
 

Zeliard

Member
I still don't understand how babtism leads to racism.

It doesn't. The baptism led to Booker relinquishing any remorse for his past actions, and this in turn led him to glorify those deeds as mandated by God and his own personal idea of America. The baptism was the excuse he needed to become Comstock.

The Booker who went on to become P.I. Booker DeWitt who sold his daughter Anna refused to take that excuse, but he also went down a dark road of his own. Booker finally "won" when he rejected the idea of the choice itself, knowing there could never be any real recompense.
 
Maybe Ken only put the Songbird cries in the code of some copies of Bioshock, to signify the number of timelines in which Booker never made it that far?

Well or maybe it's only in the recently released Rapture edition? I have a copy. I should try and get to that part and confirm.
 

ezekial45

Banned
somebody with the recent version of Bioshock that came with Infinite should go check.

btw, I heard they added new areas for the PS3 version of B1. They any good?
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=He84jP5Nuqk

0:52, exactly the same screams in the background, in a non-IGN video, uploaded January last year.

I think this is legit, people.

135519775103.gif


Songbird is likelier to appear in the sky above my house after I finish typing this post than for him to have been a part of Bioshock 1 outside of re-purposed sound effects. :p

Irrational intentionally reusing that sound effect would be mindblowing enough. Especially since it fits the timeline. By the time Jack got to Fort Frolic, the corridor that the plane crashes through would be gone and other corridors repaired by Big Daddies. Which they are in Infinite's Rapture.
 

Zeliard

Member
Songbird is likelier to appear in the sky above my house after I finish typing this post than for him to have been a part of Bioshock 1 outside of re-purposed sound effects. :p
 

Neiteio

Member
I'd like to request one change to the OP... and I don't have precise instructions, just a request... If possible, it'd be helpful if The One Who Knocks could maybe rewrite his explanation of the ending in the very first question in the OP, simply for the sake of clarity. I recall seeing him explain it better in subsequent posts. The selection that was quoted rambled a bit at times -- he was still working through his thoughts back then -- and so it's a bit hard to follow, imo. I know he can make it clearer now that he's repeatedly tested his theory every which way and it's worked out each time.
 

Riposte

Member
You don't think that bird sound has anything to do with the guy wearing a bird mask and (IIRC) playing that songbird song?

EDIT: It is not like the sound matches up with how the songbird actually sounds like when it dies.
 
Only recommend change I'd make to the OP... and I don't have the answers, I'm just underlining a potential issue... is I'd ask The One Who Knocks to maybe rewrite his explanation of the ending in the very first question in the OP. I recall seeing him explain it better in subsequent posts. The bit that was quoted was rambling and hard to follow at times, and I know he can make it clearer now that he's repeatedly tested his theory every which way and it's worked out each time.

Ill hit him up about it.
 

Nif

Member
It could be the reason you don't hear the songbird in some Bioshock 1 videos is because they were using more than 2 channels of audio, but only recorded in stereo. Possibility :p
 
Somebody go and play that section in the BS1 that comes with the PS3 Infinite and see if you can find a window to the outside. You might catch Songbird sinking into the depths.
 

Scrabble

Member
I don't buy the explanation for why Elizabeth has her powers. Her getting her pinky removed was a total freak accident that I don't see being planned by Comstock. I just see it as way of illustrating to players how the multi-dimensions are bridged together, and too further exemplify the fact that Elizabeth is Booker's daughter. Aren't the Luteces solely responsible for why Elizabeth has her powers? That and her being a test subject and experiment her whole life is explanation enough for me why she can open and create tears.
 
I don't buy the explanation for why Elizabeth has her powers. Her getting her pinky removed was a total freak accident that I don't see being planned by Comstock. I just see it as way of illustrating to players how the multi-dimensions are bridged together. Aren't the Leuteces solely responsible for why Elizabeth has her powers? That and her being a test subject and experiment her whole life is explanation enough for me why she can open and create tears.

I don't believe it was planned by Comstock. Comstock simply wanted a child and Elizabeth losing her finger and gaining the tear powers was a side effect.
 

Neiteio

Member
Ill hit him up about it.
Thanks. It's only with the utmost respect I ask The One Who Knocks to try and tighten up his ending explanation. I know the content is correct; it's just for the sake of clarity. His theory is what made everything make sense to me, but he did so across a series of subsequent posts. So, if he's up to condensing it all in one new master post, this would be helpful. :)

On another note, anyone notice that the statue of Lutece en route to Raffle Square actually changes between male and female forms? I don't know what causes it to change, but it definitely changed from Rosalind to Robert at one point.
 

PowderedToast

Junior Member
dear god, that OP

this games plot epitomizes 'going off the deep end'. i'm surprised that people are reacting positively to it. kojima would be crucified for writing something like this
 

BrokenBox

Member
WHY DOES KILLING BOOKER AT BAPTISM STOP ALL VERSIONS OF COMSTOCK?

Killing Booker before he can ever make a choice stops the Comstock as we know of him from ever happening, since he can only arise from Booker being given the choice to accept baptism or not.

In order for Elizabeth to exist, a single Booker has to be able to accept the baptism. If a single Booker accepts the baptism, no Booker accepts the baptism, because every Booker was murdered before the choice. The probability of accepting the baptism leading to a paradox is 100%. A paradox cannot happen, ever, and thus the probability of any Booker accepting the baptism is removed. Therefore, Booker rejecting the baptism becomes a constant, because if every Booker rejects the baptism, the paradox doesn't occur.

Think of it this way: If, before the game's events, Booker always rejects the baptism, what happens? Nothing, no paradox is created so every Booker lives out their lives. The ending turns this into a certainty, it erases the probability of Booker ever accepting the baptism because that leads to the paradox where every Booker died before making it.

This is the part I still don't quite understand. I asked this in the other thread, but how does him drowning at the end not erase all versions of Booker? If drowning Booker removes the paradox, how can he exist in the after-credits scene? I know the scene is there for a reason, I just don't understand how he can be alive again.
 

Trigger

Member
I don't buy the explanation for why Elizabeth has her powers. Her getting her pinky removed was a total freak accident that I don't see being planned by Comstock. I just see it as way of illustrating to players how the multi-dimensions are bridged together, and too further exemplify the fact that Elizabeth is Booker's daughter. Aren't the Leuteces solely responsible for why Elizabeth has her powers? That and her being a test subject and experiment her whole life is explanation enough for me why she can open and create tears.

What's there not to buy? It all makes sense enough for me.
 

jbartee

Member
It's probably from the Rapture edition then, like some one said? I mean the older video doesn't have it, so they must have added it. Still really cool though.

Nope, you can hear it in this 2011 video as well:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-liupFskO0

9:35 mark. Dude's sort of talking over it but it's definitely there.

Edit: you can also hear it (much more clearly) around 12:10, which means it's played multiple times. Makes it seem like part of some looping or semi-randomized background sound effect. It sounds ALOT like songbird though. Not sure what to think really.
 
Top Bottom