• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Geoff Keighley: PS4 Used Game DRM (EDIT: but now apparently on hold)

Eric C

Member
I actually did caution that it was coming about a week ago. Because as of a week ago it was.


I just heard on friday that it wasn't. I didn't want to come right out and post about it because leak-y individuals like myself are getting a bit too much attention and I don't care about myself but Im not really looking to get my friends into trouble. But i've confirmed it with a second person so I got dumb and posted it.



Chubigans can vouch for me though on having been correct on other sony leaks in the past.


And chubigans should probably PM me again telling me to be quiet.
I can indeed. And I should indeed, haha.

mortimer has some legit sources guys. If a mod needs me to confirm I certainly can.

I already know mortimer is legit, no worries chubigans. I think the other mods that read the rumor threads do too.


Great News
 
Just watched the show now, what was actually said

"white knight (referring to Sony) that's not going to restrict used games, based on some of the things I'm hearing I don't think that's entirely true because I can't see publishers allowing one system to do one thing or the other".

Sounds like a guess based on the weight the bolded part has. He didn't even mention "sources", or say the word sources, only said some things he is hearing. The title therefore is rather misleading.
Wow what the hell OP.
 
Sony have to realise that if Microsoft is doing something stupid, that they should the opposite.

What else are people gonna do, buy Wii Us? Don't be absurd.

Fixed.
Not only can people buy Wii U, they can also game on PC, or they can even choose to not play games anymore. Anything is better than getting fucked up the ass by companies.
 
Wait, you got me worked up and worried ever Geoff's feelings and speculation? Thanks for that.
I'm still cautiously optimistic about the ps4 DRM, if only because the only evidence I can remember for it are this and the kotaku rumor from last year. Weren't there a ton of rumors pointing towards a used block for the xbone?
 

Meelow

Banned
Possibly. But then the real question is would that be the trigger?

Wii U sales have been anything but good and it comes short of PS4/XBO in power.

EA canned Crysis 3 on Wii U right before launch, there was clearly a problem that happened between Nintendo and EA.
 

Raupet

Neo Member
Sounds like they're trying to deflect negative attention. It's a pretty defensive BR anyways. Pulling the "they're doing it too (maybe)"-card isn't a new trick.

Fear Uncertainty Distortion, this smells of it all.
 

chubigans

y'all should be ashamed
Title adjusted. I buy that mortimer's sources are legit, but I don't have a lot of faith that "well we completely implemented and planned to launch this, but right now on a purely internal level we're having second thoughts because of a PR backlash against our competitor" will actually translate to a permanent removal of the feature.
I am definitely expecting a form of online pass.
 
I'm doubtful that very many publishers are going to launch a game on one platform with this kind of DRM while letting it go on the other, for two reasons:


  1. ...
  2. A direct comparison would come dangerously close to proving that DRM doesn't actually translate into drastically superior sales and therefore would shake the edifice of anti-consumer groupthink that afflicts the industry.
I just thought this should be emphasised.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
WiiU + PC + Retron 5 for me if true.
 
I actually did caution that it was coming about a week ago. Because as of a week ago it was.


I just heard on friday that it wasn't. I didn't want to come right out and post about it because leak-y individuals like myself are getting a bit too much attention and I don't care about myself but Im not really looking to get my friends into trouble. But i've confirmed it with a second person so I got dumb and posted it.



Chubigans can vouch for me though on having been correct on other sony leaks in the past.


And chubigans should probably PM me again telling me to be quiet.
Keep talking, I like it.
 

Broken Joystick

At least you can talk. Who are you?
Wii U-only gen confirmed.

0LHES.gif


It'll all end in tears, E3 is going to hurt a lot of people by the looks of it. In the mean time #TeamMortimer
 

Gorki247

Member
If mortimer's sources are correct and Sony at first were going to implement DRM and now they aren't, it sounds more like they actually haven't made up their mind just yet. There are still several months to go and they may wait until things have calmed down a bit to make the final decision.
 
Spy Cam? Really now? They've already said they won't be 'spying' on anyone. If you believe they will I have a tin foil hat to sell you.

Also, yeah figures Sony don't get nearly the amount of shit MS got for this.

I would actually say this is a surprise, going by Sony's comments a few months ago.

My apologies if you took that so literal. I simply was saving myself from typing mandatory always on camera that could possibly (not confirmed - yes I realise) be monitoring you during use for visual DRM.
 
So both consoles will potentially have all of the downsides of digital distribution on PC but with none of the upsides. This combined with my ever creeping disinterest towards what passes for "triple A games" means I'll likely be sitting the next console generation out.
 

BocoDragon

or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Realize This Assgrab is Delicious
Just watched the show now, what was actually said

"white knight (referring to Sony) that's not going to restrict used games, based on some of the things I'm hearing I don't think that's entirely true because I can't see publishers allowing one system to do one thing or the other".

Sounds like a guess based on the weight the bolded part has. He didn't even mention "sources", or say the word sources, only said some things he is hearing. The title therefore is rather misleading.
This is damning evidence against the OP.

Thread title deserves an even more strongly worded edit.
 
Wait, you got me worked up and worried ever Geoff's feelings and speculation? Thanks for that.

Just to get everyone on the same page here, famousmortimer (our source in this thread) has confirmed that the Sony system is real and was planned for launch, and his sources are now suggesting it's getting shelved due to backlash. That's entirely compatible with Geoff hearing that Sony was implementing this system.

Thread deserves an even more strongly worded edit.

Fast-moving thread. I prefer to actually read some of what's happening before rushing into title edits.
 

ironcreed

Banned
Wow, if sony actually did drop some kind of archaic DRM just because of consumer criticism against such a DRM on another platform they do deserve my money.

Indeed. They will have a glowing rep and much goodwill from gamers if they avoid walking into this same pile of shit right behind Microsoft.
 

PopeReal

Member
Possibly. But then the real question is would that be the trigger?

Wii U sales have been anything but good and it comes short of PS4/XBO in power.

Yeah that is the real question. I would guess it is a combination of things (sales and lack of power like you say), but maybe the DRM thing started it.

Maybe not. Who really knows at this point because you can't get an answer from Nintendo or EA. Maybe DRM had nothing to do with it.
 
Good to see this Thread Title edit. Can we please do so with some of the Xbox One threads that used Misquotes also? For the sake of more clarity.
 
I'm doubtful that very many publishers are going to launch a game on one platform with this kind of DRM while letting it go on the other, for two reasons:

  1. Anti-used-game DRM combined with a traditional pricing model boosts sales of the top games at the expense of everything else, and every publisher wants to believe they're going to be shipping those "top games."
  2. A direct comparison would come dangerously close to proving that DRM doesn't actually translate into drastically superior sales and therefore would shake the edifice of anti-consumer groupthink that afflicts the industry.

Makes sense, but paid online on 360 still worked with a free PS3, so why not release it on there with extra DRM?
 
Some of the denial in this thread is amusing. You need to be outraged at people who pirate games because they are the reason this is happening.

I don't think even Microsoft or Sony would maintain that piracy is the reason for used game DRM. I don't even understand how that would work. Why would you connect piracy with used games?
 

Lucent

Member
Wait, so it looked like bad news and now it looks like good news. There will be many more pages before everyone sees the good news.

To requote

Pretty much. I've already seen a lot of "eff you, Sony" type responses even after that was posted. It's that "read title of thread so that's all I'm responding to" thing. lol
 

Artorias

Banned
I really hope this doesn't come to be. It's great to hear some people with real knowledge saying its unlikely.

I still think EA will do it with a pass system. I don't think Sony will block anything like that and a few publishers will probably use it.
 

DesertFox

Member
So... EA are the mastermind supervillians forcing this on the platform holders?

Perhaps this was intended to be sarcastic, but this is probably pretty close to the truth.

I'm sure the idiots running Microsoft went to EA a few years ago and said "Hey, we're developing a new console, what would you like to see?" 2 guesses as to what EA responded with.

Not blaming the publisher for Microsoft's bad policies for next-gen, but we know without a doubt that EA stands to gain. I wouldn't be surprised at all if publishers are the catalyst in all this.
 

open_mouth_

insert_foot_
I'm still waiting to see what the reaction will be if the "chosen one" aka Sony announces DRM like Xbone and fees for online multiplayer. Microsoft made a lot of coin on those online fees last gen and Sony wants a piece of that action I'm sure.

E3 can't come soon enough.
 

Koren

Member
I'm just going to mention something that seems to blow people's minds:

Game publishers/developers only deserve to get money for their product when they sell it NEW.

Games are not "special." They are not somehow better than books, movies, cars, old t-shirts, old issues of National Geographic, used Dell PC's with windows 98 on them, old Scooby Doo lunchboxes and on and on and on...
I mostly agree, but there's a difference between a car, a book or a T-shirt and digital goods. Even after some use, digital items are as good as new. I don't like buying second-hand items. But I wouldn't have problems buying a second-hand license to use a software. If games on a disc are becoming more and more a digital license to use a software, the gap between actual goods and digital ones become more and more tenous.

Besides, there's also a difference with games that uses online servers: you buy both a good and a service at the same time. I can understand online pass because of this.

That being said, I won't accept anything like a system that require me to connect to a server to check my rights to run a software, and leave a question mark on my chances to play it in 10, 20 or 30 years from now. And even if I don't use the second-hand market at all, I also can't support a system that says who can or can't sell/buy a goods and basically enforce a tax on all sales.
 

Klocker

Member
You really don't get it do you?

If you care about Microsoft, you have the obligation to show your discontent! Fuckin go apeshit if you need to! The same is the case with Sony. Staying silent and go easy on your prefered company is not the right path in this.

ahhh the old days when people didn't find out about shit like this until a magazine told them and by then it was too late and the only recourse was to write an angry letter which nobody hardly did because they were too lazy and then the only choice they had was to vote with their wallet which is the correct way... but now everybody has a megaphone and think they can just scream into it every time the world doesn't spin the right way for them

/rant

*yells at the sky
 
Famousmortimer, do you know who has picked up Dead Rising 3? Crazy Buttocks suggested it was no longer a One exclusive....

No worries if you can't talk about it, just thought I'd ask.
 
I updated the op with famousmortimer's comments.

Also, I've read some comments regarding my "misleading" title. I felt Geoff's "white knight" comment strongly indicated Sony implementing a DRM, so I felt comfortable naming Sony. Obviously it's all rumor mongering at this point.
 

Dizzy

Banned
That would suck if true. I did want to own a console this gen, and unfortunately the Wii U doesn't count.

What I'd like to know, is that if publishers are now making money from used games - will they stop fucking us over with bullshit dlc? you know the type I'm talking about.

Somehow I doubt it.
 
It would be an amazingly good sign if community reaction changed plans like this. It would be stupid for Sony to have agreed to such a thing in the first place, but listening to what people are saying and reacting accordingly is nice.


It absolutely does. Whenever i've been told about shitty things possibly happening both of the people I know at sony, who are hardcore gamers just like us, both say "make a big stink about this to yoshida (@yosp) on twitter.

I mean these guys are human, you can't keep hearing negative things and think that it's a good idea. Like I said before, I don't know anyone inside MS but basic human nature tells me that they are not happy about the reaction and will change their positions accordingly.



This week was a PR nightmare for MS. There's no two ways about it. That doesn't mean they already lost next gen. It doesn't mean that third parties are jumping ship. It's nothing crazy like fanboy delusions. But a bad PR week for any company makes that company sit down and ask themselves "How can we turn this around?" If MS or Sony think that pissing off a lot of people will cost them more money than whatever unpopular thing they want to implement would make... they will 86 that shit. It's all about dollars.

Sony also is in a tactically advantageous position right now where they aren't talking about it and they won't talk about it until they have to. And this is only amplified by the fact that they go second at E3.


I do want to warn that these decisions do flipflop (as evidenced by what i posted earlier this week vs now). I'm not 100% on this. The people I know aren't 100% on this. Some suit can come in and fuck the entire thing up. So I wouldn't go running around screaming "HAHA SONY ISN'T DOING IT!" I just wanted people to know that as of now Sony has flipped their position in response to the shitstorm microsoft got hit with.

So don't let the "just be quiet until E3" people sway you. If you don't like something, say something. Twitter is amazing for being able to talk to people in these corporations. YOSP will even respond if it's about something he can talk about (he is currently not responding to ANY questions about Used game... but you can bet your ass he is reading them).

Be respectful and tell them how you feel. I would assume this is true of MS also. And it actually works. They want our money and if they start to get scared that they won't they WILL change things.
 

DBT85

Member
Pretty much. I've already seen a lot of "eff you, Sony" type responses even after that was posted. It's that "read title of thread so that's all I'm responding to" thing. lol

The curse of forums sadly.

I MUST HAVE AN OPINION ON THE TITLE AND A BRIEF GLANCE AT THE OP, THE REST OF THIS WAFFLE IS PROBABLY NOT RELEVANT. RAAAAGE
 
Top Bottom