• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Chromecast |OT|

Tell you what, this is going to be a godsend for people like me who go to conventions and the hotels only have shitty channels to choose from.

Assuming their internet also doesn't suck.
 

Cartman86

Banned
Finally. Nexus Q was the dumbest idea. This is exactly what we wanted. Other than full mirroring which drains battery, phone resources, and at this point requires devices to be physically connected if you want a perfect experience. I'd like to see the Miracast thing catch on (if it actually works well), but the internet connected dongle is an interesting alternative.
 

luoapp

Member
The problem I have is everything already supports those now with no external device (tablet, phone) required. It's another proprietary device in a sea of proprietary media devices. It's the Google equivalent of an Apple TV but less functional.

You'd think they'd get onboard something like Miracast and make a dongle for that that actually does work with most devices and is industry standard. Instead we have an awkward cloud-based solution that only works with internet enabled media streaming on a per service basis.

It's different though. Miracast is "wireless HDMI", so to speak. Miracast receiver doesn't stream from internet, but this thing can.
 

Somnid

Member
well your in luck. Since everything supports Chrome, everything supports this. Magic

Except it doesn't. All those Android apps aren't Chrome. All those Windows apps aren't Chrome. All those iOS apps aren't Chrome. But why does it need to be this awkward? You can get full Android media sticks for a similar price. Or why not a smaller Chromebox? Chrome can already sync open tabs across devices.
 

CrunchinJelly

formerly cjelly
So all the promo images are basically a lie...

2013-07-23_22-34-13-1020_verge_super_wide.jpg


The USB sticks out a fair way:

2013-07-23_22-36-18-1020_verge_super_wide.jpg
 

GatorBait

Member
I have Netflix and YouTube functionality on my TV already. So, what would be the draws of this for someone like me?

I'm thinking:

1. Entire Google Play Music collection playable through my sound system.
2. Ability to beam web video to TV.
3. Ability to beam web pages to TV (though I rarely could see myself doing this).

Anyone else have any recommendations. I'm thinking I'll buy it anyway based on the price alone, but I'm trying to figure out the marginal benefit of it.
 
The problem I have is everything already supports those now with no external device (tablet, phone) required. It's another proprietary device in a sea of proprietary media devices. It's the Google equivalent of an Apple TV but less functional.

You'd think they'd get onboard something like Miracast and make a dongle for that that actually does work with most devices and is industry standard. Instead we have an awkward cloud-based solution that only works with internet enabled media streaming on a per service basis.
Being able to stream any Chrome tab is pretty nice and means it could (theoretically) work with anything.
 

luoapp

Member
Except it doesn't. All those Android apps aren't Chrome. All those Windows apps aren't Chrome. All those iOS apps aren't Chrome. But why does it need to be this awkward? You can get full Android media sticks for a similar price. Or why not a smaller Chromebox? Chrome can already sync open tabs across devices.

It can built on Android plotform, no doubt. I bet this is big G telling the world, "no more free lunch"
 

gcubed

Member
Except it doesn't. All those Android apps aren't Chrome. All those Windows apps aren't Chrome. All those iOS apps aren't Chrome. But why does it need to be this awkward? You can get full Android media sticks for a similar price. Or why not a smaller Chromebox? Chrome can already sync open tabs across devices.

Which apps? Most apps are just packaged things already available on the web for your mobile device. Why worry about an app if you can just stream it from a browser? HBO GO? Hulu? Amazon Instant? Max Go? Any streaming website? Its more useful then apps. The only downside is that you would need a laptop for that functionality instead of just carrying around your phone and tablet.
 

snacknuts

we all knew her
I have Netflix and YouTube functionality on my TV already. So, what would be the draws of this for someone like me?

I'm thinking:

1. Entire Google Play Music collection playable through my sound system.

This is my primary reason for buying it. And because watching YouTube videos on my TV through my PS3 is a pain in the ass.
 
I have Netflix and YouTube functionality on my TV already. So, what would be the draws of this for someone like me?

I find most Netflix and YouTube apps built into a TV to have a cumbersome or slow interface. It's just much faster and easier to do it from a laptop IMO. Especially if it's something I'm already using and want to show someone else in the room.
 

DieH@rd

Banned
Price is great, but WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY dongle does not have Miracast in it? That way we could send to TV every piece of content we have, not only stuff that is hosted on the web in these few apps.....
 

Bit-Bit

Member
So VLC needs to add chromecast ASAP.

Or maybe I can start uploading my movies to my youtube account as private videos?
 

e_i

Member
Okay. I really hope that the developers get on this. I hope MXplayer implements this into their app.
 

Cartman86

Banned
Will Android games be abled to be streamed?

Probably not. It's not streaming from your phone/tablet device to the TV. Your phone is telling the TV "Here is the link to the thing I want to watch" I don't think the dongle has much power beyond being able to decode and run video. I guess some games could run on it, but I don't know the details of how any of that would work. RAM etc.

Which makes me wonder how the chrome tab thing works. How do you scroll? If you scroll on your PC does it then scrolls on the TV?
 

Cartman86

Banned
So VLC needs to add chromecast ASAP.

Or maybe I can start uploading my movies to my youtube account as private videos?

Yeah there should be no difference to chromecast if it's coming from a local network versus the internet at large right? If Google can make this thing as easy and open for devs as possible I could see a lot of apps doing some cool things.
 
Top Bottom