A Serious Man
Member
The only thing I'm surprised by is the adoption of F2P micro-transaction tactics in a $60 game. Hopefully this shit doesn't become a trend.
They already have like hundreds of DLC for Uncharted 3, LBP and Motorstorm RC.
Again, they directly affect the game design a priori.
In order to induce and accomodate a real-money economy, by definition the basic product is changed and/or gimped. It's basic economics of price discrimination.
I think he made a thread earlier. Ryse team is sending him a free xbone, and signed (collector's edition?) of ryseI see. Well I wish him all the best. Do you know what Crytek sorted out for him at all?
Expecting 7.5 from Polygon. Just feels like a 7.5 game for them.
Rethinking my purchase here, was originally going to get Watch Dogs, but switched to this when that got delayed. Might get AC:BF or DR3 instead depending on reviews. 5 hours does not sound worth it.
No I get the economic backings behind the transactions. I'm saying that if they are proven to be unpopular than they won't keep putting them in games. I'm still saying just don't buy the transactions and they will prove to be a unsustainable business model for video games.
Honestly the best thing you can do to keep this from becoming the norm is to simply not buy a micro-transaction imo.
Publishers though will see the microtransaction money out there, and push developers to build their games around them even if no one is really buying hoping that the next game will be the 'Candy Crush' game for them that will strike gold. If there's no perceived downside from the publisher angle, there's nothing to stop them from pushing it even if the initial outings aren't successes.Than if they aren't popular than they won't make their games around this idea. Just don't by the micro transactions in the games than the developers won't make their games around them.
Rethinking my purchase here, was originally going to get Watch Dogs, but switched to this when that got delayed. Might get AC:BF or DR3 instead depending on reviews. 5 hours does not sound worth it.
Edit: Maybe Lego Marvel, isn't that back at launch?
The only thing I'm surprised by is the adoption of F2P micro-transaction tactics in a $60 game. Hopefully this shit doesn't become a trend.
Right but we still have to suffer through potentially great games now that are potentially overtuned to try to push ppl to spend more money in the mean time. You're right that if people don't buy them, they may drop them from future games but I don't have faith in the general public
Also it's late here - what's the bleeding obvious twist that Sessler hints at in the video review?
Spoiler tag answer, obviously.
actually he's had some family issues and the ryse dev team did something badass for him doubt he cares about any reviews at the moment
Have you seen Rome (HBO)?Its a real shame this game turned out so awful. After watching Spartacus, I would have loved to have had a badass Rome action game. With the money they spent making this janky, shallow combat QTE thing, we could've had something special.
I haven't even seen much of the game and from just Sesslers review I would say the spoiler is:Also it's late here - what's the bleeding obvious twist that Sessler hints at in the video review?
Spoiler tag answer, obviously.
Because you're wrong. Far Cry was a good game and Crysis is one of the best shooters ever made (if you ignore the alien part, which admittedly is a significant chuck of the game). Unfortunately all the good parts seemed to disappear out of their game when they started making console games (I'm not saying that's necessarily what caused it though).They make their money elsewhere. Crytek is a profoundly untalented studio outside of tech engines. They don't make good games and they never really have. I don't know why people are so late to this conclusion.
Really guys, talking about a user in this thread in this forum in this way?
I think a bunch if not all of the MS published XB1 games have micro-transactions.
I haven't even seen much of the game and from just Sesslers review I would say the spoiler is:
the emperor is behind the deaths of his family and Marius will kill him at the end of the game
What are you on about?Really guys, talking about a user in this thread in this forum in this way?
No I get the economic backings behind the transactions. I'm saying that if they are proven to be unpopular than they won't keep putting them in games. I'm still saying just don't buy the transactions and they will prove to be a unsustainable business model for video games.
Honestly the best thing you can do to keep this from becoming the norm is to simply not buy a micro-transaction imo.
They're probably making too much money off of military contracts to give a shit.
They make their money elsewhere. Crytek is a profoundly untalented studio outside of tech engines. They don't make good games and they never really have. I don't know why people are so late to this conclusion.
That is real obvious :|I haven't even seen much of the game and from just Sesslers review I would say the spoiler is:
the emperor is behind the deaths of his family and Marius will kill him at the end of the game
what is? Don't think that link is working
Yeah. It'sOh, duh. Thanks.
What are you on about?
Publishers though will see the microtransaction money out there, and push developers to build their games around them even if no one is really buying hoping that the next game will be the 'Candy Crush' game for them that will strike gold. If there's no perceived downside from the publisher angle, there's nothing to stop them from pushing it even if the initial outings aren't successes.
Yeah. It's.NeroSo it's not a stretch to imagine him being evil.
Fix it. I was on my mobile. Just the EA M-transaction video lol.
Crimson Dragon does it to. Eventually you hit a F2P point where hits aren't powerful enough to kill any enemies, and you're forced to play old stages to level up...Forza 5, Killer Instinct.
Dunno if others are doing it, but kind of an unsettling precedent by Microsoft Studio games.
The only thing I'm surprised by is the adoption of F2P micro-transaction tactics in a $60 game. Hopefully this shit doesn't become a trend.
Killzone's got 1080p but Ryse still looks more impressive
Neither the post you quoted nor the response to it seemed disrespectful.I feel like he is getting punched and laughed about everywhere possible while instead people could just ignore him.
Assasins creed has a ton of other shit to do though. Ryse just has the combat and nothing else.Is that combat really that bad? I mean, unless I'm missing something, it doesn't seem all that different to Assassin's Creed. And people don't seem to go on about that much anymore.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8fBnGsWVNw&feature=youtu.be
Dude, you don;t know what micro-transactions's damage to game design.
It might not impact much now, when player pay for it, publisher get those money and start design games around it, please ready for lots of grind work and repetitive.
"Vote with your wallet" is optimistic thinking. All it take is some rich guy to pay,
micro-transactions do not have max pay limit, publisher can earn more from just tiny percent of pay user. Eventually, they will start making game around that and sustainable(or earn more) just from those few players.
I doubt it. It makes too much damn money elsewhere. Publishers are more likely to double down and have developers use various tactics to squeeze the player, and encourage them to pay more. Until the free 2 play model completely crashes and burns, if it ever does, expect to see this in more and more games in the future.Well I'm going to keep not buying them cause honestly the best thing I think I can do. I've never liked the idea of these transactions but I'm not about to get all bent out of shape over them either. If the people simply don't buy them (Like I've been doing since I first saw one) Than the model will just be abandoned.
Fine, I'll post it again. Sterling addresses your very opinion, directly.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/jimquisition/7811-Fee-to-Pay
People shit on Assassin's Creed for having shitty combat all the time... for the last 6 years.Is that combat really that bad? I mean, unless I'm missing something, it doesn't seem all that different to Assassin's Creed. And people don't seem to go on about that much anymore.
Have you seen Rome (HBO)?
No that's kind of BS
If YOU dont have the self control or patience to play without buying these game accelerators its your own fault. I bought the limited edition of Forza Horizon and it came with a code for the token accelerator pack (gives you advance access to things and boost XP). Not only did I not use it I gave it away for free to another GAF member. The game also lets you know that you can buy tokens during loading screens, and I was never once tempted to buy one because I never felt the need to do so. But I could care less if someone else does. Just because its there doesn't mean you cant play the game if you don't buy these things.