Translated to English wtf would be "oui"artwalknoon said:I clicked over to the actual french article and scrolled through it. The first comment begins with "wtf".
Translated to English wtf would be "oui"artwalknoon said:I clicked over to the actual french article and scrolled through it. The first comment begins with "wtf".
This post confuses me. Isn't "wtf" already in english? Or do you mean "oui" is french for "wtf"? I'm lost.Momo said:Translated to English wtf would be "oui"
oooooo snap, you just told me!! im just so outraged because I happen to criticize your perfect translation of the French language! How will I ever live again?!ShockingAlberto said:It's not a joke. It's an article that a website posted. You can suppose all you want that it's false and the source is fake and this is all trolling, but until you can prove that, you don't really have the right to tell anyone else what to do about it. Do you want to go bump the other four threads for the other four articles and bitch about how they're not labeled as jokes, either?
You should really consider prioritizing your outrage and apparent sorrow at what gets made in to a thread and what doesn't. Or go look at cats, because that apparently keeps you off the brink and, better yet, out of these threads.
I was translating from Al Bhedartwalknoon said:This post confuses me. Isn't "wtf" already in english? Or do you mean "oui" is french for "wtf"? I'm lost.
So your issue is that it's being done with Google Translate?FTH said:oooooo snap, you just told me!! im just so outraged because I happen to criticize your perfect translation of the French language! How will I ever live again?!
Yeah, no. Anyone who talks back is not mad ok! But since you love winning e conversations I will depart your brave sanctum of discussion.
I'd like to know too.Stabby McSter said:so when are we banning 01net?
I think what he is trying to say is he had hoped you would have taken the thread and content more seriously by maybe proofing the translation and cleaning up some of the English.ShockingAlberto said:So your issue is that it's being done with Google Translate?
Because, uh, it says that right in the OP. So, I guess you win? Warning provided!
Maybe you need a better translator.FTH said:No, my issue is --
Actually nevermind. I don't care anymore.
Note de la rédaction
Cette série darticles a fait débat, entre nous, à la rédaction, et auprès de vous, nos lecteurs. Il ne sagissait en effet pas darticles comme nous avons pu en faire à plusieurs reprises avec plusieurs sources sur des informations exclusives concernant du matériel ou une annonce future.
Il sagissait de plus que cela. Cétait loccasion dentendre une voix non formatée, une voix qui dit ce qui se passe au sein de Nintendo. Comme tout témoignage, il y a forcément une part de subjectivité. Pour autant, sil ny a pas toujours des révélations fulgurantes, la parole de cet insider a beaucoup de valeur.
Par sa rareté, tout dabord, vous laurez compris. Par sa franchise ensuite, certains propos sont durs et dénotent une véritable inquiétude, partagée au sein de Big N, on ne le dira pas assez. Par sa passion débordante ensuite.
Cest un cri dalarme, un « geste politique », comme le dit notre source. Comme nous lavons écrit en préambule de notre premier article, nous sommes, comme beaucoup de joueurs, fans de Nintendo. Et il nous semblait intéressant de partager ce cri, cette inquiétude du présent, mais aussi, vous lavez lu dans ce même article, cette confiance et cette passion pour le futur. Nous espérons que cela vous aura intéressé et donné une vision plus complète de Nintendo, sans altérer votre passion pour son univers.
Sometimes I wonder if it's a good idea to have gaming enthusiasts as gaming journalists.Kazerei said:2. We're fans of Nintendo too, so it's okay
Well yauhh. I've always needed one of those !!!ShockingAlberto said:Maybe you need a better translator.
Mass hysteria that's what it is, the more we stray from that path the better.marc^o^ said:This one is ridiculous. Smartphones are said to kill handhelds without any button. Most games can be played without 2nd analog stick or be replaced by gyro/touchscreen.
Hope not, Nintendo needs to sell Nintendo 3DS's for christmas not to have people waiting for a version with an extra joystick (that for the record it's not really needed)marc^o^ said:Mission accomplished though, now let's see the world of medias report this "news" en masse.
artwalknoon said:I clicked over to the actual french article and scrolled through it. The first comment begins with "wtf", lol. Even in french the proper response to this is wtf.
Votre "journalisme" me fait vomir. J'ai rarement vu des médias aussi peu professionnels.
"Your "journalism" makes me vomit."?Votre "journalisme" me fait vomir. J'ai rarement vu des médias aussi peu professionnels.
It's certainly not by someone that deep down wants nintendo to suceed.artwalknoon said:Maybe the whole 5 part article is a conspiracy designed to weaken the 3ds post price cut and to deflate consumer and investor confidence in Nintendo. Maybe its a Sony insider posing as a Nintendo insider to take cheap shots and hurt the 3ds' consumer appeal to help out the impending vita launch!!!
I can see a new 3DS coming with another joystick if they're stranded for ideas and need to do a new piece of hardware.artwalknoon said:The second analog/rebranding of the 3ds is the only stress test we have for determining the legitimacy of these 5 articles. Everything else is insider business that would never be revealed anyway. So if next year we get a new Nintendo handheld or a dramatically rebranded dual analog 3ds then a lot of us will have egg on our faces.
Okaaaaaaaay, I see the translation is sucky again.This one is ridiculous. Smartphones are said to kill handhelds without any button
Night_Trekker said:So why, again, does the 3DS need another analog stick/slider when you can just use the touchscreen in the same way?
And why have we all apparently decided that handheld games need to control and play like console games to be attractive and fun to gamers?
That's also a problem referenced in the 1rst article.Night_Trekker said:And how would a snap-on second sick connect to the existing hardware? Because that's kind of important.
Where?lostinblue said:And badmouthing Miyamoto?
Tell me about it.lostinblue said:I grow tired of bogus.
lostinblue said:If they appear with a bullshit add-on that has no way of connecting to the console (3DS is wifi only, no bluetooth there, it has no wired communication ports, it's not meant for "acessories" like that and IR is unfeasible)
ShockingAlberto said:It does seem kind of unlikely that, say, an engineer would know if there's internal pressure among the board to take Iwata down.
And it seems pretty unlikely that someone higher up would be leaking to a French website under the idealistic terms of "I want to bring this information to the people!"
Smiles and Cries said:we can't ban them yet? I mean the man took a pay cut and they are calling for blood?
Yesterday:Mael said:Where?
The concept of Pikmin, for example, was borrowed directly from an unpublished RTS (real-time simulation game) proposed by a creators years before the games release. Thus, the official story (Miyamoto got the idea for Pikmin by observing animal life in his garden) is just a clever narrative, fabricated for marketing purposes. Mario Galaxy is another example. According to our source, three totally different versions/concepts had been proposed for what was then called Mario 128, but none of them made the cut. Nintendo then set its views on a promising prototype it had bought from an external source some time ago, added Mario and its friends, tweaked a thing or two, and... Here was Mario Galaxy!
That's not the issue, Pachter is Pachter and his track record is public; he's not hiding under a "source" guise nor claiming he has inside intel and making atrocious comments and bogus revelations based on it.Mael said:I mean did people wanna ban Bloomberg for every time Pachter came up with his shitty predictions?
so 1rst let's cut the part that have nothing to do with your argument :lostinblue said:Yesterday:
These are articles from someone with an agenda (and without much coherency to boot)
The concept of Pikmin, for example, was borrowed directly from an unpublished RTS (real-time simulation game) proposed by a creators years before the games release. Thus, the official story (Miyamoto got the idea for Pikmin by observing animal life in his garden) is just a clever narrative, fabricated for marketing purposes.
Well, I am asked about my hobbies all the time. But I have always been told not to answer because it could be a hint for our next project. It is true that some of my hobbies have turned out to be the themes in our games.
Look the narrative Nintendo pulled for Pikmin is pretty much Miyamoto was gardening, got an awesome idea went back to Nintendo's office and decided that a game called Pikmin was to be made.lostinblue said:^ Do you really want to go through with that?
Let's translate:
It says Miyamoto having ideas from his hobbies, in this case gardening is bogus, it's a "clever narrative" that never took place.
They're pretty clear on what they're implying, and they mean just that.
And now you're talking BS, Nintendo is certainly way bigger than Miyamoto (actually something like 3000 people more than that)."His" company is pretty much Miyamoto, wether he likes it or not (I don't want to be reductive to other developers, but still). But he is not a Nintendo of Japan employee, and most certainly not a higher up as many have already point out. It's not rocket science to tell when someone is incoherent and is acting on an agenda.
There won't be more and he never said anything close to that even.Tomorrow he'll say Miyamoto is about to get the boot. "Ejection seat", like he calls it.
Graphics Horse said:There are established ways to do it though, perhaps every card that supported the add-on could include a bluetooth chip, like The Typing of the Pokemon already does.
Night_Trekker said:So this would add to the already not-so-great battery life problems, wouldn't it? Like, significantly? And it would make each card more expensive to produce, wouldn't it?
This sounds less and less likely the more it's discussed.
Dude, saying it like that makes no sense.Mael said:Look the narrative Nintendo pulled for Pikmin is pretty much Miyamoto was gardening, got an awesome idea went back to Nintendo's office and decided that a game called Pikmin was to be made.
Sure, because the game existed anyway and Miyamoto is a credit hog.Mael said:Seriously with or without SM's input on the theme of the game in any other company the game would have come out anyway.
Never heard of that, and never seen Miyamoto hyping it all that much.Mael said:It's not like Nintendo didn't release games where the theme was cripplingly uninteresting (Steel Diver to begin with).
Huh? not.Mael said:Heck it was even marketed as Miyamoto's new character based game along the line of Pikmin, Mario and others.
not. I had the box in my hands yesterday, the box is holographic and just says steeldiver on the front.Mael said:Nintendo's marketing certainly picked that angle to sell their game (and I'd even argue that Pikmin being Miyamoto's creation was on Pikmin's box although I could be wrong)
That part was joking. This so called source isn't credible, but he won't jeopardize the fact that people like you are actually buying it.Mael said:There won't be more and he never said anything close to that even.
Iwata's position was certainly on the line after the recent horrible performance of the company that is HIS fault.
Yup.Night_Trekker said:So this would add to the already not-so-great battery life problems, wouldn't it? Like, significantly? And it would make each card more expensive to produce, wouldn't it?
This sounds less and less likely the more it's discussed.
yeah, LOL.Pikma said:It also costs $10, don't forget that. lol
lostinblue said:Dude, saying it like that makes no sense.
He also had an idea for Super Mario and we now know at one point it had Beam Guns and Rocket Packs. From the point you have an idea until it matures into the final form of it it's a whole process, and Miyamoto likes his experimenting.
It might not have started as a RTS in a garden, sure, but what they're implying is that: The idea wasn't his, or a team effort for that matter, it was done by a poor uncomprehended soul that was sacked of his credits. Oh and he didn't really have the idea of basing it on a garden it just happened that way as a collaborative effort (no ones idea, really) and then he was advised for marketing purposes to take all the credit and make a narrative of how he got the idea.
lostinblue said:Makes no sense and it's too convoluted. More than that it's a conspiracy theory, and I never ever seen a conspiracy theory that rang true. Why? because they're theories that overstep the bounds of logic, that's why.Sure, because the game existed anyway and Miyamoto is a credit hog.
lostinblue said:It's a creative process a Pikmin not taking place in a garden, even if it existed, it wouldn't be pikmin, and it could be not well enough resolved and/or have ineficient design. The idea is just a part of what makes a game. And I'm sure Miyamoto was involved in that creative effort as a Director/Producer is, it wasn't a hands-off approach like he does with mario and zelda (and most sequels nowadays). We know that much.Never heard of that, and never seen Miyamoto hyping it all that much.
lostinblue said:I'm sure no one did. Other than that it's marketing, if they did so, it's not convoluted to try to sell something they made But they're not saying Miyamoto had the idea in the bathroom while taking a bath and playing with a plastic submarine.
And there's still no interesting theme for that game.lostinblue said:He said he wanted to make a game with a machine whom you controlled through the game GUI for the longest time though, that's pretty legit rather than being something out of a marketing office I'd say.Huh? not.not. I had the box in my hands yesterday, the box is holographic and just says steeldiver on the front.
That part was joking. This so called source isn't credible, but he won't jeopardize the fact that people like you are actually buying it.
Ok prove it, this part actually matches the whole thing.Alextended said:Btw it's up to 01net to prove this is correct, or at least provide some evidence, such us how they verified the source's authenticity rather than just take the word of random emails for granted or whatever else, not to people who don't believe the pretty damn outrageous shit posted to prove it's bullshit. It sounds like bullshit, and they've given no reason to believe it's not so until any of these actually happens we have no reason to beleve they're true. And lol @ people speculating it's some NOE fired dude. That neither matches 01's story, nor the content of the articles, such as the reasons the source provided for doing this, so you basically admit they're talking bullshit at least in some of this is you really want to add to the plausibility of it all by citing some NOE guy who got sacked.
I think you have what it takes to be a 01net insider.Mael said:Actually that's pretty much how it probably happened, who cares who did the prototype from where the game emerged? It's a proto made from a contractor, he relinquished his rights the moment he sold the proto to Nintendo anyway. They could have made an expensive toaster for all he cared anyway, that's how it works in the software industry. Why do you think Stallman went to such length to push for his licences?
This is semantics.Mael said:Huh, there's actually no leap of logic anywhere, the idea that the gameplay idea from Pikmin came from Miyamoto while gardening is actually more farfetched than Nintendo having protos they were working on and the themes was indeed SM's idea.
Well they sure don't do interviews for him. And that's where these details regarding this stuff came from.Mael said:Actually read what I say, Miyamoto doesn't do most of the marketing. It's the marketing team's job! And what you're saying goes against multiple interviews where they say they actually come up with gameplay ideas and then put the characters and the contents afterwards.
It's not, also. Not on the box, definitely.Mael said:And I'm talking about Pikmin :
Nintendo's marketing certainly picked that angle to sell their game (and I'd even argue that Pikmin being Miyamoto's creation was on Pikmin's box although I could be wrong)
Alextended said:Because that guy isn't at Nintendo anymore and the articles cite him as being a Nintendo employee who wants it to do better than it does or whatever? Or are you now saying he got fired because of these leaks, before the leaks even got out, and 01net was sitting on this for that long?
Cest en quelque sorte un acte politique. En tant quemployé de Nintendo, jestime avoir consacré ma vie à cette société.
Mael said:The guy left not 2 months ago, is the head of the marketing of a division of the company and should certainly be privy to such things or the whole company would be unable to handle the globalisation of their operation.
This is one of the lamest retort ever.lostinblue said:I think you have what it takes to be a 01net insider.
Care to contact them?
lostinblue said:This is semantics.
Are you seriously saying that all if not most of the marketing for Nintendo is done by Miyamoto?lostinblue said:Well they sure don't do interviews for him. And that's where these details regarding this stuff came from.
Point taken. Media reported as such though (which is again part of the job of the marketing team at Nintendo)lostinblue said:It's not, also. Not on the box, definitely.
So what are you arguing exactly?lostinblue said:As for being the a character from Miyamoto well, it was.
Cosmonaut X said:Actually, from what I can tell from the outside that's exactly what doesn't seem to happen - NCL keeps things incredibly close to their chest and subsidiaries like NoA and NoE only find out about things when they need to. There's certainly more independence in terms of things like localisation - NoE seem to have more of a free hand to localise titles, or to publish titles for other companies than they used to, or in the most recent case to push a revised budget Wii SKU - and marketing approaches, but when it comes to finding out about hardware revisions and dealing with developers it all still appears to come down to NCL.
From what I've read he NEVER say 'we should do' but rather 'Nintendo should'. At least I'm fairly certain that's the case in the source material.Alextended said:When was he referred as a "former" employee? Until your speculation it's been a source from Nintendo, not merely formerly with Nintendo. And he does say "we" must do this and that, when saying what he thinks Nintendo should do. How do you interpret that as being in the past rather than at the time of the discussions?
Thank you, I tried my very best.Mael said:This is one of the lamest retort ever.
Why are you talking about Pikmin 3 being a Wii game?Mael said:This is what they're saying. There was a protos, the gameplay came from that and the rest is not even mentioned. The fact that the proto was never talked about (it probably would have in the IA if Pikmin 3 was a Wii game) doesn't preclude it from existing. The uncredited contractor probably signed his rights to the prototype when he gave it anyway, that's how contractor work goes.
I don't know how you concluded that:Mael said:Are you seriously saying that all if not most of the marketing for Nintendo is done by Miyamoto?
lostinblue said:Well they sure don't do interviews for him. And that's where these details regarding this stuff came from.
You said it was marketed as a new character from Miyamoto, I thought you were talking about steel diver and found it preposterous but if it's pikmin well, then it was a new character from miyamoto. In 2001.Mael said:So what are you arguing exactly?
There are plenty of "we"s in the OP here, and it's apparently google translated so I don't think it converted "Nintendo" into "we".From what I've read he NEVER say 'we should do' but rather 'Nintendo should'. At least I'm fairly certain that's the case in the source material.
Uh, things like uncredited third party work aren't a European branch marketing decision. Neither is Iwata getting the boot.Anyway it's most certainly someone who was on the marketing team, that's the only thing talked about in the articles.
3DS is something between PS2 and GC with extra fixed function "shaders" Do you think it would enjoy multiplatform when the Wii didn't?Ushojax said:I don't think the analog stick stuff is that far-fetched. Developers want to be able to port their games to as many platforms as possible with minimal hassle, forcing them to re-do the controls for only one stick is unnecessary. With FPS so popular these days, it probably was a mistake not to have a second stick. I wouldn't be surprised if the 3DSLite has one, and given Nintendo what Nintendo did with MotionPlus (releasing a dongle and then a redesigned controller), an add-on isn't that far fetched.
They delivered lots of titles in less time than they did with the GC and then sequels, the Wii has 3 main super mario games (two in 3D and one "classic") I wouldn't say he failed.Ushojax said:As for Iwata, he should be taking the blame for Nintendo's recent failings. He failed to ensure a solid stream of 1st party titles on the Wii
I don't disagree with someone deserving criticism for his errors (and the premium pricetag was an error) but he improved relations with third party's a lot.Ushojax said:he failed to substantially improve Nintendo's relationship with third parties, and he made many bone-headed decisions with the 3DS launch. I still think he's the right person to be in charge but he deserves criticism.
10% but he is the majority stockholder.Eteric Rice said:Yamauchi owns like 51% stock in Nintendo, I don't think they could boot him.
And hell, if Yamauchi is on Iwata's side, I don't think current stock holders can boot him either.
Ushojax said:Given what Nintendo did with MotionPlus (releasing a dongle and then a redesigned controller), an add-on isn't that far fetched.