• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"All Trump Voters Are Nazi Scum" (But Seriously Though...)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Toxi

Banned
As a Eurolander, I do have to marvel at all this chest beating as to whose the more outraged and ready to disown their entire family forever because a guy they despise won the presidency for four years.

If you want to blame anyone, blame the DNC for backing a bad horse, whose entire strategy (from what I witnessed) amounted to little more than 'don't vote for that guy' versus selling a concrete vision of what she would do for the country. Also, I think the mainstream press are culpable as well for completely underestimating the grass root support for Trump. I think that they generated an air of complacency that all is well to the extent that they assumed a Clinton victory was a foregone conclusion.
"Blame anyone but the people who actually voted for Trump"
 

diaspora

Member
Blanketing all Trump voters as Nazis isn't fair. I can see his appeal. Hillary wasn't a particularly good candidate. She's likely more corrupt than Trump. Not many people talk about how she killed any chance of Sanders winning or the fact that her organization was a scam (has since been shut down), or that she was given the questions for one of the debates early. I still voted for her because I thought she would still ultimately make a better president than Trump but in this election is was literally douche vs turd

are you stupid
 

Kadayi

Banned
The other side doing badly doesn't absolve the voting population from voting for the guy that will fuck not only them over, but especially minorities. With the exception of the 1%. The other side wasn't trying to do that, and it was clear as day.

By what measure are they accountable? To what degree? I voted for Tony Blair back in the day and that cunt took the UK into the Iraq war which we should never have gotten involved in. By the binary rationale of people in this thread, I'm accountable for that. It's schoolkid logic.

Hell, denying climate change is essentially fucking over the entire human race.

I don't disagree, but the US alone isn't going to turn that around anytime soon, when China is burning coal as fast as they can get their hands on it.

As a fellow eurolander I think you are thick as molasses for posting this. Did you even read the OP?

Yeah, I did, and then I read a lot of posts be people just saying his family were pieces of shit and he should disown them. Your point?

"Blame anyone but the people who actually voted for Trump"

A better candidate and a better campaign would have helped in what proved to be a tight race.
 

Toxi

Banned
It's like most of you dont know what a Nazi is and what happend during WWII, Because the shit going down now certainly is not anything close to what a Nazi is. Pssst...Building a wall isnt racist, nor is banning a bunch of countries entry into the United States.
Explain why those countries.
 
As a Eurolander, I do have to marvel at all this chest beating as to whose the more outraged and ready to disown their entire family forever because a guy they despise won the presidency for four years.

If you want to blame anyone, blame the DNC for backing a bad horse, whose entire strategy (from what I witnessed) amounted to little more than 'don't vote for that guy' versus selling a concrete vision of what she would do for the country. Also, I think the mainstream press are culpable as well for completely underestimating the grass root support for Trump. I think that they generated an air of complacency that all is well to the extent that they assumed a Clinton victory was a foregone conclusion.

Lets be real, what you're asking for already happened.

When Trump announced he was running, strong chuckles around these parts. When Trump won the nomination, more strong chuckles sprinkled with minor fear from few. When Trump won the election, this forum was ripe with anger aimed directly at the DNC and the Clinton campaign for all their short-comings. During the course of all of this, jabs were mostly standard Republican jabs. Nobody was talking about disowning Grandma.

Fast forward a few months later and we've settled right into straight up blind labeling tens of millions of voters as straight up Nazi's as a way to cope with feeling defeated and let down.
 
source.gif

Yeah I'm guessing this is exactly how most Trump voters feel. They're not all racist, they're just looking out for #1...which is actually how a lot of people vote.
 

rjinaz

Member
are you stupid

Yeah I mean, Clinton has been investigated by Republicans for decades including her foundation. But I'm sure she is more corrupt than the man that has had real estate deals with Russian billionaires that basically just amount to them giving him millions for overvalued property.
 

diaspora

Member
Yeah I'm guessing this is exactly how most Trump voters feel. They're not all racist, they're just looking out for #1...which is actually how a lot of people vote.

Voting for let alone outright supporting a racist 70 year old that brags about molesting people is abnormal behaviour.
 
By what measure are they accountable? To what degree? I voted for Tony Blair back in the day and that cunt took the UK into the Iraq war which we should never have gotten involved in. By the binary rationale of people in this thread, I'm accountable for that. It's schoolkid logic.

As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong), Blair didn't campaign on entering the Iraq War.

I don't disagree, but the US alone isn't going to turn that around anytime soon, when China are burning coal as fast as they can get their hands on it.

The single global superpower turning around on climate change certainly isn't helping the cause. And just because other countries are doing as bad or worse, that isn't an excuse to say "Well, won't matter if our country further accelerates impending doom, right?"
 

thetrin

Hail, peons, for I have come as ambassador from the great and bountiful Blueberry Butt Explosion
No fucking sympathy. Plainly said.
 
Blanketing all Trump voters as Nazis isn't fair. I can see his appeal. Hillary wasn't a particularly good candidate. She's likely more corrupt than Trump. Not many people talk about how she killed any chance of Sanders winning or the fact that her organization was a scam (has since been shut down), or that she was given the questions for one of the debates early. I still voted for her because I thought she would still ultimately make a better president than Trump but in this election is was literally douche vs turd

The fact that this is not an uncommon take is why the US is in real trouble long term, beyond the Trump admin. Deep, real trouble. In 10-20 years we'll be seeing public opinion openly calling for authoritarianism.
 

Copenap

Member
As a Eurolander, I do have to marvel at all this chest beating as to whose the more outraged and ready to disown their entire family forever because a guy they despise won the presidency for four years.

If you want to blame anyone, blame the DNC for backing a bad horse, whose entire strategy (from what I witnessed) amounted to little more than 'don't vote for that guy' versus selling a concrete vision of what she would do for the country. Also, I think the mainstream press are culpable as well for completely underestimating the grass root support for Trump. I think that they generated an air of complacency that all is well to the extent that they assumed a Clinton victory was a foregone conclusion.
Damn that is the dumbest thing I have read in a while.
 
The other side doing badly doesn't absolve the voting population from voting for the guy that will fuck not only them over, but especially minorities. With the exception of the 1%. The other side wasn't trying to do that, and it was clear as day.

Hell, denying climate change is essentially fucking over the entire human race.

Climate change is more likely to be solved by some no-name dude in a random lab in China figuring out how to do cheap, energy-efficient carbon capture than by the US investing in wind and solar.

Lowering emissions was never a realistic goal, imo, the technology simply was not there until too late in the game.
 

Future

Member
The real issue with trump isn't that all his followers are nazis, because they obviously aren't. It's that he has a direct dialogue with people that think like that. It's that he retweets white supremacists unapologetically, and has skin heads at his rallies without muttering a word of disapproval. He incites this division, which empowers racist groups.

It also empowers the insensitive. People tired of hearing about minorities and finally able to say what they always wanted: fuck them, what about me? These are the same people that are oddly vocal when given the chance to proclaim that they don't find black women attractive, or that all lives matter, or that transwomen are men and they have a right to opinion, etc etc. We don't have a president that is pushing forward unity but instead embellishing division. And racist groups love division

It's not about labeling specific voters, but instead labeling the conversation that is bubbling now right out in the open. And of course liberals wish everyone was against it enough to never vote trump. If you vote trump anyway, then they feel ya just don't care about the division he is creating, which I feel is probably true. You may not actually believe in keeping minorities down, or actually hate anyone....but you are also not exactly fighting against people that do this either
 

shintoki

sparkle this bitch
As someone that holds family above all else, reading stuff like this is so sad. You would really distance yourself from family over political views? That seems so last straw extreme. I hope it is something you can heal years from now.

Nothing is wrong is distancing yourself from family over views. They go down one way and you down another, I doubt there is much conversation to be had. To you really want to be around hateful people like that? It's poisonous for your own health

But the other half is, I doubt the majority of people with the same political views as you are going to be there for you like family. This sort of pride people have in disowning their family, seems more childish than anything else. It should be sad you can't be around the ones closest to you, not fuck them. May never want to be around them, but I'd still like to know if they are kicking the bucket, need help, etc.
 
Climate change is more likely to be solved by some no-name dude in a random lab in China figuring out how to do cheap, energy-efficient carbon capture than by the US investing in wind and solar.

So rather than modernizing energy supplies and trying to minimize pollution as soon as possible and therefore gaining important time we all should just lay back and hope some random person solves the problem on their own?

Excuse me if that doesn't seem like the best course to take here to me.

I mean, by denying climate change the US certainly won't invest many government funds into needed research about the topic, further lowering chances.
 

diaspora

Member
Climate change is more likely to be solved by some no-name dude in a random lab in China figuring out how to do cheap, energy-efficient carbon capture than by the US investing in wind and solar.

Lowering emissions was never a realistic goal, imo, the technology simply was not there until too late in the game.

Climate change isn't likely to be solved at all but I'd imagine the US will lag in mitigating the damage.
 
You're just repeating platitudes. This entire discussion isn't whether or not they'd have your back, but if they care enough about people who happen to not be related to them to not vote against their equality.

If that's not the case, it says a great deal more about their intelligence and compassion than being nice on christmas.
Oh they absolutely don't, they only care about people they know. But I wouldn't call them nazi's because of that.
 

Koppai

Member
You support a racist candidate then you take ownership of all their racist policies, not just the ones you like.

QFT. God damn, this is everything.

I don't get why my brother and his wife voted for Trump. I am gay and married to a Mexican...I wonder if he just talks trash behind our backs?

Most of my family voted for Trump, but it's not like I am close to them so I don't really care about them anyway. I only cared about my grandparents, and now all of them are gone.
 
Climate change is more likely to be solved by some no-name dude in a random lab in China figuring out how to do cheap, energy-efficient carbon capture than by the US investing in wind and solar.

Lowering emissions was never a realistic goal, imo, the technology simply was not there until too late in the game.

There's so much WTF going on here. Putting aside your lack of research into the subject, you do realize the current administration is going out if its way to wiping years of government data on the field right? This is a global problem that requires global participation. Sure the end goal is to solve the problem but hoping on a miracle when we've existing technology to mitigate the crisis that is willfully not being used is ludicrous.
 
So rather than modernizing energy supplies and trying to minimize pollution as soon as possible and therefore gaining important time we all should just lay back and hope some random person solves the problem on their own?

Excuse me if that doesn't seem like the best course to take here to me.

No, I'm saying that catastrophizing when there are millions of people working contra global warming all over the globe is unnecessary, especially since much of the momentum in the US is now strong enough that it will partially overcome a change in administrative priorities.

Don't get me wrong, Trump's views on this are abhorrent, but I think history will likely seem Trump's election much less significant, in terms of the history of climate change, than people's current reactions warrant.

Edit: AnathemicOne, I've done plenty of research into the subject. I'm not saying wind and solar are BAD, just that the US is not the be-all and end-all in fighting climate change, especially since wind and solar are now at a point where they likely ARE going to continue to expand, with or without executive rubber-stamping.
 

Kadayi

Banned
As far as I know (correct me if I'm wrong), Blair didn't campaign on entering the Iraq War.

No, you're entirely accountable for anything and everything they do in office. There can be no compromise here.

Damn that is the dumbest thing I have read in a while.

That Clinton was a bad choice? She lost. Can she hardly, therefore, be viewed as a good choice no? After all, innumerable members of the press said Trump had no chance, day in day out.

As for the media: -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1Sfeq-Dzqg

If that isn't hubris I don't know what is.
 

diaspora

Member
"Ignore everything about the context in which these people vote, because certainly just yelling hard enough will change them."

Admitting and bragging about molesting people didn't change them. And nobody is advocating changing them as much as working as hard as possible to make them electorally insignificant.
 
"Ignore everything about the context in which these people vote, because certainly just yelling hard enough will change them."

I don't think people in the thread are advocating changing them, atleast not from what I see nor do I seek to. Frankly, we don't need them due to the popular vote statistics so they can go rot in their own communities or be culled from earth for all I care. What we do need is the ones who sat home during this election.
 

Toxi

Banned
"Ignore everything about the context in which these people vote, because certainly just yelling hard enough will change them."
Did you even read the post I was replying to?

Providing context does not mean ignoring the problem that's there. And yes, over 60 million people voting for a candidate like Trump is a problem regardless of how badly the DNC fucked up. Over 60 million people proudly voted for an unqualified, corrupt, idiotic, unfocused, bigoted self-admitted sexual harasser. That is not a problem that just working on the DNC or media coverage of Trump will ever fix.
 
I don't think people in the thread are advocating changing them, atleast not from what I see nor do I seek to. Frankly, we don't need them due to the popular vote statistics so they can go rot in their own communities or be culled from earth for all I care. What we do need is the ones who sat home during this election.

yeah how'd that popular vote thing work out last time?
 
I don't think people in the thread are advocating changing them, atleast not from what I see nor do I seek to. Frankly, we don't need them due to the popular vote statistics so they can go rot in their own communities or be culled from earth for all I care. What we do need is the ones who sat home during this election.
I agree that Americans need to actually go out and vote. If 50% of your country literally doesn't care to vote, that is a problem.

But saying thins like we don't need them and they can rot away for all you care is not exactly helping, is it? You are literally saying some communities deserve to rot away or be culled. You don't see anything wrong with that? Isn't it better to fix this communities, and give people there a better future?

Yes, Trump is an asshole. Yes, he is terrible. Yes, he empowers hate groups. I don't dispute any of that. And I rather this situation would not exist. But it does. So we need to look at why it exists, attempt to change those things and make sure it doesn't happen again.

Did you even read the post I was replying to?

Providing context does not mean ignoring the problem that's there. And yes, over 60 million people voting for a candidate like Trump is a problem regardless of how badly the DNC fucked up. Over 60 million people proudly voted for an unqualified, corrupt, idiotic, unfocused, bigoted self-admitted sexual harasser. That is not a problem that just working on the DNC or complaining that Obama had a paid speech will ever fix.
I did. And I replied to you in a similar simplistic way as you did yourself.
 
Here is a Nazi demonstration in Germany that took place today.
This is what Nazis look like:
https://twitter.com/MarkusRosch/status/859021997682167809

They shout:
"National Socialism - Now"
and
"Free, social and national"

The slogan on their banner:
"For family, homeland and tradition"

Their goals:
Keep out foreigners, Germany First, get rid of supranational institutions like the EU and foster nationalism again.

These goals make you a nazi.
If you know someone who would support these goals, thats a nazi. As easy as that.
If you don't think that makes you a nazi, you are wrong.
 
No, you're entirely accountable for anything and everything they do in office. There can be no compromise here.

Your measure was "people in this thread". I saw some posts about exactly that, and the general consensus seemed to me to be things like Obama using drones aren't exactly foreseeable based on his campaign.

Voting Obama for reelection of course makes you accountable for this exact policy. The saving grace being here that the Republican candidate would have been the same or worse in this regard.
 

Kadayi

Banned
Providing context does not mean ignoring the problem that's there. And yes, over 60 million people voting for a candidate like Trump is a problem regardless of how badly the DNC fucked up.

If 60 Million people decided not to vote for Hillary, surely the most pressing question is why did they choose Trump instead? What is it that he was saying, that she wasn't?
 
I agree that Americans need to actually go out and vote. If 50% of your country literally doesn't care to vote, that is a problem.

But saying thins like we don't need them and they can rot away for all you care is not exactly helping, is it? You are literally saying some communities deserve to rot away or be culled. You don't see anything wrong with that? Isn't it better to fix this communities, and give people there a better future?

Yes, Trump is an asshole. Yes, he is terrible. Yes, he empowers hate groups. I don't dispute any of that. And I rather this situation would not exist. But it does. So we need to look at why it exists, attempt to change those things and make sure it doesn't happen again.
How you propose we change things? A huge portion of the people who voted for Trump don't use logic and reason as the basis for their decisions. They don't accept things as reality that are consistently proven to be. They don't care about anyone who doesn't look or believe what they do. How do you talk to these people and appeal to them?
 

Magwik

Banned
Blanketing all Trump voters as Nazis isn't fair. I can see his appeal. Hillary wasn't a particularly good candidate. She's likely more corrupt than Trump. Not many people talk about how she killed any chance of Sanders winning or the fact that her organization was a scam (has since been shut down), or that she was given the questions for one of the debates early. I still voted for her because I thought she would still ultimately make a better president than Trump but in this election is was literally douche vs turd

Fucking
Bernie
Busters
 

Tain

Member
This is exactly the kind of stupid shit that's going to result in him being re-elected. Socialists are a political minority and half of the country voted Trump. We ABSOLUTELY need more Trump supporters to vote blue, independent, or be no-shows. If no effort is made to reach out to the ones we know who were at least on the fence before reluctantly voting for him, this country will be fucked for another four years at least. You don't even need to like or respect any trump supporters - shame them, try to have a heart to heart, persuade them, pander to them, whatever works. But trashing ALL of them (keep in mind that many voted for Obama) and fucking them off will only make them take it out on you at the polls. It's possible there might even be MORE of a turnout for him than last time. Don't know about you, but I'm going to do what I can to prevent that from happening.

I'd rather reach out to the 40% of eligible voters that weren't motivated to vote than the ones that voted Trump.

No compromises can be made policy-wise to reach out to Trump's supporters.
 
I don't think people in the thread are advocating changing them, atleast not from what I see nor do I seek to. Frankly, we don't need them due to the popular vote statistics so they can go rot in their own communities or be culled from earth for all I care. What we do need is the ones who sat home during this election.
I will never understand this. Democrats have over flow of popular vote in NY and California, where that count doesn't matter. Those over flow numbers need to be spread out across the country. As the prices in coastal areas continue to sky rocket, maybe those numbers will move and spread to more red states where living is more affordable and in desperate need of alternative views.
 

shintoki

sparkle this bitch
If 60 Million people decided not to vote for Hillary, surely the most pressing question is why did they choose Trump instead? What is it that he was saying, that she wasn't?

60 mil voted for Mittens, McCain, Bush 2nd term, and Trump. It's more built in that 60 million people will vote against the Dems and for the Reps each time regardless.

I feel like it would be better spend to figure out why did Obama get 70mil in 2008, but 65 in 2012. Clinton the same as the lower year against the most polarizing candidate. Kerry less than 60. The party naturally outnumbers the Reps. Yet, it's voter turnout is always more varied. Rather than focusing on why they got 60 million again. Focus on why the turnout is down.
 
How you propose we change things? A huge portion of the people who voted for Trump don't use logic and reason as the basis for their decisions. They don't accept things as reality that are consistently proven to be. They don't care about anyone who doesn't look or believe what they do. How do you talk to these people and appeal to them?
That is the major challenge, how to fix things if people vote against their own best interest. I won't pretend to have the answer. But remarks like "let them rot" or they need to be "culled from the earth" is a hateful and unproductive way to go about it as far as I'm concerned. These people exist. They won't go away.

So you need to reach them somehow with simple messages and explain solutions in a way they will see it can work, but in the right direction. Forward and progressive, instead of backwards.

What happened to investing in communities that experience job losses for example? That is a progressive standpoint. But here I read that those same communities need to be removed from the planet.

I'd rather reach out to the 40% of eligible voters that weren't motivated to vote than the ones that voted Trump.

No compromises can be made policy-wise to reach out to Trump's supporters.
The policy needs to be packaged in such a way you can convince people it benefits them.
 

Az

Member
Of course the majority of Trump supporters are not Nazi's, however the majority of Nazi's are Trump supporters
 

tuxfool

Banned
So you need to reach them somehow with simple messages and explain solutions in a way they will see it can work, but in the right direction. Forward and progressive, instead of backwards.

What happened to investing in communities that experience job losses for example? That is a progressive standpoint. But here I read that those same communities need to be removed from the planet.


The policy needs to be packaged in such a way you can convince people it benefits them.

Because when you explain things simply and as a matter of fact, they'll ignore you at best, at worst they'll resent you for speaking down to them. These communities don't want your investment they'll shun it, because all they'll see is people that they don't like also benefiting from said investment.
 
What happened to investing in communities that experience job losses for example? That is a progressive standpoint. But here I read that those same communities need to be removed from the planet.

there was that whole thread where people were cheering that entire coal mining communities would be economically devastated - not because the posters hated coal, but because those people are probably republicans/Trump voters

that kind of weird disregard for other citizens and economic classes flies directly in the face of progressive views and it's disheartening.
 
cutting off strangers and acquaintances, okay, fine. but cutting off family and friends over this stuff seems very rash. you would be doing real world harm to years or decades old relationships. you would actually damage your side's case for tolerance. you would be acting just like the one you decry. calling people idiots and ignoring them is petty and childish. you wont change someone's mind by calling them an idiot. this is some kind of violence, an identity violence in some way. what does it accomplish to label someone without their consent?

furthermore it is privilege denial. yes if those people are in your family, you grew up hearing it, and it doesn't matter if you cut off your uncle when you are in your 20s if you have been hearing him for decades already. that stuff is in you. it is in all of us. it is ok, you don't have to hate yourself for that, it happens to everyone. it is pervasive in society. we can rise above it, all of us.
 
Of course they aren't nazis. They're more akin to people who supported nazis. Wool pulled over their eyes, going with the flow, or decent people with a slight sense of superiority.. Whatever it is, the pussy grabbing, bigoted, racist rhetoric doesn't just not phase them, they seem to like it.
 
cutting off strangers and acquaintances, okay, fine. but cutting off family and friends over this stuff seems very rash. you would be doing real world harm to years or decades old relationships. you would actually damage your side's case for tolerance. you would be acting just like the one you decry. calling people idiots and ignoring them is petty and childish. you wont change someone's mind by calling them an idiot. this is some kind of violence, an identity violence in some way. what does it accomplish to label someone without their consent?

furthermore it is privilege denial. yes if those people are in your family, you grew up hearing it, and it doesn't matter if you cut off your uncle when you are in your 20s if you have been hearing him for decades already. that stuff is in you. it is in all of us. it is ok, you don't have to hate yourself for that, it happens to everyone. it is pervasive in society. we can rise above it, all of us.

We've been extending olive branches for over the past 8 years atleast and the fruits of our labors resulted in Trump being elected. Republicans have proven time and time again that this compromising BS isn't working.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom